Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 14 UX433F (i7-8565U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 332.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1148:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.61
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 APPA039, IPS, 13.30, 2560x1600 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, IPS, 13.30, 3840x2160 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.90, 3000x2000 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 AUO B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.90, 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX430UN NV140FHM-N62, BOE0718, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 8% | 4% | 0% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 67.8 5% | 68.9 7% | 65.9 2% | 62.7 -2% | 64.6 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.7 | 96.1 7% | 98.4 10% | 95.2 6% | 92.6 3% | 84.8 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.1 | 69.8 7% | 69.5 7% | 67.6 4% | 64.7 -1% | 62 -5% |
| Response Times | -9% | -80% | -5% | 3% | -37% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 39.6 ? -0% | 69.6 ? -76% | 40.4 ? -2% | 34.4 ? 13% | 43.6 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 44 ? -83% | 25.6 ? -7% | 25.6 ? -7% | 39.2 ? -63% |
| PWM Frequency | 113600 ? | 3759 ? | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | 31% | 25% | 23% | -11% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 332.8 | 320 -4% | 478.5 44% | 442.7 33% | 312 -6% | 310.4 -7% |
| Brightness | 310 | 315 2% | 466 50% | 428 38% | 295 -5% | 303 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 95 9% | 86 -1% | 84 -3% | 87 0% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.29 -0% | 0.43 -48% | 0.31 -7% | 0.43 -48% | 0.31 -7% |
| Contrast | 1148 | 1103 -4% | 1113 -3% | 1428 24% | 726 -37% | 1001 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.14 | 1.2 77% | 3.09 40% | 2.24 56% | 7.6 -48% | 4.07 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.88 | 3.2 73% | 5.94 50% | 7.19 39% | 15.06 -27% | 8.33 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.61 | 0.5 86% | 2.06 43% | 1.11 69% | 1.96 46% | 4.07 -13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.8 | 0.8 91% | 2.4 73% | 9.7 -10% | 8.8 -0% | 2.8 68% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.063 107% | 1.42 155% | 2.01 109% | 2.217 99% |
| CCT | 8227 79% | 6548 99% | 6883 94% | 6227 104% | 6874 95% | 7033 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.1 | 62.1 7% | 69.47 20% | 61.6 6% | 59.1 2% | 55.3 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 96 8% | 98.36 10% | 95 7% | 92.3 3% | 84.6 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
22% | -16% /
9% | 7% /
16% | -3% /
-7% | -11% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3285 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4851 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3736 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus Zenbook UX430UN SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -22% | -4% | -192% | -70% | -570% | |
| Seq Read | 1201 | 2205 84% | 2416 101% | 1228 2% | 494.4 -59% | 1574 31% |
| Seq Write | 931 | 435.8 -53% | 1170 26% | 544 -42% | 300.3 -68% | 377.1 -59% |
| 4K Read | 40.25 | 29.36 -27% | 48.33 20% | 39.16 -3% | 25.39 -37% | 31.73 -21% |
| 4K Write | 111.5 | 107.4 -4% | 103.1 -8% | 106.5 -4% | 47.88 -57% | 1.73 -98% |
| 4K-64 Read | 916 | 678 -26% | 1039 13% | 466.4 -49% | 366 -60% | 115.6 -87% |
| 4K-64 Write | 871 | 444.8 -49% | 399.6 -54% | 305.1 -65% | 183.5 -79% | 2.09 -100% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.059 -18% | 0.058 -16% | 0.46 -820% | 0.089 -78% | 0.044 12% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.055 -72% | 0.036 -13% | 0.51 -1494% | 0.088 -175% | 2.391 -7372% |
| Score Read | 1076 | 926 -14% | 1329 24% | 628 -42% | 441 -59% | 305 -72% |
| Score Write | 1075 | 596 -45% | 620 -42% | 466 -57% | 261 -76% | 42 -96% |
| Score Total | 2696 | 1911 -29% | 2575 -4% | 1394 -48% | 926 -66% | 455 -83% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1153 | 585 -49% | 739 -36% | 628 -46% | 467.6 -59% | 1205 5% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 415.1 | 570 37% | 312.3 -25% | 540 30% | 270.5 -35% | 281.8 -32% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 930 | 503 -46% | 486.3 -48% | 533 -43% | 225.1 -76% | 856 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11207 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 7761 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2201 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 64710 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9469 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 461 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 78.5 | 38.1 | 31.8 | 9.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 22.8 | 13.7 | 7.2 | 5.7 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 71.4 | 32.9 | 21.1 |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook UX430UN GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 1% | -4% | 4% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 28 3% | 27.9 3% | 28.3 2% | 27.9 3% | 30.13 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 28 3% | 27.9 3% | 28.9 -0% | 27.9 3% | 30.13 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 28 3% | 27.9 3% | 30 -4% | 27.9 3% | 30 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 28 4% | 27.9 4% | 30.2 -4% | 29.3 -1% | 30.13 -4% |
| Load Average * | 36.1 | 32.5 10% | 36.2 -0% | 41.8 -16% | 32 11% | 33.4 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.2 | 42.2 -2% | 45.2 -10% | 42 -2% | 39.3 5% | 33 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 29.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.1 / 41.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.78 / 0.89 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 5.9 / 8.8 Watt |
| Carga |
41.7 / 44 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.90 | Asus Zenbook UX430UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -26% | -21% | -1% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 5 -28% | 3.5 10% | 3.4 13% | 3 23% | 3.2 18% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 8.3 -41% | 8.9 -51% | 7.5 -27% | 5.8 2% | 6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 8.8 -0% | 12.3 -40% | 11.8 -34% | 6.2 30% | 9.2 -5% |
| Load Average * | 41.7 | 46.4 -11% | 54.2 -30% | 47.7 -14% | 54.1 -30% | 29.5 29% |
| Load Maximum * | 44 | 48.6 -10% | 52.1 -18% | 63.2 -44% | 56.4 -28% | 35.6 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 | 45.9 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX430UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -33% | -12% | 5% | -23% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1146 | 819 -29% | 1243 8% | 1039 -9% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 630 | 668 6% | 465 -26% | 557 -12% | 664 5% | 560 -11% | 527 -16% |
| Load | 196 | 131 -33% | 109 -44% | 133 -32% | 98 -50% | 166 -15% |
Pro
Contra
O mercado de Ultrabooks tem crescido constantemente em termos de opções e está se tornando mais desafiador para os OEMs se diferenciarem uns dos outros. Mesmo assim, a Asus ainda consegue nos surpreender com recursos exclusivos como o UX580 ScreenPad e agora os marcos NanoEdge de quatro lados que dão ao UX433 um formato muito pequeno para o tamanho de tela de 14 polegadas. O novo design é visualmente distinto e exclusivo Zenbook, melhorando a rigidez e conectividade da última geração. É uma atualização evolutiva que passamos a esperar, mas com uma característica que é visualmente impressionante e ergonômica.
Nós apreciamos especialmente que o UX433 inclua opções mate anti refletivas e refletivas, e um eventual SKU GeForce MX150. A maioria dos Ultrabooks possui apenas telas refletivas e se limita a gráficos Intel integrados, mais lentos.
O recurso mais fraco do UX433 é o desempenho da CPU. Não é a velocidade que é decepcionante, mas é o quão marginal é a aceleração que o Whiskey Lake-U fornece sobre a 8ª geração do Kaby Lake-R, a ponto de os usuários provavelmente não perceberão nenhum ganho de desempenho. Até mesmo a Asus sabe disso, pois a página oficial do produto UX433 está comparando o Whiskey Lake-U com o Kaby Lake de 7ma ger. em vez do Kaby Lake-R de 8va ger., a fim de anunciar um salto maior no poder da CPU. Não podemos deixar de sentir que o sistema poderia ter sido mais barato e tão rápido quanto o i7-8550U ou o i5-8250U.
Para futuras iterações, gostaríamos de ver Thunderbolt 3 e uma tela mais brilhante para competir melhor contra alternativas populares como o XPS 13, MateBook X Pro, MacBook Pro 13, Samsung NP900, e outros que podem ser mais fáceis de ver em exteriores. A Asus deve abandonar a porta proprietária do adaptador de CA e adotar o mais versátil carregamento USB Type-C também. A resposta táctil para o Teclado Numérico virtual, um leitor de digitais e um teclado à prova de vazamentos são apenas alguns recursos que o fabricante poderia considerar para fornecer ao UX433 um valor ainda melhor.
Uma atualização visual e de qualidade da última geração do UX430. O sistema se sente potente para o tamanho, apesar de omitir alguns recursos comumente encontrados em outros ultrabooks em sua faixa de preços. O aumento na potência da CPU do Whiskey Lake-U será muito maior se os usuários estiverem atualizando de portáteis com pelo menos dois ou três anos de idade.
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
-
11/20/2018 v6(old)
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
