Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 3

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/02/2017

Bem vindo de volta! A Nokia volta para o ringue dos fabricantes de smartphones e adiciona um dispositivo chamado Nokia 3 de nível de entrada ao mercado. Descobriremos se deve se esconder atrás do nome que soa bem ou se alcançara novas alturas no teste.

Nokia 3
Processador
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.68 x 143 x 71.4
Bateria
10 Wh, 2630 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @720p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, contrast AF, videos @720p/30FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, fones, ferramenta SIM, suporte, temas, 24 Meses Garantia, rádio FM, SAR rates: 0.94 W/kg (body), 0.76 W/kg (head), fanless
peso
141 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g
Preço
159 EUR (£130) Euro

 

Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490)
99.7 MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz)
81.1 MBit/s ∼81%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
79.9 MBit/s ∼80% -1%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.1 MBit/s ∼54% -33%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
33.5 MBit/s ∼34% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490)
106 MBit/s ∼100% +38%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
78.7 MBit/s ∼74% +3%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz)
76.6 MBit/s ∼72%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
49.2 MBit/s ∼46% -36%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
48.2 MBit/s ∼45% -37%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Woods
GPS Nokia 3 - Overview
GPS Nokia 3 - Overview
GPS Nokia 3 - Bridge
GPS Nokia 3 - Bridge
GPS Nokia 3 - Woods
GPS Nokia 3 - Woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
506
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 506 cd/m² Médio: 468.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 481 cd/m²
Contraste: 2186:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | - Ø
95.3% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.16
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-13%
-33%
-28%
5%
Brightness
469
452
-4%
479
2%
351
-25%
534
14%
Brightness Distribution
84
84
0%
95
13%
93
11%
96
14%
Black Level *
0.22
0.42
-91%
0.55
-150%
0.49
-123%
0.33
-50%
Contrast
2186
1093
-50%
889
-59%
731
-67%
1630
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.1
4.5
44%
8.3
-2%
7.1
12%
5.7
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.5
6.5
24%
8.7
-2%
6.5
24%
4.7
45%
Gamma
2.16 111%
2.22 108%
2.08 115%
2.12 113%
2.51 96%
CCT
9014 72%
7791 83%
9034 72%
8166 80%
7264 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
27703 Points ∼12%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
22218 Points ∼10% -20%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% +3%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% +12%
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points ∼14% +17%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
2568 Points ∼25%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points ∼22% -14%
LG K8 2017
2986 Points ∼29% +16%
Sony Xperia E5
2785 Points ∼27% +8%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3439 Points ∼40%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points ∼26% -36%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼30% -25%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼55% +36%
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points ∼45% +11%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 3
575 Points ∼34%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
533 Points ∼31% -7%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% -98%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼36% +7%
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points ∼38% +11%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
211 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
308 Points ∼3% +46%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% -1%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +107%
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points ∼3% +33%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 3
703 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points ∼12% -25%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼11% -29%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14% -10%
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points ∼12% -21%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1081 Points ∼11%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
887 Points ∼9% -18%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼10% -5%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼12% +10%
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points ∼11% +1%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 3
551 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points ∼14% -5%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% -68%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -33%
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points ∼15% +3%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1045 Points ∼12%
LG K8 2017
1203 Points ∼14% +15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1520 Points ∼6%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼7% +14%
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points ∼6% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
556 Points ∼9%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼11% +15%
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points ∼9% 0%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
686 Points ∼22%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points ∼0% -100%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points ∼27% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
85 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points ∼0% -100%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points ∼2% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 3
106 Points ∼3%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points ∼0% -100%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points ∼3% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
745 Points ∼24%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
558 Points ∼18% -25%
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼20% -17%
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points ∼27% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
124 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42 Points ∼1% -66%
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0% -75%
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points ∼2% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 3
152 Points ∼3%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
53 Points ∼1% -65%
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1% -74%
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points ∼4% +39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
7925 Points ∼11%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
7429 Points ∼10% -6%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% -1%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9% -16%
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points ∼13% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3177 Points ∼1%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3836 Points ∼1% +21%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% +4%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -20%
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points ∼1% +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3665 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
4298 Points ∼2% +17%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% +3%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -19%
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points ∼3% +42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 3
6 fps ∼0%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
5.2 fps ∼0% -13%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -43%
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps ∼1% +40%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 3
10 fps ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
9.4 fps ∼2% -6%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% +10%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% -36%
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps ∼3% +50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 3
2.2 fps ∼0%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% -5%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -41%
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps ∼1% +36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 3
4.5 fps ∼1%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3.8 fps ∼1% -16%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼1% +4%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1% -18%
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps ∼2% +33%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1.4 fps ∼0%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
1.9 fps ∼0% +36%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3.2 fps ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
3.4 fps ∼2% +6%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
3.4 fps ∼2% +6%

Legend

 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Sony Xperia E5
17.885 Points ∼100% +28%
LG K8 2017
17.124 Points ∼96% +23%
Gigaset GS160
14.428 Points ∼81% +3%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.105 Points ∼79% +1%
Nokia 3
13.97 Points ∼78%
Octane V2 - Total Score
LG K8 2017
3052 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia E5
2910 Points ∼95% +28%
Gigaset GS160
2493 Points ∼82% +10%
Nokia 3
2269 Points ∼74%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1938 Points ∼63% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 3
16759 ms * ∼100%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
15895 ms * ∼95% +5%
Gigaset GS160
13907.4 ms * ∼83% +17%
Sony Xperia E5
13232.4 ms * ∼79% +21%
LG K8 2017
10742 ms * ∼64% +36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 3
49 Points ∼100%
Gigaset GS160
47 Points ∼96% -4%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 3Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KLGigaset GS160LG K8 2017Sony Xperia E5
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
-7%
78%
43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.9
14.4
-77%
19.19
-69%
52.23
-17%
45.56
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
64.3
17.7
-72%
30.71
-52%
78.55
22%
65.03
1%
Random Write 4KB
5.5
6.9
25%
6.8
24%
12.5
127%
9.84
79%
Random Read 4KB
17.7
19.7
11%
18.5
5%
41.6
135%
26.04
47%
Sequential Write 256KB
34
42.4
25%
46.6
37%
84.6
149%
83.09
144%
Sequential Read 256KB
181
143
-21%
200.5
11%
270.8
50%
209.69
16%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high13 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
Carga Máxima
 32 °C31.4 °C31.6 °C 
 32.5 °C31.7 °C32.5 °C 
 32.4 °C32 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 32.5 °C
Médio: 32 °C
30 °C31.1 °C31.7 °C
29.9 °C31.6 °C33.3 °C
31 °C32 °C34.2 °C
Máximo: 34.2 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.330.527.32527.730.827.73126.929.226.94034.233.534.25026.229.226.26323.527.823.58025.730.525.710025.429.525.412532.523.732.516022.723.822.720026.322.726.325032.122.232.131540.922.540.940049.722.149.750058.521.358.563065.119.365.18007019.770100070.71970.7125069.518.369.5160069.416.269.4200070.715.970.7250072.215.572.2315074.515.774.5400080.715.480.7500080.515.280.5630071.915.271.9800070.515.270.51000069.915.169.91250058.615.158.61600046.11546.1SPL86.529.686.5N60.21.360.2median 69.4Nokia 3median 18.3median 69.4Delta12.73.512.729.330.929.328.129.528.127.527.327.528.73128.727.527.327.526.42726.430.92530.927.223.727.232.930.232.929.623.829.636.32336.339.722.639.745.122.845.150.222.350.256.122.956.159.819.459.865.817.965.866.517.766.566.318.666.366.215.966.266.715.766.768.615.568.668.515.468.564.715.464.767.315.167.366.815.266.868.115.268.163.715.263.757.315.157.342.315.242.378.429.678.441.11.341.1median 63.7Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KLmedian 17.7median 63.711.73.811.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nokia 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.11 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.35 / 1.39 Watt
Carga midlight 3.1 / 4.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
-23%
-19%
-7%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.92
-37%
0.56
16%
0.65
3%
1.03
-54%
Idle Average *
1.35
1.76
-30%
1.7
-26%
1.6
-19%
2.06
-53%
Idle Maximum *
1.39
1.85
-33%
1.75
-26%
1.62
-17%
2.12
-53%
Load Average *
3.1
3.47
-12%
4.17
-35%
2.97
4%
5.01
-62%
Load Maximum *
4.02
4.22
-5%
5.07
-26%
4.34
-8%
5.04
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 58min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
9h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 43min
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
4%
4%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1258
1224
-3%
1326
5%
H.264
628
617
-2%
702
12%
WiFi v1.3
552
572
4%
615
11%
594
8%
422
-24%
Load
283
277
-2%
244
-14%
280
-1%

Pro

+ Marco de metal
+ Carcaça elegante
+ Android relativamente puro
+ Comparativamente muitas bandas LTE
+ Alto-falantes e fones potentes
+ Tela brilhante e de alto contraste
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Baixo consumo de energia

Contra

- Pobre qualidade da câmera
- GPS inexato
- Microfone um pouco insensível demais
- Iluminação heterogênea da tela
- Forte tonalidade azul
- Bateria não removível
In review: Nokia 3. Review sample courtesy of Cyberport.de
In review: Nokia 3. Review sample courtesy of Cyberport.de

O Nokia 3 é quase um smartphone de nível básico de entrada, o que provavelmente seria suficiente para um início bem sucedido do mercado nesta categoria. No entanto, o dispositivo também nos surpreende com taxas realmente boas em algumas áreas, como brilho da tela, contraste, consumo de energia ou muitas bandas LTE.

Isso permite que se destaque na categoria, mas também há algumas deficiências que devem ser mantidas em mente. Existem câmeras consideravelmente melhores nesta faixa de preços e, em termos de desempenho, existe um dispositivo mais forte no mercado - oXperia E5. Além disso, o som do alto-falante e a precisão do GPS não são estelares, mas isso não pode ser esperado desta faixa de preços.

Tela brilhante e de alto contraste, baixo consumo de energia, carcaça elegante - o Nokia 3 tem uma boa posição na categoria de nível de entrada. No entanto, não deve haver muito valor em uma boa câmera, pois o smartphone só pode oferecer isso de forma condicional.

A elegante carcaça e os resultados de teste decentes em muitas áreas conferem ao Nokia 3 um bom início de mercado no setor de nível de entrada. Agora, estamos antecipando os testes de seu irmão maior, porque a Nokia precisa vir com mais para convencer os compradores na gama média.

Nokia 3 - 07/28/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
93%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Camera
54%
Médio
66%
78%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 3
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08- 2 (Update: 2017-08-11)