Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto E3

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/22/2017

Moto Barato. O acessível Moto E3 é um smartphone de nível de entrada com um acabamento resistente à água e bateria relativamente grande. O orçamento de 130 Euros (~$140) é bastante apertado, mas a Lenovo é especialista em oferecer muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro...

Lenovo Moto E3 (Moto E Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6735P 1 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720
Memória
1024 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, acabamento resistente à gordura e água, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 4.84 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 32 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41); largura de banda (download/​upload): 150MBit/s / ​50MBit/s (LTE); SAR rate: 0.512 W/kg (head), 0.82 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 143.8 x 71.6
Bateria
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix auto foco, flash LED, vídeos em 720p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante frontal, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, 12 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless
peso
141 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
129 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼100% +447%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88.8 MBit/s ∼35% +89%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47 MBit/s ∼18%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼16% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼100% +535%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 MBit/s ∼69% +338%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.6 MBit/s ∼16% +1%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼16%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto E3: overview
GPS Lenovo Moto E3: overview
GPS Lenovo Moto E3: crossing
GPS Lenovo Moto E3: crossing
GPS Lenovo Moto E3: bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto E3: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
398
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 436 cd/m² Médio: 420 cd/m² Minimum: 14.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 436 cd/m²
Contraste: 1063:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.13
Lenovo Moto E3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y5 II
IPS, 1280x720, 5
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K7
IPS, 854x480, 5
Screen
-36%
-10%
-12%
-37%
Brightness
420
443
5%
491
17%
343
-18%
300
-29%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
89
-2%
85
-7%
93
2%
Black Level *
0.41
0.84
-105%
0.58
-41%
0.47
-15%
0.26
37%
Contrast
1063
554
-48%
876
-18%
796
-25%
1185
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
7.8
-44%
7
-30%
6
-11%
12
-122%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
8.4
-20%
6.1
13%
6.7
4%
15.3
-119%
Gamma
2.13 113%
2.07 116%
2.15 112%
2.19 110%
2.15 112%
CCT
8318 78%
8438 77%
8068 81%
8073 81%
22440 29%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
90 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 36 ms rise
↘ 54 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
20542 Points ∼9%
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points ∼10% +16%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼14% +59%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points ∼11% +23%
LG K7
23997 Points ∼11% +17%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
1205 Points ∼4%
Huawei Y5 II
1573 Points ∼6% +31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
428 Points ∼8%
Huawei Y5 II
561 Points ∼10% +31%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
7156 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼13% +30%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points ∼11% +10%
LG K7
8913 Points ∼12% +25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
2694 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1% +57%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points ∼1% -8%
LG K7
2473 Points ∼1% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
3127 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼2% +57%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points ∼1% -7%
LG K7
2946 Points ∼1% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
5 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps ∼1% +68%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼1% +180%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps ∼0% -12%
LG K7
4.3 fps ∼0% -14%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
9 fps ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps ∼3% +67%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼2% -8%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps ∼2% -11%
LG K7
10 fps ∼2% +11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
1.8 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1% +239%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG K7
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
4 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps ∼2% +53%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1% -30%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG K7
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
1.2 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG K7
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
2.9 fps ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG K7
fps ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points ∼39%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points ∼42%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points ∼34%
LG K7
2553 Points ∼31%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
528 Points ∼34%
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points ∼1% -98%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼41% +21%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points ∼41% +20%
LG K7
541 Points ∼35% +2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
177 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points ∼3% +60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼3% +59%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points ∼2% -22%
LG K7
145 Points ∼2% -18%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
401 Points ∼9%
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points ∼8% -6%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼22% +147%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points ∼7% -27%
LG K7
189 Points ∼4% -53%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
817 Points ∼12%
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points ∼17% +34%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼18% +47%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points ∼15% +21%
LG K7
1011 Points ∼15% +24%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
418 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points ∼5% -56%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼18% +63%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points ∼11% -5%
LG K7
350 Points ∼9% -16%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto E3 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K7 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
2077 Points ∼4%
Huawei Y5 II
2707 Points ∼5% +30%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points ∼6% +32%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points ∼4% +3%
LG K7
2280 Points ∼5% +10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
16744 ms * ∼28%
Huawei Y5 II
12505 ms * ∼21% +25%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783.4 ms * ∼21% +24%
Wiko Lenny 3
14862.9 ms * ∼25% +11%
LG K7
14579.1 ms * ∼25% +13%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
12.43 Points ∼4%
Huawei Y5 II
18.47 Points ∼6% +49%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.209 Points ∼5% +46%
Wiko Lenny 3
14.068 Points ∼4% +13%
LG K7
14.369 Points ∼4% +16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
17.49 MB/s ∼20%
Huawei Y5 II
18.03 MB/s ∼21% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s ∼22% +8%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s ∼22% +12%
LG K7
19.27 MB/s ∼22% +10%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
29.78 MB/s ∼31%
Huawei Y5 II
29.47 MB/s ∼31% -1%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s ∼41% +31%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s ∼42% +36%
LG K7
37.84 MB/s ∼39% +27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
8 MB/s ∼5%
Huawei Y5 II
6 MB/s ∼4% -25%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼4% -14%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s ∼4% -22%
LG K7
5.33 MB/s ∼3% -33%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
16 MB/s ∼9%
Huawei Y5 II
27.3 MB/s ∼16% +71%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼10% +7%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s ∼9% -6%
LG K7
15.63 MB/s ∼9% -2%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
37.3 MB/s ∼18%
Huawei Y5 II
21.6 MB/s ∼10% -42%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼25% +41%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s ∼6% -69%
LG K7
8.2 MB/s ∼4% -78%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E3
141.4 MB/s ∼18%
Huawei Y5 II
173.3 MB/s ∼22% +23%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼18% +3%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s ∼17% -6%
LG K7
128.21 MB/s ∼16% -9%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high26 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high11 fps
 very low20 fps
Carga Máxima
 33 °C33.4 °C34.9 °C 
 33.3 °C33.5 °C35.9 °C 
 34 °C34.5 °C34.1 °C 
Máximo: 35.9 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
31.8 °C32.2 °C33.1 °C
32 °C32.1 °C34.1 °C
32.2 °C32.9 °C34.8 °C
Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 32.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.52525.432.53125.335.24032.937.85033.633.46331.632.48028.431.11002728.412520.829.91602229.520021.333.725020.839.531521.250.540019.459.350019.565.363017.77180017.971.8100017.874.5125017.375.1160017.473.6200016.774.3250017.274.3315018.271.1400017.965.7500017.666.1630017.767.6800017.861.91000017.9541250018.149.31600018.253.6SPL3083.5N1.353.1median 17.9Lenovo Moto E3median 65.3Delta1.313.132.433.931.330.231.731.82632.939.440.236.235.328.629.825.428.321.33223.327.822.530.422.437.221.342.318.446.217.555.417.557.317.262.416.867.517.368.317.467.416.676.617.375.617.675.217.679.517.779.817.477.417.772.917.967.918.158.118.140.429.8871.359.8median 17.7Huawei Y5 IImedian 62.41.617.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto E3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y5 II audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.79 / 1.7 / 1.72 Watt
Carga midlight 2.65 / 3.16 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
LG K7
2125 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-49%
-41%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.79
0.54
32%
0.72
9%
0.76
4%
0.61
23%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.58
7%
1.87
-10%
2.16
-27%
1.36
20%
Idle Maximum *
1.72
1.7
1%
2
-16%
2.35
-37%
1.38
20%
Load Average *
2.65
2.98
-12%
5.99
-126%
4.65
-75%
3.11
-17%
Load Maximum *
3.16
4.98
-58%
6.45
-104%
5.35
-69%
3.59
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 05min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 49min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 15min
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
LG K7
2125 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-27%
-31%
-27%
Reader / Idle
1325
1102
-17%
944
-29%
1000
-25%
H.264
649
311
-52%
WiFi v1.3
621
503
-19%
453
-27%
549
-12%
453
-27%
Load
315
253
-20%
155
-51%
299
-5%

Pro

+ Bateria removível
+ Carcaça estável
+ USB OTG
+ Android 6.0 puro
+ LTE
+ Boas fotos da câmera
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Tela relativamente brilhante
+ Bom som do alto falante
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Apenas um SIM
- Baixo desempenho de aplicativos e jogos
- Tonalidade azul da tela
- Qualidade medíocre do microfone
- Armazenamento interno apertado
In review: Lenovo Moto E3. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo Moto E3. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

A Lenovo consegue tira o máximo do orçamento limitado, inclusive no setor de nível de entrada. Uma boa câmera, muito boa duração da bateria, bom alto falante, carcaça sólida, tela muito satisfatória, e baixas temperaturas, trazem uma brisa fresca para o setor de baixo custo. Normalmente, devem ser feitos compromissos em, pelo menos, um destes aspectos.

Agora vem o grande "porém": O desempenho do Lenovo Moto E3 é um pouco fraco e não é um desafio para os aparelhos de comparação. Os jogos 3D continuarão sendo um sonho para os proprietários deste smartphone ou eles irão engasgar tanto que não serão divertidos. Além disso, o suporte para dual-SIM não está incorporado.

O Lenovo Moto E3 ganha pontos com uma longa duração da bateria, boa câmera, e bons alto falantes. Que a Lenovo consiga unir todos estes aspectos em um aparelho tão barato, consegue o nosso respeito. Apenas o desempenho do smartphone fica atrás de outros aparelhos.

Dado que a configuração com LTE e USB OTG é muito boa e o software é reduzido e claramente ordenado, o Lenovo Moto E3 recebe uma pequena recomendação de compra para quem considerar o desempenho algo secundário, mas deseja uma câmera e alto falantes bons em seu smartphone.

Lenovo Moto E3 - 03/06/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
33 / 60 → 55%
Peso
93%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
5 / 63 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
23 / 70 → 32%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
65%
Médio
68%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto E3
Florian Wimmer, 2017-03-22 (Update: 2017-03-26)