Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 1
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 257 cd/m²
Contraste: 2133:1 (Preto: 0.12 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Nokia 1 IPS, 854x480, 4.50 | Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Gigaset GS170 IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Lenovo Moto C TFT, 854x480, 5.00 | Lenovo B TN LED, 854x480, 4.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -40% | -60% | -54% | -74% | |
| Brightness middle | 256 | 527 106% | 418 63% | 364 42% | 309 21% |
| Brightness | 251 | 503 100% | 418 67% | 355 41% | 302 20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 92 3% | 92 3% | 96 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.12 | 0.68 -467% | 0.45 -275% | 0.31 -158% | 0.46 -283% |
| Contrast | 2133 | 775 -64% | 929 -56% | 1174 -45% | 672 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.82 | 5.3 -10% | 9.7 -101% | 10.4 -116% | 9.8 -103% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.75 | 9.2 22% | 18.9 -61% | 18 -53% | 19.7 -68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5.8 -12% | 11.3 -117% | 12.7 -144% | 11.5 -121% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.12 104% | 2.27 97% | 2.04 108% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7107 91% | 7894 82% | 10414 62% | 12904 50% | 12460 52% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (2415 - 3624, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (2313 - 2768, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (450 - 581, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (1252 - 1595, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (938 - 1065, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (6 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (5.1 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (2.1 - 8, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.6 - 4.5, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Lenovo B | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 5.5, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (11.6 - 21.9, n=17) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Lenovo B (Chrome 56) | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (1730 - 3383, n=17) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Lenovo B (Chrome 56) | |
| Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
| Lenovo B (Chrome 56) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6737 (10615 - 30114, n=17) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 1 | Nokia 2 | Gigaset GS170 | Lenovo Moto C | Lenovo B | Average 8 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | -8% | -9% | -59% | -42% | 1601% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 208.3 | 131.1 -37% | 197.9 -5% | 179.3 -14% | 115.6 -45% | 128.8 ? -38% | 1502 ? 621% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 51.8 | 50.8 -2% | 44.79 -14% | 44.55 -14% | 8.1 -84% | 22.1 ? -57% | 1111 ? 2045% |
| Random Read 4KB | 25.7 | 17.44 -32% | 18.34 -29% | 18.37 -29% | 12.4 -52% | 18.1 ? -30% | 247 ? 861% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.1 | 8.1 -11% | 10.45 15% | 10.9 20% | 4.2 -54% | 5.35 ? -41% | 271 ? 2878% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.9 ? | 37.41 ? | 13.5 | 24.16 ? | 43.1 ? | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.2 ? | 21.34 ? | 10.7 | 16.8 ? | 29.1 ? |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (127.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.2 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt |
| Carga |
3.5 / 4.3 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 1 2150 mAh | Nokia 2 4100 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh | Lenovo B 2000 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6737 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 12% | 12% | -14% | -26% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.55 39% | 0.54 40% | 0.64 29% | 0.869 ? 3% | 0.897 ? -0% | |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.02 32% | 1.56 -4% | 0.96 36% | 1.987 ? -32% | 1.452 ? 3% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.09 45% | 1.6 20% | 1.33 33% | 2.11 ? -6% | 1.629 ? 19% | |
| Load Average * | 3.5 | 4.48 -28% | 3.18 9% | 4.59 -31% | 4.14 ? -18% | 5.55 ? -59% | |
| Load Maximum * | 4.3 | 5.32 -24% | 4.42 -3% | 4.63 -8% | 4.94 ? -15% | 8.31 ? -93% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 1 2150 mAh | Nokia 2 4100 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh | Lenovo B 2000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 52% | -20% | -6% | -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 552 | 840 52% | 442 -20% | 517 -6% | 442 -20% |
| Reader / Idle | 1159 | ||||
| H.264 | 529 | ||||
| Load | 278 |
Pro
Contra
O que você pode esperar de um smartphone que custa menos de 100 euros (~$115)? O Nokia 1 não oferece um desempenho de primeira, mas a Nokia produziu um smartphone faz um bom trabalho pelo valor pagado. O Nokia 1 é para aqueles que não exigem muito de um smartphone. Em compensação, você recebe um smartphone com muitos pontos positivos. O Nokia 1 tem uma tela decente com uma relação de contraste impressionante e boa precisão de cores. O GPS é preciso, os alto-falantes soam bem e as câmeras são aceitáveis, embora o desempenho com pouca luz seja ruim.
Os retardos e gaguejos ocasionais são irritantes e levarão algum tempo para se acostumar. No entanto, esse nível de desempenho deve ser esperado de um smartphone de menos de 100 euros (~$115). A boa duração da bateria e a bateria substituível podem compensar um pouco o baixo desempenho.
O Nokia 1 é um smartphone de baixo custo que tira o máximo proveito de seus recursos limitados. A bateria removível, boa tela e capas intercambiáveis nos impressionaram.
O armazenamento interno limitado e a RAM são compensados pelo Android Oreo (Go Edition), que oferece aos usuários mais espaço de armazenamento e memória do que o Android tradicional. Pode haver problemas com a troca de dados com um computador do qual você deve estar ciente. Sempre haverá comprometimentos nesta faixa de preços, mas este é frustrante, no entanto. O Nokia 1 é apenas cerca de 20 Euros (~$23) mais barato, mas oferece muito do que o Nokia 2, embora com uma tela menor e menor resolução óptica.
Nokia 1
-
05/18/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer
Pricecompare
