Notebookcheck

Breve Análise d Smartphone OnePlus 8T – Carga mais rápida por menos dinheiro

Um filho único. O OnePlus 8T oferece muitas pequenas melhorias e uma grande queda no preço em comparação com seu antecessor. Descubra se o smartphone de última geração é realmente o assassino de carros que esperamos que seja, em nossa análise.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Notebookcheck), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
OnePlus 8T (8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.55 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 236 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G,3G,4G(B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B66),5G(n1/​n3/​n7/​n28/​n41/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 160.7 x 74.1
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, OnePlus Warp Charge 65
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.7, phase comparison-AF, contrast-AF, OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, monochrome, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, vídeos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (híbridos), Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, protetor de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a); LTE 4x4 MIMO DL Cat 20/UL Cat 18 (2.0Gbps /200Mbps); aptX HD; SAR values: 0,94 W/kg (head), 1,24 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 169 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
10/2020
OnePlus 8T
SD 865, Adreno 650
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
88 %
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.10"1792x828
88 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
87 %
04/2020
Huawei P40
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
175 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.10"2340x1080
88 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
OnePlus 8T
OnePlus 8T
OnePlus 8T
OnePlus 8T
OnePlus 8T
OnePlus 8T

Size Comparison

162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g161.6 mm 75.2 mm 8.3 mm 192 g160.7 mm 74.1 mm 8.4 mm 188 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g148.9 mm 71.1 mm 8.5 mm 175 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (1104min - 1442max) MBit/s ∼100% +78%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (881min - 916max) MBit/s ∼66% +18%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s ∼65% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (802min - 879max) MBit/s ∼63% +13%
OnePlus 8T
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
767 (611min - 837max) MBit/s ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼41% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼21% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (1095min - 1376max) MBit/s ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s ∼72% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (440min - 907max) MBit/s ∼67% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
833 (418min - 883max) MBit/s ∼64% +16%
OnePlus 8T
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (679min - 724max) MBit/s ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼41% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼21% -61%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø767 (611-837)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø716 (679-724)
Positioning Garmin Edge 520 – overview
Positioning Garmin Edge 520 – overview
Positioning Garmin Edge 520 – turn
Positioning Garmin Edge 520 – turn
Positioning Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
Positioning Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
Positioning OnePlus 8T – overview
Positioning OnePlus 8T – overview
Positioning OnePlus 8T – turn
Positioning OnePlus 8T – turn
Positioning OnePlus 8T – bridge
Positioning OnePlus 8T – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
20.4 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 8T: 20.23 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 27.38 ∆E
ColorChecker
23 ∆E
10 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 8T: 11.13 ∆E min: 1.21 - max: 24.09 ∆E
697
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
743
cd/m²
756
cd/m²
716
cd/m²
733
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 762 cd/m² Médio: 733.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 743 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.89 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
OnePlus 8T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.10
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.70
Huawei P40
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Screen
-6%
-5%
-76%
-89%
-11%
Brightness middle
743
778
5%
679
-9%
610
-18%
583
-22%
786
6%
Brightness
734
783
7%
671
-9%
621
-15%
593
-19%
791
8%
Brightness Distribution
91
95
4%
93
2%
95
4%
94
3%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.89
0.9
-1%
0.8
10%
2.4
-170%
3.03
-240%
1.1
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.69
2.2
-30%
2.4
-42%
4.3
-154%
5.33
-215%
2.2
-30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.7
-21%
1.1
21%
2.8
-100%
2
-43%
1.8
-29%
Gamma
2.199 100%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.09 105%
2.301 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6423 101%
6481 100%
6610 98%
6368 102%
6621 98%
6315 103%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 458.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 458.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 458.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3214 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5364 Points ∼100% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2896 - 3310, n=13)
3153 Points ∼59% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7400, n=67)
1894 Points ∼35% -41%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3494 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4667 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2634 - 3665, n=13)
3077 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6252, n=70)
1659 Points ∼36% -53%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3164 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2766 Points ∼81% -13%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2988 Points ∼87% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼97% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=21)
3273 Points ∼96% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=171)
1932 Points ∼56% -39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
889 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
917 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
755 Points ∼82% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=21)
903 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=171)
558 Points ∼61% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9202 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼96% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10008 Points ∼89% +9%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8736 Points ∼78% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼94% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=22)
11268 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=568)
6082 Points ∼54% -34%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10990 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼96% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
13627 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11268 Points ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼87% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=21)
13586 Points ∼100% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=717)
6703 Points ∼49% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1788 Points ∼48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points ∼100% +110%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3104 Points ∼82% +74%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3684 Points ∼98% +106%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points ∼89% +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points ∼91% +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼70% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8372 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6136 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6326 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4604 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5042 Points ∼77% +10%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5456 Points ∼83% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points ∼94% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points ∼95% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼41% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5485 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4143 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4924 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4957 - 5780, n=20)
5344 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9420 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
870 Points ∼9% -91%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6606 Points ∼69% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 9567, n=20)
9380 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8125 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼74% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7076 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6140 Points ∼75% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8269, n=21)
8030 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5468 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4247 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4998 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=20)
5110 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12878 Points ∼72%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points ∼72% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11868 Points ∼66% -8%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4293 Points ∼24% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points ∼71% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 13044, n=20)
12723 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼18% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9897 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8485 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4432 Points ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=20)
9540 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4900 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3993 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4242 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8222 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points ∼99% +1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼68% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8005 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6244 Points ∼75% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7145 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼61% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6544 Points ∼91% -8%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5651 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4882 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4077 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4279 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11586 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11272 Points ∼92% -3%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3894 Points ∼32% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼21% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8877 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8097 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3973 Points ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
17817 Points ∼45%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼68% +52%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼85% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
39771 Points ∼100% +123%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22857 Points ∼57% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=19)
34885 Points ∼88% +96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼40% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
144828 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼69% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
87223 Points ∼42% -40%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
66142 Points ∼32% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 154375, n=19)
145987 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼14% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
56045 Points ∼58%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼75% +29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
68943 Points ∼71% +23%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46552 Points ∼48% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=19)
83547 Points ∼86% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼23% -60%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
207 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼64% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
191 fps ∼59% -8%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151 fps ∼47% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼63% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 209, n=21)
203 fps ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=835)
48.7 fps ∼15% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=21)
76.9 fps ∼85% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=844)
32.5 fps ∼36% -46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
127 fps ∼73%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼71% -2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
114 fps ∼65% -10%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100 fps ∼57% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼70% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 130, n=21)
122 fps ∼70% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=740)
28.9 fps ∼17% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps ∼52% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=21)
72.9 fps ∼83% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=748)
23.8 fps ∼27% -60%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼75%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼75% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
80 fps ∼68% -9%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33 fps ∼28% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼74% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 90, n=22)
85.1 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=603)
23.1 fps ∼20% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼80%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼77% -3%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
57 fps ∼76% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=22)
60.8 fps ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=605)
20.6 fps ∼27% -66%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼50%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼52% +3%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27 fps ∼45% -10%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
27 fps ∼45% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼48% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 32, n=23)
27.7 fps ∼46% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=367)
11.8 fps ∼20% -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼61%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼61% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
23 fps ∼70% +15%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29 fps ∼88% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 21, n=23)
20.2 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=365)
8.21 fps ∼25% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼78%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼80% +2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼87% +11%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
42 fps ∼70% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼77% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=23)
43.2 fps ∼72% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=371)
17.6 fps ∼29% -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
55 fps ∼63%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼62% -2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
56 fps ∼64% +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼61% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 56, n=23)
52 fps ∼60% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=371)
20.1 fps ∼23% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼73%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼71% -2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
49 fps ∼67% -8%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43 fps ∼59% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼68% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 54, n=22)
50.5 fps ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=528)
15.4 fps ∼21% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼77%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼77% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
44 fps ∼73% -4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼70% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 48, n=22)
40.5 fps ∼68% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=532)
13.6 fps ∼23% -70%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
576457 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
522516 Points ∼90% -9%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
450373 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 607937, n=22)
578062 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=153)
324151 Points ∼56% -44%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1466 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1394 Points ∼93% -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1260 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼85% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=21)
1504 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=765)
843 Points ∼56% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11790 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10789 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8634 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11399 - 12073, n=21)
11701 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=765)
2614 Points ∼22% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7899 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3829 Points ∼48% -52%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6942 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=21)
7103 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=765)
1977 Points ∼25% -75%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10029 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9421 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8992 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=21)
9721 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=765)
3587 Points ∼36% -64%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6083 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4826 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5105 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=21)
5885 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=765)
1844 Points ∼30% -70%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +91%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
69.401 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=19)
63.5 Points ∼48% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
56.102 Points ∼42% -19%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.572 Points ∼42% -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼39% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼38% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼32% -38%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +147%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
118.7 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 126, n=19)
111 Points ∼38% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
109.2 Points ∼37% -8%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.24 Points ∼35% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
95.185 Points ∼32% -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.083 Points ∼27% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼17% -58%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +120%
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86)
71.3 runs/min ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
64.4 runs/min ∼41% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=18)
63.8 runs/min ∼41% -11%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63 runs/min ∼40% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min ∼36% -21%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼32% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼29% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼64% +9%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
108 Points ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=21)
106 Points ∼58% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
101 Points ∼55% -6%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼54% -8%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
95 Points ∼52% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼39% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 24467, n=21)
22024 Points ∼45% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼45% +11%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
21348 Points ∼44% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
20022 Points ∼41% +1%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
19915 Points ∼41%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼32% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼17% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -410%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼27% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
2293.6 ms * ∼24% -23%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2287 ms * ∼24% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼22% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1839 - 2911, n=22)
2054 ms * ∼22% -10%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
1860.1 ms * ∼20%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +69%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 8TOnePlus 8Samsung Galaxy Note20Huawei P40Xiaomi Mi 10Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
40%
8%
29%
30%
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.4 (Nano Memory Card)
68.8 (68.6 - 69, n=2)
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.6 (Nano Memory Card)
85.9 (85.9 - 86, n=2)
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
Random Write 4KB
121.4
203.85
68%
233.79
93%
197
62%
215.95
78%
207 (121 - 244, n=7)
71%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-67%
Random Read 4KB
132.6
215
62%
207.64
57%
189.4
43%
207.04
56%
209 (133 - 231, n=7)
58%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
728
747.87
3%
780.17
7%
212.9
-71%
679.51
-7%
706 (674 - 740, n=7)
-3%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-81%
Sequential Read 256KB
1659.3
1706.7
3%
1682.85
1%
1591.6
-4%
1498.15
-10%
1570 (1348 - 1674, n=7)
-5%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-78%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.0.0: Ø59.8 (55-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø59.8 (55-61)
; Genshin Impact; highest 60 fps; 1.0.0_1112729_1135452: Ø59.2 (50-61)
; Genshin Impact; lowest 60 fps; 1.0.0_1112729_1135452: Ø59.5 (54-61)
Carga Máxima
 45 °C42.9 °C41.1 °C 
 45 °C43 °C40.1 °C 
 44.7 °C43.1 °C40 °C 
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 42.8 °C
38 °C40 °C40.1 °C
38.8 °C40.7 °C43.3 °C
38.8 °C41.1 °C43.8 °C
Máximo: 43.8 °C
Médio: 40.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.842.22535.539.33129.931.44030.529.2503536.2633031.98018.918.710022.921.31251727.116014.637.920013.242.22509.347.231510.153.840011.256.950012.561.363011.664.980011.467.110001371.1125013.173.2160012.873.7200012.971.3250012.972.8315012.872.7400013.771.6500014.464.6630015.361.8800016.165.1100001766.81250017.962.41600018.951.1SPL67.52682.5N20.70.750.9median 13.1median 64.6Delta1.611.932.542.129.430.322.827.925.322.930.227.923.328.121.925.4192419.633194616.148.318.954.816.658.414.361.21563.515.265.214.369.814.371.114.273.314.878.814.879.514.482.214.379.514.678.914.778.214.974.614.97414.672.914.862.715.45226.889.40.973.7median 14.8median 69.81.410.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 8TOnePlus 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 8T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Carga midlight 4.6 / 9.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 8T
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-6%
-15%
0%
-2%
18%
-19%
5%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.9
18%
0.56
49%
0.92
16%
1
9%
0.53
52%
1.134 (0.52 - 2.2, n=20)
-3%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927)
19%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.3
-53%
2.99
-99%
1.5
-0%
1.9
-27%
1.46
3%
2.07 (1.19 - 3.43, n=20)
-38%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
2.33
-37%
3.02
-78%
1.54
9%
2.4
-41%
1.52
11%
2.3 (1.23 - 4, n=20)
-35%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927)
-20%
Load Average *
4.6
3.5
24%
4.17
9%
5.49
-19%
3.5
24%
3.83
17%
5.24 (3.5 - 7.4, n=20)
-14%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921)
10%
Load Maximum *
9.4
7.68
18%
5.44
42%
9.99
-6%
6.9
27%
8.89
5%
9.73 (7.67 - 12.3, n=20)
-4%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 39min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
17h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 23min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 23min
OnePlus 8T
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
25%
14%
6%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1539
1374
-11%
2765
80%
2067
34%
2063
34%
1789
16%
H.264
1103
1096
-1%
1147
4%
1123
2%
1052
-5%
1126
2%
WiFi v1.3
1023
1045
2%
866
-15%
589
-42%
806
-21%
662
-35%
Load
203
168
-17%
267
32%
326
61%
236
16%
226
11%

Pro

+ Tela precisa com boas cores ...
+ ... E uma taxa de atualização de 120-Hz
+ Muitas bandas LTE e 5G
+ Exterior de alta qualidade
+ Sem afogamento
+ Carga muito rápida
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Localização precisa
+ Boa relação preço-desempenho

Contra

- Aquece sob uso intenso
- Não oferece carga sem fio
- Sem certificação IP
- A câmera carece de nitidez de detalhes
- A carcaça poderia ser mais estável

Veredicto – Mais por menos

Review: OnePlus 8T. Test unit provided by OnePlus Germany.
Review: OnePlus 8T. Test unit provided by OnePlus Germany.

O OnePlus 8T oferece pequenas melhorias em comparação com seu já muito bom predecessor. Por exemplo, ele oferece uma tela com uma taxa de atualização de 120 Hz, uma câmera macro com uma resolução mais alta e uma lente adicional que fornece mais dados para fotos. No entanto, a qualidade da câmera não pode ser comparada à de seus concorrentes de ponta mais caros, pois as imagens não têm nitidez de detalhes. 

Ficamos satisfeitos com o alto desempenho sem afogamento, a localização precisa, o carregamento muito rápido e a calibração precisa da tela. O novo software é atraente e oferece muitas mais opções de configuração, ao mesmo tempo que é fácil de usar para veteranos do Android.

O aparelho esquenta um pouco demais para o nosso gosto e seus alto-falantes estéreo oferecem uma qualidade de som apenas média. O Wi-Fi não é tão rápido quanto em outros dispositivos Wi-Fi 6. Os usuários também terão que se virar sem carregamento sem fio ou certificação IP.

O OnePlus 8T omite a maioria dos truques de ponta e concentra-se em sua proposta principal: muita potência e conectividade por um preço acessível. 

Se você está procurando a melhor câmera para smartphone do mercado, o OnePlus 8T pode não ser a escolha certa para você. Embora produza imagens decentes de gama alta, outros fazem um trabalho ainda melhor. Se, por outro lado, você deseja o melhor desempenho e ótima conectividade com o mínimo de dinheiro, você está no lugar certo.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

OnePlus 8T - 10/21/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 73%
Peso
89%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 64 → 93%
Desempenho da aplicação
81 / 86 → 94%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
77%
Médio
81%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise d Smartphone OnePlus 8T – Carga mais rápida por menos dinheiro
Florian Schmitt, 2020-10-26 (Update: 2020-11- 3)