Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do HP Pavilion 17t (7700HQ, UHD, GTX 1050)

Steve Schardein (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/04/2017

Pascal Pavilion Premiere… Uma configuração UHD do Pavilion 17t-ab200 que analisamos no mês passado chegou a nossos laboratórios… mas será que as vantagens extras do painel são suficiente para colocá-lo no topo?

HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 21.21.13.7682 - nVIDIA ForceWare 376.82
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400 (single-channel)
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 3840x2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO119B, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point, Intel Kaby Lake-H
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: SD full-sized
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Unidade ótica
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 32 x 419 x 288
Bateria
63 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.956 kg, Suprimento de energia: 428 g

 

294.7
cd/m²
322.7
cd/m²
297.9
cd/m²
300.7
cd/m²
325.7
cd/m²
300.3
cd/m²
311.9
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
316.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 325.7 cd/m² Médio: 308.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 325.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 880:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | - Ø
100% sRGB (Argyll) 87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.59
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
AUO119B, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
AUO109D, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GT73VR 6RF
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
22%
-25%
22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50.8
36.8
28%
55.6
-9%
33.6
34%
Response Time Black / White *
33.2
28
16%
46.8
-41%
30
10%
PWM Frequency
1000
Screen
-8%
9%
-3%
Brightness
309
265
-14%
408
32%
316
2%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
86
-4%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.37
0.28
24%
0.44
-19%
0.422
-14%
Contrast
880
996
13%
1003
14%
793
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5.8
11%
5.1
22%
4.11
37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.6
8.3
-48%
4.3
23%
5.74
-3%
Gamma
2.59 93%
2.1 114%
2.08 115%
2.3 104%
CCT
5860 111%
5723 114%
7345 88%
5987 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
57
-34%
87
0%
60.5
-30%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
87
-13%
100
0%
96
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / -2%
-8% / 2%
10% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
SpecViewperf
SpecViewperf
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
164 Points ∼74% +4%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
158 Points ∼71%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼68% -4%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼68% -4%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
149 Points ∼67% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
836 Points ∼45% +35%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼40% +19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼40% +19%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
686 Points ∼37% +11%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
620 Points ∼33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.88 Points ∼85% +4%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.8 Points ∼82%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼78% -5%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼78% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.24 Points ∼46% +33%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼41% +17%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points ∼40% +16%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6.96 Points ∼35%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
340.3 s * ∼4% -0%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
339 s * ∼4%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
329 s * ∼4% +3%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
565 Seconds * ∼3%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
547 Seconds * ∼2% +3%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
546 Seconds * ∼2% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
54.51 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
158 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
620 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
80.53 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
5214 Points ∼80% +136%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4378 Points ∼67% +98%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points ∼65% +91%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
2213 Points ∼34%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
8227 Points ∼88% +82%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
5310 Points ∼57% +18%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5161 Points ∼55% +14%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4516 Points ∼49%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4252 Points ∼71% +39%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
4212 Points ∼70% +38%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points ∼60% +17%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
3056 Points ∼51%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
3038 Points ∼51% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3056 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4516 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2213 pontos
Ajuda
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT73VR 6RF
2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-16%
-19%
59%
50%
Write 4k QD32
405.2
132.5
-67%
296
-27%
419.8
4%
441.8
9%
Read 4k QD32
282.7
399
41%
281.3
0%
573.3
103%
425
50%
Write 4k
116.2
85.32
-27%
82.25
-29%
59.76
-49%
65.68
-43%
Read 4k
20.09
32.7
63%
26.04
30%
21.04
5%
31.37
56%
Write 512
472.3
118.5
-75%
306.1
-35%
878
86%
915.8
94%
Read 512
694.6
376.2
-46%
315
-55%
760.1
9%
698.1
1%
Write Seq
263.2
353.6
34%
305.7
16%
1073
308%
916.1
248%
Read Seq
1076
520
-52%
516.8
-52%
1172
9%
914.3
-15%
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 153.6 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 698.9 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 409 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 0.1 ms
Índice de Explosão: 278.4 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 3.2 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
9116 Points ∼57% +35%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
8705 Points ∼54% +29%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7440 Points ∼47% +10%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6743 Points ∼42%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
6319 Points ∼40% -6%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
27685 Points ∼54% +253%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
23243 Points ∼46% +196%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15256 Points ∼30% +95%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7840 Points ∼15%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7649 Points ∼15% -2%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
21270 Points ∼52% +252%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
17170 Points ∼42% +184%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11160 Points ∼27% +85%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6041 Points ∼15%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
5961 Points ∼15% -1%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
103913 Points ∼64% +594%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
75190 Points ∼46% +402%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
37573 Points ∼23% +151%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
26770 Points ∼16% +79%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
14979 Points ∼9%
3DMark 06 Standard
25817 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
7554 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
11692 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
11173 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5383 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
12 fps ∼15%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
43 fps ∼55% +258%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
24.9 fps ∼32% +108%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
49.8 fps ∼64% +315%
Doom - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
15 fps ∼15%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
64.1 fps ∼65% +327%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
13 fps ∼22%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
47 fps ∼81% +262%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
52 fps ∼90% +300%
baixo média alto ultra4K
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 13fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 12fps
Doom (2016) 15fps

Barulho

Ocioso
34.5 / 34.5 / 36.6 dB
DVD
36.6 / dB
Carga
46.6 / 52.3 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.6 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Noise
-1%
6%
-2%
off / environment *
29.6
30.8
-4%
29
2%
29.2
1%
Idle Minimum *
34.5
35.3
-2%
30.4
12%
32
7%
Idle Average *
34.5
35.4
-3%
32.1
7%
32
7%
Idle Maximum *
36.6
35.4
3%
32.1
12%
35
4%
Load Average *
46.6
48.6
-4%
45.6
2%
50
-7%
Load Maximum *
52.3
49.8
5%
51.5
2%
64
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 24 °C48.8 °C32.4 °C 
 25.4 °C46.4 °C34.2 °C 
 23.8 °C31 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 48.8 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C
38.4 °C27.4 °C21.6 °C
29.2 °C26.4 °C22 °C
23.8 °C29 °C24.2 °C
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 26.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.432.739.42535.332.135.33136.332.336.34033.532.233.55033.231.633.26333.932.533.98039.130.139.110039.53139.512540.530.840.516037.728.937.72004627.44625053.726.853.731555.526.755.540055.326.655.350058.824.958.863061.125.461.180059.225.459.2100061.724.961.7125064.625.164.6160064.624.664.6200063.323.463.3250061.323.661.3315059.322.859.3400061.622.961.6500063.422.963.4630063.922.763.9800054.222.854.21000054.522.854.51250048.822.948.81600037.422.937.4SPL73.936.273.9N33.42.633.4median 58.8HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHDmedian 24.9median 58.8Delta6.62.16.638.840.435.137.334.938.23535.334.234.433.134.73341.931.947.730.948.929.456.129.455.828.857.227.459.426.960.125.857.525.565.124.968.124.967.92564.424.863.624.464.323.663.523.560.423.572.423.571.223.368.723.366.523.362.423.247.923.43236.679.12.845median 24.9MSI GT73VR 6RFmedian 62.42.54.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

MSI GT73VR 6RF audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.26 / 0.38 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13.3 / 18.5 / 19 Watt
Carga midlight 78 / 113.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Power Consumption
24%
-62%
-122%
Idle Minimum *
13.3
8.2
38%
15.7
-18%
28.9
-117%
Idle Average *
18.5
11
41%
23.4
-26%
30.6
-65%
Idle Maximum *
19
11.1
42%
23.5
-24%
33.1
-74%
Load Average *
78
77
1%
184.6
-137%
224.4
-188%
Load Maximum *
113.4
116.9
-3%
233.1
-106%
302.6
-167%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 53min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 22min
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 63 Wh
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 62 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 69 Wh
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75.2 Wh
Battery Runtime
32%
-26%
-21%
-32%
Reader / Idle
533
691
30%
256
-52%
306
-43%
Load
82
102
24%
98
20%
65
-21%
WiFi v1.3
286
409
43%
155
-46%
225
-21%
198
-31%

Pro

+ Bela tela UHD com boa cobertura de gama de cores e brilho
+ Temperaturas de operação razoáveis
+ Bom desempenho para o custo, não obstante os soluços

Contra

- Carcaça plástica frágil
- Touchpad ruim
- Soluços aleatórios durante a operação
- Afogamento arbitrário do desempenho, mesmo quando a temperatura não é um problema
- Redução significante do desempenho sob carga contínua
- Desempenho médio de aplicativos
- Operação relativamente barulhenta
- Manutenção desnecessariamente difícil
In review: the HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King. Use coupon code Pav100NBC to get $100 USD off
In review: the HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King. Use coupon code Pav100NBC to get $100 USD off

Considerando que o Pavilion 17t que revisamos no mês passado, apesar de todas as suas lutas, parecia um candidato plausível para um entusiasta de jogos móveis com um orçamento sério, esta última máquina vem consideravelmente mais desequilibrada em termos de fortalezas e fraquezas. Embora a GPU e outros componentes permaneçam bastante consistentes com aqueles da configuração anterior, algumas limitações do poder/firmware resultam em um desempenho mais baixo do que o que medimos no modelo 1080p, e a tela da resolução  mais alta - embora inegavelmente mais atraente - significa que jogar com a resolução nativa com configurações e taxas de fotogramas respeitáveis, é quase impossível com a GTX 1050. Este é um ótimo exemplo de uma situação onde mais é menos—dado que a fatia de mercado muito específica que provavelmente encontre o Pavilion 17t atraente, provavelmente não verá um motivo para pagar um preço substancialmente mais alto para uma atualização do a painel que não poderiam aproveitar durante os jogos.

Depois vem a questão dos entusiastas da edição de foto e vídeo, desde que o o painel UHD  forneça uma boa cobertura da gama de cores e um brilho e resolução muito melhor que sua contraparte da 1080p. No entanto, existem máquinas muito melhores para esses propósitos, e considerando os problemas relativamente severos de estabilidade, que encontramos com o 17t durante nosso período de testes (incluindo os soluços do desempenho, que ainda permanecem até certo grau, inclusive depois da atualização do firmware), se estiver por fazer um investimento moderado para um hobby de edição de fotos e vídeos, seria sensato não optar por uma máquina com um histórico de outros problemas relacionados, sem importar quanto possa economizar.

Se, inclusive depois de tomar em conta sua miríade de problemas, o Pavilion 17t ainda estiver sendo considerado, é imperativo aplicar BIOS F.35 REV A para corrigir alguns dos principais problemas de estabilidade.   

E não vamos nos esquecer sobre todos os outros pontos negativos que pragam este modelo em particular, incluindo a carcaça de plástico fino, manutenção desafiadora, touchpad ruim, pobre seleção de portas, e operação barulhenta. A conclusão é que você nem sequer precisa procurar muito, mais que entre outras máquinas da HP para encontrar melhores opções para quase qualquer propósito — qualquer um, desde um HP Spectre até uma Dell XPS 15 ou Lenovo Yoga 720, embora seja bastante mais caro, seria uma opção muito melhor para esse propósito. O Pavilion 17t um portátil que nós realmente lhe recomendaríamos que evite.

HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD - 03/27/2017 v6
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
55 / 98 → 56%
Teclado
71%
Mouse
61%
Conectividade
50 / 81 → 62%
Peso
57 / 67 → 79%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
76 / 85 → 89%
Desempenho da aplicação
76 / 92 → 83%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
63 / 95 → 66%
Audio
50%
Camera
57 / 85 → 67%
Médio
67%
76%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do HP Pavilion 17t (7700HQ, UHD, GTX 1050)
Steve Schardein, 2017-04- 4 (Update: 2017-04-11)