Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M21 - Simples, mas bom

Deveria ter sido menos? O Samsung Galaxy M21 é um parente próximo, mas de preço mais baixo, do Galaxy M31. Oferece menos espaço de armazenamento e um sistema de câmeras um pouco reduzido. No entanto, ele ainda possui a mesma bateria gigantesca. O Galaxy M21 é o smartphone ideal para os caçadores de pechinchas? Continue lendo nossa análise para descobrir.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Galaxy M21 Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 56 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de movimento, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 159 x 75.1
Bateria
6000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, autofoco de detecção facial, LED flash, Video @2160p/​30fps (câmera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle (câmera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth sensor (câmera 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta para remoção de cartão SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE speed: 600 Mb/s (Download), 150 Mb/s (Upload); SAR value: 0.492 W/​kg (head), 1.13 W/​kg (body) , fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
09/2020
Samsung Galaxy M21
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
75 %
06/2020
Sony Xperia L4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"1680x720
77 %
08/2020
Oppo A72
SD 665, Adreno 610
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.10"2400x1080
81 %
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Galaxy M21

Size Comparison

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g162 mm 75.5 mm 8.9 mm 192 g159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g159 mm 71 mm 8.7 mm 178 g149.9 mm 69.8 mm 7.9 mm 152 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Oppo A72
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (330min - 356max) MBit/s ∼95% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (231min - 352max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼79% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s ∼78% -14%
Sony Xperia L4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
120 (106min - 124max) MBit/s ∼33% -64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Oppo A72
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 (284min - 346max) MBit/s ∼95% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (285min - 323max) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼79% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s ∼73% -16%
Sony Xperia L4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 (103min - 114max) MBit/s ∼31% -64%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (231-352)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (285-323)
Garmin Edge 520 – Route overview
Garmin Edge 520 – Route overview
Garmin Edge 520 – Roundabout
Garmin Edge 520 – Roundabout
Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
Samsung Galaxy M21 – Route overview
Samsung Galaxy M21 – Route overview
Samsung Galaxy M21 – Roundabout
Samsung Galaxy M21 – Roundabout
Samsung Galaxy M21 – Bridge
Samsung Galaxy M21 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: FlowersMain camera: CityscapeMain camera: Low-light photographyUltra wide-angle
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
46 ∆E
36 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
56 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
65 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M21: 40.35 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 65.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M21: 8.11 ∆E min: 2.1 - max: 18.27 ∆E
600
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 629 cd/m² Médio: 613.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.82 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 617 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.11 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
141.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073
Samsung Galaxy M21
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Sony Xperia L4
IPS, 1680x720, 6.20
Oppo A72
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-103%
-100%
-18%
-46%
Brightness middle
617
429
-30%
505
-18%
554
-10%
622
1%
Brightness
614
404
-34%
482
-21%
559
-9%
612
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
92
-3%
93
-2%
92
-3%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.26
0.55
0.56
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.11
6.14
-191%
6.3
-199%
2
5%
3.98
-89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.41
10.51
-208%
10.1
-196%
7.7
-126%
7.33
-115%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
6.6
-154%
6.8
-162%
1.6
38%
4.5
-73%
Gamma
2.073 106%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.11 104%
2.206 100%
CCT
6921 94%
8346 78%
8161 80%
6589 99%
7361 88%
Contrast
1650
918
1111
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 215.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1565 Points ∼85%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
387 Points ∼21% -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1565 - 1605, n=3)
1592 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 5532, n=64)
1852 Points ∼100% +18%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1208 Points ∼74%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
453 Points ∼28% -62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1208 - 1345, n=3)
1299 Points ∼79% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=67)
1634 Points ∼100% +35%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1322 Points ∼67%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼45% -33%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1256 Points ∼64% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼62% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼86% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1207 - 1387, n=4)
1310 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4201, n=165)
1959 Points ∼100% +48%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
150 Points ∼26% -57%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼54% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼63% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼99% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (345 - 349, n=4)
347 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=165)
567 Points ∼100% +62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5892 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5251 Points ∼46% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11432 Points ∼100% +94%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼59% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points ∼67% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5080 - 5925, n=7)
5572 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=564)
6088 Points ∼53% +3%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6043 Points ∼67%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6909 Points ∼77% +14%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7651 Points ∼85% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼84% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5777 - 6697, n=7)
6166 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=714)
6701 Points ∼74% +11%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2125 Points ∼77%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2287 Points ∼83% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼82% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1972 - 2163, n=7)
2099 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=218)
2638 Points ∼95% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1439 Points ∼48%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼32% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼33% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points ∼75% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1442, n=7)
1414 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=218)
3023 Points ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1550 Points ∼58%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1123 Points ∼42% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼43% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points ∼88% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1557, n=7)
1525 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=218)
2666 Points ∼100% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2260 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1102 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2154 Points ∼66% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼75% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1463 - 2332, n=7)
2115 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=574)
2295 Points ∼70% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1532 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
467 Points ∼18% -70%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼39% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼40% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼100% +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1533, n=7)
1488 Points ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=574)
2295 Points ∼90% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1650 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
536 Points ∼20% -68%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1097 Points ∼41% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼44% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1659, n=7)
1588 Points ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=575)
2119 Points ∼79% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1917 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼34% -42%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2199 Points ∼67% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼75% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1402 - 2336, n=6)
2087 Points ∼64% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=605)
2213 Points ∼68% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
782 Points ∼21% -51%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1653 Points ∼43% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼39% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100% +138%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1601 - 2021, n=6)
1873 Points ∼49% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=605)
3148 Points ∼83% +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1662 Points ∼45%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
836 Points ∼23% -50%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼48% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼44% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +121%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1662 - 2074, n=6)
1903 Points ∼52% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=605)
2584 Points ∼70% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2186 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1078 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2246 Points ∼71% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼73% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1415 - 2258, n=7)
2084 Points ∼66% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=654)
2168 Points ∼69% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1445 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
405 Points ∼17% -72%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
980 Points ∼41% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼43% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1478, n=7)
1422 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=654)
1911 Points ∼81% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1563 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
470 Points ∼19% -70%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1134 Points ∼45% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼46% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1601, n=7)
1524 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=655)
1813 Points ∼72% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2176 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1084 Points ∼35% -50%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2282 Points ∼74% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 2286, n=6)
2079 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=696)
2041 Points ∼66% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2092 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
680 Points ∼19% -67%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1564 Points ∼43% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼30% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100% +74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2092, n=6)
1944 Points ∼53% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=695)
2551 Points ∼70% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2110 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
741 Points ∼21% -65%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼48% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼35% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2110, n=6)
1958 Points ∼56% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=698)
2177 Points ∼62% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19902 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14930 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
17865 Points ∼89% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (13103 - 20393, n=6)
18907 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=840)
15967 Points ∼80% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25024 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11549 Points ∼22% -54%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24321 Points ∼46% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼42% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100% +111%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25625, n=6)
23092 Points ∼44% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=838)
29192 Points ∼55% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23670 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12161 Points ∼31% -49%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
22445 Points ∼58% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼54% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 24052, n=6)
21849 Points ∼56% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=838)
22297 Points ∼58% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
35 fps ∼41%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼45% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps ∼100% +146%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (28 - 48, n=7)
39.1 fps ∼45% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼57% +39%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼53%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼54% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼63% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +90%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (25 - 44, n=7)
35.1 fps ∼59% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼55% +5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
18 fps ∼43%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼45% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼50% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +133%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 26, n=7)
20.4 fps ∼49% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼69% +61%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼51%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼46% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼54% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +95%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15 - 24, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼54% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼64% +25%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼52%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼42% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +94%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 16, n=7)
14.7 fps ∼47% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼75% +44%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼52%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼41% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼48% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.9 - 14, n=7)
13.3 fps ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼76% +47%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼47%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼35% -27%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4 fps ∼34% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼42% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼93% +96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)
6.01 fps ∼51% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=364)
11.8 fps ∼100% +111%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼42%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼17% -60%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps ∼33% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼34% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼85% +100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)
3.56 fps ∼43% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=362)
8.26 fps ∼100% +136%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼52%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.4 fps ∼36% -30%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.2 fps ∼35% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼42% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼96% +85%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)
9.26 fps ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=368)
17.7 fps ∼100% +92%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼50%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.8 fps ∼19% -62%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.8 fps ∼39% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼37% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (7.8 - 10, n=7)
9.66 fps ∼48% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=368)
20.2 fps ∼100% +102%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼56%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.9 fps ∼38% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼45% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (6.4 - 10, n=7)
9.43 fps ∼52% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼86% +54%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼56%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6 fps ∼38% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼48% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)
8.53 fps ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼85% +53%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
180019 Points ∼55%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
177251 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼48% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points ∼85% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (152185 - 187087, n=7)
175473 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼100% +81%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼85%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1231 Points ∼87% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼75% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1202, n=7)
620 Points ∼44% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼60% -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2138 Points ∼56%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1897 Points ∼50% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼29% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=7)
2149 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼69% +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1759 Points ∼41%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2451 Points ∼57% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼50% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points ∼100% +144%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1291 - 2122, n=7)
1706 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼46% +12%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4586 Points ∼67%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4787 Points ∼70% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼75% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2839 - 4978, n=7)
4361 Points ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼53% -22%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2133 Points ∼60%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points ∼63% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼54% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=7)
1418 Points ∼40% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼52% -14%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.527 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼88% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼67% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
30.642 Points ∼63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)
28.2 Points ∼58% -8%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
22.887 Points ∼47% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.457 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼63% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)
50.4 Points ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼56% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
49.497 Points ∼55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min ∼98% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)
29 runs/min ∼64% +9%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
28.2 runs/min ∼62% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼62% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)
26.6 runs/min ∼59%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points ∼97% +25%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
55 Points ∼77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)
53.4 Points ∼75% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼73% -5%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
50 Points ∼70% -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼61% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
9810 Points ∼57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)
9667 Points ∼56% -1%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
9345 Points ∼54% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼49% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -103%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)
4863 ms * ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
4664.3 ms * ∼49%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
4487.2 ms * ∼47% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼40% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794.2 ms * ∼29% +40%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M21Sony Xperia L4Oppo A72Samsung Galaxy A41Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-8%
-15%
1%
-4%
-33%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
31.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32)
-17%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
37.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32)
-13%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
124.2
22.5
-82%
152.9
23%
72.53
-42%
123.6
0%
68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43)
-45%
40.3 (0.14 - 319, n=934)
-68%
Random Read 4KB
126
61.2
-51%
135.91
8%
84
-33%
137
9%
133 (78.2 - 173, n=43)
6%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=934)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.7
165
-14%
234.61
22%
211.05
10%
214.8
11%
199 (133 - 388, n=43)
3%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=934)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
487.8
293.4
-40%
504.32
3%
299.89
-39%
496.6
2%
703 (476 - 895, n=43)
44%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=934)
-26%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.0.0: Ø36.3 (28-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø25 (10-40)
; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø56.1 (37-60)
Carga Máxima
 42.5 °C36.1 °C34.3 °C 
 41.5 °C36.2 °C34.4 °C 
 40.1 °C36.6 °C34.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
33.1 °C35.2 °C38.1 °C
33.8 °C35.2 °C39.2 °C
33.9 °C36.2 °C38.3 °C
Máximo: 39.2 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.941.42536.838.33133.135.14032.935.25035.337.36328.728.18019.121.810020.421.612520.519.316017.227.320014.237.325014.545.831514.550.840012.85450013.456.863013.661.780018.966.2100018.672.6125021.273.7160014.975.2200014.174.4250014.672.6315014.769.4400015.566.6500016.263.163001766.880001875.51000018.876.61250019.663.21600020.549.5SPL62.158.42983.8N14.110.61.154.2median 16.2median 63.2Delta2.512.234.829.419.626.323.92524.324.730.533.418.726.820.422.518.621.417.517.419.532.919.239.416.448.315.254.314.25714.760.413.862.514.66714.168.613.568.414.473.113.976.513.878.413.873.714.772.414.275.414.473.714.974.61563.415.152.315.350.126.585.50.859.7median 14.7median 63.40.813.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M21Samsung Galaxy A41
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.8 / 2.1 Watt
Carga midlight 6.2 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Oppo A72
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
29%
-8%
-11%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.7
42%
0.96
20%
1.5
-25%
1.173 (0.9 - 1.6, n=7)
2%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
26%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.97
-9%
1.57
13%
2.1
-17%
2.28 (1.7 - 4.24, n=7)
-27%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
2%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
1.98
6%
1.61
23%
2.5
-19%
2.86 (1.8 - 4.34, n=7)
-36%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
3%
Load Average *
6.2
3.83
38%
2.93
53%
5.2
16%
5.97 (5 - 6.99, n=7)
4%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
34%
Load Maximum *
7.9
6.2
22%
4.97
37%
7.5
5%
7.83 (6.3 - 9.4, n=7)
1%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
38h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
21h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 49min
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Sony Xperia L4
3580 mAh
Oppo A72
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Battery Runtime
-40%
-22%
-26%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2297
1843
-20%
2263
-1%
H.264
1352
998
-26%
1269
-6%
WiFi v1.3
1298
783
-40%
1018
-22%
650
-50%
1187
-9%
Load
289
268
-7%
279
-3%

Pro

+ Tela AMOLED brilhante
+ Ótima duração da bateria
+ Sistema de câmera flexível
+ Geolocalização precisa

Contra

- Desempenho pobre
- O SoC não é energeticamente eficiente
- Bloatware pré-instalado

Veredicto – Para quem procura algo sólido

Review of the Samsung Galaxy M21
Review of the Samsung Galaxy M21

O Samsung Galaxy M21 oferece um sistema de câmera medíocre e um nível de desempenho medíocre. Outros fabricantes estão perseguindo especificações e colocando ênfase no desempenho da câmera. A Samsung constrói apenas smartphones sólidos, que não têm fraquezas e oferecem alguns recursos especiais além.

O Galaxy M21 está no lugar exato, que smartphones muito mais expressivos com bateria muito boa e telas OLED brilhantes costumavam ocupar. 

O Samsung Galaxy M21 é um smartphone sólido como uma rocha, de gama média inferior, com uma tela excelente e bateria com boa duração.

O Samsung Galaxy M21 é um smartphone sólido como uma rocha, de gama média inferior, com uma tela excelente e bateria com boa duração. Não é tão eficiente em termos de energia ou poderoso quanto os SoCs da concorrência, mas ainda oferece um nível de desempenho bastante decente.

No dia-a-dia, o Galaxy M21 é bom, e traz para a mesa tudo que um smartphone dessa faixa de preço deveria oferecer.

Samsung Galaxy M21 - 09/24/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
46 / 70 → 66%
Peso
89%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
17 / 64 → 27%
Desempenho da aplicação
57 / 86 → 66%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
60%
Médio
73%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M21 - Simples, mas bom
Florian Schmitt, 2020-09-26 (Update: 2020-09-26)