Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M21 - Simples, mas bom

Name: Samsung Galaxy M21
Brand: Samsung

Deveria ter sido menos? O Samsung Galaxy M21 é um parente próximo, mas de preço mais baixo, do Galaxy M31. Oferece menos espaço de armazenamento e um sistema de câmeras um pouco reduzido. No entanto, ele ainda possui a mesma bateria gigantesca. O Galaxy M21 é o smartphone ideal para os caçadores de pechinchas? Continue lendo nossa análise para descobrir.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/26/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy M21 (Galaxy M21 Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memória

4096 MB

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 56 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de movimento, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 159 x 75.1

Bateria

6000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/2.0, autofoco de detecção facial, LED flash, Video @2160p/30fps (câmera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide-angle (câmera 2); 5.0MP, f/2.2, depth sensor (câmera 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta para remoção de cartão SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE speed: 600 Mb/s (Download), 150 Mb/s (Upload); SAR value: 0.492 W/kg (head), 1.13 W/kg (body) , fanless

peso

188 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g

Preço

200 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80 %	09/2020	Samsung Galaxy M21 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	188 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
75 %	06/2020	Sony Xperia L4 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	178 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	1680x720
77 %	08/2020	Oppo A72 SD 665, Adreno 610	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
79 %	06/2020	Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2	152 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
81 %	05/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Oppo A72 Samsung Galaxy M21 Sony Xperia L4 Samsung Galaxy A41 ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash	365 (349^min - 370^max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Oppo A72 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	347 (330^min - 356^max) MBit/s ∼95% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	332 (231^min - 352^max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641)	290 MBit/s ∼79% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 (225^min - 321^max) MBit/s ∼78% -14%
Sony Xperia L4 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	120 (106^min - 124^max) MBit/s ∼33% -64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash	349 (339^min - 355^max) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Oppo A72 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	330 (284^min - 346^max) MBit/s ∼95% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	304 (285^min - 323^max) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641)	276 MBit/s ∼79% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 (247^min - 263^max) MBit/s ∼73% -16%
Sony Xperia L4 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	109 (103^min - 114^max) MBit/s ∼31% -64%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (231-352)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (285-323)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: Flowers Main camera: Cityscape Main camera: Low-light photography Ultra wide-angle

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M21

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M21

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M21

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M21

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M21: 40.35 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 65.03 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.info/Breve-Analise-do-Smartphone-Samsung-Galaxy-M21-Simples-mas-bom.495787.0.html">Samsung Galaxy M21</a> — Samsung Galaxy M21


600 cd/m²	614 cd/m²	621 cd/m²
599 cd/m²	617 cd/m²	629 cd/m²
602 cd/m²	616 cd/m²	626 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 629 cd/m² Médio: 613.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.82 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 617 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.11 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
141.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073

	Samsung Galaxy M21 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40	Sony Xperia L4 IPS, 1680x720, 6.20	Oppo A72 IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.50	Samsung Galaxy A41 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen		-103%	-100%	-18%	-46%
Brightness middle	617	429 -30%	505 -18%	554 -10%	622 1%
Brightness	614	404 -34%	482 -21%	559 -9%	612 0%
Brightness Distribution	95	92 -3%	93 -2%	92 -3%	94 -1%
Black Level *		0.26	0.55		0.56
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.11	6.14 -191%	6.3 -199%	2 5%	3.98 -89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3.41	10.51 -208%	10.1 -196%	7.7 -126%	7.33 -115%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.6	6.6 -154%	6.8 -162%	1.6 38%	4.5 -73%
Gamma	2.073 ^106%	2.23 ^99%	2.29 ^96%	2.11 ^104%	2.206 ^100%
CCT	6921 ^94%	8346 ^78%	8161 ^80%	6589 ^99%	7361 ^88%
Contrast		1650	918		1111
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

215.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1565 Points ∼85%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	387 Points ∼21% -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1565 - 1605, n=3)	1592 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 5532, n=64)	1852 Points ∼100% +18%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1208 Points ∼74%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	453 Points ∼28% -62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1208 - 1345, n=3)	1299 Points ∼79% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 4789, n=67)	1634 Points ∼100% +35%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1322 Points ∼67%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	883 Points ∼45% -33%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1256 Points ∼64% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1222 Points ∼62% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points ∼86% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1207 - 1387, n=4)	1310 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (421 - 4201, n=165)	1959 Points ∼100% +48%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	349 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	150 Points ∼26% -57%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	309 Points ∼54% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	357 Points ∼63% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	559 Points ∼99% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (345 - 349, n=4)	347 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 1604, n=165)	567 Points ∼100% +62%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5892 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	5251 Points ∼46% -11%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11432 Points ∼100% +94%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6742 Points ∼59% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7673 Points ∼67% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5080 - 5925, n=7)	5572 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=564)	6088 Points ∼53% +3%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6043 Points ∼67%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6909 Points ∼77% +14%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7651 Points ∼85% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7594 Points ∼84% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9027 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5777 - 6697, n=7)	6166 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=714)	6701 Points ∼74% +11%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2125 Points ∼77%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2287 Points ∼83% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2281 Points ∼82% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2765 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1972 - 2163, n=7)	2099 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4061, n=218)	2638 Points ∼95% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1439 Points ∼48%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	981 Points ∼32% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1005 Points ∼33% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2257 Points ∼75% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1320 - 1442, n=7)	1414 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 11259, n=218)	3023 Points ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1550 Points ∼58%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1123 Points ∼42% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1148 Points ∼43% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2353 Points ∼88% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1442 - 1557, n=7)	1525 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6977, n=218)	2666 Points ∼100% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2260 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1102 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2154 Points ∼66% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2427 Points ∼75% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3256 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1463 - 2332, n=7)	2115 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=574)	2295 Points ∼70% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1532 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	467 Points ∼18% -70%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points ∼39% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1028 Points ∼40% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2551 Points ∼100% +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1267 - 1533, n=7)	1488 Points ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 12146, n=574)	2295 Points ∼90% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1650 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	536 Points ∼20% -68%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1097 Points ∼41% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1179 Points ∼44% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2680 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 1659, n=7)	1588 Points ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 9643, n=575)	2119 Points ∼79% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1917 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1106 Points ∼34% -42%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2199 Points ∼67% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2466 Points ∼75% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3267 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1402 - 2336, n=6)	2087 Points ∼64% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=605)	2213 Points ∼68% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1601 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	782 Points ∼21% -51%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1653 Points ∼43% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1486 Points ∼39% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3803 Points ∼100% +138%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1601 - 2021, n=6)	1873 Points ∼49% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 22052, n=605)	3148 Points ∼83% +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1662 Points ∼45%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	836 Points ∼23% -50%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1765 Points ∼48% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1630 Points ∼44% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3669 Points ∼100% +121%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1662 - 2074, n=6)	1903 Points ∼52% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 11895, n=605)	2584 Points ∼70% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2186 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1078 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2246 Points ∼71% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2296 Points ∼73% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3152 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1415 - 2258, n=7)	2084 Points ∼66% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=654)	2168 Points ∼69% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1445 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	405 Points ∼17% -72%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	980 Points ∼41% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1016 Points ∼43% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2369 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1203 - 1478, n=7)	1422 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 11573, n=654)	1911 Points ∼81% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1563 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	470 Points ∼19% -70%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1134 Points ∼45% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1160 Points ∼46% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2507 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1342 - 1601, n=7)	1524 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9138, n=655)	1813 Points ∼72% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2176 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1084 Points ∼35% -50%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2282 Points ∼74% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2181 Points ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3070 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 2286, n=6)	2079 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5301, n=696)	2041 Points ∼66% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2092 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	680 Points ∼19% -67%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1564 Points ∼43% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1093 Points ∼30% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points ∼100% +74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1468 - 2092, n=6)	1944 Points ∼53% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 16670, n=695)	2551 Points ∼70% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2110 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	741 Points ∼21% -65%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1675 Points ∼48% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1229 Points ∼35% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3501 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1595 - 2110, n=6)	1958 Points ∼56% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 11256, n=698)	2177 Points ∼62% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	19902 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	14930 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	17865 Points ∼89% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	17231 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20019 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (13103 - 20393, n=6)	18907 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 59268, n=840)	15967 Points ∼80% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25024 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11549 Points ∼22% -54%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24321 Points ∼46% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	22232 Points ∼42% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	52700 Points ∼100% +111%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15971 - 25625, n=6)	23092 Points ∼44% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 224130, n=838)	29192 Points ∼55% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23670 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	12161 Points ∼31% -49%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	22445 Points ∼58% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	20885 Points ∼54% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38671 Points ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (16738 - 24052, n=6)	21849 Points ∼56% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=838)	22297 Points ∼58% -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	35 fps ∼41%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	39 fps ∼45% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	86 fps ∼100% +146%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (28 - 48, n=7)	39.1 fps ∼45% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834)	48.7 fps ∼57% +39%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	31 fps ∼53%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	32 fps ∼54% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	37 fps ∼63% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps ∼100% +90%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (25 - 44, n=7)	35.1 fps ∼59% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843)	32.5 fps ∼55% +5%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	18 fps ∼43%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps ∼45% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	21 fps ∼50% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +133%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (17 - 26, n=7)	20.4 fps ∼49% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739)	28.9 fps ∼69% +61%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	19 fps ∼51%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	17 fps ∼46% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	20 fps ∼54% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	37 fps ∼100% +95%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15 - 24, n=7)	19.9 fps ∼54% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747)	23.8 fps ∼64% +25%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16 fps ∼52%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	13 fps ∼42% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	31 fps ∼100% +94%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 16, n=7)	14.7 fps ∼47% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602)	23.1 fps ∼75% +44%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps ∼52%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11 fps ∼41% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	13 fps ∼48% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps ∼100% +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.9 - 14, n=7)	13.3 fps ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604)	20.6 fps ∼76% +47%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.6 fps ∼47%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.1 fps ∼35% -27%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4 fps ∼34% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4.9 fps ∼42% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼93% +96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)	6.01 fps ∼51% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=364)	11.8 fps ∼100% +111%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps ∼42%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.4 fps ∼17% -60%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.7 fps ∼33% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2.8 fps ∼34% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7 fps ∼85% +100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)	3.56 fps ∼43% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=362)	8.26 fps ∼100% +136%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.2 fps ∼52%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.4 fps ∼36% -30%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.2 fps ∼35% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps ∼42% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼96% +85%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)	9.26 fps ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=368)	17.7 fps ∼100% +92%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps ∼50%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.8 fps ∼19% -62%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.8 fps ∼39% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps ∼37% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7.8 - 10, n=7)	9.66 fps ∼48% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=368)	20.2 fps ∼100% +102%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps ∼56%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.9 fps ∼38% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8.1 fps ∼45% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (6.4 - 10, n=7)	9.43 fps ∼52% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 75, n=527)	15.4 fps ∼86% +54%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps ∼56%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6 fps ∼38% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.7 fps ∼48% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)	8.53 fps ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=531)	13.6 fps ∼85% +53%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	180019 Points ∼55%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	177251 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	157473 Points ∼48% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	275931 Points ∼85% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (152185 - 187087, n=7)	175473 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152)	325323 Points ∼100% +81%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1200 Points ∼85%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1231 Points ∼87% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1062 Points ∼75% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1410 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 1202, n=7)	620 Points ∼44% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=764)	843 Points ∼60% -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2138 Points ∼56%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1897 Points ∼50% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1113 Points ∼29% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3807 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2127 - 2168, n=7)	2149 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=764)	2615 Points ∼69% +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1759 Points ∼41%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2451 Points ∼57% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2148 Points ∼50% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4295 Points ∼100% +144%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1291 - 2122, n=7)	1706 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=764)	1976 Points ∼46% +12%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4586 Points ∼67%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4787 Points ∼70% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5142 Points ∼75% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6828 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2839 - 4978, n=7)	4361 Points ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=764)	3587 Points ∼53% -22%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2133 Points ∼60%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2232 Points ∼63% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1901 Points ∼54% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3542 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (634 - 2191, n=7)	1418 Points ∼40% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=764)	1844 Points ∼52% -14%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	48.527 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)	42.9 Points ∼88% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	32.643 Points ∼67% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	30.642 Points ∼63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)	28.2 Points ∼58% -8%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	22.887 Points ∼47% -25%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	89.457 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	55.972 Points ∼63% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)	50.4 Points ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)	50.4 Points ∼56% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	49.497 Points ∼55%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)	45.2 runs/min ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)	44.1 runs/min ∼98% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)	29 runs/min ∼64% +9%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	28.2 runs/min ∼62% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	27.8 runs/min ∼62% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)	26.6 runs/min ∼59%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)	71.1 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	69 Points ∼97% +25%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	55 Points ∼77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)	53.4 Points ∼75% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	52 Points ∼73% -5%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	50 Points ∼70% -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	17303 Points ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	10499 Points ∼61% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	9810 Points ∼57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)	9667 Points ∼56% -1%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	9345 Points ∼54% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)	8416 Points ∼49% -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)	9488 ms * ∼100% -103%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)	4863 ms * ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	4664.3 ms * ∼49%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	4487.2 ms * ∼47% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	3778.9 ms * ∼40% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	2794.2 ms * ∼29% +40%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy M21	Sony Xperia L4	Oppo A72	Samsung Galaxy A41	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-30%	-8%	-15%	1%	-4%	-33%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	31.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -50%	67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -12%	51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32) -17%	51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) -17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	37.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -52%	83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32) -13%	69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) -11%
Random Write 4KB	124.2	22.5 -82%	152.9 23%	72.53 -42%	123.6 0%	68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43) -45%	40.3 (0.14 - 319, n=934) -68%
Random Read 4KB	126	61.2 -51%	135.91 8%	84 -33%	137 9%	133 (78.2 - 173, n=43) 6%	63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=934) -50%
Sequential Write 256KB	192.7	165 -14%	234.61 22%	211.05 10%	214.8 11%	199 (133 - 388, n=43) 3%	139 (2.99 - 1321, n=934) -28%
Sequential Read 256KB	487.8	293.4 -40%	504.32 3%	299.89 -39%	496.6 2%	703 (476 - 895, n=43) 44%	363 (12.1 - 2037, n=934) -26%

; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.0.0: Ø36.3 (28-41)

; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø25 (10-40)

; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø56.1 (37-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42.5 °C	36.1 °C	34.3 °C
41.5 °C	36.2 °C	34.4 °C
40.1 °C	36.6 °C	34.4 °C

Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C


33.1 °C	35.2 °C	38.1 °C
33.8 °C	35.2 °C	39.2 °C
33.9 °C	36.2 °C	38.3 °C

Máximo: 39.2 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	1.2 / 1.8 / 2.1 Watt
Carga	6.2 / 7.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh	Oppo A72 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9611	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		20%	29%	-8%	-11%	17%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	0.7 42%	0.96 20%	1.5 -25%	1.173 (0.9 - 1.6, n=7) 2%	0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) 26%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.97 -9%	1.57 13%	2.1 -17%	2.28 (1.7 - 4.24, n=7) -27%	1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) 2%
Idle Maximum *	2.1	1.98 6%	1.61 23%	2.5 -19%	2.86 (1.8 - 4.34, n=7) -36%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) 3%
Load Average *	6.2	3.83 38%	2.93 53%	5.2 16%	5.97 (5 - 6.99, n=7) 4%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) 34%
Load Maximum *	7.9	6.2 22%	4.97 37%	7.5 5%	7.83 (6.3 - 9.4, n=7) 1%	6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) 22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		38h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		21h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 49min

	Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh	Sony Xperia L4 3580 mAh	Oppo A72 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh
Battery Runtime		-40%	-22%	-26%	-5%
Reader / Idle	2297			1843 -20%	2263 -1%
H.264	1352			998 -26%	1269 -6%
WiFi v1.3	1298	783 -40%	1018 -22%	650 -50%	1187 -9%
Load	289			268 -7%	279 -3%

Pro

+ Tela AMOLED brilhante

+ Ótima duração da bateria

+ Sistema de câmera flexível

+ Geolocalização precisa

Contra

- Desempenho pobre

- O SoC não é energeticamente eficiente

- Bloatware pré-instalado

Veredicto – Para quem procura algo sólido

O Samsung Galaxy M21 oferece um sistema de câmera medíocre e um nível de desempenho medíocre. Outros fabricantes estão perseguindo especificações e colocando ênfase no desempenho da câmera. A Samsung constrói apenas smartphones sólidos, que não têm fraquezas e oferecem alguns recursos especiais além.

O Galaxy M21 está no lugar exato, que smartphones muito mais expressivos com bateria muito boa e telas OLED brilhantes costumavam ocupar.

O Samsung Galaxy M21 é um smartphone sólido como uma rocha, de gama média inferior, com uma tela excelente e bateria com boa duração.

O Samsung Galaxy M21 é um smartphone sólido como uma rocha, de gama média inferior, com uma tela excelente e bateria com boa duração. Não é tão eficiente em termos de energia ou poderoso quanto os SoCs da concorrência, mas ainda oferece um nível de desempenho bastante decente.

No dia-a-dia, o Galaxy M21 é bom, e traz para a mesa tudo que um smartphone dessa faixa de preço deveria oferecer.

Samsung Galaxy M21 - 2020-09-2409/24/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

46 / 70 → 66%

Peso

89%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

17 / 64 → 27%

Desempenho da aplicação

57 / 86 → 66%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 76%

Camera

60%

Médio

73%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Linked Articles

Samsung Galaxy M21 (Galaxy M21 Serie)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M21 - Simples, mas bom

Comparison Devices

Os Top 10

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Para quem procura algo sólido

Linked Articles

Artigos Relacionados

Pricecompare