Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 850 G4 (Core i5, Full HD)

Benjamin Herzig (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/04/2017

Uma tradição de ângulos pobres. A HP enviou seus EliteBooks atualizados para a luta pela afecção dos usuários empresarial e os corações e mentes de gerentes de compras de grandes empresas. Nossa extensa análise revelará se eles conseguem ganhar com o EliteBook 850 G4 ou se a HP mais uma vez fez recortes e se esqueceram dessa parte em particular como já fizeram com o seu predecessor.

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET (EliteBook 850 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2133, 1 de 2 slots em uso, 32 GB máx.
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO35ED, TN LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB 
, 2280 PCIe NVMe SSD
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm (entrada/sáida combinadas), Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD 3-em-1, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20.8 x 383.6 x 257.7
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo speakers, Teclado: 6 row chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Discover HP Tpuchpoint Manager, HP Client Security Manager, HP Device Access Manager, HP Documentation, HP Sure Connect, HP Velocity, HP Workwise, Microsoft Office 365 Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.883 kg, Suprimento de energia: 324 g
Preço
1437 Euro

 

Lid side view
Peek at the interior
Maximum opening angle
Front view (open)
Front view (closed)
Modifier keys: Wi-Fi and speaker mute
Touchpad made of glass
TrackPoint with two buttons
Bottom cover

Size comparison

Right side: USB Type-C Gen1, DisplayPort, SD-card slot, 3.5-mm audio jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, Ethernet, DockingPort, SIM-card slot, power adapter
Right side: USB Type-C Gen1, DisplayPort, SD-card slot, 3.5-mm audio jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, Ethernet, DockingPort, SIM-card slot, power adapter
Left side: Kensington lock, VGA, USB 3.0 Type-A, SmartCard Reader
Left side: Kensington lock, VGA, USB 3.0 Type-A, SmartCard Reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
155 MB/s ∼100% +112%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
74 MB/s ∼48% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
73.6 MB/s ∼47% +1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
73.2 MB/s ∼47%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
68.1 MB/s ∼44% -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
89.5 MB/s ∼100% +5%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
85.39 MB/s ∼95%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
82.6 MB/s ∼92% -3%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
660 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s ∼97% +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
588 MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
561 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
523 MBit/s ∼93%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
522 MBit/s ∼93% 0%
342
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 364 cd/m² Médio: 341.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336 cd/m²
Contraste: 417:1 (Preto: 0.81 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 13.3 | - Ø
83.4% sRGB (Argyll) 53.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.11
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
LG Philips LGD04D5 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
LG Philips 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6
HP EliteBook 850 G3
AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
4316%
-25%
-23%
-39%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 (26.8, 20.4)
41.6 (22, 19.6)
12%
36 (17.2, 18.8)
24%
38 (14, 24)
19%
47 (22, 25)
-0%
46.4 (22.4, 24)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
15.2 (10, 5.2)
20.8 (6.8, 14)
-37%
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
-74%
25 (6, 19)
-64%
27 (10, 17)
-78%
27.2 (9.2, 18)
-79%
PWM Frequency
199.2 (50)
26040 (40)
12972%
200 (50)
0%
Screen
37%
45%
20%
-4%
8%
Brightness
341
245
-28%
294
-14%
319
-6%
236
-31%
287
-16%
Brightness Distribution
90
89
-1%
84
-7%
71
-21%
90
0%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.81
0.24
70%
0.27
67%
0.61
25%
0.56
31%
0.54
33%
Contrast
417
1092
162%
1159
178%
505
21%
407
-2%
537
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.9
4.5
59%
4.5
59%
4.51
59%
10.02
8%
9.7
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.3
3.5
74%
4
70%
2.91
78%
10.66
20%
10.83
19%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.32 103%
2.24 107%
2.4 100%
2.48 97%
2.91 82%
CCT
16030 41%
6524 100%
6387 102%
6740 96%
11800 55%
12761 51%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
53.8
42.04
-22%
55.3
3%
56
4%
39
-28%
51.15
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83.4
65.4
-22%
84.74
2%
86
3%
61
-27%
78.96
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
2177% / 1204%
10% / 31%
-2% / 12%
-22% / -11%
-9% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 199.2 Hz50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 199.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 199.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HWInfo
HWInfo
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼67% +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼66% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼66% +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼65%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points ∼64% -2%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel Core i5-6200U
78 Points ∼40% -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼15% 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
322 Points ∼15% -2%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel Core i5-6300U
310 Points ∼14% -6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel Core i5-6200U
219 Points ∼10% -34%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
38.24 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
330 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4606 Points ∼71% +6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4467 Points ∼69% +3%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4330 Points ∼66%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
4301 Points ∼66% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3542 Points ∼59%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3523 Points ∼59% -1%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3475 Points ∼58% -2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3320 Points ∼56% -6%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
3282 Points ∼55% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3542 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4330 pontos
Ajuda
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
75%
-13%
-32%
-44%
Write 4k QD32
297.5
426.4
43%
256.7
-14%
211.4
-29%
100.2
-66%
Read 4k QD32
495
509.7
3%
402.8
-19%
226.2
-54%
383.3
-23%
Write 4k
138.4
130.6
-6%
88.37
-36%
64.67
-53%
96.59
-30%
Read 4k
41.79
56.59
35%
36.43
-13%
25.66
-39%
34
-19%
Write 512
298.8
860.3
188%
321.7
8%
320.5
7%
119.7
-60%
Read 512
672.7
933.4
39%
414.3
-38%
418
-38%
393.6
-41%
Write Seq
298.6
1166
290%
488.4
64%
333.1
12%
155
-48%
Read Seq
1245
1318
6%
509.3
-59%
479.1
-62%
474.7
-62%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Sequential Read: 1245 MB/s
Sequential Write: 298.6 MB/s
512K Read: 672.7 MB/s
512K Write: 298.8 MB/s
4K Read: 41.79 MB/s
4K Write: 138.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 495 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 297.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1431 Points ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1417 Points ∼99%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1347 Points ∼94% -5%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1327 Points ∼93% -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1309 Points ∼91% -8%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
1296 Points ∼91% -9%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
822 Points ∼100% +4%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
792 Points ∼96%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
786 Points ∼96% -1%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
762 Points ∼93% -4%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7030 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6963 Points ∼99% +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6840 Points ∼97%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
6586 Points ∼94% -4%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
6303 Points ∼90% -8%
3DMark 11 Performance
1534 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5666 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
748 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.424.220.5fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 21.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 17.7fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga
31 / 33.4 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.533.234.32536.931.434.13137.832.933.24036.331.330.95031.328.328.8632927.626.78028.127.72710026.523.425.112526.825.327.116024.42323.620023.523.92425024.826.224.531522.622.423.240021.62122.65002019.721.16302018.722.18002019.623.9100020.319.824.512502016.923160019.714.922.5200019.614.321.5250019.714.120.3315017.513.819.7400017.314.119.2500015.514.118630015.214.115.780001514.114.91000015.214.415.11250014.614.214.81600014.614.114.4SPL312933.1N1.51.21.8median 20HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ETmedian 16.9median 22.1Delta2.73.92.932.430.432.332.131.233.430.83231.929.631.232.728.531.630.626.32727.725.426.527.323.924.826.722.723.12421.523.423.720.922.523.52322.923.123.920.125.320.719.121.719.61821.3211721.819.717.620.221.917.822.82215.523.12214.522.319.414.42120.813.821.42014.120.218.91519.617.514.818.415.914.716.915.214.61614.914.615.714.514.614.914.414.315.132.228.1331.61.11.8median 20.7Fujitsu LifeBook U757median 15.5median 21.422.42.1hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Top (Idle)
Top (Idle)
Bottom (Idle)
Bottom (Idle)
Top (Load)
Top (Load)
Bottom (Load)
Bottom (Load)
Carga Máxima
 31.2 °C35.7 °C35.2 °C 
 28.7 °C34 °C37 °C 
 23.7 °C24.3 °C24.8 °C 
Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C
41.1 °C40.1 °C31.3 °C
37.5 °C37.1 °C30.9 °C
27.8 °C28.1 °C25.1 °C
Máximo: 41.1 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  34.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203432.22535.9353132.636.34034.535.95027.931.76326.931802732.610025.832.512525.537.116023.941.320024.448.625025.852.531521.860.440020.16250019.364.163018.864.180019.560.910002061.8125017.861.2160015.458200014.959.2250014.563.6315014.161.6400015.662.7500014.764630017.166.6800016.964.11000015.755.61250016.352.51600018.649.4SPL29.574.6N1.336.1median 18.6HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ETmedian 60.9Delta3.35.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 20%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.56 / 0.65 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.58 / 5.97 / 6.81 Watt
Carga midlight 29.4 / 39.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
7200U, HD Graphics 620, TN LED, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS, 1920x1080
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS LED, 1920x1080
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
6200U, HD Graphics 520, IPS, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
6300U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1366x768
HP EliteBook 850 G3
6500U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-14%
-9%
-51%
-10%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
3.58
3.6
-1%
3.96
-11%
6.6
-84%
4.5
-26%
5
-40%
Idle Average *
5.97
7.7
-29%
7.74
-30%
10.4
-74%
7.6
-27%
7.8
-31%
Idle Maximum *
6.81
8.2
-20%
8.64
-27%
12.7
-86%
8.7
-28%
8.4
-23%
Load Average *
29.4
30.8
-5%
28.8
2%
36
-22%
28.5
3%
28.8
2%
Load Maximum *
39.7
46.1
-16%
32
19%
35
12%
29.2
26%
43
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 01min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge)
8h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 37min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 40min
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh
HP EliteBook 850 G3
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh
Battery Runtime
3%
-17%
-16%
4%
-20%
Reader / Idle
1081
1167
8%
840
-22%
1231
14%
915
-15%
H.264
637
587
-8%
571
-10%
430
-32%
WiFi v1.3
530
454
-14%
440
-17%
512
-3%
632
19%
417
-21%
Load
160
201
26%
123
-23%
151
-6%
142
-11%

Resumir o EliteBook 850 G4 é bastante frustrante. Embora a HP marque todas as caixas de verificação corretas com este aparelho, ainda consegue nos decepcionar no final. A carcaça é sólida e muito bem construída, os dispositivos de entrada são bons (embora não perfeitos), o resfriamento funciona brilhantemente, e a duração da bateria é muito boa, considerando a capacidade da bateria. Em resumo, não há muito o que criticar mais que a ausência do Thunderbolt 3, a manutenção complicada, ou seu alto preço.

Infelizmente, tudo isto é manchado pela tradição da HP de equipar seus portáteis premium com telas TN  de má qualidade. Depois de tudo, o modelo que testamos custa mais de 1.400 Euros (~$1491), e inclusive o modelo top que deixará um buraco de 1.700-Euros (~$1811) em seu bolso vem com exatamente a mesma tela. Sim, ela é brilhante, mas fora isso, mostra todas as "qualidades" que você esperaria de um painel TN. A opção UHD IPS listada na folha de especificações, ainda não está disponível na Alemanha.

A HP marca todas as caixas de verificação corretas... exceto uma: o painel TN do EliteBook 850 G4 estraga a muito boa impressão que ele deixou.

É por isso, apesar de todas suas capacidades e qualidades que não podemos recomendar o EliteBook 850 G4. Cinco anos atrás teria sido uma história completamente diferente: antes, quase todos os portáteis empresariais vinham equipados com telas similarmente ruins. No entanto, a HP aprece ser a única que não recebeu o memorando, e os paineis TN estão extintos em portáteis da mesma faixa de preços. Seu principal concorrente oferece paineis IPS Full HD exclusivamente em seus aparelhos empresariais premium, hoje em dia. Inclusive o painel IPS desagradável do ThinkPad T570 derrota facilmente o painel TN do EliteBook, sem mencionar os paineis IPS de alta qualidade, como o do Fujitsu Lifebook U757.

Pro

+ Carcaça resistente e de alta qualidade
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Muito frio e silencioso
+ Energeticamente eficiente e com longas durações da bateria
+ Três anos de garantia
+ Bom desempenho

Contra

- Painel TN inaceitável com PWM-flickering
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Manutenção difícil
- Comparativamente caro
In review: HP EliteBook 850 G4. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HP EliteBook 850 G4. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Summing up the EliteBook 850 G4 is rather frustrating. While HP does tick all the right boxes with this device, it still manages to disappoint in the end. The case is very well built and sturdy, the input devices are decent (although not perfect), cooling works brilliantly, and battery life is very good considering the battery capacity. All-in-all, there's not much to criticize other than maybe the lack of Thunderbolt 3, the rather intricate maintenance, or its high price.

Unfortunately, all this is overshadowed by HP's tradition of equipping its premium and upscale business laptops with shoddy TN displays. After all, the model we've tested clocks in at slightly over 1,400 Euros (~$1491), and even the top model that will leave a 1,700-Euro (~$1811) dent in your pocket comes with the exact same display. Yes, it's bright, but other than that it shows all the "qualities" you come to expect from a TN panel. The UHD IPS option listed in the laptop's spec sheet is not yet available in Germany.

HP ticks all the right boxes...except for one: the EliteBook 850 G4's TN panel ruins the otherwise very good impression it makes.

This is why, despite all of its capabilities and qualities, we cannot recommend the EliteBook 850 G4. Five years ago it would've been a completely different story: back then almost all business laptops came equipped with similarly poor displays. However, HP seems to be the only one that hasn't gotten the memo, and TN panels are all but extinct in similarly priced laptops. Its main competitors offer Full HD IPS panels exclusively in their premium business devices these days. Even the ThinkPad T570's rather dodgy IPS panel beats the EliteBook's shoddy TN panel hands down, not to mention high-quality IPS panels such as the one in Fujitsu's Lifebook U757.

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET - 03/25/2017 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
57 / 80 → 71%
Peso
64 / 67 → 94%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
77%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 81%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
98%
Audio
64%
Camera
27 / 85 → 32%
Médio
75%
86%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 850 G4 (Core i5, Full HD)
Benjamin Herzig, 2017-04- 4 (Update: 2017-04-11)