Breve Análise d Smartphone OnePlus 8T – Carga mais rápida por menos dinheiro
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, vídeos @1080p/30fps
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % | 10/2020 | OnePlus 8T SD 865, Adreno 650 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
88 % | 06/2020 | OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 180 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
87 % | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 1792x828 | |
88 % | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 192 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
87 % | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 175 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 | |
88 % | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2340x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641) | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Huawei P40 | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641) |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel

|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 743 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.89 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
OnePlus 8T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.10 | Samsung Galaxy Note20 Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.70 | Huawei P40 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -6% | -5% | -76% | -89% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 743 | 778 5% | 679 -9% | 610 -18% | 583 -22% | 786 6% |
Brightness | 734 | 783 7% | 671 -9% | 621 -15% | 593 -19% | 791 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 95 4% | 93 2% | 95 4% | 94 3% | 96 5% |
Black Level * | 0.68 | |||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 0.89 | 0.9 -1% | 0.8 10% | 2.4 -170% | 3.03 -240% | 1.1 -24% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 1.69 | 2.2 -30% | 2.4 -42% | 4.3 -154% | 5.33 -215% | 2.2 -30% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.4 | 1.7 -21% | 1.1 21% | 2.8 -100% | 2 -43% | 1.8 -29% |
Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.09 105% | 2.301 96% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6423 101% | 6481 100% | 6610 98% | 6368 102% | 6621 98% | 6315 103% |
Contrast | 999 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 458.7 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 458.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 458.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2896 - 3310, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7400, n=67) | |
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2634 - 3665, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6252, n=70) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=171) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=171) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=568) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=717) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 209, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=835) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=844) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 130, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=740) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=748) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 90, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=603) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=605) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 8T | |
OnePlus 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Huawei P40 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 607937, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=153) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 126, n=19) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=18) | |
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=21) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 24467, n=21) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855) | |
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1839 - 2911, n=22) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 8T | OnePlus 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note20 | Huawei P40 | Xiaomi Mi 10 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 34% | 40% | 8% | 29% | 30% | -70% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.4 (Nano Memory Card) | 68.8 (68.6 - 69, n=2) | 51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) | ||||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.6 (Nano Memory Card) | 85.9 (85.9 - 86, n=2) | 69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) | ||||
Random Write 4KB | 121.4 | 203.85 68% | 233.79 93% | 197 62% | 215.95 78% | 207 (121 - 244, n=7) 71% | 40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -67% |
Random Read 4KB | 132.6 | 215 62% | 207.64 57% | 189.4 43% | 207.04 56% | 209 (133 - 231, n=7) 58% | 63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -52% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 728 | 747.87 3% | 780.17 7% | 212.9 -71% | 679.51 -7% | 706 (674 - 740, n=7) -3% | 139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -81% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1659.3 | 1706.7 3% | 1682.85 1% | 1591.6 -4% | 1498.15 -10% | 1570 (1348 - 1674, n=7) -5% | 363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -78% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 8T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
OnePlus 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
desligado | ![]() ![]() |
Ocioso | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Carga |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh | Huawei P40 3800 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -15% | 0% | -2% | 18% | -19% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.56 49% | 0.92 16% | 1 9% | 0.53 52% | 1.134 (0.52 - 2.2, n=20) -3% | 0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927) 19% |
Idle Average * | 1.5 | 2.3 -53% | 2.99 -99% | 1.5 -0% | 1.9 -27% | 1.46 3% | 2.07 (1.19 - 3.43, n=20) -38% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926) -17% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.7 | 2.33 -37% | 3.02 -78% | 1.54 9% | 2.4 -41% | 1.52 11% | 2.3 (1.23 - 4, n=20) -35% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927) -20% |
Load Average * | 4.6 | 3.5 24% | 4.17 9% | 5.49 -19% | 3.5 24% | 3.83 17% | 5.24 (3.5 - 7.4, n=20) -14% | 4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921) 10% |
Load Maximum * | 9.4 | 7.68 18% | 5.44 42% | 9.99 -6% | 6.9 27% | 8.89 5% | 9.73 (7.67 - 12.3, n=20) -4% | 6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921) 35% |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh | Huawei P40 3800 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | 25% | 14% | 6% | -2% | |
Reader / Idle | 1539 | 1374 -11% | 2765 80% | 2067 34% | 2063 34% | 1789 16% |
H.264 | 1103 | 1096 -1% | 1147 4% | 1123 2% | 1052 -5% | 1126 2% |
WiFi v1.3 | 1023 | 1045 2% | 866 -15% | 589 -42% | 806 -21% | 662 -35% |
Load | 203 | 168 -17% | 267 32% | 326 61% | 236 16% | 226 11% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Mais por menos
O OnePlus 8T oferece pequenas melhorias em comparação com seu já muito bom predecessor. Por exemplo, ele oferece uma tela com uma taxa de atualização de 120 Hz, uma câmera macro com uma resolução mais alta e uma lente adicional que fornece mais dados para fotos. No entanto, a qualidade da câmera não pode ser comparada à de seus concorrentes de ponta mais caros, pois as imagens não têm nitidez de detalhes.
Ficamos satisfeitos com o alto desempenho sem afogamento, a localização precisa, o carregamento muito rápido e a calibração precisa da tela. O novo software é atraente e oferece muitas mais opções de configuração, ao mesmo tempo que é fácil de usar para veteranos do Android.
O aparelho esquenta um pouco demais para o nosso gosto e seus alto-falantes estéreo oferecem uma qualidade de som apenas média. O Wi-Fi não é tão rápido quanto em outros dispositivos Wi-Fi 6. Os usuários também terão que se virar sem carregamento sem fio ou certificação IP.
O OnePlus 8T omite a maioria dos truques de ponta e concentra-se em sua proposta principal: muita potência e conectividade por um preço acessível.
Se você está procurando a melhor câmera para smartphone do mercado, o OnePlus 8T pode não ser a escolha certa para você. Embora produza imagens decentes de gama alta, outros fazem um trabalho ainda melhor. Se, por outro lado, você deseja o melhor desempenho e ótima conectividade com o mínimo de dinheiro, você está no lugar certo.
OnePlus 8T - 10/21/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt