Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad T5 (10,1 polegadas, LTE)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

Full Metal Tablet. MFeito com material de alta qualidade, o MediaPad T5 de 10 polegadas da Huawei está equipado com uma tela FHD e um poderoso processador de quatro núcleos. Descubra o que você pode esperar de um tablet vendido por cerca de $230 em nossa análise.

Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (MediaPad Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
10.1 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, Sensores: Sensor de gravidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), WCDMA (900, 2100), LTE (1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 243.4 x 162
Bateria
5100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f/2.4
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 speakers, Teclado: on-screen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, cabo micro USB, Ferramenta SIM, EMUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR (body): 0.83 W/kg, fanless
peso
460 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g
Preço
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼86% +14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼79% +5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s ∼75%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
85.2 MBit/s ∼28% -63%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
239 MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
186 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84.9 MBit/s ∼35% -64%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
336
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 356 cd/m² Médio: 339.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.16 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 356 cd/m²
Contraste: 712:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Medion Lifetab P10606
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Screen
-159%
-99%
-34%
-10%
Brightness middle
356
326
-8%
340
-4%
426
20%
392
10%
Brightness
340
338
-1%
320
-6%
399
17%
383
13%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
84
-9%
91
-1%
81
-12%
Black Level *
0.5
0.56
-12%
0.19
62%
0.38
24%
0.25
50%
Contrast
712
582
-18%
1789
151%
1121
57%
1568
120%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
9.1
-296%
15
-552%
4.5
-96%
4.2
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.5
18.2
-180%
22.8
-251%
7.9
-22%
11.2
-72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
12
-757%
4
-186%
5.2
-271%
2.9
-107%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
2.09 105%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6565 99%
11359 57%
6940 94%
6875 95%
7115 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 67.57 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 67.57 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 67.57 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8933 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 27.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼31% +17%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% +6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
67359 Points ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8)
65730 Points ∼26% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼25% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44015 Points ∼17% -35%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
34009 Points ∼13% -50%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=18)
167271 Points ∼30% +92%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
87335 Points ∼15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6)
87019 Points ∼15% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -11%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44992 Points ∼8% -48%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4615 - 4911, n=8)
4805 Points ∼47% +4%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
4615 Points ∼45%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=27)
4253 Points ∼41% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -20%
Medion Lifetab P10606
3508 Points ∼34% -24%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2980 Points ∼29% -35%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼43% +1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5798 Points ∼43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5798 - 6252, n=8)
5212 Points ∼39% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼36% -16%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=69)
4489 Points ∼33% -23%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4449 Points ∼33% -23%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3948 Points ∼29% -32%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=8)
819 Points ∼40% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
818 Points ∼40%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=99)
743 Points ∼37% -9%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
672 Points ∼33% -18%
Medion Lifetab P10606
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=99)
2089 Points ∼7% +148%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (836 - 859, n=8)
848 Points ∼3% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
844 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -1%
Medion Lifetab P10606
729 Points ∼3% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼2% -17%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
292 Points ∼1% -65%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1960 Points ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=8)
1910 Points ∼30% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% -23%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=99)
1044 Points ∼17% -47%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼15% -51%
Medion Lifetab P10606
772 Points ∼12% -61%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
752 Points ∼12% -62%
System
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3133 Points ∼19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=8)
3056 Points ∼19% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -26%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=99)
2270 Points ∼14% -28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼12% -38%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1744 Points ∼11% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1192 Points ∼7% -62%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1435 Points ∼17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=8)
1418 Points ∼17% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -9%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=99)
1219 Points ∼14% -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼12% -29%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
647 Points ∼8% -55%
Medion Lifetab P10606
313 Points ∼4% -78%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=24)
7773 Points ∼18% +153%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3077 Points ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3148, n=8)
3045 Points ∼7% -1%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2091 Points ∼5% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -49%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1103 Points ∼3% -64%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=38)
4647 Points ∼13% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3316 - 3805, n=8)
3608 Points ∼10% +9%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3316 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -25%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2477 Points ∼7% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1697 Points ∼5% -49%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=38)
1606 Points ∼25% +81%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% +74%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=8)
919 Points ∼14% +4%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
885 Points ∼14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
658 Points ∼10% -26%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
588 Points ∼9% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1746 Points ∼41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=8)
1696 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=50)
1439 Points ∼34% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -22%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1221 Points ∼29% -30%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
860 Points ∼20% -51%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=50)
1163 Points ∼22% +731%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% +298%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% +195%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (140 - 338, n=8)
251 Points ∼5% +79%
Medion Lifetab P10606
240 Points ∼4% +71%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
140 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
108 Points ∼2% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=55)
1025 Points ∼22% +482%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% +242%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% +178%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (176 - 409, n=8)
308 Points ∼7% +75%
Medion Lifetab P10606
292 Points ∼6% +66%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
176 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
134 Points ∼3% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1586 - 1788, n=8)
1707 Points ∼40% +8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1586 Points ∼38%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=53)
1374 Points ∼33% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% -15%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1199 Points ∼28% -24%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -29%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
810 Points ∼19% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=53)
1589 Points ∼19% +1489%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% +784%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% +498%
Medion Lifetab P10606
496 Points ∼6% +396%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (99 - 532, n=8)
288 Points ∼3% +188%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
167 Points ∼2% +67%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
100 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=57)
1264 Points ∼20% +903%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼14% +637%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% +441%
Medion Lifetab P10606
570 Points ∼9% +352%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (125 - 627, n=8)
347 Points ∼5% +175%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
203 Points ∼3% +61%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
126 Points ∼2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=8)
13618 Points ∼17% +6%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 39393, n=138)
12922 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
12893 Points ∼16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
9076 Points ∼11% -30%
Medion Lifetab P10606
8995 Points ∼11% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=138)
17864 Points ∼3% +71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% +22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=8)
11066 Points ∼2% +6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10466 Points ∼2%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9602 Points ∼2% -8%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4622 Points ∼1% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 103813, n=139)
14750 Points ∼7% +35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=8)
11543 Points ∼5% +6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% +3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10923 Points ∼5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9460 Points ∼4% -13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
5188 Points ∼2% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=165)
29.7 fps ∼0% +56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.8 fps ∼0% -1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼0% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
16 fps ∼0% -16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
8.6 fps ∼0% -55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% +11%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=169)
20.4 fps ∼1% +7%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼1% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼1% -11%
Medion Lifetab P10606
15 fps ∼0% -21%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
14 fps ∼0% -26%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=103)
19.9 fps ∼0% +134%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼0% +16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼0% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.8, n=8)
8.31 fps ∼0% -2%
Medion Lifetab P10606
7.1 fps ∼0% -16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3.1 fps ∼0% -64%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=106)
14.2 fps ∼0% +67%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼0% +12%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼0% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=8)
8.28 fps ∼0% -3%
Medion Lifetab P10606
6.6 fps ∼0% -22%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
6.2 fps ∼0% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=53)
21 fps ∼0% +312%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼0% +18%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5.1 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8)
4.81 fps ∼0% -6%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.2 fps ∼0% -57%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2 fps ∼0% -61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 95, n=53)
12.9 fps ∼0% +158%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼0% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8)
5.04 fps ∼0% +1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -6%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4.3 fps ∼0% -14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4.3 fps ∼0% -14%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (7.2 - 107, n=33)
14.7 fps ∼0% +374%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3.1 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=8)
3.06 fps ∼0% -1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼0% -3%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.5 fps ∼0% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -35%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4 - 47, n=33)
8.12 fps ∼0% +180%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=8)
2.96 fps ∼0% +2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.9 fps ∼0%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.4 fps ∼0% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -31%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼100% +63%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼96% +57%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=155)
6345 Points ∼71% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
5471 Points ∼61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8)
4947 Points ∼56% -10%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
3059 Points ∼34% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
2290 Points ∼26% -58%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
113 Points ∼82%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=71)
109 Points ∼80% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8)
104 Points ∼76% -8%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼46% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
54 Points ∼39% -52%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=71)
55.4 Points ∼100% +88%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼85% +61%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼84% +57%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
29.467 Points ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8)
28.1 Points ∼51% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
18.873 Points ∼34% -36%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
15.407 Points ∼28% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
13705 ms * ∼100% -47%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
12793.8 ms * ∼93% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8)
9440 ms * ∼69% -2%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=166)
9352 ms * ∼68% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
9293.1 ms * ∼68%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼29% +57%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼27% +60%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad T5 10Medion Lifetab P10606Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-38%
-31%
-52%
-33%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-58%
34.9
-52%
47.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=112)
-35%
42.5 (14.6 - 73.8, n=41)
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
40.9
-51%
66.4 (8.2 - 96.5, n=112)
-21%
60.8 (34.4 - 87.7, n=41)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
76.12
12.02
-84%
8.77
-88%
9.37
-88%
9.8
-87%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=151)
-75%
5.52 (0.13 - 77.9, n=192)
-93%
Random Read 4KB
76.67
34.59
-55%
13.7
-82%
27.72
-64%
23
-70%
36.3 (3.59 - 117, n=151)
-53%
17.5 (1.32 - 142, n=192)
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB
83.84
74.24
-11%
92.38
10%
147.67
76%
66
-21%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=151)
13%
35 (2.04 - 208, n=192)
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
312.17
274.74
-12%
173.7
-44%
262.2
-16%
216
-31%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=151)
-26%
104 (6.75 - 741, n=192)
-67%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 29.1 °C30.2 °C32.8 °C 
 27.8 °C28.4 °C32.5 °C 
 27.5 °C28.8 °C32.5 °C 
Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 30 °C
29.1 °C30.5 °C29.2 °C
29.2 °C29 °C28 °C
28.4 °C28.7 °C27.5 °C
Máximo: 30.5 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  34.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203034.22536.134.43132274029.429.95031.533.36327.923.28022.121.11002224.712521.223.316021.534.220020.344.925018.451.431517.357.140016.765.35001766.163016.167.780015.866.5100015.872.5125015.371.3160015.874.2200014.975.325001577.3315014.776400014.778.350001577.4630015.174.480001576.41000015.476.2125001569.71600016.350.5SPL27.687.1N168.6median 15.8median 69.7Delta1.912.328.630.724.926.324.627.126.423.530.832.323.621.520.220.419.91917.622.719.13619.135.917.44016.945.316.850.615.155.316.560.915.662.91561.215.562.415.362.815.763.815.564.915.564.415.459.515.858.11656.315.853.616.15516.153.517.358.527.973.5130.3median 16median 56.30.69.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad T5 10Medion Lifetab P10606
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Medion Lifetab P10606 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.27 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.33 / 8.46 / 8.49 Watt
Carga midlight 11.14 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Power Consumption
33%
10%
38%
60%
Idle Minimum *
2.33
1.4
40%
3.21
-38%
1.55
33%
0.76
67%
Idle Average *
8.46
4.17
51%
5.97
29%
4.17
51%
3.23
62%
Idle Maximum *
8.49
4.2
51%
6.19
27%
4.25
50%
3.35
61%
Load Average *
11.14
7.5
33%
9.72
13%
7.13
36%
4.79
57%
Load Maximum *
12.3
13.71
-11%
9.97
19%
9.63
22%
5.72
53%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
55h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 01min
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Battery Runtime
26%
-44%
-13%
-10%
Reader / Idle
3329
1506
-55%
735
-78%
960
-71%
1321
-60%
H.264
580
660
14%
585
1%
622
7%
WiFi v1.3
525
796
52%
387
-26%
542
3%
467
-11%
Load
241
463
92%
175
-27%
274
14%
302
25%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Tamanho confortável
+ Suporte para redes GSM, 3G, e LTE
+ Os aplicativos pré-carregados podem ser facilmente desinstalados

Contra

- Sem carga rápida
- Câmeras medíocres
- Os aplicativos não podem ser movidos para o SD
- Alto consumo de energia
- Adaptador de força muito fraco
- Sem sensor de luz ambiente
In review: Huawei MediaPad T5. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei MediaPad T5. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Durante nossos testes, o MediaPad T5 apresentou-se como um tablet de alto desempenho, adequado para a maioria das necessidades do dia a dia, seja navegando na web ou jogando. Graças à sua tela de 10 polegadas, ele conseguiu se manter razoavelmente portátil.

O Huawei MediaPad T5 oferece muito desempenho a um preço baixo. No entanto, o fabricante reduziu a conectividade.

Seu preço de cerca de $230 significa que algumas modificações eram inevitáveis. Vamos pegar as câmeras, por exemplo: elas mal são boas o suficiente para fotos ocasionais. Ou o relativamente pequeno armazenamento interno de apenas 32 GB, que pode ser expandido via cartão microSD, mas apenas para armazenar arquivos de mídia, não aplicativos. Nossa maior reclamação, no entanto, foi o tempo de carregamento desnecessariamente longo, o que pode não incomodá-lo se você não se importar com a falta do Quick Charge. O tablet também não tinha recursos como um leitor de digitais ou ajuste automático de brilho.

Huawei MediaPad T5 10 - 09/23/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
81%
Teclado
71 / 80 → 89%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
37 / 65 → 56%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
17 / 68 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
55 / 76 → 72%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
69%
81%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad T5 (10,1 polegadas, LTE)
Mike Wobker, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)