Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51: Kaby Lake G leve luta com redução de custos

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/19/2020

White featherweight. A Acer abandona caminhos conhecidos com seu ConceptD 5 CN515-51 para se diferenciar da concorrência, com materiais especialmente leves, o Kaby Lake G com uma GPU AMD integrada e uma tela UHD 4K que cobre uma gama de cores mais ampla. Ao mesmo tempo, o Acer ConceptD CN515-51 também é mais barato que outros portáteis multimídia com uma tela de 15,6 polegadas. Infelizmente, a redução de custos necessária se tornam evidentes bastante rápido nesta análise.

Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (ConceptD 5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8705G
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 - 4096 (shared) MB, Análises do: 1011 MHz, Memoría: 700 MHz, Crimson 18.50.06
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, soldada
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, B156ZAN03.1, LTPS IPS LED, Brilhante: não
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 423 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17 x 360 x 242
Bateria
48 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Acer Care Center, Acer Collection 5, Acer Jumpstart, App Explorer, Acer ConceptID Palette, Acer Quick Access, eBay, Norton Security Ultra, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.479 kg, Suprimento de energia: 432 g
Preço
1599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
02/2020
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870
1.5 kg17 mm15.6"3840x2160
87 %
08/2019
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2 kg17 mm15.6"3840x2160
90 %
12/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16"3072x1920
87 %
02/2020
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
1.7 kg18.7 mm15.6"3840x2160

Size & weight comparison

361.8 mm 245.7 mm 18.7 mm 1.7 kg360 mm 242 mm 17 mm 1.5 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg
left: charging port, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 type C, combo audio port
left: charging port, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 type C, combo audio port
right: SD card-reader, USB 3.0 type A, Kensington lock port
right: SD card-reader, USB 3.0 type A, Kensington lock port
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s ∼100% +694%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
164 MB/s ∼95% +656%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=192)
59.4 MB/s ∼34% +174%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
21.7 MB/s ∼13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.6 MB/s ∼100% +673%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s ∼97% +647%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=188)
75.2 MB/s ∼38% +193%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.7 MB/s ∼13%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1431 (min: 1279, max: 1644) MBit/s ∼100% +269%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (min: 806, max: 821) MBit/s ∼57% +111%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼47% +74%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 1431, n=160)
536 MBit/s ∼37% +38%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
388 (min: 364, max: 411) MBit/s ∼27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1431 (min: 566, max: 1523) MBit/s ∼100% +174%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s ∼45% +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (min: 533, max: 616) MBit/s ∼41% +11%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
523 (min: 471, max: 572) MBit/s ∼37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 1563, n=159)
518 MBit/s ∼36% -1%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 Intel Wireless-AC 7265; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø387 (364-411)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (806-821)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1431 (1279-1644)
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 Intel Wireless-AC 7265; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø524 (471-572)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø582 (533-616)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (566-1523)
302
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 350 cd/m² Médio: 328.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347 cd/m²
Contraste: 1321:1 (Preto: 0.265 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 4.38
ΔE Greyscale 3.62 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
B156ZAN03.1, LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NE156QUM-N66, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
95%
15%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
63 (32, 31)
2.3 (1.1, 1.2)
96%
52.4 (23.9, 28.5)
17%
46.4 (22, 24.4)
26%
Response Time Black / White *
40 (24, 16)
2.4 (1.1, 1.3)
94%
34.9 (17.8, 17.1)
13%
30.4 (17.2, 13.2)
24%
PWM Frequency
59.52 (100)
131700
Screen
5%
28%
2%
Brightness middle
350
421.2
20%
519
48%
464
33%
Brightness
329
417
27%
477
45%
448
36%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
86
0%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.265
0.39
-47%
0.36
-36%
Contrast
1321
1331
1%
1289
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.08
6.06
-19%
2.28
55%
4.2
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.25
11.89
-16%
6.54
36%
11.4
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.38
0.86
80%
0.8
82%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.62
2.8
23%
0.9
75%
7.2
-99%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.15 102%
2145 0%
2.17 101%
CCT
6389 102%
6235 104%
6572 99%
6345 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
81
-8%
78
-11%
85.2
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.6
0%
99
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
50% / 23%
22% / 26%
14% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 Intel Core i7-8705G, Intel Core i7-8705G: Ø767 (760-794)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1314 (1090.6-1600.38)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø982 (967.16-1074.4)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points ∼95% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼92% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Core i7-8705G
176 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G
  (165 - 176, n=3)
172 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 201, n=394)
131 Points ∼65% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1435 (min: 1401, max: 1435) Points ∼100% +77%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1362 (min: 1268.87, max: 1362.31) Points ∼95% +68%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1305 (min: 1090.6, max: 1369.3, 99th percentile: 1367.66) Points ∼91% +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
979 (min: 967.16, max: 1074.4) Points ∼68% +21%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Core i7-8705G
810 (min: 760, max: 810) Points ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G
  (699 - 810, n=3)
739 Points ∼51% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.4 - 1550, n=411)
509 Points ∼35% -37%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
98.62 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
810 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4833 - 5493, n=3)
5224 Points ∼85% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5171 Points ∼85% +7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4833 Points ∼79%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=122)
3774 Points ∼62% -22%
Productivity
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (6786 - 7265, n=3)
6955 Points ∼93% +2%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
6815 Points ∼91%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6489 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=123)
6301 Points ∼84% -8%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (7936 - 9360, n=3)
8527 Points ∼88% +7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7936 Points ∼82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 10539, n=123)
7746 Points ∼80% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7548 Points ∼78% -5%
Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
5500 Points ∼100% +20%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points ∼99% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4583 - 5001, n=3)
4847 Points ∼88% +6%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4583 Points ∼83%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4535 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5500, n=124)
4051 Points ∼74% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4812 Points ∼100% +10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points ∼99% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4329 - 4469, n=3)
4386 Points ∼91% +1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4359 Points ∼91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=297)
4327 Points ∼90% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4241 Points ∼88% -3%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4900 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (3551 - 4235, n=3)
3911 Points ∼80% +10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points ∼78% +7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
3551 Points ∼72%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3417 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4900, n=318)
3394 Points ∼69% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3551 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4031 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4359 pontos
Ajuda
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-7%
11%
5%
Write 4K
120.6
104.3
-14%
55.54
-54%
148.08
23%
133 (109 - 194, n=6)
10%
Read 4K
41.43
45.23
9%
16.21
-61%
47.31
14%
41.4 (29.1 - 51.2, n=6)
0%
Write Seq
2402
1729
-28%
1959.24
-18%
1414.08
-41%
2201 (1584 - 2535, n=6)
-8%
Read Seq
1997
1861
-7%
1762.83
-12%
1320.24
-34%
1879 (1538 - 2512, n=6)
-6%
Write 4K Q32T1
335.2
509.2
52%
398.51
19%
493.59
47%
406 (335 - 536, n=6)
21%
Read 4K Q32T1
381.7
388.5
2%
648.05
70%
593.94
56%
478 (364 - 603, n=6)
25%
Write Seq Q32T1
2553
2813
10%
2726.7
7%
2969.6
16%
2542 (2536 - 2553, n=6)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3356
2906
-13%
3241.6
-3%
3471.7
3%
3361 (3218 - 3489, n=6)
0%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Sequential Read: 2464 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2488 MB/s
512K Read: 2060 MB/s
512K Write: 1406 MB/s
4K Read: 44.06 MB/s
4K Write: 174.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 536 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 454.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
14725 Points ∼100% +50%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
12388 Points ∼84% +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
10885 Points ∼74% +11%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (9632 - 10118, n=5)
9910 Points ∼67% +1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
9825 Points ∼67%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=658)
3134 Points ∼21% -68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
3364 Points ∼100% +66%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
3353 Points ∼100% +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
2909 Points ∼86% +43%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (2031 - 2108, n=3)
2070 Points ∼62% +2%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
2031 Points ∼60%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142 - 4734, n=79)
1610 Points ∼48% -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
10399 Points ∼100% +45%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8532 Points ∼82% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
7741 Points ∼74% +8%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (7059 - 7355, n=5)
7254 Points ∼70% +1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
7181 Points ∼69%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=435)
3031 Points ∼29% -58%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
65776 Points ∼100% +69%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
45246 Points ∼69% +17%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (37915 - 44796, n=5)
40459 Points ∼62% +4%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
38812 Points ∼59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=433)
17440 Points ∼27% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
9104 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15911 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5879 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
2121 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 216.3 165.3 148 59.85 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 116.6 75.9 41.3 24.3 14.4 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 105 65 56 38 16 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB
Carga
32.6 / 40.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.135.23334.335.12536.233.933.534.136.23137.537.837.63637.54030.731.332.233.830.75030.43230.432.230.46333.12929.33133.18031.429.428.628.231.410028.829.328.629.328.812530.328.828.929.330.316026.424.924.224.326.420026.524.122.822.426.525028.723.82222.428.731529.923.921.321.229.940028.422.42020.428.450028.222.219.519.528.263026.120.918.918.726.180027.320.618.918.327.3100032.723.118.217.732.7125030.722.117.817.730.7160030.220.317.617.130.2200030.420.317.717.430.425002920.517.617.429315027.41917.717.627.4400024.419.21817.724.450002318.718.11823630021.319.218.11821.3800020.918.718.218.320.91000020.318.718.118.120.31250018.918.618.118.218.91600018.918.618.118.218.9SPL40.232.630.530.440.2N3.41.81.41.43.4median 27.4median 20.6median 18.2median 18.2median 27.4Delta32.11.92.33hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Carga Máxima
 44.6 °C44.6 °C34.8 °C 
 42.3 °C42.8 °C27.9 °C 
 29.7 °C27 °C25.2 °C 
Máximo: 44.6 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
34 °C45.4 °C43.4 °C
24.1 °C39 °C38.6 °C
24.6 °C27.7 °C29.4 °C
Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 34 °C
alimentação elétrica  47.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket sie / Fluke t300 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.634.333.62532.334.132.33137.23637.24032.733.832.75031.332.231.36330.43130.48029.728.229.710029.129.329.112531.629.331.616033.624.333.620032.722.432.72504422.44431550.721.250.740055.520.455.550051.519.551.563057.218.757.280066.318.366.3100066.717.766.7125063.617.763.6160062.917.162.9200067.117.467.1250060.417.460.4315065.117.665.1400060.817.760.8500064.21864.2630065.61865.6800063.118.363.11000058.218.158.21250051.218.251.21600046.318.246.3SPL75.830.475.8N361.436median 58.2median 18.2median 58.2Delta9.62.39.643.54338.839.440.338.137.337.736.538.136.638.536.334.835.335.634.443.134.249.432.846.432.359.531.568.63169.930.268.329.97529.879.229.575.429.173.929.279.528.775.428.477.428.477.928.377.928.370.92876.12874.62875.727.975.327.778.141.188.54.279.6median 29.2median 751.77.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.11 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.28 / 0.45 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 12 / 17.8 / 19.7 Watt
Carga midlight 59 / 87 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-9%
8%
-11%
2%
5%
Idle Minimum *
12
6.2
48%
3.7
69%
8.5
29%
9.97 (6.2 - 12, n=3)
17%
11.4 (2.1 - 101, n=956)
5%
Idle Average *
17.8
9.6
46%
12.1
32%
14.7
17%
15.8 (12.9 - 17.8, n=3)
11%
15.9 (3 - 122, n=956)
11%
Idle Maximum *
19.7
21.2
-8%
17
14%
19.4
2%
17.4 (13.6 - 19.7, n=3)
12%
19.4 (4.6 - 181, n=956)
2%
Load Average *
59
104.3
-77%
91.5
-55%
89.6
-52%
72.5 (59 - 82.3, n=3)
-23%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=935)
-2%
Load Maximum *
87
135.3
-56%
102.3
-18%
129.8
-49%
93.8 (87 - 99.4, n=3)
-8%
78.1 (20.1 - 329, n=940)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
91.7
103
96.1

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 42min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
4h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge)
3h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 56min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 25min
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 48 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 80 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
100%
56%
-14%
4%
Reader / Idle
462
910
97%
417 (73 - 2085, n=904)
-10%
H.264
416
580
39%
284
-32%
369 (114 - 1053, n=112)
-11%
WiFi v1.3
275
467
70%
718
161%
285
4%
370 (96 - 942, n=274)
35%
Load
85
199
134%
58
-32%
72
-15%
85.7 (32 - 238, n=908)
1%
Witcher 3 ultra
54
72.7 (54 - 94, n=11)

Pro

+ Peso baixo para um portátil de 15,6 polegadas
+ Tela mate UHD 4K com ampla gama de cores
+ Segundo SSD facilmente atualizável
+ Mais barato que a concorrência

Contra

- Tampa fraca da tela
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Leitor de cartões SD extremamente lento
- RAM soldada
- Tela: não fornece o brilho prometido e apresenta bleeding da luz de fundo
- Alto-falantes abaixo da média
- Duração ruim da bateria
- Desempenho reduzido com a bateria
in review: Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51, review sample supplied by
in review: Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51, review sample supplied by

A Acer criou um portátil multimídia fora do comum com o ConceptD 5 CN515-51.

Ele se vê diferente de outros modelos desta classe e tem um foco forte no peso baixo graças aos materiais do chassi. Isso é algo bom, mas a tampa fraca da tela parece ser um efeito secundário negativa deste foco sob uma iluminação baixa. No que se refere às portas, a Acer não incluiu Thunderbolt 3. Também é utilizado um leitor de cartões SD extremamente lento, que está completamente mal posicionado em um portátil multimídia caro. O mesmo é verdade para o módulo Wi-Fi desatualizado, que nem sequer suporta o mais recente padrão Bluetooth. Louvável e censurável é a capacidade de atualização: Enquanto a RAM é completamente soldada, a capacidade de armazenamento em massa pode ser atualizada facilmente, graças ao slot M.2 2280 disponível.

A tela do portátil Acer possui uma excelente cobertura de cores, seu brilho mais baixo do que o prometido e o bleeding da luz de fundo relativamente forte, nos decepcionam. Em termos de desempenho, o ConceptD oferece aproximadamente o que esperávamos do Kaby Lake G. Um bom desempenho para um portátil multimídia, mas muitos outros portáteis com CPUs Intel mais recentes e GPUs Nvidia dedicadas oferecem melhor desempenho. Infelizmente, isto não resulta  em uma melhor duração da bateria, em troca. Em vez disso, a bateria arruina a equação, pois é muito pequena. Além disso, temos que pesar negativamente o ruído da bobina, a limitação de desempenho quando o dispositivo funciona com energia da bateria e os falantes abaixo da média (para um portátil multimídia).

Não sem compromissos: Infelizmente, a Acer decidiu cortar custos em componentes cruciais. Não pode competir com os concorrentes mais caros.

Para nós, não está claro para quem a Acer deseja comercializar o ConceptD 5 CN515-51. A característica positiva mais destacada é o baixo peso e a tela colorida. Com esses dois pontos fortes, parece destinado a ser um sonho dos fotógrafos. Este grupo, no entanto, provavelmente ficará extremamente irritado com o lento leitor de cartões SD Além disso, a baixa duração da bateria é um problema. O ConceptD pode ser usado para jogar, mas também não foi feito para isso.

Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 - 02/17/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
53 / 80 → 67%
Peso
69 / 20-72 → 95%
Bateria
65 / 95 → 69%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
76 / 90 → 85%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 90 → 95%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
48%
Camera
28 / 85 → 33%
Médio
73%
83%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51: Kaby Lake G leve luta com redução de custos
Benjamin Herzig, 2020-02-19 (Update: 2020-02-29)