snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 7200: O dispositivo híbrido deixa uma boa impressão, apesar de seu teclado flexível

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, 10/02/2019

The changing business display. Com o 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 7200, o fabricante texano tem um concorrente para o Surface Pro 6 da Microsoft no mercado. Especialmente os clientes corporativos devem ficar impressionados com recursos como o LTE integrado. A instabilidade relacionada ao design do teclado representa a maior desvantagem deste portátil Dell.

Dell Latitude 7200 (Latitude 7200 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8365U
Memória
16384 MB 
, LPDDR3-2133, soldada
Pantalha
12.3 polegadas 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixel 188 PPI, Multi-touch de 10 pontos, native pen support, SHP14A3 LQ123N1, IPS LED, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB 
, , 412 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 1, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Noble Lock
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, DW5821e Snapdragon X20 LTE modem, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.35 x 292 x 208.8
Bateria
38 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: 6 filas, chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Teclado Folio, Dell Command, Dell Power Manager, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.18 kg, Suprimento de energia: 265 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

304 mm 225.6 mm 8.9 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 231.5 mm 7.9 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 208.8 mm 9.35 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type A, cable lock slot
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type A, cable lock slot
Left-hand side: 2 Thunderbolt 3 ports, memory card reader (microSD), SIM card slot, combo headphone/microphone jack
Left-hand side: 2 Thunderbolt 3 ports, memory card reader (microSD), SIM card slot, combo headphone/microphone jack
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7200
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
177 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=132)
62 MB/s ∼35% -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7200
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
193.4 MB/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Convertible
  (19.2 - 246, n=129)
77.1 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
605 MBit/s ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼94% -2%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 688, n=147)
490 MBit/s ∼77% -19%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
584 MBit/s ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼93% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 743, n=147)
495 MBit/s ∼83% -15%
402
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
SHP14A3 LQ123N1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 402 cd/m² Médio: 384.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 394 cd/m²
Contraste: 1432:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Dell Latitude 7200
SHP14A3 LQ123N1, , 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Response Times
-7%
18%
427%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52 (26, 26)
47.2 (21.2, 26)
9%
47 (23, 24)
10%
43 (21, 22)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
34.8 (18.4, 16.4)
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
-22%
26 (14, 12)
25%
25 (13, 12)
28%
PWM Frequency
1645 (25)
22000 (50)
1237%
Screen
-30%
-51%
-36%
Brightness middle
401
474
18%
452
13%
484
21%
Brightness
385
418
9%
412
7%
473
23%
Brightness Distribution
88
76
-14%
85
-3%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.33
-18%
0.48
-71%
0.33
-18%
Contrast
1432
1436
0%
942
-34%
1467
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.2
-78%
4.05
-125%
4.29
-138%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.4
6.1
-79%
6.64
-95%
6.46
-90%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
0.9
18%
1.56
-42%
1.34
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
4.5
-181%
4.87
-204%
4.3
-169%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.51 88%
CCT
6702 97%
5881 111%
7160 91%
7315 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.6
64
-4%
62
-7%
62
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
99.4
0%
97
-2%
95
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -26%
-17% / -41%
196% / 63%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1645 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1645 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1645 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Dell Latitude 7200 Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel Core i5-8365U: Ø519 (509.77-619.48)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i5-8365U
  (163 - 171, n=4)
167 Points ∼100% +2%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Core i5-8365U
164 Points ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼98% -1%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points ∼88% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼84% -14%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 179, n=305)
106 Points ∼63% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
695 Points ∼100% +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points ∼95% +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points ∼92% +24%
Average Intel Core i5-8365U
  (515 - 580, n=4)
558 Points ∼80% +8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points ∼74% 0%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Core i5-8365U
515 (min: 509.77, max: 658) Points ∼74%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 830, n=314)
304 Points ∼44% -41%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
515 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
164 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2859 - 3403, n=4)
3117 Points ∼100% +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
2952 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2939 Points ∼94% +3%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
2859 Points ∼92%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2714 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Convertible
  (605 - 4342, n=103)
2500 Points ∼80% -13%
Productivity
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6002 - 6623, n=4)
6358 Points ∼100% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6326 Points ∼99%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5698 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5509 Points ∼87% -13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
5353 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7179, n=105)
5283 Points ∼83% -16%
Essentials
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7842 - 8863, n=4)
8186 Points ∼100% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8119 Points ∼99%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7919 Points ∼97% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7460 Points ∼91% -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
7039 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9678, n=105)
6993 Points ∼85% -14%
Score
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3751 - 4086, n=4)
3871 Points ∼100% +2%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3782 Points ∼98%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points ∼92% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points ∼92% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4677, n=106)
3193 Points ∼82% -16%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4858 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4381 - 4911, n=3)
4717 Points ∼97% -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points ∼88% -12%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=232)
3753 Points ∼77% -23%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points ∼98% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3392 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3146 - 3546, n=4)
3392 Points ∼97% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=281)
2807 Points ∼81% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3392 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4858 pontos
Ajuda
Dell Latitude 7200
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-2%
9%
-29%
6%
Write 4K
131.9
95.43
-28%
90.97
-31%
83.23
-37%
135 (98.2 - 191, n=20)
2%
Read 4K
45.47
39.19
-14%
36.84
-19%
43.84
-4%
43.3 (27.6 - 53.1, n=20)
-5%
Write Seq
1021
1197
17%
636.4
-38%
1267 (750 - 1768, n=19)
24%
Read Seq
1085
1705
57%
899.7
-17%
1237 (423 - 1710, n=19)
14%
Write 4K Q32T1
444.9
399.24
-10%
355.8
-20%
192.9
-57%
401 (239 - 749, n=20)
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
366.6
260.67
-29%
256.9
-30%
247.36
-33%
417 (229 - 654, n=20)
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1458
1286.9
-12%
1222
-16%
861.1
-41%
1503 (1319 - 2544, n=20)
3%
Read Seq Q32T1
1640
3024.8
84%
3460
111%
1615
-2%
1748 (473 - 3433, n=20)
7%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Sequential Read: 1072 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1092 MB/s
512K Read: 806.6 MB/s
512K Write: 786 MB/s
4K Read: 42.48 MB/s
4K Write: 133.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 365.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 445.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points ∼92% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
1802 Points ∼91%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=174)
1716 Points ∼87% -5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=330)
1288 Points ∼65% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (85 - 1682, n=35)
492 Points ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 431, n=34)
359 Points ∼73%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
335 Points ∼68%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points ∼100% +3%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
1160 Points ∼98%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=144)
1128 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=240)
1023 Points ∼86% -12%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=162)
9146 Points ∼90% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points ∼89% 0%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
9128 Points ∼89%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points ∼82% -9%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=291)
6788 Points ∼66% -26%
3DMark 11 Performance
1992 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7916 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1071 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 67.6 34.6 29.2 9.5 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 73 43.3 19.9 17.8 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 22.1 14.7 13.1 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB
Carga
30.1 / 30.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.127.528.62526.825.926.93126.225.328.84025.826.226.35025.121.924.66323.722.322.98022.721.923.510022.422.824.512522.32223.416021.921.422.720021.520.522.225024.523.222.631521.520.921.140020.519.220.250019.819.520.563019.218.519.180018.718.119.1100019.317.819.3125018.417.218.3160018.216.518.3200017.716.418.8250019.115.617.9315017.315.317.1400016.715.116.5500015.415.115.4630015.215.215.4800015.21515.11000015.114.815.11250014.914.714.91600014.714.614.8SPL30.128.830N1.31.21.3median 18.7median 17.2median 18.8Delta2.52.82.532.13329.531.432.132.230.33130.932.233.434.934.230.433.428.930.129.928.628.932.231.231.230.832.227.4282727.127.426.827.326.22826.825.426.625.72625.425.424.625.325.425.423.924.423.723.623.923.12322.622.423.122.22322.221.522.221.421.620.820.621.421.922.12020.521.921.32119.419.321.321.521.11918.921.522.722.518.418.322.721.822.217.918.121.82121.217.717.72122.522.217.617.422.521.220.917.417.321.22322.917.517.62323.623.617.817.823.620.420.517.91820.419.819.818.218.119.8191918.218.41918.518.518.618.318.518.418.418.418.318.418.418.418.218.218.418.318.418.218.218.333.533.531.830.430.433.51.81.81.51.31.31.8median 21.5median 21.6median 18.4median 18.3median 21.51.71.12.11.91.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Latitude 7200Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Carga Máxima
 38 °C39.2 °C42.5 °C 
 35 °C36.6 °C35.1 °C 
 30.6 °C30.9 °C28.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
39.4 °C37.5 °C37.7 °C
31.3 °C35.2 °C34.1 °C
28.6 °C31 °C30.2 °C
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 33.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.531.22525.926.43125.325.24026.224.55021.925.86322.325.28021.922.510022.823125222616021.435.620020.536.925023.239.631520.941.140019.246.850019.549.963018.551.780018.152.6100017.855.3125017.259.7160016.559.1200016.458250015.660.7315015.360.4400015.157.7500015.155.6630015.251800015521000014.848.41250014.748.61600014.648.5SPL28.869.2N1.222.8median 17.2median 51Delta2.87.933.331.433.330.530.930.533.830.433.832.728.632.73130.83128.927.128.928.52828.534.82634.84225.44249.523.649.551.922.451.951.321.551.352.720.652.758.620.558.658.419.358.461.818.961.869.418.369.46618.16659.717.759.761.517.461.566.317.366.368.917.668.969.117.869.163.71863.764.618.164.658.218.458.253.518.353.556.118.356.147.618.247.637.618.237.67730.47736.71.336.7median 58.4median 18.3median 58.46.71.96.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 7200Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Latitude 7200 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.37 / 0.74 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.3 / 5.8 / 6.5 Watt
Carga midlight 37 / 51.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 7200
8365U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
-38%
-25%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
3.3
4.8
-45%
4.9
-48%
3.2
3%
Idle Average *
5.8
9
-55%
8.9
-53%
8.7
-50%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
10.5
-62%
11
-69%
10.4
-60%
Load Average *
37
42.8
-16%
32
14%
29.2
21%
Load Maximum *
51.3
57.8
-13%
36
30%
40.8
20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
6h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 46min
Dell Latitude 7200
8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
-7%
6%
23%
13%
Reader / Idle
790
781
1083
771 (117 - 2139, n=290)
H.264
489
523
7%
389
-20%
453 (206 - 1070, n=115)
-7%
WiFi v1.3
417
395
-5%
459
10%
509
22%
456 (153 - 1010, n=256)
9%
Load
106
83
-22%
137
29%
131
24%
145 (49 - 677, n=286)
37%

Pro

+ LCD high-color no formato 3:2
+ Touchpad confortável
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade
+ Bom equipamento de interfaces
+ Reparável
+ Operação quase totalmente silenciosa
+ Leitor de cartões microSD veloz
+ WWAN integrada
+ Garantia extensiva

Contra

- Capa instável do teclado
- Superfície LCD refletiva
- Brilho mais baixo da tela em comparação com concorrentes do mercado
- Desempenho da CPU inferior em comparação com concorrentes
In review: Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. Test model provided by Dell.
In review: Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. Test model provided by Dell.

Um clone do Surface? A Dell provavelmente ficaria longe dessa descrição para o 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 7200, mesmo que seja adequada para o dispositivo. A Dell adapta o princípio básico do Microsoft Surface Pro 6 com suas fortalezas e fraquezas.

Um dos pontos fortes dessa categoria de dispositivo é definitivamente a tela, que também no caso do 2-em1 Dell Latitude 7200 possui o confortável formato 3:2 e uma alta cobertura de espaço de cores. A desvantagem, no entanto, é a superfície brilhante e o brilho mais baixo em comparação com os concorrentes, mesmo que o computador Dell certamente não tenha um desempenho tão ruim aqui. Um ponto fraco, no entanto, é o teclado. A falta de estabilidade da tampa do teclado tem um efeito muito negativo na experiência de digitação. Esses dois pontos representam a separação mais óbvia de portáteis "de verdade", como o Dell Latitude 7300.

Na classe de tablets conversíveis, o Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1 impressiona com sua boa conectividade e boa capacidade de manutenção. Também classificamos como positiva a operação quase silenciosa, a carcaça de alta qualidade, o touchpad confortável e a ampla garantia do Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1. O rápido leitor de cartões microSD e a WWAN embutida também são vantagens. Negativo, a nosso ver, é o desempenho da CPU, pior que o do Microsoft Surface Pro 6, por exemplo.

A Dell não comete erros aqui, e é por isso que podemos dizer em sã consciência: O Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1 é recomendado.

Em conclusão, podemos recomendar o Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1 como um tablet empresarial muito bom. Como comprador, é claro, você deve estar ciente de suas prioridades. Se você colocar uma ênfase maior na tela, um tablet poderá ser uma solução melhor. Se for o teclado, você provavelmente se sairia melhor com um portátil normal como o Dell Latitude 7300.

Dell Latitude 7200 - 09/26/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
86%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
75 / 75 → 99%
Peso
73 / 20-75 → 96%
Bateria
74%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
51 / 78 → 65%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 85 → 91%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
99%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Médio
78%
89%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 7200: O dispositivo híbrido deixa uma boa impressão, apesar de seu teclado flexível
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-10- 2 (Update: 2019-10- 7)