Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Porsche Design BOOK ONE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Porsche Design BOOK ONE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 262 cd/m²
Contraste: 1008:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.28 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) BOE06EC, , 2160x1440, 12.60 | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12.00 | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12.00 | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.60 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -2% | 17% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.6 | 58.8 -16% | 65.2 -6% | 81.8 18% | 66.6 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90 | 87.5 -3% | 91 1% | 98.3 9% | 96.5 7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 60.6 -8% | 66.1 0% | 82.2 25% | 67.8 3% |
| Response Times | 9% | 2% | 12% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 37 ? 10% | 45 ? -10% | 30 ? 27% | 37 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 26 ? 7% | 24 ? 14% | 29 ? -4% | 25 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 22130 ? | |||
| Screen | -26% | -7% | -2% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 262 | 369 41% | 406 55% | 316 21% | 482 84% |
| Brightness | 254 | 331 30% | 396 56% | 307 21% | 466 83% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 75 -16% | 88 -1% | 91 2% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.46 -77% | 0.3 -15% | 0.29 -12% | 0.395 -52% |
| Contrast | 1008 | 802 -20% | 1353 34% | 1090 8% | 1220 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.34 | 5.52 -65% | 5.28 -58% | 3.91 -17% | 4 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.12 | 9.29 -30% | 9.83 -38% | 7.9 -11% | 7.2 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.28 | 6.95 -112% | 6.71 -105% | 5.37 -64% | 5.7 -74% |
| Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.58 85% | 2.29 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7180 91% | 7009 93% | 6532 100% | 7812 83% | 7950 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 56 -5% | 59 0% | 72 22% | 62 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 88 -2% | 91 1% | 98 9% | 96 7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-18% | -2% /
-5% | 9% /
4% | 6% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2591 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4034 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 89% | 256% | 3% | 116% | 20% | |
| Read Seq | 475.3 | 1066 124% | 2408 407% | 398.9 -16% | 1308 175% | 518 9% |
| Write Seq | 260.9 | 593 127% | 1702 552% | 402 54% | 961 268% | 267.2 2% |
| Read 512 | 289.3 | 653 126% | 1301 350% | 303.1 5% | 227.5 -21% | 562 94% |
| Write 512 | 260.7 | 535 105% | 1288 394% | 320.3 23% | 792 204% | 263.5 1% |
| Read 4k | 30.06 | 35.92 19% | 53.6 78% | 26.11 -13% | 53.6 78% | 32.88 9% |
| Write 4k | 73.5 | 128.3 75% | 162.2 121% | 57.7 -21% | 136.3 85% | 85.6 16% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 296.8 | 460.6 55% | 504 70% | 245.8 -17% | 485.6 64% | 351.3 18% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 239.8 | 425.4 77% | 420.8 75% | 253.8 6% | 421.5 76% | 265.2 11% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1552 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5878 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 316 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 24.55 | 11.32 | 9.98 | |
| Thief (2014) | 10.6 | 6.1 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 6.86 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / dB |
| Carga |
| 30.8 / 32.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.41 / 4.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.7 / 7.4 Watt |
| Carga |
15 / 29.7 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.60 | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00 | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.00 | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.60 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30 | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -27% | -66% | -71% | -53% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.86 -14% | 3.5 -3% | 6.7 -97% | 4.2 -24% | 4.8 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 5.7 | 6.4 -12% | 7.2 -26% | 10.3 -81% | 10.1 -77% | 7.9 -39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 7.17 3% | 7.9 -7% | 13.5 -82% | 14 -89% | 10.7 -45% |
| Load Average * | 15 | 30.5 -103% | 29.6 -97% | 26 -73% | 37.4 -149% | 35 -133% |
| Load Maximum * | 29.7 | 32.4 -9% | 30.8 -4% | 28.8 3% | 34 -14% | 31.6 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | 1% | -28% | 35% | 55% | |
| Reader / Idle | 842 | 711 -16% | 713 -15% | 426 -49% | 1087 29% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 280 | 355 27% | 345 23% | 223 -20% | 489 75% | 672 140% |
| Load | 118 | 95 -19% | 111 -6% | 102 -14% | 112 -5% | 115 -3% |
| H.264 | 206 | 614 | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 115 |
Pro
Contra
Asus' Transformer 4 Pro is a sham model upgrade. In reality, the convertible laptop is in some ways inferior to its predecessor. The lower resolution display, the throttling CPU and an equal battery capacity leave few recognizable improvements to the Transformer 3 Pro. The only truly useful improvement is the fact that the USB Type-C port is no longer occupied by the power cord when the device is in AC power mode.
The improvements to the Transformer 4 Pro come at the expense of some of the previous model's good attributes. In crucial areas, our impression of this device is worse than that of its predecessor. Prospective buyers may want to consider whether a different product would suit them better.
Buyers of the Transformer 4 Pro will receive a convertible laptop that is in fact a good device, taken in isolation. Compared to the competition, however, it is clear where Asus cut costs. The device's processor performance and SSD performance are both far below average. Compared to the previous model, the Transformer 3 Pro, things look even worse. With the exception of its longer battery life, the new model provides no genuine added value. At its current price, the Transformer 4 Pro's performance is simply too weak. Other manufacturers offer devices with stronger performance at similar price points.
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620)
-
11/27/2017 v6(old)
Mike Wobker