Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 (i5, 3K-IPS)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 470 cd/m²
Contraste: 1436:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13.00 | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13.00 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.30 | Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 SHP1479, , 1920x1280, 12.30 | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -3% | 2% | -5% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 67.8 | 67.5 -1% | 67.1 -1% | 70.5 4% | 67.2 -1% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 99.1 | 96.7 -3% | 95.5 -4% | 98.6 -1% | 90.8 -9% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.9 69.3 | 68.2 -2% | 67.9 -3% | 71.5 2% | 66.5 -5% | |
| Response Times | 20% | 25% | -3% | 12% | 43% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.2 ? | 47 ? -0% | 43 ? 9% | 56.8 ? -20% | 42 ? 11% | 28.4 ? 40% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 42.4 ? | 26 ? 39% | 25 ? 41% | 36 ? 15% | 37 ? 13% | 22.8 ? 46% |
| PWM Frequency | 22000 ? | 1852 ? | 17000 ? | 221.2 ? | ||
| Screen | -18% | -5% | -16% | -39% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 474 | 452 -5% | 484 2% | 548 16% | 350 -26% | 388.1 -18% |
| Brightness | 418 | 412 -1% | 473 13% | 545 30% | 343 -18% | 344 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 76 | 85 12% | 91 20% | 86 13% | 73 -4% | 78 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.48 -45% | 0.33 -0% | 0.51 -55% | 0.29 12% | 0.39 -18% |
| Contrast | 1436 | 942 -34% | 1467 2% | 1075 -25% | 1207 -16% | 995 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 4.05 -27% | 4.29 -34% | 3.65 -14% | 6.36 -99% | 4.6 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 6.64 -9% | 6.46 -6% | 7.15 -17% | 11.63 -91% | 9.1 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 1.56 -73% | 1.34 -49% | 1.81 -101% | 1.7 -89% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.87 -8% | 4.3 4% | 5.5 -22% | 8.04 -79% | 6.1 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.71 81% | 2.51 88% | 2.154 102% | 2.47 89% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 5881 111% | 7160 91% | 7315 89% | 7052 92% | 7716 84% | 7104 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 62 -3% | 62 -3% | 65.2 2% | 59 -8% | 59 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 97 -2% | 95 -4% | 99.1 0% | 91 -8% | 91 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-10% | 6% /
-1% | -6% /
-11% | -11% /
-26% | 10% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3479 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4767 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4136 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3544 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2041 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8625 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1103 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59.2 | 34.8 | 30.2 | 10.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.1 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 59.2 | 35.1 | 23.1 |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Rocket League | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 31.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.9 / 38.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 3% | 6% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 29.8 | 30.3 -2% | 30.3 -2% | 28.5 4% | 30.3 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 30.3 -2% | 30.3 -2% | 28.5 4% | 30.9 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.8 | 30.3 -2% | 30.3 -2% | 28.5 4% | 30.9 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 31.2 -0% | 30.3 3% | 28.5 9% | 32.3 -3% |
| Load Average * | 35.9 | 32.8 9% | 33.5 7% | 28.5 21% | 32.7 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.6 | 32.9 15% | 33.5 13% | 41.6 -8% | 32.7 15% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.6 °C / 99.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.5 °C / -17.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.16 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.8 / 9 / 10.5 Watt |
| Carga |
42.8 / 57.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.00 | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.00 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30 | Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.30 | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 20% | 22% | 5% | 34% | 19% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.9 -2% | 3.2 33% | 3 37% | 4.7 2% | 5 -4% | 3.81 ? 21% | 5.44 ? -13% |
| Idle Average * | 9 | 8.9 1% | 8.7 3% | 7.2 20% | 9.4 -4% | 6.3 30% | 6.94 ? 23% | 8.27 ? 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 11 -5% | 10.4 1% | 10 5% | 16 -52% | 7.8 26% | 8.75 ? 17% | 10.8 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 42.8 | 32 25% | 29.2 32% | 37.1 13% | 26.4 38% | 19.5 54% | 35 ? 18% | 46.7 ? -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 57.8 | 36 38% | 40.8 29% | 38.2 34% | 34 41% | 19.6 66% | 47.5 ? 18% | 65.4 ? -13% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 14% | 41% | -12% | 39% | 19% | 45% | |
| Reader / Idle | 790 | 781 -1% | 1083 37% | 662 -16% | 1112 ? 41% | ||
| H.264 | 523 | 389 -26% | 769 ? 47% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 395 | 459 16% | 509 29% | 300 -24% | 551 39% | 441 12% | 564 ? 43% |
| Load | 83 | 137 65% | 131 58% | 84 1% | 134 61% | 121.7 ? 47% |
Pro
Contra
Vamos começar com a nossa pergunta introdutória - é o novo Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet o melhor conversível empresarial? Esta questão não pode ser respondida em geral, porque os dispositivos concorrentes são muito diferentes nos detalhes. Depende de como o usuário planeja usar o dispositivo. Se precisar de uma longa duração da bateria e se o dispositivo irá ser usado frequentemente em exteriores, existem alternativas melhores. Outros dispositivos também oferecem mais e diferentes portas. Se for necessária uma tela mate, o usuário também não estará contente com o X1 Tablet.
No entanto, vimos na análise que a terceira geração do X1 Tablet é, em geral, um dispositivo muito bom. Sim, há pontos fracos, mas esses não impactam todos os usuários da mesma maneira. Se o dispositivo for usado principalmente com uma estação docking e se o tablet for usado principalmente para fazer anotações durante uma reunião, a duração média da bateria e a porta USB A ausente não serão um problema.
Vamos falar sobre os aspectos positivos: Um chassi estável, dispositivos de entrada muito bons com um teclado excelente, uma tela muito boa (especialmente quando calibrada) e USB C com Thunderbolt 3. Com a mudança para os modernos processadores quad-core, o conversível oferece um nível de desempenho de CPU semelhante ao dos Ultrabooks normais de negócios, mesmo que isso signifique que o ventilador seja audível e que as temperaturas sejam bem altas sob carga. Dito isto, a opção opcional de CPU i7 para o Tablet X1 não vale o seu dinheiro e é muito mais lenta do que o i5 com carga contínua.
Com o ThinkPad X1 Tablet totalmente reformulado, a Lenovo oferece um conversível comercial muito bom, o que dilui ainda mais a fronteira entre o tablet e o subportátil típico de negócios. No entanto, o Tablet X1 não oferece novos registros em termos de duração da bateria e a CPU i7 opcional não vale o seu custo.
Torna-se óbvio que as fronteiras entre as classes de dispositivos conhecidos são cada vez mais diluídas quando olha nossa avaliação. Como conversível, o Tablet X1 atinge 89%. Se este dispositivo for classificado como portátil ou subportátil, ele alcançaria 90%, já que ambas as categorias enfatizam mais os dispositivos de entrada e conectividade - duas categorias nas quais o ThinkPad X1 Tablet se destaca (no caso da conectividade, graças às modernas portas e amplos recursos de segurança).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
-
10/17/2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Pricecompare
