Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P40 – Venda difícil apesar de sua ótima câmera

Será que podem fazer isso funcionar? O Huawei P40 pertence à primeira geração dos smartphones da série P da Huawei sem os serviços da Google. A câmera do P40 tira fotos muito nítidas e o smartphone de gama alta parece muito promissor em geral.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Huawei P40 (P40 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 8 x - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A76/-A55
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.1 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 422 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, Card Reader: Nano Memória de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B7/​B8/​B9/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n28/​n38/n41/​n77/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 148.9 x 71.1
Bateria
3800 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.9, phase detection AF (dual-pixel), sensor de gama de cor, dual LED flash, video @2160p/​60FPS, video @720p/​7860FPS (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0MP, f/​2.4, OIS, telephoto lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, video @2160p/​60FPS (câmera 1); ToF (câmera 2)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, SIM tool, fones, 24 Meses Garantia, IP53-certified; SAR value: 0,49W/​kg (head), 1,29W/​kg (body); eSIM, fanless, waterproof
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 69 g
Preço
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
04/2020
Huawei P40
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
175 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.1"2340x1080
88 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.2"3200x1440
86 %
04/2019
Huawei P30
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
165 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.1"2340x1080
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
86 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
89 %
08/2019
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
SD 855, Adreno 640
191 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40

Size Comparison

160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g151.7 mm 69.1 mm 7.9 mm 163 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g148.9 mm 71.1 mm 8.5 mm 175 g149.1 mm 71.36 mm 7.57 mm 165 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (1104min - 1442max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (791min - 846max) MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
544 (38min - 618max) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (374min - 485max) MBit/s ∼31% -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (242min - 434max) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼21% -79%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (1095min - 1376max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (847min - 902max) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
680 (646min - 700max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼41% -59%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (238min - 447max) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (366min - 444max) MBit/s ∼30% -70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼21% -79%
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1368 (1104-1442)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1296 (1095-1376)
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
Locating Huawei P40 – Overview
Locating Huawei P40 – Overview
Locating Huawei P40 – Turn
Locating Huawei P40 – Turn
Locating Huawei P40 – Bridge
Locating Huawei P40 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P40: 6.19 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 11.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P40: 8.74 ∆E min: 1.9 - max: 16.38 ∆E
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture 3x zoom
Picture 3x zoom
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture 5x zoom
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture wide-angle optics
Picture standard optics
Picture 3x zoom
Picture 5x zoom
588
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 616 cd/m² Médio: 592.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 583 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6
129.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.301
Huawei P40
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2
Huawei P30
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
14%
17%
34%
-9%
7%
Brightness middle
583
745
28%
561
-4%
679
16%
693
19%
594
2%
Brightness
593
740
25%
560
-6%
671
13%
703
19%
607
2%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
95
1%
93
-1%
96
2%
91
-3%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.03
2.67
12%
1.5
50%
0.8
74%
3.42
-13%
1.51
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.33
4.52
15%
2.5
53%
2.4
55%
6.12
-15%
4.27
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
2
-0%
1.8
10%
1.1
45%
3.3
-65%
2.6
-30%
Gamma
2.301 96%
2.092 105%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.265 97%
2.219 99%
CCT
6621 98%
6240 104%
6512 100%
6610 98%
6799 96%
6390 102%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2693 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points ∼100% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2693 - 3979, n=4)
3350 Points ∼91% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1668 Points ∼45% -38%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3606 Points ∼88%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3600 - 4586, n=4)
4076 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1789 Points ∼44% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2988 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points ∼89% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2972 - 3183, n=4)
3077 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=121)
1945 Points ∼63% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
755 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (755 - 783, n=4)
771 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=121)
553 Points ∼61% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8736 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8016 Points ∼77% -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼89% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8512 - 11509, n=4)
10025 Points ∼96% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=524)
5973 Points ∼57% -32%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11268 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9890 Points ∼67% -12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼70% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼76% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (10628 - 14814, n=4)
12766 Points ∼87% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=682)
6555 Points ∼45% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3684 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points ∼81% -16%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3080 Points ∼80% -16%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼90% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼69% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3638 - 4057, n=4)
3857 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=175)
2664 Points ∼69% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6326 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points ∼95% 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4613 Points ∼69% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4046 - 6360, n=4)
5773 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9047, n=175)
3054 Points ∼46% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5456 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points ∼93% -6%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4165 Points ∼75% -24%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3948 - 5648, n=4)
5174 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=175)
2722 Points ∼49% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4924 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2682 Points ∼54% -46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼67% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2497 - 5766, n=4)
4729 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=527)
2229 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6606 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points ∼100% +23%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4162 Points ∼51% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼83% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5672 - 6771, n=4)
6451 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=527)
2160 Points ∼27% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6140 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points ∼97% +8%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3707 Points ∼54% -40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4422 - 6508, n=4)
5895 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=528)
2014 Points ∼29% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4998 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points ∼74% -21%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2550 Points ∼48% -49%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼64% -32%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼62% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4836 - 5721, n=4)
5318 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=559)
2145 Points ∼40% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4293 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points ∼63% +163%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3491 Points ∼20% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +316%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64% +166%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼38% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4064 - 7905, n=4)
6024 Points ∼34% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=559)
2908 Points ∼16% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4432 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points ∼87% +80%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3226 Points ∼35% -27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +108%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93% +92%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼59% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4213 - 7286, n=4)
5793 Points ∼63% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=559)
2441 Points ∼27% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4242 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points ∼86% -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3496 Points ∼76% -18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼53% -43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼97% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼81% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4242 - 4983, n=4)
4625 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=608)
2107 Points ∼46% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6244 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4200 Points ∼50% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼68% -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼85% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼75% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6244 - 6472, n=4)
6362 Points ∼76% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9032, n=608)
1821 Points ∼22% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5651 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4020 Points ∼60% -29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼65% -22%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼94% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼81% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5651 - 6069, n=4)
5867 Points ∼87% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=609)
1732 Points ∼26% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4279 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points ∼87% -6%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3548 Points ∼77% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼81% -13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4192 - 4975, n=4)
4605 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=651)
1977 Points ∼43% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3894 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points ∼59% +64%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3281 Points ∼30% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +177%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼59% +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3894 - 7499, n=4)
5702 Points ∼53% +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12632, n=650)
2412 Points ∼22% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3973 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points ∼69% +42%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3337 Points ∼41% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +105%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3973 - 6739, n=4)
5362 Points ∼66% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=653)
2068 Points ∼25% -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22857 Points ∼65%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21257 Points ∼60% -7%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼96% +48%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼95% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼77% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (22857 - 46731, n=4)
35317 Points ∼100% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=795)
15577 Points ∼44% -32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
66142 Points ∼32%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
44261 Points ∼21% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +216%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼56% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (60860 - 82652, n=4)
72875 Points ∼35% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=793)
27196 Points ∼13% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46552 Points ∼48%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35680 Points ∼37% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% +37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46141 - 70593, n=4)
58351 Points ∼60% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=793)
21154 Points ∼22% -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼62% +32%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
122 fps ∼38% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +113%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (139 - 152, n=4)
149 fps ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=796)
45.8 fps ∼14% -70%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼87% 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼86% -2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼87% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.5 fps ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=805)
31.5 fps ∼46% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps ∼62% +8%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
87 fps ∼50% -13%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +75%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼51% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (81 - 118, n=4)
104 fps ∼59% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=701)
27.1 fps ∼15% -73%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +30%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +28%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +30%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46 - 60, n=4)
53 fps ∼88% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=709)
22.7 fps ∼38% -51%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼73% +158%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼43% +52%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +255%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% +139%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼53% +88%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (33 - 75, n=4)
58.5 fps ∼50% +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=564)
21.8 fps ∼19% -34%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
54 fps ∼90% -5%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (26 - 57, n=4)
47.5 fps ∼79% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=566)
19.7 fps ∼33% -65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
27 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼37% -19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼33% -26%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +122%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (23 - 46, n=4)
30.5 fps ∼51% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=320)
11.4 fps ∼19% -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps ∼59% -31%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼41% -52%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼98% +14%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼53% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼71% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (19 - 68, n=4)
33.8 fps ∼100% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=318)
8.12 fps ∼24% -72%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
42 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼83% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼52% -26%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (36 - 60, n=4)
44.5 fps ∼74% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=324)
17.1 fps ∼29% -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps ∼62% +10%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼36% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +78%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼48% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (49 - 165, n=4)
78.5 fps ∼90% +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=323)
19.6 fps ∼23% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼68% +16%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼41% -30%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +70%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼49% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (32 - 44, n=4)
40.5 fps ∼55% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=489)
14.6 fps ∼20% -66%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps ∼72% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
27 fps ∼45% -25%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (17 - 36, n=4)
29.5 fps ∼49% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=493)
13 fps ∼22% -64%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
450373 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points ∼100% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (450373 - 527856, n=4)
486472 Points ∼96% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=118)
322814 Points ∼64% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1260 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points ∼86% +1%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1246 Points ∼84% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼72% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (950 - 1631, n=4)
1368 Points ∼92% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=735)
826 Points ∼56% -34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8634 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6751 Points ∼63% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼99% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼81% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8570 - 10138, n=4)
9350 Points ∼87% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=735)
2543 Points ∼24% -71%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6942 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points ∼62% -38%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5425 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼56% -44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6038 - 6942, n=4)
6382 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=735)
1895 Points ∼27% -73%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8992 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points ∼95% -2%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7684 Points ∼82% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼79% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8823 - 9806, n=4)
9351 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=735)
3495 Points ∼37% -61%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5105 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points ∼91% -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4327 Points ∼83% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼77% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4640 - 5595, n=4)
5232 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=735)
1787 Points ∼34% -65%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +139%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=4)
62.7 Points ∼47% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼44% +6%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.572 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.863 Points ∼41% -3%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
48.635 Points ∼37% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=195)
41.1 Points ∼31% -26%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +184%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103 - 117, n=4)
110 Points ∼37% +7%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.24 Points ∼35%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
96.309 Points ∼33% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼33% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.499 Points ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=625)
47.6 Points ∼16% -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +149%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=4)
67.4 runs/min ∼43% +7%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63 runs/min ∼40%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
58.7 runs/min ∼37% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min ∼32% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=177)
43 runs/min ∼27% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼27% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼58% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 124, n=3)
106 Points ∼58% +12%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points ∼53% +2%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
95 Points ∼52%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
90 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=262)
70 Points ∼38% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +129%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=4)
22323 Points ∼46% +5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
21348 Points ∼44%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
20714 Points ∼42% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points ∼37% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=793)
7954 Points ∼16% -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=819)
9707 ms * ∼100% -324%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511.2 ms * ∼26% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼24% -2%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2287 ms * ∼24%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
2094.7 ms * ∼22% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=4)
2083 ms * ∼21% +9%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼21% +12%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P40Samsung Galaxy S20Huawei P30OnePlus 7TXiaomi Mi 9T ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
-13%
-26%
-27%
21%
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.4 (Nano Memory Card)
57.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
71.33 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
7%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
-11%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.6 (Nano Memory Card)
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
82.82 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
1%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
-12%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
197
228.1
16%
195.3
-1%
29.9
-85%
148.51
-25%
186 (29.9 - 230, n=10)
-6%
36.4 (0.14 - 319, n=890)
-82%
Random Read 4KB
189.4
205.3
8%
138.79
-27%
170.1
-10%
142.5
-25%
199 (170 - 238, n=10)
5%
59.7 (1.59 - 324, n=890)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
212.9
669.9
215%
186.03
-13%
218.4
3%
196.87
-8%
542 (213 - 697, n=10)
155%
129 (2.99 - 911, n=890)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB
1591.6
1541.7
-3%
908.94
-43%
1406
-12%
808.76
-49%
1529 (1406 - 1692, n=10)
-4%
345 (12.1 - 1802, n=890)
-78%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø59.8 (54-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.2 (29-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 5.0.1: Ø30.1 (29-31)
Carga Máxima
 38.9 °C38.9 °C36.3 °C 
 39.8 °C38.7 °C37.1 °C 
 39.9 °C38.9 °C37.1 °C 
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
36.1 °C38.3 °C38.4 °C
37.1 °C38.4 °C41 °C
36.8 °C38.4 °C41.3 °C
Máximo: 41.3 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.3432540.740.83131.130.14034.3335034.7336328.927.48023.824.410026.225.71252231.916020.739.22002144.425018.649.431517.754.540017.257.450019606301761.780015.265.5100017.371125015.471.7160018.568200015.966.7250015.170.7315014.469400014.866.4500015.162.9630015.364.2800015.663.91000015.959.11250016.165.91600016.657SPL69.667.428.379.6N24.219.31.144.1median 16.6median 62.9Delta1.67.432.534.431.925.722.326.821.724.929.23126.725.520.324.620.530.52335.815.647.417.846.616.353.215.456.115.955.915.857.913.361.314.162.514.167.91470.213.572.613.469.413.970.114.272.113.975.514.670.814.266.814.768.8156814.958.715.34326.482.40.851.4median 14.7median 62.50.99.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P40Huawei P30
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P40 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei P30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 3.5 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-2%
-7%
-8%
6%
-11%
5%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.9
10%
0.69
31%
0.56
44%
0.9
10%
0.7
30%
1.24 (0.82 - 2.22, n=4)
-24%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
11%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.5
21%
2.41
-27%
2.99
-57%
1.4
26%
1
47%
2.33 (1.41 - 3.94, n=4)
-23%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
8%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
2
17%
2.51
-5%
3.02
-26%
2.9
-21%
1.3
46%
2.49 (1.47 - 4.01, n=4)
-4%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
15%
Load Average *
3.5
4.8
-37%
3.86
-10%
4.17
-19%
4.7
-34%
5.2
-49%
3.55 (2.99 - 4.34, n=4)
-1%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
-18%
Load Maximum *
6.9
11.5
-67%
6.96
-1%
5.44
21%
8.3
-20%
10
-45%
7.09 (6.37 - 8.46, n=4)
-3%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
34h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 56min
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-3%
16%
5%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2063
1914
-7%
2105
2%
2765
34%
2003
-3%
1768
-14%
H.264
1052
1050
0%
809
-23%
1147
9%
967
-8%
987
-6%
WiFi v1.3
806
715
-11%
726
-10%
866
7%
896
11%
762
-5%
Load
236
208
-12%
279
18%
267
13%
283
20%
249
6%

Pro

+ Desempenho veloz
+ Fotos da câmera com alto grau de nitidez
+ Câmeras com zoom flexível
+ Boa qualidade do microfone
+ Tela de cores precisas
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ 5G e eSIM
+ Reconhecimento facial infravermelho

Contra

- Somente zoom digital durante a gravação de vídeo
- Sem serviços Google
- Limitado para cartões de memória nano
- Taxa de atualização da tela limitada para 60 Hz
- Sem carregamento sem fio

Veredicto – Não abandone toda a esperança

In review: Huawei P40. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany
In review: Huawei P40. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany

Nossa pergunta inicial "Será que podem fazer isso funcionar?” é claro, aludiu ao fato de que o Huawei P40 não tem acesso aos serviços do Google. A resposta é um "Talvez" definitivo. Por um lado, o Huawei P40 é um smartphone de gama alta com uma boa configuração de câmera, durações razoáveis da bateria, desempenho rápido e Wi-Fi rápido.

Por outro lado, há uma grande desvantagem: A falta de serviços do Google torna impossível o uso do Google Maps ou da Play Store do Google, além de potencialmente causar problemas com muitos outros aplicativos. Embora a Galeria de aplicativos cresça constantemente e a instalação de aplicativos de fontes desconhecidas seja possível, pelo menos em teoria, o último envolve um alto risco de segurança para usuários normais e, mesmo para usuários avançados, pode ser difícil saber se os arquivos de download de fontes externas foram manipulados.

A Huawei está dando suporte aos usuários de várias maneiras, incluindo aplicativos e serviços para ajudar os usuários durante a configuração inicial. É uma venda difícil, principalmente porque existem muitos outros smartphones alternativos que simplesmente funcionam imediatamente.

Dito isto, como o desenvolvimento do ecossistema da Huawei está avançando mais rapidamente do que o esperado, é possível que a situação mude em um ou dois anos, tornando a Huawei uma alternativa real para quem não quer o Google em seu smartphone.

O Huawei P40 é um smartphone de gama alta premium que força os usuários a se comprometerem devido à falta de serviços do Google.

Além disso, o fabricante parece estar focado principalmente no P40 Pro, e, como resultado, se sente como que o P40 fica para trás em uma comparação direta com a concorrência: Primeiro, apenas uma das ópticas pode ser usada para gravar vídeos e o zoom óptico é limitado a imagens.

Em segundo lugar, a taxa de atualização é limitada aos 60 Hz habituais, enquanto o Galaxy S20 tem mais a oferecer. O brilho da tela também pode ser maior, não há carregamento sem fio e, além disso, os possíveis compradores terão que se perguntar se desejam comprar um cartão de memória dedicado apenas para o Huawei P40, pois o microSD não é suportado.

Huawei P40 - 04/16/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
58 / 70 → 83%
Peso
90%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 64 → 84%
Desempenho da aplicação
76 / 86 → 89%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
77%
Médio
81%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P40 – Venda difícil apesar de sua ótima câmera
Florian Schmitt, 2020-04-23 (Update: 2020-04-27)