Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Portátil para jogos exclusivo com muito desempenho sob o capô

Name: Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Brand: Asus

Tela dupla. Com seu hardware poderoso, o Zephyrus Duo consegue exibir os jogos mais recentes sem problemas em sua tela 4K mate (IPS, validado pela Pantone, 100% AdobeRGB, G-Sync). Também existem outros ótimos recursos: 2 SSDs NVMe (RAID 0), 32 GB de RAM (no modo dual-channel), Thunderbolt 3. Além disso, o portátil vem com muitos acessórios.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/27/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Zephyrus Duo 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1080 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 256-bits, 27.21.14.5148 (Nvidia 451.48), Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, um slot (ocupado), 16 GB soldados

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM470

Disco rígido

2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB

, 1780 GB livre

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Entrada para microfone, fone (conector de áudio combinado), TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 360 x 268

Bateria

90 Wh, 5675 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15.4 V

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Headset, gaming mouse, webcam externa, pousa palmas, segundo carregador (Type-C USB) e capa para portátil, McAfee LiveSafe (versão de teste), MS Office 365, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.512 kg, Suprimento de energia: 625 g

Preço

4500 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.5 %	07/2020	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.5 kg	20 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
	04/2020	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.1 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 %	05/2020	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85.8 %	05/2020	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	3840x2160

Size Comparison

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)

Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)

Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1330 MBit/s +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1310 MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1290 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1390 MBit/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s +9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1320 MBit/s +5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1260 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1170 MBit/s -7%


401 cd/m²	398 cd/m²	361 cd/m²
401 cd/m²	398 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
385 cd/m²	395 cd/m²	368 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 401 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 385.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 398 cd/m²
Contraste: 1421:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display		-16%	-16%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	87	70.3 -19%	69.5 -20%	99.9 15%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.5 0%	99.6 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	99.9	72.2 -28%	70.8 -29%	98.2 -2%
Response Times		66%	68%	95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56.4 ?(26.4, 30)	14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2) 74%	14 ?(6.8, 7.2) 75%	2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 96%
Response Time Black / White *	24.4 ?(10, 14.4)	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 57%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 61%	1.8 ?(1, 0.8) 93%
PWM Frequency				60 ?(80)
Screen		-48%	-31%	-30%
Brightness middle	398	320 -20%	316 -21%	385 -3%
Brightness	385	318 -17%	311 -19%	390 1%
Brightness Distribution	90	88 -2%	92 2%	93 3%
Black Level *	0.28	0.24 14%	0.21 25%
Contrast	1421	1333 -6%	1505 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.53	4.03 -163%	3.03 -98%	2.46 -61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.69	8.43 -128%	7.32 -98%	4.01 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.77	0.98 -27%	1.1 -43%	2.6 -238%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	5.94 -148%	3.9 -63%	1.39 42%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.42 ^91%	2.42 ^91%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	6996 ^93%	6751 ^96%	7439 ^87%	6395 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	100	66 -34%	65 -35%	98 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	99 -1%	100 0%	100 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / -28%	7% / -16%	23% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26.4 ms rise
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1560 (1527.18-1799.01)

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK; Turbo: Ø1671 (1636.19-1862.18)

CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

205 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1799 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

147.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	268 Points +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	219 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	213 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (198 - 219, n=15)	207 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	205 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	201 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	190 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3089 Points +72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	1862 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1818 (1544.4^min - 1818.6^max) Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1799 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1606 - 1862, n=15)	1739 Points -3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1635 (1518.31^min - 1635.12^max) Points -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	1288 (1201.27^min - 1287.87^max) Points -28%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	368 Seconds * -27%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	295 Seconds * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	292.8 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	290.5 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	285 Seconds * +2%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (239 - 299, n=13)	277 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)	199.8 Seconds * +31%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6122 MIPS +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	5457 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (5081 - 5542, n=13)	5386 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5364 MIPS
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5227 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	5081 MIPS -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	5015 MIPS -7%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	76978 MIPS +62%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	47455 MIPS
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	47170 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (43786 - 49275, n=13)	47126 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	44959 MIPS -5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	43786 MIPS -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	35130 MIPS -26%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	698 Points +41%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	511 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	494 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (465 - 507, n=13)	488 Points -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	477 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	468 Points -5%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7419 Points +97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (3526 - 4487, n=13)	3933 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	3801 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3762 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3713 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	2932 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)	1808 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1401 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1347 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1283 - 1401, n=12)	1339 Points -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1283 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	1233 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13567 Points +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8416 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (7634 - 8666, n=12)	8175 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	8087 Points -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	7634 Points -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	6216 Points -26%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.2 fps +70%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	13 fps +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (12 - 14.6, n=13)	13 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.5 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	12.5 fps 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.2 fps -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.1 fps -19%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	54.8 s *
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (44 - 89, n=13)	53.7 s * +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	52.4 s * +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	52.4 s * +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	52.1 s * +5%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.2 s * +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	48.89 s * +11%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.606 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	0.596 sec * -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.592 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.582 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (0.561 - 0.596, n=13)	0.576 sec * +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	0.547 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4699 sec * +19%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3821 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4210 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4762 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5277 pontos
Ajuda

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7580 Points +44%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	6580 Points +25%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6490 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (5277 - 6574, n=2)	5926 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5484 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	5277 Points

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)	5222 Points +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3821 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q ()	3821 Points 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)	6048 Points +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	4762 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q ()	4762 Points 0%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6244 μs * -85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3375 μs *
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	1916 μs * +43%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	1877 μs * +44%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3431 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 529 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 472.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2984 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2958 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.6 MB/s

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	Average 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-8%	-13%	-4%	23%
Write 4K	127.6	131.7 3%	131.3 3%	127.4 0%	175.9 ?(110.4 - 236, n=4) 38%
Read 4K	48.4	47.34 -2%	45.84 -5%	147.5 205%	49.7 ?(47.1 - 55.1, n=4) 3%
Write Seq	2958	2884 -3%	2370 -20%	485.9 -84%	4078 ?(2958 - 4822, n=3) 38%
Read Seq	2984	2303 -23%	1509 -49%	1352 -55%	3653 ?(2933 - 5043, n=3) 22%
Write 4K Q32T1	472.7	423.9 -10%	481.5 2%	476.5 1%	540 ?(467 - 625, n=4) 14%
Read 4K Q32T1	529	487.7 -8%	560 6%	531 0%	456 ?(387 - 529, n=4) -14%
Write Seq Q32T1	3431	2822 -18%	2392 -30%	1061 -69%	4457 ?(3424 - 5623, n=4) 30%
Read Seq Q32T1	3536	3478 -2%	3232 -9%	2552 -28%	5307 ?(3519 - 7130, n=4) 50%
AS SSD		2%	-1%	-36%	9%
Seq Read	2981	2767 -7%	1065 -64%	1200 -60%	3515 ?(2981 - 4981, n=4) 18%
Seq Write	2783	2613 -6%	2360 -15%	836 -70%	2878 ?(2561 - 3116, n=4) 3%
4K Read	43.98	47.55 8%	48.09 9%	65.8 50%	48.4 ?(43 - 57, n=4) 10%
4K Write	113.9	98.9 -13%	110.7 -3%	103.8 -9%	165.6 ?(102 - 261, n=4) 45%
4K-64 Read	1519	1205 -21%	1635 8%	789 -48%	1419 ?(1205 - 1549, n=4) -7%
4K-64 Write	1296	2007 55%	1829 41%	929 -28%	1348 ?(1290 - 1426, n=4) 4%
Access Time Read *	0.062	0.065 -5%	0.071 -15%	0.103 -66%	0.0455 ?(0.032 - 0.062, n=4) 27%
Access Time Write *	0.033	0.038 -15%	0.034 -3%	0.045 -36%	0.04375 ?(0.033 - 0.061, n=4) -33%
Score Read	1861	1529 -18%	1790 -4%	975 -48%	1818 ?(1751 - 1901, n=4) -2%
Score Write	1688	2367 40%	2176 29%	1117 -34%	1801 ?(1688 - 1923, n=4) 7%
Score Total	4492	4677 4%	4950 10%	2594 -42%	4521 ?(4428 - 4583, n=4) 1%
Copy ISO MB/s	2438				2919 ?(2438 - 3357, n=4) 20%
Copy Program MB/s	604				706 ?(544 - 966, n=4) 17%
Copy Game MB/s	1404				1560 ?(1116 - 2051, n=4) 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -2%	-7% / -6%	-20% / -22%	16% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 Performance		23526 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		44534 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17714 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		7780 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)	40451 Points +49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	32946 Points +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	30456 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (26292 - 32995, n=10)	29663 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	28900 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	27202 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	25135 Points -8%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)	29442 Points +48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	22967 Points +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	22326 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (19655 - 23649, n=10)	21743 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	21121 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	19914 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	18992 Points -5%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)	12060 Points +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)	8979 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	8379 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7372 - 8979, n=11)	8210 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7829 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	7665 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	7084 Points -8%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)	116.8 fps +54%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)	95.8 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11)	85.3 fps +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	83.4 (67^min) fps +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	79.1 (64^min) fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	75.8 (63^min) fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	70.5 (55^min) fps -7%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)	181.1 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (170.2 - 181.1, n=4)	174.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	173.1 fps

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)	165.2 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8)	155.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	152.1 fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	147 (94^min) fps -3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	137 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (22.2 - 189.7, n=5, last 2 years)	130.7 fps -14%

Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	44.9 fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	43.7 (28^min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (40.6 - 45, n=5)	43 fps -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	42.4 (25^min) fps -6%

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	107 (72^min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91.2 - 107, n=4)	96 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	91.2 fps

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=124, last 2 years)	126 fps +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	102 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4)	101 fps -1%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=30, last 2 years)	161.3 fps +81%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	100 (77^min) fps +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	97 (75^min) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (89 - 106, n=10)	95.8 fps +8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	91 (72^min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)	91 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	89 fps

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-79)

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)

GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	425.1	349.2	324.2	173.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	330.5	237	143.4	75.8		53.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	143	115	108	102	77	42
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	103	95	93	89	67	36
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	245.5	136.4	86.5	62.5	39.9	19.6
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	128	93	87	65	49	29
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)	172.3	123.6	104.3	91.2	64.7	36.3
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)	131.4	99.7	68.3	44.9	36.2	23.5
Doom Eternal (2020)	205	168.3	154	152.1	116.7	64
Gears Tactics (2020)	210.4	161.2	110.6	89.7	57.9	30.3
F1 2020 (2020)	253	167	149	118	89	51

Barulho

Ocioso		33 / 34 / 35 dB
Carga		48 / 49 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Noise		0%	-4%	-5%	4%	12%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	30 -0%	27.9 ?(24.4 - 30.1, n=8) 7%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	33	30 9%	32 3%	34 -3%	29.7 ?(24.4 - 33, n=8) 10%	25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years) 22%
Idle Average *	34	33 3%	34 -0%	36 -6%	30.8 ?(24.4 - 35, n=8) 9%	27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Maximum *	35	36 -3%	39 -11%	41 -17%	35.4 ?(24.4 - 44, n=8) -1%	30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average *	48	50 -4%	53 -10%	48 -0%	47.2 ?(39.5 - 53, n=8) 2%	43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years) 10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	48 -0%	48 -0%	48 -0%
Load Maximum *	49	50 -2%	53 -8%	54 -10%	49.6 ?(45 - 59.4, n=8) -1%	53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


34 °C	36 °C	35 °C
43 °C	43 °C	41 °C
42 °C	42 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C


52 °C	53 °C	47 °C
50 °C	51 °C	44 °C
43 °C	44 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 47.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
32 °C	31 °C	30 °C
32 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C


31 °C	31 °C	30 °C
31 °C	30 °C	30 °C
28 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 35 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35 °C	34 °C	39 °C
45 °C	42 °C	40 °C
44 °C	42 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C


53 °C	53 °C	49 °C
49 °C	50 °C	45 °C
43 °C	44 °C	43 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 47.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Heat		3%	-2%	-2%	-1%	-1%
Maximum Upper Side *	43	44 -2%	53 -23%	49 -14%	47.9 ?(35.2 - 57, n=8) -11%	46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years) -7%
Maximum Bottom *	53	50 6%	55 -4%	61 -15%	51.9 ?(32.5 - 62, n=8) 2%	49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Upper Side *	32	29 9%	28 12%	27 16%	30 ?(27.4 - 34, n=8) 6%	31.3 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Bottom *	31	31 -0%	29 6%	29 6%	31 ?(28 - 33, n=8) -0%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.4 / 2.1 Watt
Ocioso	23 / 30 / 39 Watt
Carga	156 / 208 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		31%	23%	10%	28%	23%
Idle Minimum *	23	11 52%	13 43%	18 22%	12.9 ?(9 - 23, n=8) 44%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	30	15 50%	16 47%	21 30%	17.3 ?(12.6 - 30, n=8) 42%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years) 36%
Idle Maximum *	39	25 36%	27 31%	38 3%	26.9 ?(15.8 - 42, n=8) 31%	26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years) 31%
Load Average *	156	95 39%	109 30%	113 28%	123.9 ?(94.8 - 156, n=8) 21%	111.1 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years) 29%
Witcher 3 ultra *	152	140 8%	155 -2%	149 2%
Load Maximum *	208	211 -1%	236 -13%	256 -23%	205 ?(169 - 216, n=8) 1%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years) -21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)		3h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 25min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 12min

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		38%	48%	79%	38%
Reader / Idle	480	495 3%	505 5%	518 8%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 13%
H.264	325				399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years) 23%
WiFi v1.3	185	378 104%	364 97%	364 97%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=180, last 2 years) 99%
Load	72	78 8%	102 42%	166 131%	84.4 ?(36 - 173, n=142, last 2 years) 17%

Pro

+ Tela 4K brilhante e de alto contraste

+ Validação Pantone

+ Boa precisão das cores

+ Alto desempenho do sistema

+ CPU habilitado para overclock

+ Chassi de metal

+ Peso moderado

+ Os usuários podem escolher entre G-Sync e Optimus

+ Unidades RAID 0 (2 TB)

+ Excelentes velocidades de transferência de Wi-Fi

+ Os acessórios incluem fone de ouvido, mouse para jogos, webcam externa, descanso para as mãos, segundo arregador e uma capa

+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Tempos de resposta medíocres da tela

- Apenas um slot de RAM

- Sem leitor de cartões

The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, courtesy of Asus Germany

Com este dispositivo Zephyrus e seu Screenpad Plus, a Asus está tentando fornecer valor adicional ao grupo-alvo de jogadores, streamers e criadores de conteúdo. No geral, a Screenpad tende a ser útil de uma maneira ou de outra. No entanto, isso tem um custo: Comparado a outros portáteis para jogos sem tela secundária, o peso e as dimensões do Zephyrus são maiores.

Graças à CPU octa-core Core i9-10980HK e à GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, o portátil não apresenta falta de desempenho. Os núcleos de processamento são acompanhados por 32 GB de RAM (no modo de canal duplo), composto por um módulo de 16 GB e 16 GB de memória soldada. São possíveis atualizações de até 48 GB. Os dois SSDs NVMe em RAID 0 oferecem altas velocidades de transferência e muito armazenamento (2 TB).

Todos os jogos mais recentes funcionam sem problemas no Asus Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS.

A tela IPS 4K habilitada para G-Sync oferece alto brilho, uma boa taxa de contraste, bons ângulos de visão e - graças à validação Pantone - ótimas cores. Além disso, abrange todo o espaço de cores AdobeRGB. Os tempos de resposta são medíocres. Para melhores tempos de resposta, também está disponível uma opção alternativa de tela Full HD de 300 Hz.

A seleção de portas generosa inclui notavelmente uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Pode ser usada para conectar docks ricos em recursos ou GPUs externas. Além disso, a porta pode ser usada para alimentar o dispositivo com um nível de desempenho reduzido, por exemplo, ao viajar, com o segundo adaptador de CA incluído (65 watts).

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS - 2020-07-22 07/22/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

83 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

80%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

64 / 80 → 80%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Bateria

57 / 95 → 60%

Pantalha

93%

Desempenho do jogos

94%

Desempenho da aplicação

89%

Temperatura

80 / 95 → 84%

Ruído

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

80%

Médio

72%

85%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Portátil para jogos exclusivo com muito desempenho sob o capô

Sascha Mölck, 2020-07-27 (Update: 2020-07-27)

Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Portátil para jogos exclusivo com muito desempenho sob o capô

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare