Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G9 Plus - Gigante da bateria com problemas de brilho
Comparison devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.8 % | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G9 Plus SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 223 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.81" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.9 % | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.3 % | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M51 SD 730, Adreno 618 | 213 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.6 % | 06/2020 | Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.8 % | 01/2020 | Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.8 % | 10/2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 215 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 390 cd/m²
Contraste: 591:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.506
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Samsung Galaxy M51 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70 | Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60 | Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 58% | 19% | -5% | -23% | 39% | |
| Brightness middle | 390 | 610 56% | 626 61% | 442 13% | 594 52% | 623 60% |
| Brightness | 377 | 579 54% | 632 68% | 419 11% | 613 63% | 600 59% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% | 93 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.66 | 0.37 44% | 0.37 44% | 0.54 18% | ||
| Contrast | 591 | 1649 179% | 1195 102% | 1154 95% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.39 | 1.8 47% | 2.88 15% | 6.1 -80% | 6.1 -80% | 1.8 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.22 | 3 43% | 4.97 5% | 9.7 -86% | 10.6 -103% | 4.7 10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.5 42% | 5.9 -37% | 5.9 -37% | 7 -63% | 3.3 23% |
| Gamma | 2.506 88% | 2.31 95% | 3.441 64% | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6033 108% | 6864 95% | 6415 101% | 7631 85% | 7370 88% | 6712 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 | |
| Realme 6 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 275660, n=6) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Realme 6 Pro | Oppo A91 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | -2% | 15% | -13% | -4% | 24% | 242% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 489.4 | 498.1 2% | 491.7 0% | 513 5% | 505 3% | 506 3% | 760 ? 55% | 1506 ? 208% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 186.2 | 171.1 -8% | 189.8 2% | 203.3 9% | 185.3 0% | 173.1 -7% | 297 ? 60% | 1115 ? 499% |
| Random Read 4KB | 134.8 | 122.6 -9% | 123.6 -8% | 158.7 18% | 145.6 8% | 123.4 -8% | 152.9 ? 13% | 247 ? 83% |
| Random Write 4KB | 98.1 | 112.9 15% | 114.5 17% | 154 57% | 28.55 -71% | 112.6 15% | 131.6 ? 34% | 271 ? 176% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.3 ? | 76.7 ? -10% | 74.8 ? -12% | 86.4 ? 1% | 77.2 ? -9% | 75.2 ? -12% | 76 ? -11% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.4 ? | 54.9 ? -16% | 59.4 ? -9% | 63.4 ? -3% | 60.3 ? -8% | 55.6 ? -15% | 59.6 ? -9% |
PUBG mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (130.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.8 / 1.7 / 2.2 Watt |
| Carga |
5.3 / 7.4 Watt |
    
| |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M51 7000 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | 11% | -2% | 18% | -15% | 0% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.75 6% | 0.8 -0% | 0.92 -15% | 0.82 -3% | 0.93 -16% | 0.84 ? -5% | 0.897 ? -12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 2.19 -29% | 1.3 24% | 1.79 -5% | 1.73 -2% | 2.47 -45% | 1.953 ? -15% | 1.452 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 2.24 -2% | 1.8 18% | 1.88 15% | 1.75 20% | 2.51 -14% | 2.26 ? -3% | 1.629 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 5.3 | 3.88 27% | 4.8 9% | 5.41 -2% | 2.33 56% | 5.62 -6% | 4.51 ? 15% | 5.55 ? -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.4 | 5.97 19% | 7 5% | 7.59 -3% | 5.97 19% | 6.93 6% | 6.63 ? 10% | 8.31 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M51 7000 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 0% | 29% | 7% | -37% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2732 | 2336 -14% | 2642 -3% | 2427 -11% | ||
| H.264 | 1352 | 1096 -19% | 1685 25% | 1188 -12% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 968 | 1175 21% | 1508 56% | 1031 7% | 605 -37% | 1116 15% |
| Load | 267 | 303 13% | 365 37% | 280 5% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto sobre o Moto G9 Plus - o celular Motorola não tem aquele pequeno extra
Em nossa análise, o G9 Plus deixa uma impressão mista. Por um lado, o modelo de gama média da Motorola oferece uma qualidade de som muito boa, tempos de carregamento rápidos e um desempenho adequado para a sua faixa de preço. A qualidade de construção também está no lado positivo do celular Moto.
O Moto G9 Plus é um sólido telefone móvel de gama média - nada mais, mas também nada menos.
Por outro lado, o Moto-G decepciona em uma área que é importante para um smartphone: a tela - e também o desempenho da câmera não é totalmente convincente. O painel LTPS tem apenas 60 Hz, não é muito brilhante e em combinação com os altos níveis de preto isso resulta em um contraste bem abaixo da média. Além disso, existem fenômenos típicos do LCD, como halos e distribuição desigual de brilho nas bordas da tela.
Embora o Moto G9 Plus tenha um preço baixo de cerca de 289 dólares, agora também existem telas LC com uma alta taxa de atualização (por exemplo, Poco X3 NFC) ou paineis OLED (como o Samsung Galaxy M51) disponíveis no segmento da gama média.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
-
10/13/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich