Breve Análise do Workstation Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200)

Name: Fujitsu Celsius H980
Brand: Fujitsu

An XXL workstation. A Fujitsu atualizou seu workstation Celsius para os processadores Intel Coffee Lake. O Celsius H980 também inclui uma GPU NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Continue lendo para descobrir se o fabricante japonês corrigiu os problemas de resfriamento que afligem o Celsius H970 e como o seu sucessor funciona em nossos testes.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/12/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Workstation Business Coffee Lake Desktop Gaming Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu Celsius H980

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1543 MHz, Memoría: 7012 MHz, GP104, 397.93, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4-2400, dual channel, 2 de 4 slots SO-DIMM ocupados, máximo de 64 GB

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel QM370

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB

, 432 GB livre

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: 3-em-1 SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 418 x 288

Bateria

96 Wh, 6700 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: 6 filas com iluminação de fundo e teclado numérico, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Disco de rcuperação, disco de controladores, Fujitsu Battery Utility, Microsoft Office Trial, CyberLink YouCam 6, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

3.493 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.342 kg

Preço

3899 Euro

Links

Fujitsu página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Dell Precision 7720 HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Fujitsu Celsius H980 Fujitsu Celsius H970 Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE DIN A4 ❌

Right-hand side: SD card slot, 2 x Thunderbolt 3 ports, USB 3.0 Type-A, DisplayPort, Charging port

Left-hand side: Kensington lock slot, VGA, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A, 3.5 mm combined headphone and microphone jack, smart card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	177 MB/s +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	171 MB/s +16%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	148 MB/s
Fujitsu Celsius H970 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	140 MB/s -5%
Average of class Workstation (54.8 - 200, n=16, last 2 years)	95.8 MB/s -35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	203.3 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	202.7 MB/s +15%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	176.9 MB/s
Fujitsu Celsius H970 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	175.5 MB/s -1%
Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 226, n=16, last 2 years)	125.6 MB/s -29%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	679 MBit/s +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	652 (330^min - 712^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	642 (629^min - 650^max) MBit/s -2%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	518 MBit/s -21%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	504 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 (345^min - 697^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	681 (341^min - 686^max) MBit/s -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	676 MBit/s -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 MBit/s -5%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	587 MBit/s -15%

Fujitsu Celsius H980; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø681 (345-697)

Fujitsu Celsius H980; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø641 (330-712)


396 cd/m²	403 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
393 cd/m²	400 cd/m²	406 cd/m²
374 cd/m²	400 cd/m²	378 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 406 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 394.1 cd/m² Minimum: 21.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 784:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Fujitsu Celsius H970 LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Dell Precision 7720 SHP1446 (LQ173D1), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.30	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE LP173WF4_SPF7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA AUO B173HW01 V0, , 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		-1%	36%	0%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	67.3	66.8 -1%	87.6 30%	67.4 0%	66.3 -1%
sRGB Coverage	85	84.6 0%	100 18%	85 0%	89.9 6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62.2	61.8 -1%	99.2 59%	62.2 0%
Response Times		1%	-86%	-16%	-17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(19.2, 18.8)	32 ?(14.8, 17.2) 16%	60 ?(26.8, 33.2) -58%	40.8 ?(22, 18.8) -7%	42.4 ?(21.2, 21.2) -12%
Response Time Black / White *	23.2 ?(10, 13.2)	26.4 ?(14.8, 11.6) -14%	46.4 ?(28.4, 18) -100%	28.8 ?(15.6, 13.2) -24%	28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8) -22%
PWM Frequency	120500 ?(99)		1020 ?(20) -99%
Screen		2%	24%	12%	14%
Brightness middle	400	368 -8%	464 16%	338 -15%	335 -16%
Brightness	394	360 -9%	441 12%	317 -20%	326 -17%
Brightness Distribution	92	91 -1%	89 -3%	86 -7%	92 0%
Black Level *	0.51	0.3 41%	0.45 12%	0.28 45%	0.22 57%
Contrast	784	1227 57%	1031 32%	1207 54%	1523 94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.3	6.4 -21%	3.2 40%	4.3 19%	4.7 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.3	10.1 -9%	6.1 34%	10.2 -10%	8.7 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.8			3.7 3%	2.7 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.5	7.2 -31%	4.2 24%	2.2 60%	6.5 -18%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.02 ^109%	2.01 ^109%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6686 ^97%	6882 ^94%	6736 ^96%	6621 ^98%	6108 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.8	55.5 -1%	88.1 58%	55.8 0%	58.7 5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84.9	84.4 -1%	100 18%	84.7 0%	89.7 6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / 1%	-9% / 6%	-1% / 6%	0% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Colour Saturation – uncalibrated

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.2 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120500 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1025.75-1058.79)

Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6: Ø652 (625-675)

Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6: Ø848 (836.51-852.66)

Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; Undervolting: Ø1267 (1252.58-1272.26)

Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; Default: Ø1147 (1115.23-1244.83)

HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H: Ø1062 (1050.28-1181.65)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=27, last 2 years)	255 Points +46%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	214 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	184 Points +5%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	181 Points +3%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	179 Points +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	171 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (706 - 3625, n=27, last 2 years)	2369 Points +117%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	1623 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1267 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1262 Points +16%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	1200 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1090 Points
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	848 Points -22%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	675 Points -38%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	2.97 Points +49%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	2.43 Points +22%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40)	1.967 Points -1%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1.92 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	21.6 Points +71%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	17.37 Points +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	13.93 Points +10%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.62 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)	12.2 Points -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	7.48 Points -41%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (8472 - 8665, n=5)	8542 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	8472 Points
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	8325 Points -2%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	46384 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (33944 - 46384, n=5)	42290 Points -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	28617 Points -38%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	315.6 Points +28%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	294.7 Points +20%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	279.5 Points +14%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	259.9 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	254.1 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (205 - 299, n=49)	247 Points 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	245.9 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Workstation (68050 - 100022, n=10, last 2 years)	85350 Points +151%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	44371 Points +30%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	41579 Points +22%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	35247 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	34141 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (27460 - 44549, n=47)	34108 Points 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	34043 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1117 ms * -0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1114 ms *
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (695 - 1272, n=50)	1108 ms * +1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	1070 ms * +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	871 ms * +22%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	862 ms * +23%
Average of class Workstation (451 - 612, n=28, last 2 years)	525 ms * +53%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (396 - 486, n=6)	456 Seconds * -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	444.4 Seconds *
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	276.1 Seconds * +38%
Average of class Workstation (137 - 684, n=27, last 2 years)	251 Seconds * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8472 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6739

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

35116

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6561

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6803 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

46384 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

120 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.99 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

118.9 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

11.35 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

1.78 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.62 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

175 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

165 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1090 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Workstation (5488 - 8587, n=26, last 2 years)	6880 Points +32%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	6255 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	5335 Points +2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	5287 Points +2%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5248 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5206 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200 ()	5206 Points 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5041 Points -3%
Essentials
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=26, last 2 years)	10541 Points +31%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	9847 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	9121 Points +14%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	8140 Points +1%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8077 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8032 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200 ()	8032 Points 0%
Productivity
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=26, last 2 years)	9145 Points +27%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	8307 Points +15%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	7734 Points +7%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	7544 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	7459 Points +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7203 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200 ()	7203 Points 0%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation (5399 - 13947, n=26, last 2 years)	9286 Points +40%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	8122 Points +23%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6622 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200 ()	6622 Points 0%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6437 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	6058 Points -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5523 Points -17%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	5130 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	4550 Points +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4376 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200 ()	4376 Points 0%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	4332 Points -1%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	3772 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	5503 Points +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5277 Points +3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	5276 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5132 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200 ()	5132 Points 0%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4460 Points -13%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4376 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5132 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5206 pontos
Ajuda

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7720 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		33%	15%	8%	13%
Write 4K	111.8	176.1 58%	169.2 51%	101 -10%	126.7 ?(90.4 - 176.3, n=64) 13%
Read 4K	32.02	44.53 39%	46.03 44%	45.37 42%	44 ?(28 - 61.3, n=63) 37%
Write Seq	1539	1637 6%	1234 -20%	1409 -8%	1617 ?(112 - 2730, n=62) 5%
Read Seq	1252	1714 37%	1854 48%	2129 70%	1716 ?(501 - 2665, n=62) 37%
Write 4K Q32T1	355.4	534 50%	364.8 3%	320.3 -10%	413 ?(198.2 - 1707, n=64) 16%
Read 4K Q32T1	408.7	635 55%	552 35%	348.3 -15%	420 ?(230 - 1015, n=64) 3%
Write Seq Q32T1	1913	1632 -15%	1088 -43%	1529 -20%	2076 ?(1714 - 2994, n=64) 9%
Read Seq Q32T1	2530	3310 31%	2582 2%	2957 17%	3130 ?(1772 - 3565, n=64) 24%
Write 4K Q8T8	1772				1264 ?(369 - 1814, n=13) -29%
Read 4K Q8T8	1022				1193 ?(527 - 1620, n=13) 17%
AS SSD		3%		2%	5%
Seq Read	1082	2726 152%		2935 171%	1976 ?(1030 - 2806, n=62) 83%
Seq Write	1781	1609 -10%		1451 -19%	1637 ?(487 - 2564, n=62) -8%
4K Read	46.09	38.88 -16%		46.64 1%	50.5 ?(31.7 - 61, n=62) 10%
4K Write	100.4	78.1 -22%		105.8 5%	112 ?(1.76 - 145.8, n=62) 12%
4K-64 Read	1209	1246 3%		704 -42%	1203 ?(530 - 1823, n=62) 0%
4K-64 Write	1622	971 -40%		540 -67%	1504 ?(96.2 - 2716, n=62) -7%
Access Time Read *	0.053	0.05 6%		0.044 17%	0.05092 ?(0.029 - 0.103, n=62) 4%
Access Time Write *	0.037	0.048 -30%		0.037 -0%	0.08337 ?(0.025 - 2.52, n=62) -125%
Score Read	1363	1557 14%		1044 -23%	1451 ?(752 - 2125, n=62) 6%
Score Write	1901	1210 -36%		791 -58%	1780 ?(147 - 2992, n=62) -6%
Score Total	4003	3509 -12%		2305 -42%	3966 ?(2348 - 5316, n=62) -1%
Copy ISO MB/s	1396	1722 23%		1545 11%	1755 ?(917 - 3259, n=43) 26%
Copy Program MB/s	354.3	297.5 -16%		520 47%	454 ?(206 - 828, n=43) 28%
Copy Game MB/s	691	839 21%		909 32%	1057 ?(547 - 1639, n=43) 53%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		18% / 14%	15% / 15%	5% / 5%	9% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ

Sequential Read: 1257 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1665 MB/s

512K Read: 811 MB/s

512K Write: 1578 MB/s

4K Read: 52.6 MB/s

4K Write: 97.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 342.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 305.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Workstation (7432 - 54334, n=27, last 2 years)	23492 Points +40%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	19569 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	17021 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	16805 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (14673 - 17021, n=4)	16233 Points -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	15433 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	86679 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	84059 Points +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	82300 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (57501 - 84059, n=4)	76643 Points -7%
Average of class Workstation (32743 - 133204, n=14, last 2 years)	63450 Points -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	53834 Points -35%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Workstation (4816 - 35868, n=27, last 2 years)	16582 Points +32%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	14666 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	12555 Points 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	12554 Points
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	12259 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (11316 - 12558, n=4)	12246 Points -2%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Workstation (1882 - 16218, n=27, last 2 years)	6506 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	4378 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	4356 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (3732 - 4378, n=3)	4155 Points -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	3960 Points -9%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	2898 Points -33%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Average of class Workstation (88.8 - 225, n=10, last 2 years)	162.2 fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	148.4 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	144.9 fps
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	142.3 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (102 - 148.4, n=5)	130.4 fps -10%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	117.4 fps -19%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	117.1 fps -19%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Average of class Workstation (27.2 - 309, n=10, last 2 years)	170 fps +26%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	157.4 fps +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	134.5 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	130.1 fps -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	126.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (108.4 - 134.5, n=5)	124.1 fps -8%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	83.1 fps -38%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Average of class Workstation (30.5 - 172.5, n=10, last 2 years)	115.5 fps +96%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	68.8 fps +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	67.2 fps +14%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	59.9 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (58.5 - 59.9, n=5)	59.1 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	59 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	58.5 fps -1%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Average of class Workstation (29.5 - 136.7, n=9, last 2 years)	84.5 fps +74%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	62.7 fps +29%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	48.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	47.28 fps -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	47.1 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (43.7 - 48.7, n=5)	46.2 fps -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	39.4 fps -19%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Average of class Workstation (62.9 - 232, n=10, last 2 years)	144.2 fps +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	92.7 fps +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	90.3 fps
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	88.8 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (64.9 - 92.7, n=5)	79.8 fps -12%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	77.9 fps -14%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	69.4 fps -23%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Average of class Workstation (8.45 - 31.5, n=8, last 2 years)	20.4 fps +90%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	14.22 fps +33%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	10.72 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	10.61 fps -1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	10.51 fps -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	10.29 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (9.04 - 10.7, n=5)	10.2 fps -5%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Average of class Workstation (86.9 - 204, n=9, last 2 years)	153.8 fps +40%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	117.2 fps +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	112.6 fps +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	109.5 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (97.2 - 112.6, n=5)	106.4 fps -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	97.2 fps -11%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	97.1 fps -11%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Average of class Workstation (73.8 - 268, n=10, last 2 years)	183.1 fps +46%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	139.9 fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	126.8 fps +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	125.4 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (105.1 - 126.8, n=5)	117.3 fps -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	115.2 fps -8%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	107.5 fps -14%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (110 - 110.3, n=2)	110.2 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	110 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	93.6 fps -15%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	77.9 fps -29%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Workstation (91.8 - 227, n=26, last 2 years)	152.1 fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	133.5 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	131.5 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (108.5 - 133.5, n=4)	121 fps -8%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	108.5 fps -17%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	243.5 fps
Average of class Workstation (48.9 - 551, n=26, last 2 years)	242 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	238.9 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (204 - 244, n=4)	229 fps -6%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	228.4 fps -6%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Average of class Workstation (24.8 - 190.3, n=26, last 2 years)	82.2 fps +40%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	59.2 fps +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	58.8 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (58.4 - 59.2, n=4)	58.8 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	58.4 fps -1%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation (34.5 - 176.2, n=26, last 2 years)	91.1 fps +195%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (27.5 - 37.9, n=4)	31.6 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	30.91 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	29.9 fps -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	27.49 fps -11%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Workstation (77.5 - 449, n=26, last 2 years)	220 fps +30%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	168.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	163.9 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (148.2 - 168.6, n=4)	157.8 fps -6%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	150.3 fps -11%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Workstation (7.71 - 109.7, n=26, last 2 years)	41.3 fps +386%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (8.39 - 25.2, n=4)	12.6 fps +48%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	8.5 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	8.41 fps -1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	8.39 fps -1%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Workstation (76.8 - 398, n=25, last 2 years)	205 fps +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	165.3 fps +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	158.8 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (146.4 - 165.3, n=4)	156.3 fps -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	146.4 fps -8%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Workstation (99.5 - 409, n=26, last 2 years)	231 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	200.5 fps +5%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	190.8 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (168.9 - 201, n=4)	185.3 fps -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	168.9 fps -11%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Workstation (61.6 - 284, n=25, last 2 years)	155.6 fps +45%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	107.5 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	105.9 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (92.5 - 108, n=4)	103.5 fps -4%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	92.5 fps -14%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	2337 Samples/s +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	2181 Samples/s
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (1842 - 2206, n=5)	2052 Samples/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1863 Samples/s -15%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1847 Samples/s -15%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1842 Samples/s -16%
Average of class Workstation (510 - 2981, n=3, last 2 years)	1599 Samples/s -27%
Sala GPUs-only
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	4383 Samples/s
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	4357 Samples/s -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (3612 - 4383, n=5)	4038 Samples/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	3635 Samples/s -17%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	3612 Samples/s -18%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	3564 Samples/s -19%
Average of class Workstation (981 - 6323, n=3, last 2 years)	3524 Samples/s -20%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	88.2 fps +21%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	73 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (70.3 - 73, n=3)	71.6 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	71.4 fps -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	70.3 fps -4%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	35.1 fps -52%
Extreme Preset DX11
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	100.3 fps +30%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	77.2 fps
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	75.7 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	75.6 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (71.4 - 77.2, n=4)	75 fps -3%
Average of class Workstation (25.2 - 38.3, n=2, last 2 years)	31.8 fps -59%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	73.9 fps +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	63 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (57.1 - 63, n=3)	60 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	59.9 fps
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	57.1 fps -5%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	34.1 fps -43%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	55.4 fps +10%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	50.2 fps
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	49.7 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (49.3 - 50.2, n=3)	49.7 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	49.3 fps -2%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	26.8 fps -47%

SiSoft Sandra 2016
Image Processing
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	821 MPix/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	819 MPix/s 0%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (691 - 830, n=4)	790 MPix/s -4%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	786 MPix/s -4%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	691 MPix/s -16%
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	33.08 GB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	30.16 GB/s +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	30 GB/s
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (28.1 - 30.2, n=4)	29.3 GB/s -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	28.1 GB/s -6%
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	100.5 KOPT/s +16%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	86.4 KOPT/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	86.1 KOPT/s 0%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (84.5 - 86.6, n=4)	85.9 KOPT/s -1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	84.5 KOPT/s -2%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Average of class Workstation (1946 - 6150, n=4, last 2 years)	3830 Points +9%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	3518 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (3204 - 3518, n=3)	3311 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	3210 Points -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	2934 Points -17%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Average of class Workstation (1043 - 3132, n=4, last 2 years)	2129 Points +6%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	2016 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (1837 - 2016, n=3)	1919 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1837 Points -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1767 Points -12%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Average of class Workstation (1257 - 3056, n=4, last 2 years)	2239 Points +13%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	1983 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (1821 - 1983, n=3)	1899 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1821 Points -8%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1786 Points -10%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1065 Points +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	910 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (892 - 910, n=3)	899 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	895 Points -2%
Average of class Workstation (408 - 1242, n=4, last 2 years)	726 Points -20%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1058 Points +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	908 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (891 - 908, n=3)	898 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	891 Points -2%
Average of class Workstation (408 - 1304, n=4, last 2 years)	745 Points -18%
1024x600 Normal, Score
Average of class Workstation (5190 - 14884, n=4, last 2 years)	9670 Points +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	9335 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (8654 - 9335, n=3)	8927 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	8654 Points -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	8609 Points -8%

3DMark 11 Performance		15178 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		90781 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34178 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		11114 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		5856 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		4593 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	284.9	246.5	231.5	112.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	129.6	121.2	114.7	107.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	182	144	86	73
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	100	86	72
Far Cry 5 (2018)	120	79	74	70

Barulho

Ocioso		29.6 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB
Carga		34.9 / 49.1 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A)

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Noise		-6%	4%	10%	5%
off / environment *	29.6	30.2 -2%	29.5 -0%	28.6 3%	28.7 3%
Idle Minimum *	29.6	30.2 -2%	29.5 -0%	28.6 3%	28.7 3%
Idle Average *	32.5	32.8 -1%	29.5 9%	28.6 12%	28.7 12%
Idle Maximum *	32.5	32.8 -1%	29.5 9%	28.6 12%	30.9 5%
Load Average *	34.9	47.3 -36%	35 -0%	31.9 9%	37.3 -7%
Load Maximum *	49.1	47.3 4%	47.8 3%	37.7 23%	41.4 16%
Witcher 3 ultra *			41	35.7	41.1

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.7 °C	41.8 °C	37.4 °C
33.8 °C	37.3 °C	35.8 °C
23.1 °C	23.6 °C	23.8 °C

Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 33 °C


40 °C	46.2 °C	41.9 °C
26.1 °C	35.9 °C	36.1 °C
26.4 °C	22.4 °C	21.8 °C

Máximo: 46.2 °C
Médio: 33 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.8 °C / 74.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+4 °C / 7.2 F).

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Heat		-1%	-1%	9%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.8	41.4 1%	42.3 -1%	42.8 -2%	42.9 -3%
Maximum Bottom *	46.2	48.7 -5%	44.9 3%	39.5 15%	46.3 -0%
Idle Upper Side *	25.6	26.2 -2%	26.1 -2%	23.1 10%	24.8 3%
Idle Bottom *	26.6	26.4 1%	27.9 -5%	23.5 12%	24.9 6%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Fujitsu Celsius H980 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.65 / 0.9 Watt
Ocioso	14.8 / 20.4 / 21.5 Watt
Carga	98.4 / 213.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Dell Precision 7720 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P5000, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.30	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE i7-8850H, Quadro P3200, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA i7-8850H, Quadro P3200, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200	Average of class Workstation
Power Consumption		22%	7%	35%	23%	13%	25%
Idle Minimum *	14.8	10.7 28%	9.6 35%	4.6 69%	9.3 37%	10.9 ?(4.6 - 15.7, n=5) 26%	7.82 ?(2.6 - 19.5, n=25, last 2 years) 47%
Idle Average *	20.4	15.8 23%	20.5 -0%	12.2 40%	14.4 29%	17.1 ?(12.2 - 20.4, n=5) 16%	12.7 ?(4 - 35.9, n=25, last 2 years) 38%
Idle Maximum *	21.5	17.8 17%	22.9 -7%	15.4 28%	15.8 27%	19.6 ?(15.4 - 25.7, n=5) 9%	18.7 ?(5.6 - 47, n=25, last 2 years) 13%
Load Average *	98.4	92 7%	96.8 2%	79.6 19%	89.2 9%	95.1 ?(79.6 - 118.9, n=5) 3%	96.5 ?(47.7 - 182, n=25, last 2 years) 2%
Load Maximum *	213.5	137 36%	202.1 5%	176 18%	189 11%	191.3 ?(174 - 214, n=5) 10%	158.9 ?(60.2 - 311, n=25, last 2 years) 26%
Witcher 3 ultra *				86	123

* ... smaller is better

A look at the Celsius H980’s battery compartment

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		13h 31min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)		8h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 55min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 22min

Battery life while playing a looped H.264 video

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, 96 Wh	Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, 96 Wh	Dell Precision 7720 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P5000, 91 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE i7-8850H, Quadro P3200, 99 Wh	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA i7-8850H, Quadro P3200, Wh	Average of class Workstation
Battery Runtime		21%	-10%	61%	56%	24%
Reader / Idle	811	1002 24%	685 -16%	1697 109%	1313 62%	700 ?(319 - 1072, n=5, last 2 years) -14%
H.264	355	573 61%	405 14%	739 108%	553 56%	717 ?(347 - 1104, n=9, last 2 years) 102%
WiFi v1.3	496	542 9%	379 -24%	670 35%		536 ?(252 - 897, n=25, last 2 years) 8%
Load	82	74 -10%	70 -15%	76 -7%	124 51%	81.3 ?(55 - 118, n=15, last 2 years) -1%

Pro

+ Tela brilhante

+ Acabamento mate da tela

+ Leitor de cartões SD veloz

+ Bom desempenho do Wi-Fi

+ Fácil de reparara e manter

+ Resfriamento efetivo da GPU

+ Duas portas Thunderbolt 3

+ Duração da bateria aceitável

+ Bateria substituível

Contra

- Controle da ventoinha irritante

- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores

- Altos desvios do espaço de cores

- Sem opções de telas 4K

- Alto-falantes inferiores

The Fujitsu Celsius H980 workstation review. Test device courtesy of Fujitsu Germany.

O mercado de workstations é pequeno, com apenas alguns OEMs atualmente produzindo dispositivos que atendem às necessidades de um workstation. A Fujitsu é um fabricante que sabe o que faz um workstation bom, graças aos seus anos de experiência. O Celsius pode explorar o potencial do seu processador hexa-core, particularmente em aplicações multi-threaded, sem limitação térmica, o que é excelente. No entanto, o Core i7-8750H em nossa unidade de teste é a CPU menos potente que a Fujitsu oferece para o Celsius H980, por isso gostaríamos de saber se ele pode obter o melhor do Intel Xeon E-2186M sem superaquecer.

O Celsius H970 teve um resfriamento de GPU efetivo e, felizmente, ele permaneceu inalterado com o H980. Em suma, a NVIDIA Quadro P3200 teve um bom desempenho em nossos testes e é uma boa combinação com o Core i7-8750H.

O Fujitsu Celsius H980 tem melhor desempenho de sistema e resfriamento de CPU do que seu antecessor, mas sua tela de 1080p não pode competir com a resolução ou precisão de cores de concorrentes como o Dell Precision 7720.

O Celsius H980 é um dispositivo volumoso e faminto por energia, mas como são muitos outros workstations. O dispositivo conseguiu entregar um excelente desempenho do sistema e lidou com nossos benchmarks de workstations com facilidade. Além disso, enquanto a tela de 17,3 polegadas é brilhante e tem um acabamento mate, que será útil ao usar o Celsius H980 em exteriores, falta a precisão das cores de seus concorrentes. Nossa unidade de análise obteve coberturas de espaço de cor muito baixas e desvios DeltaE muito altos para o nosso gosto. Pior ainda, a Fujitsu oferece o Celsius H980 apenas com uma tela 1080p, o que coloca o dispositivo em desvantagem com os concorrentes que possuem painéis 4K opcionais, como o Dell Precision 7720.

Essas desvantagens farão do Celsius H980 uma venda difícil, apesar de seu bom desempenho de CPU e GPU, particularmente porque enfrenta uma forte concorrência do Dell Precision 7720, do HP ZBook 17 G5 e do Lenovo ThinkPad P72.

Também é importante ter em mente que o Celsius H980 também tem uma duração de bateria pior do que seu predecessor, mas suspeitamos que isso importará pouco para a maioria das pessoas que usam workstations, já que as máquinas tendem a ser usadas em uma mesa em vez de em movimento. No geral, o Fujitsu Celsius H980 é um excelente workstation que só é restrito pela sua tela com cor imprecisa.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - 2020-01-08 01/08/2020 v7
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

81 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

85%

Conectividade

73 / 80 → 92%

Peso

53 / 10-66 → 77%

Bateria

73 / 95 → 77%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

90%

Desempenho da aplicação

90%

Temperatura

92 / 95 → 96%

Ruído

74 / 90 → 82%

Audio

50%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Médio

76%

85%

Workstation - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9903 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Workstation Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200)

Sebastian Bade, 2019-02-12 (Update: 2019-02-12)