Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P40 – Venda difícil apesar de sua ótima câmera
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.4 % | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 175 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 | |
| 87.7 % | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 163 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.20" | 3200x1440 | |
| 86.4 % | 04/2019 | Huawei P30 Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10 | 165 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 | |
| 86.5 % | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 1792x828 | |
| 85.8 % | 10/2019 | OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 88.6 % | 08/2019 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro SD 855, Adreno 640 | 191 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.39" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei P40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | |
| Huawei P30 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Huawei P30 | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 583 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
129.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.301
| Huawei P40 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10 | Samsung Galaxy S20 AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.20 | Huawei P30 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.10 | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.10 | OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 14% | 17% | 34% | -9% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 583 | 745 28% | 561 -4% | 679 16% | 693 19% | 594 2% |
| Brightness | 593 | 740 25% | 560 -6% | 671 13% | 703 19% | 607 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 97 3% | 95 1% | 93 -1% | 96 2% | 91 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.03 | 2.67 12% | 1.5 50% | 0.8 74% | 3.42 -13% | 1.51 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.33 | 4.52 15% | 2.5 53% | 2.4 55% | 6.12 -15% | 4.27 20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2 -0% | 1.8 10% | 1.1 45% | 3.3 -65% | 2.6 -30% |
| Gamma | 2.301 96% | 2.092 105% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.265 97% | 2.219 99% |
| CCT | 6621 98% | 6240 104% | 6512 100% | 6610 98% | 6799 96% | 6390 102% |
| Contrast | 999 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 245 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 245 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 245 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | |
| Huawei P30 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (26 - 57, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | |
| Huawei P30 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (33 - 75, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (450373 - 527856, n=4) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103.2 - 116.6, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chome 76) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=4) | |
| Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 124, n=3) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=4) | |
| Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=4) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P40 | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Huawei P30 | OnePlus 7T | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 34% | -13% | -26% | -27% | 21% | 121% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1592 | 1542 -3% | 909 -43% | 1406 -12% | 809 -49% | 1520 ? -5% | 1505 ? -5% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 212.9 | 670 215% | 186 -13% | 218.4 3% | 196.9 -8% | 546 ? 156% | 1112 ? 422% |
| Random Read 4KB | 189.4 | 205.3 8% | 138.8 -27% | 170.1 -10% | 142.5 -25% | 206 ? 9% | 247 ? 30% |
| Random Write 4KB | 197 | 228.1 16% | 195.3 -1% | 29.9 -85% | 148.5 -25% | 193.9 ? -2% | 271 ? 38% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.6 ? | 66.3 ? -19% | 82.8 ? 1% | 67.3 ? -18% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.4 ? | 57.7 ? -13% | 71.3 ? 7% | 55.7 ? -16% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P40 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P30 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt |
| Carga |
3.5 / 6.9 Watt |
    
| |
| Huawei P40 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh | Huawei P30 3650 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -2% | -7% | -8% | 6% | -11% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.9 10% | 0.69 31% | 0.56 44% | 0.9 10% | 0.7 30% | 1.24 ? -24% | 0.897 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.9 | 1.5 21% | 2.41 -27% | 2.99 -57% | 1.4 26% | 1 47% | 2.33 ? -23% | 1.452 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.4 | 2 17% | 2.51 -5% | 3.02 -26% | 2.9 -21% | 1.3 46% | 2.49 ? -4% | 1.629 ? 32% |
| Load Average * | 3.5 | 4.8 -37% | 3.86 -10% | 4.17 -19% | 4.7 -34% | 5.2 -49% | 3.55 ? -1% | 5.55 ? -59% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 11.5 -67% | 6.96 -1% | 5.44 21% | 8.3 -20% | 10 -45% | 7.09 ? -3% | 8.31 ? -20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P40 3800 mAh | Huawei P30 3650 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | -3% | 16% | 5% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2063 | 1914 -7% | 2105 2% | 2765 34% | 2003 -3% | 1768 -14% |
| H.264 | 1052 | 1050 0% | 809 -23% | 1147 9% | 967 -8% | 987 -6% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 806 | 715 -11% | 726 -10% | 866 7% | 896 11% | 762 -5% |
| Load | 236 | 208 -12% | 279 18% | 267 13% | 283 20% | 249 6% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Não abandone toda a esperança
Nossa pergunta inicial "Será que podem fazer isso funcionar?” é claro, aludiu ao fato de que o Huawei P40 não tem acesso aos serviços do Google. A resposta é um "Talvez" definitivo. Por um lado, o Huawei P40 é um smartphone de gama alta com uma boa configuração de câmera, durações razoáveis da bateria, desempenho rápido e Wi-Fi rápido.
Por outro lado, há uma grande desvantagem: A falta de serviços do Google torna impossível o uso do Google Maps ou da Play Store do Google, além de potencialmente causar problemas com muitos outros aplicativos. Embora a Galeria de aplicativos cresça constantemente e a instalação de aplicativos de fontes desconhecidas seja possível, pelo menos em teoria, o último envolve um alto risco de segurança para usuários normais e, mesmo para usuários avançados, pode ser difícil saber se os arquivos de download de fontes externas foram manipulados.
A Huawei está dando suporte aos usuários de várias maneiras, incluindo aplicativos e serviços para ajudar os usuários durante a configuração inicial. É uma venda difícil, principalmente porque existem muitos outros smartphones alternativos que simplesmente funcionam imediatamente.
Dito isto, como o desenvolvimento do ecossistema da Huawei está avançando mais rapidamente do que o esperado, é possível que a situação mude em um ou dois anos, tornando a Huawei uma alternativa real para quem não quer o Google em seu smartphone.
O Huawei P40 é um smartphone de gama alta premium que força os usuários a se comprometerem devido à falta de serviços do Google.
Além disso, o fabricante parece estar focado principalmente no P40 Pro, e, como resultado, se sente como que o P40 fica para trás em uma comparação direta com a concorrência: Primeiro, apenas uma das ópticas pode ser usada para gravar vídeos e o zoom óptico é limitado a imagens.
Em segundo lugar, a taxa de atualização é limitada aos 60 Hz habituais, enquanto o Galaxy S20 tem mais a oferecer. O brilho da tela também pode ser maior, não há carregamento sem fio e, além disso, os possíveis compradores terão que se perguntar se desejam comprar um cartão de memória dedicado apenas para o Huawei P40, pois o microSD não é suportado.
Huawei P40
-
08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
