Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Triton 500: Superstar

Atualização de desempenho. A Nvidia atualizou recentemente seus chips Max-Q, que economizam energia. O Predator Triton 500 da Acer é um dos primeiros portáteis a serem equipados com uma Super GPU correspondente. Leia nossa análise para descobrir o desempenho oferecido por este modelo de alta tecnologia.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/23/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 (Predator Triton 500 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 815 MHz, Memoría: 1353 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, Máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM470

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB

, NVMe, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280

Placa de Som

Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 359 x 255

Bateria

84 Wh, 5550 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 watts, Predator Sense, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 736 g

Preço

2500 EUR

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
	04/2020	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.1 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.8 %	06/2019	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
88.8 %	05/2019	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.2 kg	17.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	09/2019	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.2 kg	18.3 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size comparison

Alienware m15 R2 P87F Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1390 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s -1%

ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: 10.61 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 18.71 ∆E


310 cd/m²	311 cd/m²	294 cd/m²
335 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
330 cd/m²	323 cd/m²	329 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 335 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 318.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 1333:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-4%	-4%	-7%
Display P3 Coverage	70.3	67.6 -4%	66.9 -5%	65.3 -7%
sRGB Coverage	99.5	97.5 -2%	98.1 -1%	95.1 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.2	68.9 -5%	68.5 -5%	65.9 -9%
Response Times		-5%	6%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2)	13.6 ?(8, 5.6) 6%	12.8 ?(6.8, 6) 11%	16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) -14%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)	12 ?(7.6, 4.4) -15%	10.4 ?(6, 4.4) -0%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 15%
PWM Frequency		23260 ?(19)	23810 ?(10)	23810 ?(24)
Screen		10%	7%	-26%
Brightness middle	320	282.3 -12%	293 -8%	324.2 1%
Brightness	318	269 -15%	270 -15%	304 -4%
Brightness Distribution	88	90 2%	87 -1%	90 2%
Black Level *	0.24	0.32 -33%	0.29 -21%	0.38 -58%
Contrast	1333	882 -34%	1010 -24%	853 -36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.03	1.17 71%	1.69 58%	5.01 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.43	3.29 61%	3.37 60%	12.7 -51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.98	1.06 -8%	1.24 -27%	1.64 -67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.94	1.3 78%	2.3 61%	7.9 -33%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.3 ^96%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6751 ^96%	6643 ^98%	6758 ^96%	8455 ^77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	66	63.8 -3%	63 -5%	60.8 -8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99	97.5 -2%	98.5 -1%	95.5 -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		0% / 5%	3% / 5%	-11% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.2 ms rise
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)

Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points +41%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	190 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H	179 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points -8%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H	174 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points +141%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	1288 (1201.27^min - 1287.87^max) Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H	1185 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	1175 Points -9%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H	1046 Points -19%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	699 Points +49%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	468 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H	429 Points -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7442 Points +154%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	2932 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H	2429 Points -17%

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37299

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7478

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

13620

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

14.13 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

82.1 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.22 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

190 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

149 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1288 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points +38%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5839 Points +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5725 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5484 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	5374 Points -2%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6244 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-21%	-11%	1%
Write 4K	131.7	91.3 -31%	137.2 4%	108.8 -17%
Read 4K	47.34	40.73 -14%	46.82 -1%	45.41 -4%
Write Seq	2884	1915 -34%	1221 -58%	2467 -14%
Read Seq	2303	2051 -11%	1217 -47%	2456 7%
Write 4K Q32T1	423.9	308.3 -27%	527 24%	532 26%
Read 4K Q32T1	487.7	417.4 -14%	614 26%	590 21%
Write Seq Q32T1	2822	1922 -32%	1986 -30%	2801 -1%
Read Seq Q32T1	3478	3395 -2%	3234 -7%	3172 -9%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3478 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2822 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 487.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2303 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2884 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.34 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.7 MB/s

3DMark 06 Standard Score		38265 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		60306 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		22730 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		38107 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18678 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		8043 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	22326 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21758 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	20718 Points -7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	18962 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points +44%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	8379 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	8342 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	7840 Points -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	7266 Points -13%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)	7720 Points +52%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	5086 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	5006 Points -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	4275 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	4032 Points -21%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points +33%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	30456 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28369 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	27762 Points -9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	24926 Points -18%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +40%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	83.4 (67^min) fps
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	81.3 fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	78.3 fps -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	66.9 fps -20%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	179	172	153	85.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)		236	143	83.4		58.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146	134	123	118
Fortnite (2018)		121	114	99.5	80.3	44.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		103	80.8			37.6
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)		119	100	72	56.1	31.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	107	93.4	79.5
Monster Hunter World (2018)		105	97.7	90	63.3	31.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)		111	105	97	72	39
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)		92	78	58	53	32
Hitman 2 (2018)		86.7	78.6	77	76	46.1
Battlefield V (2018)		139	127	119	96.1	58.7
Darksiders III (2018)		112	109	103	82.1	43.2
Just Cause 4 (2018)		152	113	105	73.9	41.3
Apex Legends (2019)		194	165	163	118	65
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)		103	97	87	71	48
Metro Exodus (2019)		101	77.8	63.4	51.2	31.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)		166	162	98.8	76.4
The Division 2 (2019)		129	112	80	59	31
Anno 1800 (2019)		94	74.4	44.9	38.8	23.2
Rage 2 (2019)		126	106	103	68.4	34.1
F1 2019 (2019)		174	141	138	122	74
Control (2019)		107	79.8		48.4	24.9
Borderlands 3 (2019)		107	84.3	68.1	49.1	26.6
FIFA 20 (2019)		251	241	240	239	190
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)		102	92	70	53	31
GRID 2019 (2019)		85.9	77.7	72	66.4	46.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)		134	129	107	78.9	44.5
Need for Speed Heat (2019)		93	86.6	83.3	66.9	40.9
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		95.7	93.1	89.9	76.2	42.7
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)		98	67.4	43.7	37	23.8
Escape from Tarkov (2020)		121	121	119	83.1	39.7
Hunt Showdown (2020)		119	101		68.8	32.4
Doom Eternal (2020)		164	150	147	108	58

Barulho

Ocioso		30 / 33 / 36 dB
Carga		50 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Noise		7%	13%	-3%	12%
off / environment *	30	28.3 6%	28.3 6%	28.3 6%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	30	30.4 -1%	28.8 4%	28.5 5%	25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	33	30.5 8%	28.8 13%	28.5 14%	27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	36	30.6 15%	29 19%	49 -36%	30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average *	50	37.6 25%	33.5 33%	49 2%	43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years) 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	46 4%	45 6%	49 -2%
Load Maximum *	50	55.1 -10%	45.2 10%	55 -10%	53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
41 °C	41 °C	38 °C
38 °C	39 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 40 °C


50 °C	49 °C	40 °C
46 °C	46 °C	41 °C
40 °C	40 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 43.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
28 °C	28 °C	28 °C
26 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 27.9 °C


31 °C	31 °C	30 °C
29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
28 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 35 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
42 °C	42 °C	39 °C
40 °C	40 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C


50 °C	49 °C	39 °C
47 °C	47 °C	43 °C
41 °C	42 °C	41 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).

	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-5%	-1%	-11%	-4%
Maximum Upper Side *	44	45.6 -4%	47 -7%	53.8 -22%	46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years) -5%
Maximum Bottom *	50	53.8 -8%	49.2 2%	58 -16%	49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Upper Side *	29	28.6 1%	28.6 1%	29.8 -3%	31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Bottom *	31	33.2 -7%	31.4 -1%	32.2 -4%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 1.6 Watt
Ocioso	11 / 15 / 25 Watt
Carga	95 / 211 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-22%	-2%	-71%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	11	18.3 -66%	12.5 -14%	19 -73%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Average *	15	22 -47%	15.3 -2%	40.5 -170%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Maximum *	25	28.8 -15%	20.7 17%	52 -108%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -8%
Load Average *	95	93 2%	90.2 5%	132.3 -39%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	140	142.6 -2%	162 -16%	183.3 -31%
Load Maximum *	211	215.9 -2%	209.3 1%	217.2 -3%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 15min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 18min

	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-4%	43%	-15%	5%
Reader / Idle	495		953 93%	554 12%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 10%
WiFi v1.3	378	362 -4%	393 4%	332 -12%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -3%
Load	78		102 31%	44 -44%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) 8%

Pro

+ Carcaça leve e estável

+ Painel responsivo de 300 Hz

+ G-Sync e Optimus

+ Muito bom desempenho

+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Alto desenvolvimento de ruído do sob uso de 3D

- Som de inicialização irritante (pode ser desativado)

- Manutenção limitada

Predator Triton 500: Review device provided by Acer Germany

Em 2020, o Predator Triton 500 continua impressionando com sua combinação de baixo peso, dimensões compactas e potência generosa.

O chassi de 15 polegadas relativamente leve e plano pode ter colegas significativamente mais grossos em muitos benchmarks, mas a versão Max-Q da RTX 2080 Super não é exatamente a melhor escolha do ponto de vista de preço-desempenho. De qualquer forma, a GPU rápida garante taxas de quadros Full HD uniformes, mesmo com títulos modernos (nas configurações máximas, é claro). Um outro destaque seria a tela de 300 Hz, que não é apenas responsiva, mas rica em contraste também.

Em suma, quase não há nada a criticar sobre a nova versão do Triton 500. O maior ponto de crítica é, como tantas vezes, o ruído de fundo sob uso intenso.