Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Portátil para jogos exclusivo com muito desempenho sob o capô

Tela dupla. Com seu hardware poderoso, o Zephyrus Duo consegue exibir os jogos mais recentes sem problemas em sua tela 4K mate (IPS, validado pela Pantone, 100% AdobeRGB, G-Sync). Também existem outros ótimos recursos: 2 SSDs NVMe (RAID 0), 32 GB de RAM (no modo dual-channel), Thunderbolt 3. Além disso, o portátil vem com muitos acessórios.
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Processador
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 735-1080 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 256-bits, 27.21.14.5148 (Nvidia 451.48), Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, um slot (ocupado), 16 GB soldados
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, 1780 GB livre
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Entrada para microfone, fone (conector de áudio combinado), TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 360 x 268
Bateria
90 Wh, 5675 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15.4 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Headset, gaming mouse, webcam externa, pousa palmas, segundo carregador (Type-C USB) e capa para portátil, McAfee LiveSafe (versão de teste), MS Office 365, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.512 kg, Suprimento de energia: 625 g
Preço
4500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
07/2020
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.5 kg20 mm15.6"3840x2160
04/2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
05/2020
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.6"1920x1080
85 %
05/2020
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.6"3840x2160

Size Comparison

360 mm 268 mm 20 mm 2.5 kg358 mm 248 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg
Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)
Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)
Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1  (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s ∼91%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1170 MBit/s ∼84% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=63)
1161 MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=332)
700 MBit/s ∼50% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s ∼99% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1310 MBit/s ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1290 MBit/s ∼96%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1666, n=63)
1021 MBit/s ∼76% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=332)
653 MBit/s ∼49% -49%
401
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 401 cd/m² Médio: 385.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 398 cd/m²
Contraste: 1421:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.53 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
66%
68%
95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56.4 (26.4, 30)
14.4 (7.2, 7.2)
74%
14 (6.8, 7.2)
75%
2.2 (1, 1.2)
96%
Response Time Black / White *
24.4 (10, 14.4)
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
57%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
61%
1.8 (1, 0.8)
93%
PWM Frequency
60 (80)
Screen
-48%
-31%
-30%
Brightness middle
398
320
-20%
316
-21%
385
-3%
Brightness
385
318
-17%
311
-19%
390
1%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
92
2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.24
14%
0.21
25%
Contrast
1421
1333
-6%
1505
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.53
4.03
-163%
3.03
-98%
2.46
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.69
8.43
-128%
7.32
-98%
4.01
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.77
0.98
-27%
1.1
-43%
2.6
-238%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.94
-148%
3.9
-63%
1.39
42%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.42 91%
2.42 91%
2.31 95%
CCT
6996 93%
6751 96%
7439 87%
6395 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
100
66
-34%
65
-35%
98
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99
-1%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / -31%
19% / -16%
33% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17957 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1560 (1527.18-1799.01)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK; Turbo: Ø1671 (1636.19-1862.18)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
205 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1799 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
147.46 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
219 Points ∼100% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
213 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (201 - 219, n=8)
207 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
205 Points ∼94%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points ∼92% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=589)
160 Points ∼73% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
1862 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1818 (min: 1544.4, max: 1818.6) Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1799 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (1614 - 1862, n=8)
1736 Points ∼93% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (min: 1518.31, max: 1635.12) Points ∼88% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (min: 1201.27, max: 1287.87) Points ∼69% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=593)
897 Points ∼48% -50%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=59)
402 Seconds * ∼100% -38%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
368 Seconds * ∼92% -27%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * ∼73% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
292.8 Seconds * ∼73% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
290.5 Seconds * ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (278 - 295, n=6)
287 Seconds * ∼71% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
285 Seconds * ∼71% +2%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47455 MIPS ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
47170 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (43786 - 47806, n=6)
46153 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
44959 MIPS ∼95% -5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=59)
35922 MIPS ∼76% -24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
35130 MIPS ∼74% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
5457 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5364 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (5081 - 5525, n=6)
5333 MIPS ∼98% -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS ∼96% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
5081 MIPS ∼93% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
5015 MIPS ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=59)
4830 MIPS ∼89% -10%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
511 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
494 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (476 - 494, n=6)
486 Points ∼95% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points ∼93% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=105)
445 Points ∼87% -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
3801 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (3539 - 3883, n=6)
3769 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3762 Points ∼99%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points ∼98% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points ∼77% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=106)
2886 Points ∼76% -23%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8416 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (7634 - 8666, n=5)
8281 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
8087 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=40)
6568 Points ∼78% -22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
6216 Points ∼74% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1401 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1347 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (1283 - 1401, n=5)
1341 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1233 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1401, n=40)
1202 Points ∼86% -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
13 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (12.2 - 13, n=6)
12.6 fps ∼97% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.5 fps ∼96%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
12.5 fps ∼96% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps ∼94% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.1 fps ∼78% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=59)
9.79 fps ∼75% -22%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=35)
59.2 s ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
54.8 s ∼93%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s ∼89% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.4 s ∼89% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
52.1 s ∼88% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (48.4 - 54.8, n=6)
51.6 s ∼87% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
48.89 s ∼83% -11%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=40)
0.62 sec * ∼100% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.606 sec * ∼98% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
0.596 sec * ∼96% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * ∼95% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.582 sec * ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (0.564 - 0.596, n=6)
0.58 sec * ∼94% -0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.547 sec * ∼88% +6%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3821 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4210 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4762 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6580 Points ∼100% +25%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6490 Points ∼99% +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=277)
5312 Points ∼81% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
5277 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
5277 Points ∼80% 0%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=436)
5097 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
4762 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
4762 Points ∼93% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=453)
4281 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3821 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
3821 Points ∼89% 0%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6243.8 μs * ∼100% -85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3374.7 μs * ∼54%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs * ∼31% +43%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
1877.3 μs * ∼30% +44%

* ... smaller is better

2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3431 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 528.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 472.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2984 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2958 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.6 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Average 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-8%
-13%
-4%
0%
Write 4K
127.6
131.7
3%
131.3
3%
127.4
0%
128
0%
Read 4K
48.4
47.34
-2%
45.84
-5%
147.5
205%
48.4
0%
Write Seq
2958
2884
-3%
2370
-20%
485.9
-84%
2958
0%
Read Seq
2984
2303
-23%
1509
-49%
1352
-55%
2984
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
472.7
423.9
-10%
481.5
2%
476.5
1%
473
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
528.7
487.7
-8%
559.6
6%
531.2
0%
529
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
3431
2822
-18%
2392
-30%
1061
-69%
3431
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3536
3478
-2%
3232
-9%
2552
-28%
3536
0%
AS SSD
2%
-1%
-36%
0%
Copy Game MB/s
1404.1
1404
0%
Copy Program MB/s
604.27
604
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2438.33
2438
0%
Score Total
4492
4677
4%
4950
10%
2594
-42%
4492
0%
Score Write
1688
2367
40%
2176
29%
1117
-34%
1688
0%
Score Read
1861
1529
-18%
1790
-4%
975
-48%
1861
0%
Access Time Write *
0.033
0.038
-15%
0.034
-3%
0.045
-36%
0.033
-0%
Access Time Read *
0.062
0.065
-5%
0.071
-15%
0.103
-66%
0.062
-0%
4K-64 Write
1296.26
2007.16
55%
1829.36
41%
929.38
-28%
1296
0%
4K-64 Read
1518.76
1205.16
-21%
1635.31
8%
789.2
-48%
1519
0%
4K Write
113.87
98.89
-13%
110.7
-3%
103.83
-9%
114
0%
4K Read
43.98
47.55
8%
48.09
9%
65.76
50%
44
0%
Seq Write
2783.45
2612.8
-6%
2359.82
-15%
836.4
-70%
2783
0%
Seq Read
2980.71
2766.61
-7%
1064.87
-64%
1200.02
-60%
2981
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -2%
-7% / -6%
-20% / -22%
0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030204020502060207020802090210021102120213021402150216021702180219022002210222022302240225022602270228022902300231023202330234023502360237023802390240024102420243024402450246024702480249025002510252025302540255025602570258025902600261026202630264026502660267026802690270027102720273027402750276027702780279028002810282028302840285028602870288028902900291029202930294029502960297029802990300030103020303030403050306030703080309031003110312031303140315031603170318031903200321032203230324032503260327032803290330033103320333033403350336033703380339034003410342034303440345034603470348034903500351035203530Tooltip
: Ø3513 (3304.27-3524.47)
3DMark 11 Performance
23526 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44534 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17714 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7780 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
32946 Points ∼100% +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
30456 Points ∼92% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
28900 Points ∼88% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (26292 - 32946, n=6)
28659 Points ∼87% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27202 Points ∼83%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
25135 Points ∼76% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=688)
14414 Points ∼44% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
8979 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
8379 Points ∼93% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7372 - 8979, n=6)
7963 Points ∼89% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7829 Points ∼87% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7665 Points ∼85%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7084 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=224)
5957 Points ∼66% -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
22967 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
22326 Points ∼97% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
21121 Points ∼92% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (19655 - 22967, n=6)
21076 Points ∼92% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
19914 Points ∼87%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
18992 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=611)
12052 Points ∼52% -39%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
95.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
83.4 (min: 67) fps ∼87% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (74.3 - 95.8, n=7)
81.3 fps ∼85% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
79.1 (min: 64) fps ∼83% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
75.8 (min: 63) fps ∼79%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
70.5 (min: 55) fps ∼74% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=384)
52.5 fps ∼55% -31%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
181.1 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (173 - 181, n=3)
176 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
173.1 fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=375)
101 fps ∼56% -42%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
165.2 fps ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
152.1 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (140 - 165, n=4)
151 fps ∼91% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
147 (min: 94) fps ∼89% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (93.3 - 191, n=18)
139 fps ∼84% -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
137 fps ∼83% -10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
44.9 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
43.7 (min: 28) fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (41 - 44.9, n=3)
43.2 fps ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
42.4 (min: 25) fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.6 - 56.8, n=21)
37.1 fps ∼83% -17%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
107 (min: 72) fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91.2 - 107, n=3)
96.7 fps ∼90% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
91.2 fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 136, n=21)
79.5 fps ∼74% -13%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
102 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
102 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=49)
71 fps ∼70% -30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
100 (min: 77) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
97 (min: 75) fps ∼97% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (89 - 97, n=5)
93 fps ∼93% +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
91 (min: 72) fps ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
91 fps ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
89 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 124, n=93)
74.4 fps ∼74% -16%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-79)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)
GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test
GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 425.1 349.2 324.2 173.1 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 330.5 237 143.4 75.8 53.5 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 143 115 108 102 77 42 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 103 95 93 89 67 36 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 245.5 136.4 86.5 62.5 39.9 19.6 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 128 93 87 65 49 29 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 172.3 123.6 104.3 91.2 64.7 36.3 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 131.4 99.7 68.3 44.9 36.2 23.5 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 205 168.3 154 152.1 116.7 64 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 210.4 161.2 110.6 89.7 57.9 30.3 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 253 167 149 118 89 51 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
33 / 34 / 35 dB
Carga
48 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.632.638.230.938.52540.235.340.533.239.23132.432.631.329.931.34034.831.532.335.733.75041.835.834.631.742.46333.228.528.329.135.38028.526.727.425.731.810025.62526.224.726.912528.225.525.824.627.81603227.827.725.831.220031.124.424.322.83125031.522.923.522.132.931530.823.423.521.33240034.224.923.119.53550031.922.9221933.46303423.42217.835.480036.925.424.21837.4100039.326.726.317.940.212503924.923.318.939.9160037.822.420.817.939.1200037.522.220.417.739.4250035.920.519.517.637.3315034.521.619.51836.440003519.518.917.936.6500035.119.2191836.6630032.918.518.517.935.7800028.218.818.61830.21000025.819.218.817.926.91250025.119.81917.8241600022.11918.617.920.1SPL47.934.533.530.449.2N6.22.121.46.8median 32.9median 22.9median 22median 18median 35Delta3.82.42.52.13.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
-4%
-5%
2%
5%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.9 (25 - 30.1, n=6)
4%
29.3 (25 - 32, n=385)
2%
Idle Minimum *
33
30
9%
32
3%
34
-3%
31.2 (30 - 33, n=6)
5%
31.4 (25 - 42, n=808)
5%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
36
-6%
32.5 (30 - 35, n=6)
4%
32.6 (26 - 46.6, n=808)
4%
Idle Maximum *
35
36
-3%
39
-11%
41
-17%
35.8 (30.1 - 43, n=6)
-2%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=808)
1%
Load Average *
48
50
-4%
53
-10%
48
-0%
45.9 (39.5 - 50, n=6)
4%
41.1 (28 - 59, n=809)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48
-0%
48
-0%
48
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
50
-2%
53
-8%
54
-10%
49.6 (45 - 59.4, n=6)
-1%
48.4 (38.9 - 64.1, n=809)
1%

* ... smaller is better

 34 °C36 °C35 °C 
 43 °C43 °C41 °C 
 42 °C42 °C40 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
52 °C53 °C47 °C
50 °C51 °C44 °C
43 °C44 °C42 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 47.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-15.2 °C / -27.4 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
3%
-2%
-2%
-3%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
44
-2%
53
-23%
49
-14%
49.3 (43 - 57, n=6)
-15%
46 (28 - 68.8, n=772)
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
53
50
6%
55
-4%
61
-15%
53.4 (50 - 59, n=6)
-1%
49.8 (25.9 - 78, n=770)
6%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
28
12%
27
16%
30 (27.4 - 34, n=6)
6%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=724)
4%
Idle Bottom *
31
31
-0%
29
6%
29
6%
30.9 (28 - 33, n=6)
-0%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=722)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.936.32533.241.83129.933.34035.738.35031.740.56329.133.68025.743.410024.752.212524.654.916025.853.820022.853.425022.156.931521.359.840019.5655001964.263017.865.88001867.8100017.971.4125018.972.4160017.976.5200017.773.1250017.671.631501870.3400017.97850001879.3630017.977.580001878.31000017.976.21250017.871.21600017.959.9SPL30.487.1N1.469.2median 18median 70.3Delta2.17.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 2.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 23 / 30 / 39 Watt
Carga midlight 156 / 208 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
31%
23%
10%
24%
22%
Idle Minimum *
23
11
52%
13
43%
18
22%
14.1 (10 - 23, n=6)
39%
19 (1.9 - 113, n=768)
17%
Idle Average *
30
15
50%
16
47%
21
30%
18.6 (13.1 - 30, n=6)
38%
24.4 (6 - 119, n=768)
19%
Idle Maximum *
39
25
36%
27
31%
38
3%
30.1 (15.8 - 42, n=6)
23%
30 (8.3 - 122, n=768)
23%
Load Average *
156
95
39%
109
30%
113
28%
128 (94.8 - 156, n=6)
18%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=759)
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152
140
8%
155
-2%
149
2%
Load Maximum *
208
211
-1%
236
-13%
256
-23%
202 (169 - 211, n=6)
3%
175 (21.9 - 590, n=758)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
3h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 25min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 12min
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
38%
48%
79%
3%
Reader / Idle
480
495
3%
505
5%
518
8%
358 (39 - 1174, n=715)
-25%
H.264
325
263 (88 - 554, n=159)
-19%
WiFi v1.3
185
378
104%
364
97%
364
97%
264 (62 - 622, n=427)
43%
Load
72
78
8%
102
42%
166
131%
79.6 (18 - 243, n=682)
11%

Pro

+ Tela 4K brilhante e de alto contraste
+ Validação Pantone
+ Boa precisão das cores
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ CPU habilitado para overclock
+ Chassi de metal
+ Peso moderado
+ Os usuários podem escolher entre G-Sync e Optimus
+ Unidades RAID 0 (2 TB)
+ Excelentes velocidades de transferência de Wi-Fi
+ Os acessórios incluem fone de ouvido, mouse para jogos, webcam externa, descanso para as mãos, segundo arregador e uma capa
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Tempos de resposta medíocres da tela
- Apenas um slot de RAM
- Sem leitor de cartões
The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, courtesy of Asus Germany
The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, courtesy of Asus Germany

Com este dispositivo Zephyrus e seu Screenpad Plus, a Asus está tentando fornecer valor adicional ao grupo-alvo de jogadores, streamers e criadores de conteúdo. No geral, a Screenpad tende a ser útil de uma maneira ou de outra. No entanto, isso tem um custo: Comparado a outros portáteis para jogos sem tela secundária, o peso e as dimensões do Zephyrus são maiores.

Graças à CPU octa-core Core i9-10980HK e à GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, o portátil não apresenta falta de desempenho. Os núcleos de processamento são acompanhados por 32 GB de RAM (no modo de canal duplo), composto por um módulo de 16 GB e 16 GB de memória soldada. São possíveis atualizações de até 48 GB. Os dois SSDs NVMe em RAID 0 oferecem altas velocidades de transferência e muito armazenamento (2 TB).

Todos os jogos mais recentes funcionam sem problemas no Asus Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS.

A tela IPS 4K habilitada para G-Sync oferece alto brilho, uma boa taxa de contraste, bons ângulos de visão e - graças à validação Pantone - ótimas cores. Além disso, abrange todo o espaço de cores AdobeRGB. Os tempos de resposta são medíocres. Para melhores tempos de resposta, também está disponível uma opção alternativa de tela Full HD de 300 Hz.

A seleção de portas generosa inclui notavelmente uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Pode ser usada para conectar docks ricos em recursos ou GPUs externas. Além disso, a porta pode ser usada para alimentar o dispositivo com um nível de desempenho reduzido, por exemplo, ao viajar, com o segundo adaptador de CA incluído (65 watts).

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS - 07/22/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
80%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
64 / 80 → 80%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
57 / 95 → 60%
Pantalha
93%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
89%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
80%
Médio
72%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Portátil para jogos exclusivo com muito desempenho sob o capô
Sascha Mölck, 2020-07-27 (Update: 2020-07-27)