Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T470s (7300U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 271.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1132:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US LEN40A9 (R140NWF5 R1), IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 B140QAN01.5, IPS, 14.00, 2560x1440 | Dell Latitude 7480 LG Philips LGD0557, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 65% | 58% | 3% | 48% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.35 | 69 71% | 65.4 62% | 41.6 3% | 61.4 52% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.3 | 95.1 58% | 92.3 53% | 61.9 3% | 85.9 42% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.72 | 69.6 67% | 65.8 58% | 43.06 3% | 62.4 50% |
| Response Times | -7% | -4% | -10% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 46.4 ? -14% | 40.8 ? -0% | 41.6 ? -2% | 41.6 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 28.8 ? -0% | 31.2 ? -8% | 34 ? -18% | 31.6 ? -10% |
| PWM Frequency | 219.3 ? | ||||
| Screen | 7% | 29% | -3% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 271.6 | 327 20% | 344 27% | 306 13% | 311 15% |
| Brightness | 264 | 311 18% | 321 22% | 287 9% | 288 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 85 -3% | 88 0% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.25 -4% | 0.32 -33% | 0.3 -25% | 0.24 -0% |
| Contrast | 1132 | 1308 16% | 1075 -5% | 1020 -10% | 1296 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 6.1 -0% | 2.6 57% | 6.2 -2% | 5.5 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 28.6 | 12.2 57% | 7.8 73% | 13.6 52% | 9 69% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 8.8 -159% | 2.6 24% | 5.8 -71% | 6.2 -82% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.18 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.04 108% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 6077 107% | 6172 105% | 7050 92% | 6277 104% | 5950 109% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 61.56 62% | 65.82 73% | 39.62 4% | 55.96 47% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 94.88 58% | 92.27 54% | 61.44 2% | 85.77 43% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
17% | 28% /
30% | -3% /
-3% | 18% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 219.3 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 219.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 219.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3987 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4910 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4999 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7480 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | -56% | -10% | 10% | |
| Read Seq | 1399 | 1760 26% | 486.5 -65% | 1155 -17% | 1827 31% |
| Write Seq | 1213 | 1666 37% | 418.6 -65% | 1076 -11% | 1383 14% |
| Read 512 | 831 | 832 0% | 354.3 -57% | 811 -2% | 814 -2% |
| Write 512 | 856 | 1064 24% | 306.8 -64% | 862 1% | 1098 28% |
| Read 4k | 60.7 | 53.2 -12% | 29.25 -52% | 55.5 -9% | 61 0% |
| Write 4k | 159.2 | 167.4 5% | 90.5 -43% | 134.6 -15% | 172.2 8% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 580 | 630 9% | 280.2 -52% | 496.2 -14% | 601 4% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 499.4 | 533 7% | 252.8 -49% | 425.4 -15% | 495.6 -1% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 9671 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1741 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 67756 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6945 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 971 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.6 | 31.7 | 26 | 8.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 27.8 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.8 / 42 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 6% | 3% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 27.8 | 28.9 -4% | 28 -1% | 29.3 -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 28.9 -4% | 28.6 -3% | 28 -1% | 29.3 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 27.8 | 28.9 -4% | 28.6 -3% | 28 -1% | 29.3 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.8 | 30.1 -8% | 28.6 -3% | 29.4 -6% | 32.2 -16% |
| Load Average * | 34.8 | 39.2 -13% | 30.2 13% | 31.4 10% | 34.3 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 42 | 39.2 7% | 31.2 26% | 34.6 18% | 39.3 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-6.1 °C / -10.9 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7480 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.8 / 6.6 / 7 Watt |
| Carga |
39.2 / 44.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | 16% | 19% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.64 3% | 4.32 10% | 3.21 33% | 3.84 20% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 8.93 -35% | 6.27 5% | 6.15 7% | 6.3 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 9.12 -30% | 6.35 9% | 6.82 3% | 8.6 -23% |
| Load Average * | 39.2 | 42.2 -8% | 29.82 24% | 28.5 27% | 41.9 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.8 | 47.3 -6% | 30.64 32% | 34.5 23% | 48.7 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -29% | 34% | -23% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1062 | 787 -26% | 1662 56% | 1252 18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 487 | 417 -14% | 719 48% | 438 -10% | 496 2% |
| Load | 172 | 93 -46% | 171 -1% | 110 -36% | 110 -36% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict
Com uma construção bem leve que é portável e durável (graças à construção híbrida de gama alta de fibra de carbono e magnésio), excelente duração da bateria, e excelentes dispositivos de entrada pelos quais a marca ThinkPad é conhecida há muito tempo, o Lenovo ThinkPad T470s FHD já deve ter a atenção de profissionais empresariais à procura de seu próximo companheiro do dia a dia. Mas adicione a isso o excelente desempenho dos aplicativos (possível ´graças a um muito veloz SSD NVMe SSD da Samsumg), sólido desempenho da CPU do chip Core i5, e fácil manutenção, e este é um dispositivo difícil de recusar.
Pontos negativos? Sim, há alguns. Para começar, a tela não é tão impressionante quanto as de muitos concorrentes, e dá um passo para trás do modelo WQHD não apenas em termos de resolução, mas também no brilho, contraste, e reprodução de cores. Detectamos PWM em todos os níveis de brilho, exceto no máximo, o qual é uma decepção para um ThinkPad. E finalmente, o aparelho esquenta rapidamente, atingindo rápido temperaturas perturbantes na carcaça (sob carga), especialmente durante o uso sobre as pernas.
Fora o desafortunado flicker PWM, qualidade baixa da tela, e um pouco de calor desagradável durante cargas de trabalho mais pesadas, o Lenovo ThinkPad T470s FHD é uma excelente escolha.
Se o usuário não se importar com uma duração da bateria ligeiramente inferior (mas ainda muito boa) e um preço mais alto, recomendamos que dê uma olhada no modelo T470s WQHD que analisamos recentemente, dado que sua tela não apenas oferece melhores brilho e cores, mas também não utiliza PWM para controlar as reduções do brilho. No entanto, a CPU Core i5 que analisamos na configuração atual parece ser um investimento mais racional, considerando o excelente desempenho e a relativa estabilidade, contra o i7 da configuração WQHD que avaliamos. O Dell Latitude 7480 também é uma ótima opção — ou, se o orçamento permite, o ThinkPad X1 Carbon. Mas, além dos problemas da tela, desde que o usuário não se importe com um pouco de calor durante as o uso mais pesado, o T470s FHD é um concorrente imediato para um dos melhores portáteis de negócios de 14 polegadas no mercado, hoje em dia.
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
-
05/13/2017 v6(old)
Steve Schardein
Pricecompare
