Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone RugGear RG850

No bricks here. Enquanto a maioria dos smartphones para exteriores se assemelham a um tijolo, a RugGear deu ao RG850 um design mais discreto que o faz parecer mais com um smartphone tradicional. O fabricante também não sacrificou recursos para conseguir isso, o que é impressionante. Leia mais para descobrir se o RG850 consegue se destacar de seus concorrentes e como ele se desempenha em nossos testes.
RugGear RG850
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.99 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB. sistemas de arquivos FAT e FAT32 suportados., Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, e-compass, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM: 850, 900, 1.800, 1.900. 3G UMTS: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G LTE FDD/TDD: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.5 x 163 x 79.2
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix autofocus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix fixed focus
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Carregador USB, cabo Type-C, fones, ferramenta SIM, protetor de tela, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 1.027 W/kg, Head - 0.762 W/kg., fanless, ruggedized
peso
209 g, Suprimento de energia: 73 g
Preço
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RugGear RG850
RugGear RG850

Size Comparison

166 mm 83 mm 13.2 mm 268 g163 mm 82 mm 12 mm 253 g163 mm 79.2 mm 11.5 mm 209 g152.5 mm 79 mm 12.5 mm 213 g152 mm 75 mm 12.9 mm 218 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
311 (292min - 329max) MBit/s +954%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
201 MBit/s +581%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.8 MBit/s +238%
CAT S41
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.7 MBit/s +31%
RugGear RG850
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.5 (17min - 46max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +726%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
344 (219min - 350max) MBit/s +656%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
199 MBit/s +337%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 128 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s +144%
RugGear RG850
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.5 (36min - 51max) MBit/s
CAT S41
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.1 MBit/s -16%
05101520253035404550Tooltip
RugGear RG850; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø45.4 (36-51)
RugGear RG850; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø29.6 (17-46)
GPS test: RugGear RG850 - Overview
GPS test: RugGear RG850 - Overview
GPS test: RugGear RG850 - Bridge
GPS test: RugGear RG850 - Bridge
GPS test: RugGear RG850 – Loop
GPS test: RugGear RG850 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
472
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 497 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 468.9 cd/m² Minimum: 10.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 444 cd/m²
Contraste: 716:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.736
RugGear RG850
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Ulefone Armor 6
IPS LCD, 2246x1080, 6.20
CAT S41
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00
Crosscall Action-X3
IPS, 1280x800, 5.00
Blackview BV9000 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.70
Screen
56%
17%
35%
33%
Brightness middle
444
418
-6%
537
21%
417
-6%
621
40%
Brightness
469
413
-12%
506
8%
425
-9%
598
28%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
86
-2%
91
3%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.62
0.2
68%
0.9
-45%
0.29
53%
0.64
-3%
Contrast
716
2090
192%
597
-17%
1438
101%
970
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
9.75
4.5
54%
5.02
49%
7.12
27%
5.5
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
22.4
6.8
70%
7.98
64%
10.19
55%
10
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.5
3.3
76%
5.3
61%
6.1
55%
5.1
62%
Gamma
2.736 80%
2.24 98%
2.154 102%
2.687 82%
2.52 87%
CCT
9287 70%
7205 90%
7226 90%
7687 85%
7362 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 781 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 781 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 781 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
685 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
Points -100%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
869 Points +27%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
634 Points -7%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
828 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (619 - 685, n=16)
657 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +663%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2605 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
Points -100%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
3414 Points +31%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2360 Points -9%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
3818 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (2222 - 2889, n=16)
2553 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +439%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2452 Points
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
2888 Points +18%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2045 Points -17%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
2635 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (1731 - 2461, n=13)
2118 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +343%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4290 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9513 Points +122%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
4778 Points +11%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4665 Points +9%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
4465 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (3347 - 5290, n=18)
4577 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +252%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3596 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6950 Points +93%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
Points -100%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3666 Points +2%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
3865 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (3408 - 3892, n=16)
3668 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +202%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9551 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19616 Points +105%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
13404 Points +40%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9231 Points -3%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
10258 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (9213 - 9977, n=18)
9559 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9704 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18998 Points +96%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
13844 Points +43%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9342 Points -4%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
10023 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (9342 - 10271, n=17)
9707 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9051 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22137 Points +145%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
12063 Points +33%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
8864 Points -2%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
11176 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (8253 - 10364, n=17)
9093 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
593 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1008 Points +70%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
969 Points +63%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
561 Points -5%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1008 Points +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (554 - 613, n=18)
583 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +535%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
522 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
861 Points +65%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
909 Points +74%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points -6%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
921 Points +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (483 - 535, n=18)
509 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +702%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1128 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2511 Points +123%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1261 Points +12%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1099 Points -3%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1505 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (1002 - 1339, n=18)
1182 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
601 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1581 Points +163%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
961 Points +60%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
549 Points -9%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1047 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (542 - 612, n=18)
583 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +1456%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
529 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1441 Points +172%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
889 Points +68%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
478 Points -10%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
978 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (423 - 532, n=18)
506 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +2991%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1148 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2765 Points +141%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1338 Points +17%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1148 Points 0%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1391 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (1072 - 1333, n=18)
1195 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
733 Points +141%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
707 Points +133%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
284 Points -7%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
685 Points +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (284 - 330, n=18)
303 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)
2755 Points +806%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
252 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
628 Points +149%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
613 Points +143%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
234 Points -7%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
600 Points +138%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (234 - 271, n=18)
250 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)
2751 Points +992%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1116 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2478 Points +122%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1529 Points +37%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1098 Points -2%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1353 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (1034 - 1360, n=18)
1178 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)
3163 Points +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
364 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1037 Points +185%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
717 Points +97%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
333 Points -9%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
750 Points +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (333 - 369, n=18)
354 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)
6737 Points +1751%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
881 Points +189%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
633 Points +108%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
277 Points -9%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
647 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (277 - 306, n=18)
295 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)
9723 Points +3088%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1121 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2675 Points +139%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1340 Points +20%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1131 Points +1%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1693 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (1064 - 1338, n=18)
1195 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)
4224 Points +277%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
376 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  ()
376 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)
2671 Points +610%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
306 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  ()
306 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)
2850 Points +831%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1835 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  ()
1835 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)
2675 Points +46%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59936 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
131861 Points +120%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
57023 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (44992 - 59990, n=11)
56835 Points -5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
889 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2062 Points +132%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1255 Points +41%
Crosscall Action-X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
Points -100%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1370 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (263 - 1055, n=17)
737 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +548%
System (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1746 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4736 Points +171%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
2372 Points +36%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
3238 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (1281 - 2154, n=17)
1726 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +454%
Memory (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
706 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2276 Points +222%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1269 Points +80%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1028 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (530 - 1209, n=17)
769 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +788%
Graphics (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
740 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1486 Points +101%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
1126 Points +52%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
1121 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (715 - 788, n=17)
738 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +1822%
Web (sort by value)
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
684 Points
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1128 Points +65%
CAT S41
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2, 3072
731 Points +7%
Blackview BV9000 Pro
Mediatek Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 6144
945 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
  (10 - 866, n=17)
499 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +119%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +85%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
72 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (24 - 72, n=3)
41.7 Points -42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +889%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
8287 Points +145%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)
5024 Points +48%
Blackview BV9000 Pro (Chrome Mobile 53)
4155 Points +23%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
3386 Points
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
3251 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=18)
3194 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Blackview BV9000 Pro (Chrome Mobile 53)
16298 ms * -20%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
13599 ms *
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
13331 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=18)
12677 ms * +7%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)
10444 ms * +23%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
4416 ms * +68%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +88%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +468%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
45.02 (8min) Points +145%
Blackview BV9000 Pro (Chrome Mobile 53)
32.42 Points +77%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)
26.67 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=16)
19.1 Points +4%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
18.35 Points
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
18.05 Points -2%

* ... smaller is better

RugGear RG850Ulefone Armor 6CAT S41Crosscall Action-X3Blackview BV9000 ProAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
35%
-18%
-3%
20%
4%
962%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.1
290.8
4%
253
-10%
264.7
-5%
244.7
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
120.7
188.4
56%
117.2
-3%
139.3
15%
174.6
45%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
39
81.3
108%
65.5
68%
47
21%
72.6
86%
Random Write 4KB
12.64
19.87
57%
12.99
3%
8.4
-34%
12.72
1%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
23.87
-72%
84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
5
-92%
56.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
68.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-17%
Carga Máxima
 46 °C37.4 °C35.6 °C 
 43.8 °C37.3 °C37.7 °C 
 41 °C36.8 °C35.5 °C 
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 39 °C
31.8 °C35.1 °C38.9 °C
32.3 °C35.1 °C37.8 °C
31.5 °C33.8 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 38.9 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204351.32539.142.73132.934.54038.834.75042.240.16332.432.98026.728.410025.925.312529.232.116024.928.520020.132.325019.136.931518.943.140018.549.850019.556.563017.163.680016.168.7100016.271.9125015.672.5160016.469.520001768.6250016.368.1315015.367.3400015.461.1500015.262.2630015.262.8800015.462.61000015.562.21250015.453.51600015.548.8SPL73.371.367.173.666.728.779.5N28.626.720.828.218.51.241.9median 16.4median 62.2median 44median 50.9median 42.6median 14.9median 60.7Delta4.913.123.222.724.113.818.838.137.937.634.835.930.328.128.328.629.327.826.429.824.330.424.722.220.823.922202919.434.217.240.216.45016.553.915.159.615.165.614.666.414.464.413.766.512.365.212.161.811.861.311.759.911.759.911.660.411.657.911.557.611.558.511.656.957.971.366.356.725.974.811.324.316.810.40.832.5median 14.4median 58.5median 41.6median 33.6median 13.3median 53.65.211.824.723.212.621.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRugGear RG850Crosscall Action-X3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
RugGear RG850 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Crosscall Action-X3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.7 / 2.6 Watt
Carga midlight 3.8 / 6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
RugGear RG850
4000 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
CAT S41
5000 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Blackview BV9000 Pro
4180 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-14%
-16%
-7%
1%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.9
25%
1.4
-17%
1.1
8%
1.04
13%
0.918 ?(0.52 - 1.88, n=18)
23%
Idle Average *
1.7
2.04
-20%
2.2
-29%
1.9
-12%
2.14
-26%
2.01 ?(1.4 - 4.17, n=18)
-18%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.09
20%
2.8
-8%
2.9
-12%
2.17
17%
Load Average *
3.8
3.4
11%
4.1
-8%
4.8
-26%
5.11
-34%
Load Maximum *
6
7.31
-22%
6.4
-7%
8.4
-40%
6.37
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
14h 17min
RugGear RG850
4000 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
CAT S41
5000 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Blackview BV9000 Pro
4180 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
857
874
2%
953
11%
843
-2%
579
-32%

Pro

+ Design comparativamente fino
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Certificações IP68 e MIL-STD-810G

Contra

- Câmeras sem inspiração
- Porta USB 2.0 Type-C
- Baixa relação de contraste
- Alto valor de preto da tela
The RugGear RG850 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of RugGear Germany.
The RugGear RG850 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of RugGear Germany.

O RugGear RG850 é um smartphone de gama média competente que se destaca de seus contemporâneos, principalmente por causa de seu SO Android puro. Embora tenha um desempenho inferior em comparação a muitos dos nossos dispositivos de comparação, ainda mantém um desempenho fluente mesmo em aplicativos exigentes. A câmera, a tela e o desempenho do Wi-Fi também são insuficientes, mas não significativamente.

O RugGear RG850 é um smartphone de gama média decente que consegue ser mais fino que seus concorrentes sem sacrificar recursos ou qualidade de construção.

O design fino do RG850 é outra área que o distingue de outros smartphones reforçados. O dispositivo não se sente tão volumoso quanto muitos de seus contemporâneos e cabe muito bem em nossas mãos, apesar de ter uma tela de 6 polegadas. No geral, o RugGear RG850 é uma proposta atraente para aqueles que estão atrás de um smartphone que pode sobreviver a quedas sem o tamanho e a forma de um tijolo, como muitos smartphones robustos são.

RugGear RG850 - 05/12/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
88%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
22 / 63 → 35%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
64%
Médio
70%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone RugGear RG850
Mike Wobker, 2019-05-14 (Update: 2019-05-15)