Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)

Boas conexões. A atualização do ZenPad 10 da Asus está disponível em duas versões e ambas suportam LTE. Dado que é mais caro que o modelo do ano passado, o ZenPad 10 Z301ML deve primeiro provar que vale a pena o dinheiro extra no teste.
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Processador
Mediatek MT8735 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
10.10 polegadas 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 149 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: giroscópio, acelerômetro, sensor hall, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE (bands 1/​3/​5/​7/​8/​9/​18/​19/​20/​26/​28/​38/​41), UMTS (850/​900/​1800/​2100Mhz), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.95 x 251.77 x 172.17
Bateria
17.8 Wh, 4680 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo frontais, DTS HD Premium Sound, tecnologia Sonic Master, suporte para aptX, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, FAQ, ServiceCenter, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE-Speed UL:50 Mbps/DL:150 Mbps; , fanless
peso
490 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus ZenPad 10
Asus ZenPad 10
Asus ZenPad 10
Asus ZenPad 10
Asus ZenPad 10
Asus ZenPad 10
Asus ZenPad 10

Size Comparison

258 mm 153 mm 8 mm 505 g253 mm 185 mm 9.5 mm 665 g254.2 mm 155.3 mm 8.2 mm 525 g251.77 mm 172.17 mm 8.95 mm 490 g249 mm 172 mm 7.9 mm 503 g241 mm 172 mm 7.1 mm 460 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
258 MBit/s +204%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84.9 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
338 MBit/s +297%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
85.2 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Asus ZenPad 10 – total
GPS Asus ZenPad 10 – total
GPS Asus ZenPad 10 – crossing
GPS Asus ZenPad 10 – crossing
GPS Asus ZenPad 10 – woods
GPS Asus ZenPad 10 – woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: Target colors are displayed in the lower half of each patch.
ColorChecker: Target colors are displayed in the lower half of each patch.
Photographed reference card
Photographed reference card
Reference card details
Reference card details
410
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 410 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 382.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.95 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 392 cd/m²
Contraste: 1568:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
78.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.10
Medion Lifetab P10505
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.10
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Screen
8%
-20%
-65%
-0%
-28%
Brightness middle
392
435
11%
542
38%
320
-18%
363
-7%
370
-6%
Brightness
383
413
8%
520
36%
308
-20%
344
-10%
351
-8%
Brightness Distribution
81
93
15%
91
12%
84
4%
87
7%
89
10%
Black Level *
0.25
0.25
-0%
0.68
-172%
0.36
-44%
0.34
-36%
0.4
-60%
Contrast
1568
1740
11%
797
-49%
889
-43%
1068
-32%
925
-41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.2
4.4
-5%
4.2
-0%
7.5
-79%
3.25
23%
4.6
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.2
7.7
31%
6.7
40%
16.1
-44%
5.68
49%
9.5
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
3.2
-10%
4.8
-66%
10.8
-272%
2.78
4%
6.5
-124%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.35 94%
2.42 91%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.17 101%
CCT
7115 91%
7056 92%
7434 87%
9907 66%
6722 97%
6354 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Medion Lifetab P10505
65641 Points +93%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
46814 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
44191 Points +30%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
36602 Points +8%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
34009 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
22422 Points -34%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
5438 Points +38%
Medion Lifetab P10505
5233 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4796 Points +21%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
4246 Points +8%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3948 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
2720 Points -31%
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
3927 Points +32%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2980 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Medion Lifetab P10505
1084 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1015 Points +57%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
749 Points +16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
647 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
402 Points -38%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
362 Points -44%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2240 Points +88%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1902 Points +60%
Medion Lifetab P10505
1429 Points +20%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
1277 Points +7%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1192 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
793 Points -33%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1362 Points +81%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1214 Points +61%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
910 Points +21%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
752 Points
Medion Lifetab P10505
708 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
229 Points -70%
Graphics
Medion Lifetab P10505
1576 Points +440%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
764 Points +162%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
511 Points +75%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
339 Points +16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
292 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
274 Points -6%
Web
Medion Lifetab P10505
832 Points +24%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
762 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
682 Points +1%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
672 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
527 Points -22%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
10 Points -99%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
662 Points +13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
588 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2889 Points +70%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1697 Points
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2242 Points +103%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1103 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Medion Lifetab P10505
20003 Points +286%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
9906 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6905 Points +33%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
6165 Points +19%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
5188 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
4488 Points -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Medion Lifetab P10505
22025 Points +377%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
10102 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6151 Points +33%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
5490 Points +19%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4622 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
4092 Points -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Medion Lifetab P10505
15139 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12095 Points +33%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
10816 Points +19%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
9275 Points +2%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
9076 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
6786 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Medion Lifetab P10505
1593 Points +685%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
599 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
468 Points +131%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
245 Points +21%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
203 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Medion Lifetab P10505
1732 Points +937%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
518 Points +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
388 Points +132%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
203 Points +22%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
167 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1657 Points +105%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1313 Points +62%
Medion Lifetab P10505
1244 Points +54%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
916 Points +13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
810 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Medion Lifetab P10505
1192 Points +790%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
315 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
290 Points +116%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
152 Points +13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
134 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Medion Lifetab P10505
1175 Points +988%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
259 Points +140%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
235 Points +118%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
123 Points +14%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
108 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
0 Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1646 Points +91%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1318 Points +53%
Medion Lifetab P10505
1254 Points +46%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
918 Points +7%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
860 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
0 Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Medion Lifetab P10505
27 fps +93%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
16 fps +14%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
14 fps 0%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
14 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
11 fps -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
9.3 fps -34%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Medion Lifetab P10505
33 fps +284%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
17 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12 fps +40%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
10 fps +16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
8.6 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
5.4 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Medion Lifetab P10505
13 fps +110%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
7 fps +13%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6.9 fps +11%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
6.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.5 fps -27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
3.8 fps -39%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Medion Lifetab P10505
15 fps +384%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
7.5 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.9 fps +58%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
3.5 fps +13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3.1 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
1.8 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Medion Lifetab P10505
10 fps +133%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
5 fps +16%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
4.5 fps +5%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2.8 fps -35%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Medion Lifetab P10505
11 fps +450%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
4.8 fps +140%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
2.3 fps +15%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.7 fps -15%

Legend

 
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Medion Lifetab P10505 Intel Atom x5-Z8300, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Medion Lifetab P10505
6177 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
3855 Points +68%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
3320 Points +45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
3167 Points +38%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2290 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
2152 Points -6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
65 Points +20%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
61 Points +13%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
61 Points +13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
54 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
44 Points -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Medion Lifetab P10505
34.44 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
23.71 Points +54%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
21.2 Points +38%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
20.18 Points +31%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
15.41 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
14.19 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
15229 ms * -11%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
13705 ms *
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
12840 ms * +6%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
11161 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
9789 ms * +29%
Medion Lifetab P10505
5133 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)Huawei MediaPad M3 LiteSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585Medion Lifetab P10505Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50FAsus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
AndroBench 3-5
27%
17%
-26%
-47%
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
216
133.5
-38%
215.8
0%
142.9
-34%
127.8
-41%
163.5
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB
66
60.3
-9%
45.88
-30%
44
-33%
50.2
-24%
121.2
84%
Random Read 4KB
23
38.8
69%
23.46
2%
23
0%
10.9
-53%
25.79
12%
Random Write 4KB
9.8
8.5
-13%
10.01
2%
11.7
19%
3.12
-68%
7.36
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
40.9
78.7
92%
75.5
85%
18.9
-54%
37
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
34.9
56.8
63%
50.1
44%
15.4
-56%
24.7
-29%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high16 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 29.6 °C28 °C29.6 °C 
 31.2 °C28.8 °C30 °C 
 30.3 °C28.5 °C29.5 °C 
Máximo: 31.2 °C
Médio: 29.5 °C
27.2 °C27.3 °C30.8 °C
27.8 °C27.8 °C34.4 °C
27.5 °C27.2 °C32.5 °C
Máximo: 34.4 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat-map front
Heat-map front
Heat-map rear
Heat-map rear
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.830.528.82527.230.827.23127.129.227.14029.533.529.55028.629.228.66334.227.834.2802830.52810028.729.528.712534.223.734.216038.723.838.720047.622.747.625048.622.248.63154722.54740052.722.152.750061.621.361.663060.519.360.580058.519.758.51000621962125066.618.366.6160067.816.267.8200071.215.971.2250069.615.569.6315069.615.769.6400069.315.469.3500069.815.269.8630069.515.269.580007115.2711000062.515.162.5125005515.1551600042.21542.2SPL80.229.680.2N45.51.345.5median 61.6median 18.3median 61.6Delta11.33.611.328.629.428.62929.52932.429.132.443.936.743.933.726.733.728.926.228.924.824.624.829.124.429.141.927.441.954.720.454.76022.56056.92156.959.620.759.662.622.262.664.921.464.964.418.164.471.119.571.172.819.972.872.619.672.67516.37576.61676.676.715.476.776.615.176.673.515.273.572.414.972.470.715.170.769.615.169.666.315.166.361.81561.851.914.951.985.629.585.662.71.362.7median 66.3median 18.1median 66.37.62.97.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.14 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.76 / 3.23 / 3.35 Watt
Carga midlight 4.79 / 5.72 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10505
7000 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
10200 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
4680 mAh
Power Consumption
-41%
-36%
-81%
-88%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
1.45
-91%
1.18
-55%
2.01
-164%
2.54
-234%
1.22
-61%
Idle Average *
3.23
4.44
-37%
4.65
-44%
4.82
-49%
5.1
-58%
3.15
2%
Idle Maximum *
3.35
4.61
-38%
4.74
-41%
4.89
-46%
5.24
-56%
3.39
-1%
Load Average *
4.79
6.21
-30%
5.75
-20%
8.35
-74%
7.07
-48%
3.95
18%
Load Maximum *
5.72
6.33
-11%
6.97
-22%
9.91
-73%
8.24
-44%
5.64
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 01min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 02min
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10505
7000 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F
10200 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A
4680 mAh
Battery Runtime
28%
66%
-1%
59%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1321
1345
2%
2634
99%
1445
9%
2830
114%
1275
-3%
H.264
622
833
34%
893
44%
740
19%
603
-3%
WiFi v1.3
467
802
72%
826
77%
564
21%
776
66%
435
-7%
Load
302
312
3%
428
42%
203
-33%
415
37%
279
-8%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina e leve
+ Software extenso
+ Suporte para LTE
+ Bom GPS
+ Tela de alto contraste...
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Baixo consumo de energia

Contra

- Carcaça não muito rígida, rangidos
- Sem USB OTG
- Longos tempos de carga
- Desempenho fraco do sistema
- Duração da bateria relativamente curta
In review: Asus ZenPad 10. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenPad 10. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.

O Asus ZenPad 10 Z301ML oferece suporte LTE, um painel HD e uma carcaça elegante e relativamente leve por 240 euros (~$283). No entanto, isso envolve bastantes "poréms": O antigo Asus ZenPad 10 Z300M oferece uma melhor configuração em alguns aspectos e melhor desempenho, e custa muito menos. Muitos tablets do próximo nível de preços mais altos também entraram no nível de preços do ZenPad 10 e derrotaram o tablet em muitas áreas, como resolução, desempenho ou duração da bateria.

Então, por que a Asus fez um esforço para atualizar? Isto é difícil de responder. A versão Full HD Z301MFL recentemente lançada pode ser consideravelmente mais competitiva, especialmente porque oferece mais RAM e um SoC mais veloz.

As fortalezas do ZenPad 10 Z301ML são encontradas na tela de alto contraste, bom software com muitas configurações, câmeras decentes, e a conectividade LTE. No entanto, muitos tablets com preços similares o superam em muitos aspectos.

Comprar o dispositivo pode valer a pena se o preço baixar em breve, o dinheiro é um problema e um tablet com Internet móvel é necessário. Então o comprador receberá uma tela decente, câmeras com boa qualidade de imagem e, claro, LTE. No entanto, existem melhores alternativas para o preço atual do fabricante.

Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) - 08/15/2017 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
77%
Teclado
67 / 80 → 84%
Mouse
85%
Conectividade
35 / 65 → 54%
Peso
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
8 / 68 → 12%
Desempenho da aplicação
35 / 76 → 46%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
58 / 85 → 69%
Médio
68%
79%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-26 (Update: 2017-09- 2)