Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 7480 (7600U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Networking | |
| WiFi Speed Client 1m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| WiFi Speed Server 1m 4M x10 (-R) Netgear AX12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344 cd/m²
Contraste: 1075:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92.27% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.82% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Dell Latitude 7480 LG Philips LGD0557, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 AUO B140QAN Dell PN F0WXVV, IPS, 14.00, 2560x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, TN, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 B140QAN01.5, IPS, 14.00, 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -6% | -13% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.4 | 67.2 3% | 61.4 -6% | 55.8 -15% | 69 6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.3 | 95.9 4% | 85.9 -7% | 80.7 -13% | 95.1 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 69.3 5% | 62.4 -5% | 57.7 -12% | 69.6 6% |
| Response Times | -3% | -2% | 15% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 48 ? -18% | 41.6 ? -2% | 39 ? 4% | 46.4 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 27 ? 13% | 31.6 ? -1% | 23 ? 26% | 28.8 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -1% | -26% | -90% | -39% | |
| Brightness middle | 344 | 380 10% | 311 -10% | 346 1% | 327 -5% |
| Brightness | 321 | 354 10% | 288 -10% | 317 -1% | 311 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 81 -5% | 85 0% | 86 1% | 88 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.24 25% | 0.86 -169% | 0.25 22% |
| Contrast | 1075 | 1462 36% | 1296 21% | 402 -63% | 1308 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 3.11 -20% | 5.5 -112% | 8.64 -232% | 6.1 -135% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 6.73 14% | 9 -15% | 13.58 -74% | 12.2 -56% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 4.35 -67% | 6.2 -138% | 11.24 -332% | 8.8 -238% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.02 109% | 2.62 84% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 7050 92% | 6771 96% | 5950 109% | 12530 52% | 6172 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.82 | 62 -6% | 55.96 -15% | 52 -21% | 61.56 -6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.27 | 96 4% | 85.77 -7% | 80 -13% | 94.88 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
0% | -11% /
-19% | -29% /
-61% | -12% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Dell Latitude 7280 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3985 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4981 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5052 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 7480 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7280 SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB | Dell Latitude 5480 Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 163% | 141% | 168% | -2% | -1% | |
| Read Seq | 486.5 | 1827 276% | 1819 274% | 1760 262% | 470.8 -3% | 469.4 -4% |
| Write Seq | 418.6 | 1383 230% | 1263 202% | 1666 298% | 477.4 14% | 264.8 -37% |
| Read 512 | 354.3 | 814 130% | 922 160% | 832 135% | 370.1 4% | 408.1 15% |
| Write 512 | 306.8 | 1098 258% | 804 162% | 1064 247% | 323.2 5% | 265.5 -13% |
| Read 4k | 29.25 | 61 109% | 61.4 110% | 53.2 82% | 30.23 3% | 24.66 -16% |
| Write 4k | 90.5 | 172.2 90% | 157.1 74% | 167.4 85% | 59.5 -34% | 114.8 27% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 280.2 | 601 114% | 513 83% | 630 125% | 344.4 23% | 380.3 36% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 252.8 | 495.6 96% | 410.2 62% | 533 111% | 183 -28% | 207.2 -18% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Dell Latitude 7280 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Dell Latitude 7280 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1807 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 64798 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6706 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 934 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 441 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 83.6 | 43.3 | 25.9 | 12.7 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.5 | 31.6 | 26.3 | 8.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.2 / 31.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) | ||
| Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7280 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB | Dell Latitude 5480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -9% | -13% | -3% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.6 | 29.3 -2% | 31 -8% | 28.9 -1% | 29.4 -3% | 29.6 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 28.6 | 29.3 -2% | 31 -8% | 28.9 -1% | 29.4 -3% | 29.6 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.6 | 32.2 -13% | 31 -8% | 30.1 -5% | 30 -5% | 29.6 -3% |
| Load Average * | 30.2 | 34.3 -14% | 33.5 -11% | 39.2 -30% | 30.6 -1% | 42 -39% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.2 | 39.3 -26% | 33.7 -8% | 39.2 -26% | 32.7 -5% | 47.1 -51% |
| off / environment * | 29.3 | 31 | 28.9 | 29.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
Dell Latitude 7480 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.29 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.32 / 6.27 / 6.35 Watt |
| Carga |
29.82 / 30.64 Watt |
   
| |
| Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 7280 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50 | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | 2% | -38% | 7% | -18% | -26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.32 | 3.84 11% | 2.9 33% | 4.64 -7% | 4.28 1% | 6.64 -54% | 5.1 -18% |
| Idle Average * | 6.27 | 6.3 -0% | 5.6 11% | 8.93 -42% | 5.11 19% | 6.67 -6% | 8.5 -36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.35 | 8.6 -35% | 8.15 -28% | 9.12 -44% | 5.49 14% | 7.78 -23% | 10.1 -59% |
| Load Average * | 29.82 | 41.9 -41% | 30.6 -3% | 42.2 -42% | 29.83 -0% | 30.83 -3% | 35.2 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 30.64 | 48.7 -59% | 31 -1% | 47.3 -54% | 30.05 2% | 31.7 -3% | 31 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -31% | -15% | -47% | 5% | -44% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1662 | 1252 -25% | 1155 -31% | 787 -53% | 1448 -13% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 719 | 496 -31% | 571 -21% | 417 -42% | 964 34% | 346 -52% |
| Load | 171 | 110 -36% | 184 8% | 93 -46% | 159 -7% | 112 -35% |
Pro
Contra
Embora não chegue perto do glamour dos seus irmãos XPS de 13 e 15 polegadas da própria Dell, o Latitude 7480 é de certa forma o equivalente empresarial daquelas máquinas mainstream bem recebidas. O portátil de 14-polegadas de bom visual é menor e muito mais leve que antes, mas a qualidade de construção continua sendo inquestionavelmente alta. O chassi é sólido com tolerâncias apertadas e possui um acabamento suave e amigável ao toque. A tela é brilhante com cores precisas e revestimento antirefletivo, portanto, os viajantes não terão que lidar com reflexos irritantes. O desempenho é de primeira categoria - embora os testes específicos da CPU fiquem um pouco para trás, o portátil se destaca quando se trata de benchmarks sintéticos - e a bateria dura todo o dia mesmo sem ser completamente carregada. Os dispositivos de entrada também são muito bons com o teclado em particular, recebendo o nosso assentimento como um dos melhores disponíveis no mercado atualmente.
O Latitude 7480 é um portátil empresarial sólido de alta qualidade. No entanto, o barulho de sua bobina poderia ser um fator decisivo para alguns.
Se houver uma pontos negativo flagrante, é o barulho da bobina, que é audível há pelo menos 3 metros de distância e parece estar presente independentemente do nível de uso (mas é claro, mais perceptível durante o modo inativo). Certamente esperamos que este barulho afete apenas o nosso modelo de teste, mas dado que observamos o mesmo tipo de barulho durante nossa análise do Latitude 5480 e 7280, não ficaríamos surpresos se este for um problema mais espalhado.
Dell Latitude 7480
-
04/18/2017 v6(old)
Bernie Pechlaner
Pricecompare
