Breve Análise do Workstation Fujitsu Celsius H970 (E3-1535M v6, P4000)

Name: Fujitsu Celsius H970
Brand: Fujitsu

CPU potente, resfriamento fraco. O Celsius H970 poderia ser o último workstation de 17,3 polegadas da Fujitsu. Este deve ser motivo suficiente para que o fabricante faça o seu maior esforço. Mas infelizmente, ele falha em dois lugares. Você pode ler em nossa análise de teste, onde acontece isso.

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/21/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Workstation Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Business

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu Celsius H970

Processador

Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 4 x 3.1 - 4.2 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1252 MHz, Memoría: 1499 MHz, GP104, 376.33, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-2400, 2 de 4 slots ocupados

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel CM238

Disco rígido

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB

, 424 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: 3-em-1 SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, EM7305, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 418 x 288

Bateria

96 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: 6 filas de teclas com iluminação de fundo e teclado numérico, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Disco de restauração, disco de controladores, Fujitsu Battery Utility, Microsoft Office Trial, CyberLink YouCam 6, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

3 kg, Suprimento de energia: 999 g

Preço

5299 Euro

Links

Fujitsu página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Größenvergleich

SCHENKER W706 Dell Precision 7710 Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Fujitsu Celsius H970 MSI WE72 7RJ DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD-card slot, 2x Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-A, DisplayPort, power

Left: Kensington Lock, VGA, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, 3,5-mm audio combo, smart-card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 7710	213 MB/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE	156 MB/s +11%
Fujitsu Celsius H970	140 MB/s
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	114 MB/s -19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE	216 MB/s +23%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	210 MB/s +20%
Fujitsu Celsius H970	175.5 MB/s
Dell Precision 7710	142 MB/s -19%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	504 MBit/s
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	287 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	676 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	667 MBit/s -1%
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	351 MBit/s -48%


360 cd/m²	364 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
354 cd/m²	368 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
344 cd/m²	379 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LP173WF4-SPF3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 379 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 360.1 cd/m² Minimum: 37.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 373 cd/m²
Contraste: 1227:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 LP173WF4-SPF3, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE LEN4123, VVX17P051J00, , 3840x2160, 17.30	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA SDC3854, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Dell Precision 7710 SDC8151, VHN17_173HL, , 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI WE72 7RJ LP173WF4-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER W706 LP173WF4-SPD1, LGD046C, , 1920x1080, 17.30
Display			9%	9%	1%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	66.8		67.3 1%	66.6 0%	67.4 1%	66.2 -1%
sRGB Coverage	84.6		95.9 13%	96.9 15%	85.3 1%	84.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.8		69 12%	68.6 11%	62.4 1%	61.5 0%
Response Times		-6%	-33%	-46%	-21%	-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32 ?(14.8, 17.2)	39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8) -23%	50.4 ?(17.2, 33.2) -58%	50 ?(17, 33) -56%	45.2 ?(27.2, 18) -41%	44 ?(17.2, 26.8) -38%
Response Time Black / White *	26.4 ?(14.8, 11.6)	23.2 ?(11.6, 11.6) 12%	28.4 ?(7.2, 21.2) -8%	36 ?(11, 25) -36%	26.4 ?(14.8, 11.6) -0%	29.2 ?(8.4, 20.8) -11%
PWM Frequency		1412 ?(90)	200 ?(40)	198 ?(25)
Screen		23%	18%	7%	-6%	-5%
Brightness middle	368	358 -3%	252 -32%	332 -10%	302 -18%	356 -3%
Brightness	360	338 -6%	243 -32%	307 -15%	306 -15%	331 -8%
Brightness Distribution	91	83 -9%	86 -5%	83 -9%	93 2%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.3	0.31 -3%	0.21 30%	0.33 -10%	0.31 -3%	0.48 -60%
Contrast	1227	1155 -6%	1200 -2%	1006 -18%	974 -21%	742 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.4	2.1 67%	2.2 66%	3 53%	6.2 3%	4.64 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.1	3.6 64%	3.8 62%		10.6 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.2	2 72%	2.7 62%	4 44%	7.3 -1%	3.65 49%
Gamma	2.02 ^109%	2.16 ^102%	2.28 ^96%	2 ^110%	2.08 ^106%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	6882 ^94%	6216 ^105%	6686 ^97%	7089 ^92%	7020 ^93%	6393 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.5	77 39%	62 12%	62 12%	56 1%	55 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84.4	99.97 18%	96 14%	97 15%	85.2 1%	84 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 19%	-2% / 9%	-10% / -0%	-9% / -6%	-10% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	171 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Core i7-7820HQ	166 Points -3%
Dell Precision 7710 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	162 Points -5%
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points -6%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	156 Points -9%
SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700	117 Points -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Core i7-7820HQ	762 Points +13%
Dell Precision 7710 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	746 Points +11%
SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700	743 Points +10%
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	743 Points +10%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	742 Points +10%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	675 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6831

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20729

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6426

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6832 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

28617 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8325 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

105.6 fps

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

107.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

675 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

171 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Precision 7710 FirePro W7170M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5417 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5277 Points
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Quadro M3000M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5271 Points 0%
SCHENKER W706 Quadro M5000M, 6700, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5151 Points -2%
MSI WE72 7RJ Quadro M2200, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	5150 Points -2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	7135 Points
SCHENKER W706 Quadro M5000M, 6700, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	6772 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Quadro P3000, i7-7820HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	6402 Points -10%
Dell Precision 7710 FirePro W7170M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5668 Points -21%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Quadro M3000M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4564 Points -36%

PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7135 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5277 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5041 pontos
Ajuda

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI WE72 7RJ Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Dell Precision 7710 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	SCHENKER W706 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		-15%	18%	14%	-7%	-2%
Seq Read	2726	1596 -41%	2586 -5%	2447 -10%	1886 -31%	1915 -30%
Seq Write	1609	703 -56%	1441 -10%	1596 -1%	626 -61%	1511 -6%
4K Read	38.88	51.1 31%	53 36%	53.3 37%	51 31%	49.71 28%
4K Write	78.1	148.2 90%	148.1 90%	144.1 85%	179 129%	146.2 87%
4K-64 Read	1246	1037 -17%	1517 22%	1362 9%	1064 -15%	1115 -11%
4K-64 Write	971	230.4 -76%	826 -15%	740 -24%	275 -72%	375 -61%
Score Total	3509	2302 -34%	3831 9%	3517 0%	2435 -31%	2712 -23%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1821 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1622 MB/s

512K Read: 395.5 MB/s

512K Write: 1258 MB/s

4K Read: 42.86 MB/s

4K Write: 87.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 590 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 522 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	15433 Points
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	12015 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	11162 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	10259 Points -34%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	9708 Points -37%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	8313 Points -46%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7319 Points -53%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	65687 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	61574 Points +14%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	53834 Points
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	50666 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	49204 Points -9%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	43124 Points -20%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	37841 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	12259 Points
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	9368 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	9022 Points -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	7723 Points -37%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	6935 Points -43%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	6658 Points -46%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5869 Points -52%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	117.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	107.3 fps -8%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	105 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	97.1 fps -17%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	85.3 fps -27%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	84.8 fps -28%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	73 fps -38%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	127.8 fps +54%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	88 fps +6%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	83.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	73.3 fps -12%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	65.8 fps -21%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	63 fps -24%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	58.1 fps -30%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	67.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	54 fps -20%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	44 fps -35%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	43.81 fps -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	40.33 fps -40%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	37 fps -45%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	32.77 fps -51%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	39.4 fps
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	33 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	29.32 fps -26%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	27 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	26.06 fps -34%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	22.34 fps -43%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	20.34 fps -48%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	77.9 fps
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	73 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	64.6 fps -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	64 fps -18%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	50.4 fps -35%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	46.94 fps -40%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	46 fps -41%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	10.29 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	7.6 fps -26%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	7.4 fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	6.04 fps -41%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	4.85 fps -53%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4.28 fps -58%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	3.17 fps -69%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	97.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	85.6 fps -12%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	82 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	78.4 fps -19%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	68.5 fps -29%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	64.8 fps -33%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	50 fps -49%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	115.2 fps
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	99 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	92.3 fps -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	88.1 fps -24%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	77.9 fps -32%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	73.2 fps -36%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	58 fps -50%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	93.6 fps

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1847 Samples/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	1824 Samples/s -1%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	1324 Samples/s -28%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	1288 Samples/s -30%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1204 Samples/s -35%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	782 Samples/s -58%
Sala GPUs-only
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	3564 Samples/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	3386 Samples/s -5%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	2288 Samples/s -36%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	2167 Samples/s -39%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2086 Samples/s -41%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	1412 Samples/s -60%

ComputeMark v2.1 - 1024x600 Normal, Score
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	8609 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	6501 Points -24%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	6291 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	5686 Points -34%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4332 Points -50%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	925 Points -89%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	209.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	165.8 fps -21%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	110.7 fps -47%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	60 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	60 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	41.8 fps -30%

3DMark Vantage - 1280x1024 P Result
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	36260 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	33390 Points -8%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	26345 Points -27%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	24622 Points -32%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		29155 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		36260 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		12346 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		68394 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		18726 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		10158 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		5526 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3825 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	84.6 fps +29%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	65.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	59.1 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Quadro P3000, i7-7820HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	50.3 fps -23%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	39.7 fps -39%
MSI WE72 7RJ Quadro M2200, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	34.4 fps -47%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Quadro M3000M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	33.4 fps -49%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	196.9	174.4	162.4	96
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	67.6	61.1	59.7	44.94
Total War: Rome II (2013)	236.7	184.1	151.4	63.3
GRID: Autosport (2014)	153.8	106.3	96.9	84.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	159.7	113.6	77.2	41.09
Star Wars Battlefront (2015)	122.5	116.4	89.2	85.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	115.9	103.2	76.8	65.5
Doom (2016)	119.5	112.4	91	87.1
Civilization VI (2016)	66.7	55.2	45.13	43.7
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	70.3	61.6	58.8	54

Barulho

Ocioso		30.2 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB
Carga		47.3 / 47.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38 °C	39.9 °C	41.4 °C
32.7 °C	36.1 °C	35 °C
25.4 °C	26.6 °C	26.2 °C

Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C


42.4 °C	48.7 °C	40.8 °C
43.3 °C	39.9 °C	32.9 °C
28.5 °C	26.7 °C	29.7 °C

Máximo: 48.7 °C
Médio: 37 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).

Fujitsu Celsius H970 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.66 / 1.1 Watt
Ocioso	10.7 / 15.8 / 17.8 Watt
Carga	92 / 137 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER W706 6700, Quadro M5000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE i7-7820HQ, Quadro P3000, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Power Consumption		6%	-29%	-17%	-74%	0%
Idle Minimum *	10.7	6.7 37%	6.04 44%	15 -40%	25.9 -142%	7.44 30%
Idle Average *	15.8	12.5 21%	15.2 4%	20.1 -27%	31 -96%	18 -14%
Idle Maximum *	17.8	13.2 26%	42.3 -138%	23.8 -34%	31.9 -79%	21.8 -22%
Load Average *	92	128.2 -39%	112.8 -23%	85.6 7%	104.7 -14%	77.1 16%
Load Maximum *	137	158.9 -16%	182.2 -33%	128 7%	193 -41%	150.5 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		16h 42min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 14min

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, 96 Wh	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh	Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, 72 Wh	MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, 51 Wh	SCHENKER W706 6700, Quadro M5000M, 82 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE i7-7820HQ, Quadro P3000, 96 Wh
Battery Runtime		-13%	-23%	-63%	-48%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1002	956 -5%	775 -23%	268 -73%	205 -80%	872 -13%
H.264	573	299 -48%	283 -51%	181 -68%	151 -74%	517 -10%
WiFi v1.3	542	290 -46%	365 -33%	177 -67%	177 -67%	358 -34%
Load	74	110 49%	85 15%	42 -43%	96 30%	66 -11%

Pro

+ Alto brilho da tela

+ Muito boa duração da bateria

+ Manutenção simples

+ Resfriamento efetivo da GPU

Contra

- A CPU se afoga no uso diário

- Ventoinha da CPU barulhenta

- Teclado muito flexível

- Nenhuma tela 4K com alta cobertura do espaço de cores disponível

In Review: Fujitsu Celsius H970, provided by Fujitsu

Não é fácil agradar no mercado dos workstations. Existem apenas alguns fabricantes com experiência e reputação suficientes para entrar neste jogo de classe "alta" de portáteis. A Fujitsu quer ser um desses fabricantes - pelo menos por enquanto. No entanto, o Fujitsu Celsius H970 não consegue nos convencer. A Fujitsu entrega um workstation móvel que é surpreendentemente bom em algumas áreas, mas muito fraco em outras. As boas áreas certamente incluem a duração da bateria, que é mais que decente para um workstation. Mostra-se aqui que, com as novas gerações de CPU mais eficientes, os processadores quad-core não precisam necessariamente ser um motivo para uma duração de bateria ruim. O brilho da tela também é atraente e, como a duração da bateria, o Celsius é o melhor da classe aqui. O desempenho da GPU é de primeira classe, o que se deve ao efetivo sistema de resfriamento da GPU. E, finalmente, precisamos mencionar a excelente capacidade de manutenção como uma das vantagens do Celsius. Ele é apenas um pouco prejudicado pelo fato de que você precisa de cabos especiais para inserir unidades de 2,5 polegadas.

A duração da bateria e o brilho da tela são os valores mais importantes para um portátil que você provavelmente só o moverá de um espaço de trabalho estacionário para outro, devido ao seu tamanho e peso? Provavelmente não! Infelizmente, a Fujitsu falha em lugares mais importantes, como no sistema de resfriamento da CPU. Onde o sistema de resfriamento da GPU é bem-sucedido, o sistema de resfriamento da CPU falha. É simplesmente muito pequeno. Isso torna o dispositivo muito barulhento, dado que a ventoinha tem que funcionar muito para resfriar a CPU. E, no entanto, apesar disso, o afogamento térmico não pode ser evitado. Isso já ocorre no teste Cinebench, que nem sequer fornece muita carga, de modo que, no cotidiano, o Celsius está longe de poder usar todo o potencial da CPU incorporada. Neste sentido, o caro Xeon E3-1535M V6, que é realmente a CPU móvel Kaby-Lake mais veloz, se trona o chip mais lento, em nossa comparação. Como se isso não fosse ruim o suficiente, a Fujitsu cometeu um grande erro com o teclado saltitante. E, embora a tela seja brilhante, as cores não são particularmente fortes e nem cobrem o espaço de cores sRGB. A Fujitsu não oferece uma tela com maior resolução e cobertura de espaço de cores.

Não passa: Enquanto o Fujitsu Celsius H970 tem suas qualidades, em particular o sistema de resfriamento de CPU deficiente está fora de lugar em um workstation móvel.

Devido a estes problemas, o Celsius tem dificuldades em enfrentar a concorrência estabelecida, como o ThinkPad P71, ZBook 17 G3, ou Precision 7710. O fator que ainda é suficiente para uma obter uma boa avaliação é p é o alto desempenho da nova placa de vídeo profissional.

Fujitsu Celsius H970 - 2017-07-07 07/07/2017 v6^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento

84 / 98 → 86%

Teclado

76%

Mouse

85%

Conectividade

74 / 81 → 91%

Peso

57 / 10-66 → 83%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

93%

Desempenho da aplicação

91%

Temperatura

91 / 95 → 95%

Ruído

67 / 90 → 74%

Audio

50%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Médio

78%

86%

Workstation - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Workstation Fujitsu Celsius H970 (E3-1535M v6, P4000)

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-07-21 (Update: 2017-07-27)