Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T (i7-8565U, SSD, FHD)

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/12/2019

999 grams. A Acer criou um portátil de 15,6 polegadas que é leve como uma pena e possui tecnologia atualizada: um processador Whisky Lake, um SSD NVMe e RAM DDR4 de dois canais. Claro que esses recursos não são baratos: O dispositivo está disponível por cerca de $1.400.

Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 (Swift 5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8565U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300-1150 MHz, Dual-Channel, 25.20.100.6373
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, RAM soldada, sem slots livres
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, LG Philips LP156WFA-SPG2, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, 512 GB 
, SSD soldado; slot M.2 2280 livre (apenas para SSDs NVMe), 440 GB livre
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de de áudio combinado, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.9 x 358 x 230
Bateria
53.9 Wh, 4670 mAh Lítio-Ion, 11,55 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Mozilla Firefox, Norton Security (versão de teste), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
999 g, Suprimento de energia: 155 g
Preço
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

358 mm 228 mm 17 mm 1.1 kg358 mm 230 mm 15.9 mm 999 g323 mm 217 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg319 mm 199 mm 15.9 mm 1.2 kg
Right: combined audio jack, port for lock
Right: combined audio jack, port for lock
Left: power adapter, HDMI, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (2x Type A, 1x Type C)
Left: power adapter, HDMI, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (2x Type A, 1x Type C)
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 (min: 493, max: 679) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
641 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
540 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 950, n=113)
532 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 (min: 582, max: 695) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
563 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
540 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 949, n=113)
523 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
494 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (493-679)
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø638 (582-695)
Input devices
Input devices
307
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 345 cd/m² Médio: 319.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336 cd/m²
Contraste: 1100:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.01 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 2.01 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-3%
0%
8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (19, 19)
40 (18, 22)
-5%
39.6 (21.2, 18.4)
-4%
34.3 (16.4, 17.9)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (14, 11)
25 (14, 11)
-0%
24 (14.4, 9.6)
4%
23.7 (13.1, 10.6)
5%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-0%
-80%
-18%
Brightness middle
341
298
-13%
332.8
-2%
349
2%
Brightness
319
287
-10%
310
-3%
331
4%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
87
0%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.31
0.2
35%
0.29
6%
0.32
-3%
Contrast
1100
1490
35%
1148
4%
1091
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.01
2.19
-9%
5.14
-156%
3.1
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.74
4.39
7%
11.88
-151%
6.6
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
1.67
-50%
3.61
-225%
1.5
-35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.01
1.97
2%
8.8
-338%
3.3
-64%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.43 91%
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
CCT
6704 97%
6571 99%
8227 79%
6973 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
62
-2%
58.1
-8%
61.46
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
95
-3%
89.2
-9%
96.05
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -1%
-40% / -68%
-5% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9447 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - SaturationSweeps
CalMAN - SaturationSweeps
CalMAN - ColorChecker (after calibration)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (after calibration)
CalMAN - Grayscales (after calibration)
CalMAN - Grayscales (after calibration)
CalMAN - SaturationSweeps (after calibration)
CalMAN - SaturationSweeps (after calibration)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø441 (424.51-542.46)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø591 (579.19-624.27)
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø475 (461.37-506.44)
CPU clock rates during CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during CB15 loop
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16331
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8621
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6466
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
39.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
55.07 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
543 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
173 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=37)
170 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
169 Points ∼98% -2%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel Core i7-8550U
158 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 184, n=264)
115 Points ∼66% -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
622 Points ∼99% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=38)
596 Points ∼94% +10%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
543 Points ∼86%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel Core i7-8550U
501 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 721, n=274)
333 Points ∼53% -39%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
6760 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (2682 - 8906, n=12)
6559 Points ∼97% +1%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
6466 Points ∼96%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (322 - 6760, n=456)
3126 Points ∼46% -52%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
19689 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (14912 - 23118, n=12)
18056 Points ∼92% +11%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
16331 Points ∼83%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (661 - 20773, n=438)
6980 Points ∼35% -57%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (10521 - 13703, n=9)
12261 Points ∼100% +10%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
11122 Points ∼91%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1018 - 13703, n=72)
6009 Points ∼49% -46%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (3568 - 4820, n=9)
4034 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
3965 Points ∼98%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (592 - 4051, n=72)
2556 Points ∼63% -36%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (11576 - 14655, n=4)
13367 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
11576 Points ∼87%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2529 - 14655, n=29)
7836 Points ∼59% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
4791 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (4701 - 4791, n=3)
4750 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1179 - 4791, n=29)
3465 Points ∼72% -28%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (8142 - 16890, n=20)
13946 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
12832 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
12218 Points ∼88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2593 - 15584, n=25)
10044 Points ∼72% -18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
5210 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (2357 - 5547, n=20)
4989 Points ∼96% +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
4915 Points ∼94%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1529 - 5280, n=25)
3876 Points ∼74% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 30250, n=148)
2008 ms * ∼100% -88%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (730 - 2622, n=32)
1084 ms * ∼54% -1%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 44)
1068 ms * ∼53%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1025.7 ms * ∼51% +4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
35538 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (13935 - 49795, n=32)
35516 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 44)
34708 Points ∼98%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3963 - 41871, n=140)
25161 Points ∼71% -28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 44)
244.82 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
241.02 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (108 - 277, n=27)
240 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.8 - 277, n=125)
187 Points ∼76% -24%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6240 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4093 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5013 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5181 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3024 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2264 - 3370, n=17)
2961 Points ∼98% +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
2915 Points ∼96%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
2781 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (534 - 3704, n=80)
2417 Points ∼80% -17%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
1506 Points ∼50% -48%
Productivity
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7050 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 7588, n=17)
6721 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6400 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
6140 Points ∼87% -13%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
5553 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=80)
5197 Points ∼74% -26%
Essentials
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
8493 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5450 - 9029, n=17)
8244 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7952 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
7799 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 8549, n=80)
6728 Points ∼79% -21%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
6628 Points ∼78% -22%
Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4006 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2486 - 4178, n=17)
3919 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3764 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3736 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4344, n=83)
3111 Points ∼78% -22%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
2733 Points ∼68% -32%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5181 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4851 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3596 - 5189, n=15)
4780 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
4600 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=205)
4032 Points ∼78% -22%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
3518 Points ∼68% -32%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4093 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3690 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2577 - 4179, n=16)
3570 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3285 Points ∼80% -20%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
3255 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4182, n=233)
3028 Points ∼74% -26%
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Sequential Read: 1089 MB/s
Sequential Write: 762.7 MB/s
512K Read: 875 MB/s
512K Write: 677.9 MB/s
4K Read: 48.68 MB/s
4K Write: 149.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 571 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 490.1 MB/s
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
Average SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-20%
-51%
-17%
Write 4k QD32
490.1
184.7
-62%
224.2
-54%
336 (266 - 490, n=5)
-31%
Read 4k QD32
571
306.1
-46%
251.5
-56%
352 (231 - 571, n=5)
-38%
Write 4k
149.1
94.09
-37%
71.1
-52%
111 (86.1 - 149, n=5)
-26%
Read 4k
48.68
34.87
-28%
23.6
-52%
42.6 (35.8 - 48.7, n=5)
-12%
Write 512
677.9
243.3
-64%
413.8
-39%
609 (411 - 768, n=5)
-10%
Read 512
875
1227
40%
367
-58%
818 (603 - 1140, n=5)
-7%
Write Seq
762.7
479
-37%
446.7
-41%
741 (650 - 823, n=5)
-3%
Read Seq
1089
1880
73%
488.2
-55%
980 (756 - 1119, n=5)
-10%
3DMark 06 Standard
12132 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
2087 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9036 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1199 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1979 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1868 Points ∼94% 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1866 Points ∼94%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=154)
1706 Points ∼86% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 4905, n=353)
1260 Points ∼64% -32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 1130, n=31)
498 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
402 Points ∼81%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
372 Points ∼75%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 402, n=24)
348 Points ∼70%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1323 Points ∼100%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1284 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1283 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=123)
1117 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=233)
1036 Points ∼78% -22%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
11294 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10795 Points ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
10234 Points ∼91% -5%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
10131 Points ∼90% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=141)
9107 Points ∼81% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 22615, n=261)
7544 Points ∼67% -30%
baixo média alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 103.751.834.415.2fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 76.539.933.59.4fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16.910.96.13.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.9 dB
Carga
34.9 / 35 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.730.930.632.830.72531.132.630.129.431.1313130.631.930.6314031.730.129.63031.75029.929.427.728.829.96328.12828.526.128.1802625.62727.62610026.426.526.125.626.412525.624.625.324.825.616024.323.623.723.924.320023.32322.622.423.325022.922.722.321.722.931521.621.921.321.221.640021.321.420.720.221.350020.620.719.819.420.663020.119.919.318.920.18002221.818.517.722100023.723.818.217.723.7125023.724.118.117.723.7160023.823.618.117.623.8200025.325.318.317.725.3250024.424.918.217.524.4315024.324.518.418.124.3400021.421.718.418.221.4500022.62318.718.322.6630019.919.91918.619.9800019.419.419.118.919.41000019.319.119.21919.31250019.519.219.31919.51600020.520.619.519.420.5SPL34.935.130.930.534.9N221.31.32median 22.6median 22.7median 19.2median 18.9median 22.6Delta1.81.81.61.81.842.54238.441.737.430.929.932.330.632.430.829.629.829.528.831.331.330.32929.729.630.22928.130.128.829.928.727.528.327.530.62825.727.225.828.52625.226.624.226.52524.324.923.924.224.922.724.323.323.824.22223.422.326.425.321.422.321.82423.720.82120.824.123.420.22020.323.322.419.119.819.621.921.118.51919.222.5221818.819.422.321.917.618.519.823.222.817.318.319.82524.517.418.42025.625.117.117.719.125.725.91717.31824.424.51717.417.320.520.516.917.417.21918.91717.217.31817.817.217.417.417.717.517.217.417.417.517.417.217.517.217.617.217.117.317.317.417.217.217.431.135.134.829.730.31.52.22.11.31.4median 19.6median 23.3median 22.8median 17.4median 18.42.32.52.91.82.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Noise
4%
1%
1%
2%
-1%
off / environment *
30.5
30.25
1%
28.8
6%
29.7
3%
29.5 (27.8 - 30.7, n=158)
3%
29.9 (27.6 - 31.6, n=129)
2%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
30.25
1%
28.8
6%
30.3
1%
29.6 (27.8 - 32.5, n=159)
3%
29.6 (27.9 - 37.6, n=596)
3%
Idle Average *
30.5
30.25
1%
28.8
6%
30.3
1%
29.6 (27.8 - 33.8, n=159)
3%
30.3 (27.9 - 48.5, n=596)
1%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
30.25
2%
29.1
6%
31.1
-1%
30.1 (27.8 - 34.2, n=159)
3%
30.9 (27.9 - 44.2, n=596)
-0%
Load Average *
34.9
31.3
10%
36.1
-3%
34.9
-0%
33.7 (28.2 - 44.8, n=156)
3%
34.2 (28.6 - 49.7, n=594)
2%
Load Maximum *
35
31.3
11%
41.2
-18%
34.9
-0%
35.9 (28.8 - 46.8, n=159)
-3%
38.9 (30.2 - 53.8, n=596)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 44.4 °C43.3 °C41.4 °C 
 39.2 °C38.4 °C28 °C 
 29 °C38.9 °C27.1 °C 
Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
29.8 °C45.7 °C38.1 °C
27.1 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C
27.2 °C28.9 °C29.6 °C
Máximo: 45.7 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  55.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-10.3 °C / -18.5 F).
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Heat
0%
-9%
-1%
-1%
-11%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.4
40.7
8%
42.4
5%
43
3%
41.2 (29 - 52.6, n=159)
7%
41.1 (28.4 - 57, n=604)
7%
Maximum Bottom *
45.7
41.6
9%
45
2%
41
10%
44.4 (31.8 - 60.2, n=159)
3%
43.6 (24.3 - 66.2, n=604)
5%
Idle Upper Side *
25.4
28
-10%
31
-22%
28
-10%
26.9 (21.4 - 38, n=158)
-6%
29.7 (22 - 42, n=527)
-17%
Idle Bottom *
25.8
27.4
-6%
30.8
-19%
27
-5%
27.7 (21.8 - 40.4, n=158)
-7%
36.1 (21.6 - 2625, n=527)
-40%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.332.833.32529.829.429.83131.330.631.34028.93028.95030.228.830.26328.926.128.9802927.62910032.225.632.21253624.83616037.523.937.520032.822.432.825041.421.741.431547.521.247.540053.120.253.150050.119.450.163051.918.951.980057.817.757.8100059.117.759.1125061.717.761.7160062.117.662.1200062.417.762.4250057.217.557.2315054.918.154.9400056.218.256.2500052.918.352.9630053.718.653.7800052.418.952.41000052.31952.31250052.31952.31600047.719.447.7SPL70.130.570.1N23.31.323.3median 52.4median 18.9median 52.4Delta5.21.85.243.840.33230.830.43030.730.429.829.228.228.625.92824.627.127.824.839.62448.323.253.222.358.721.364.221.167.720.472.119.77519.473.118.972.918.474.318.469.317.76617.465.817.563.217.366.417.366.117.467.117.568.717.468.117.362.717.482.230.5531.4median 66.1median 18.46.72.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (62.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.25 / 0.25 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3 / 7.7 / 11.6 Watt
Carga midlight 34 / 35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
1%
-6%
-13%
-6%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.7
-57%
3.9
-30%
3.7
-23%
3.9 (1 - 12.4, n=162)
-30%
6.69 (1 - 36, n=589)
-123%
Idle Average *
7.7
7.3
5%
5.9
23%
8.5
-10%
7.14 (4.3 - 15.5, n=162)
7%
9.9 (2.06 - 39, n=589)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
11.6
9.4
19%
8.8
24%
10
14%
9 (5.2 - 16.6, n=162)
22%
12.2 (3.9 - 55, n=589)
-5%
Load Average *
34
28
18%
41.7
-23%
36
-6%
35.4 (12.9 - 51.6, n=162)
-4%
33.5 (6.3 - 75, n=579)
1%
Load Maximum *
35
28.2
19%
44
-26%
48.7
-39%
43.7 (22 - 79, n=162)
-25%
40.6 (7.6 - 111, n=582)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 25min
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
103%
31%
33%
-10%
Reader / Idle
970
1468
51%
1146
18%
616 (87 - 2557, n=547)
-36%
H.264
434
950
119%
657
51%
463 (182 - 950, n=110)
7%
WiFi v1.3
430
805
87%
621
44%
630
47%
466 (206 - 805, n=206)
8%
Load
145
111
-23%
196
35%
121 (40 - 347, n=554)
-17%

Pro

+ Tela IPS
+ Resolução Full-HD
+ Tela com boas cores
+ Carcaça feita de magnésio
+ Baixo peso
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ SSD NVMe
+ Retro iluminação do teclado
+ Slot M.2 livre

Contra

- Tela refletiva
- A RAM não pode ser expandida
- SSD soldado
- Sem leitor de cartões SD
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
The Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6. Test unit provided by Acer Germany.
The Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6. Test unit provided by Acer Germany.

O Swift 5 SF515-51T da Acer é um portátil muito leve que é feito para viajantes frequentes que não querem abrir mão de uma grande tela de 15,6 polegadas.

Pesando pouco menos de um quilograma, o dispositivo é dificilmente perceptível em sua bolsa - sem ombros tensos com este!

A fim de alcançar este baixo peso, a Acer escolheu uma carcaça de magnésio e várias limitações. Os módulos de RAM, SSD e Wi-Fi estão todos soldados na placa-mãe, o que significa que nenhum desses componentes pode ser trocado ou expandido. Portanto, você deve estar ciente de quanto armazenamento precisará ao longo dos próximos anos antes de comprar um Swift 5. Pelo menos há um slot M.2 2280 livre, então você pode adicionar algum armazenamento NVMe mais tarde.

O dispositivo é alimentado por um processador Core i7 Whiskey Lake que oferece capacidade de processamento suficiente para aplicativos de escritório e internet. Infelizmente, o Swift 5 não pode tirar o máximo proveito de sua CPU ao trabalhar por um longo tempo, particularmente durante a operação multi-thread. Se você precisar de desempenho máximo contínuo, é melhor procurar em outro lugar.

O Swift 5 oferece um teclado decente com luz de fundo de um nível, além de durações de bateria relativamente boas. A tela táctil IPS também nos deu uma boa impressão. Tem valores normais de contraste e brilho e suas cores são agradáveis. No entanto, esteja ciente de que esta é uma tela reflexiva. O ideal seria que a Acer oferecesse alternadamente uma tela mate sem o recurso de tela táctil.

O Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T compete com o LG Gram 15Z980. O Acer é claramente o vencedor em termos de peso - o Gram, no entanto, oferece durações de bateria significativamente mais longas e uma melhor seleção de portas. Esses dois fatores podem inclinar a balança em favor do dispositivo LG para muitos compradores em potencial. Se a Acer conseguir manter o peso em futuras reencarnações do Swift 5 enquanto melhora a duração da bateria e a seleção de portas, as coisas poderiam ficar apertadas para o Gram.     

Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 - 02/11/2019 v6
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
83 /  98 → 85%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
54 / 80 → 67%
Peso
75 / 35-78 → 93%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 68 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
89 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
91 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
92%
Audio
58 / 91 → 63%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
76%
87%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T (i7-8565U, SSD, FHD)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-02-12 (Update: 2019-02-12)