Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/28/2018

Shooting Star Com o ROG Strix GL504, a Asus apresenta um portátil de 15 polegadas que traz quase todos os recursos que você poderia desejar em uma plataforma de jogos. Um painel de 144-Hz? Confere. Marcos finos da tela? Confere. Teclado RGB? Confere. CPU Hexa-core e GPU DirectX-12? Confere. Explicamos em nosso teste por que isso ainda não é suficiente para uma avaliação "muito boa".

Asus GL504GS (GL504 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 397.31
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, all slots occupied, 32 GB max
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, NVMe + Seagate FireCuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 + 1x 2.5 in
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Audio combo port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26 x 361 x 262
Bateria
66 Wh, 4210 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 3.5 watts, Teclado: Chiclet, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230-watt power supply, key chain, sticker, various manufacturer tools, XSplit Gamecaster, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.456 kg, Suprimento de energia: 613 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s ∼100% +142%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=205)
90.1 MB/s ∼47% +14%
Asus GL504GS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼41%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s ∼13% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +195%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=203)
109 MB/s ∼45% +33%
Asus GL504GS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82 MB/s ∼34%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼13% -61%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Asus GL504GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
672 MBit/s ∼97%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=178)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus GL504GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
697 MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
665 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
643 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=178)
535 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
238
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 278 cd/m² Médio: 261.1 cd/m² Minimum: 29 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 271 cd/m²
Contraste: 847:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.33
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Asus GL504GS
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 2018
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG Neo 15
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-88%
-80%
-95%
-66%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
17.2 (8.8, 8.4)
-139%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-133%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-144%
16 (8.4, 7.6)
-122%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-36%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-27%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-45%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
2%
21%
11%
8%
Brightness middle
271
290
7%
313
15%
254
-6%
325
20%
Brightness
261
281
8%
300
15%
262
0%
303
16%
Brightness Distribution
86
82
-5%
78
-9%
89
3%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.32
0.3
6%
0.33
-3%
0.22
31%
0.33
-3%
Contrast
847
967
14%
948
12%
1155
36%
985
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.61
2.85
-9%
1.29
51%
2.37
9%
2.69
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.93
6.27
-27%
2.04
59%
4.71
4%
4.91
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.33
1.39
40%
1.84
21%
1.27
45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.97
2.4
-22%
0.69
65%
1.58
20%
2.34
-19%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.34 94%
2.43 91%
2.48 89%
2.38 92%
CCT
6398 102%
6718 97%
6550 99%
6785 96%
6872 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
60
2%
60
2%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
94
4%
94
4%
92
2%
94
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-43% / -12%
-30% / 4%
-42% / -5%
-29% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼98% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus GL504GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=417)
152 Points ∼87% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL504GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1190 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1154 Points ∼97% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
983 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=418)
746 Points ∼63% -37%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.96 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus GL504GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=407)
1.68 Points ∼84% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL504GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.26 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.89 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.51 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=508)
7.27 Points ∼55% -45%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.26 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1190 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5191 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼98% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points ∼97% +4%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5046 Points ∼97% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=116)
4936 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4854 Points ∼94%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5673 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5669 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5637 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=311)
4921 Points ∼87% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5390 Points ∼100%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4658 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
4585 Points ∼85% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=329)
4218 Points ∼78% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5390 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5673 pontos
Ajuda
Asus GL504GS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 2018
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
AS SSD
-6%
-31%
-7%
13%
Score Total
4318
3806
-12%
2536
-41%
4122
-5%
5224
21%
Score Write
1983
1450
-27%
939
-53%
2051
3%
2423
22%
Score Read
1542
1584
3%
1092
-29%
1346
-13%
1837
19%
4K Write
105.67
93.55
-11%
80.44
-24%
107.15
1%
105.97
0%
4K Read
53.26
46.45
-13%
23.36
-56%
48.94
-8%
48.03
-10%
Seq Write
1729.74
1520.94
-12%
1163.11
-33%
1834.04
6%
2323.76
34%
Seq Read
1836.5
2375.98
29%
2212.97
20%
1266.1
-31%
1914.52
4%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2738 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1864 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 344.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 297.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1761 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1852 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.23 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97.91 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
17775 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36818 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14394 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16345 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15748 Points ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11558 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=445)
10237 Points ∼63% -37%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21058 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19969 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14367 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=518)
11863 Points ∼56% -44%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
55.6 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
53.5 fps ∼96% -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.7 fps ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.4 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=222)
44.7 fps ∼80% -20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
38.6 fps ∼69% -31%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 10255.6fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 247218fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 135116fps
Fortnite (2018) 148111fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 57.2fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 9287fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 6060fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 33 / 40 dB
Carga
49 / 53 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
7%
3%
10%
-2%
7%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
29
-0%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=225)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
32
29
9%
30
6%
30
6%
29
9%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=648)
1%
Idle Average *
33
30
9%
31
6%
31
6%
35
-6%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=648)
1%
Idle Maximum *
40
38
5%
35
12%
34
15%
40
-0%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=648)
13%
Load Average *
49
46
6%
49
-0%
43
12%
50
-2%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=649)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
49
4%
51
-0%
42
18%
53
-4%
Load Maximum *
53
46
13%
54
-2%
44
17%
58
-9%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=649)
10%

* ... smaller is better

 52 °C51 °C55 °C 
 45 °C47 °C47 °C 
 36 °C34 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 44.6 °C
55 °C52 °C53 °C
48 °C53 °C50 °C
34 °C38 °C32 °C
Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 46.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  60 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-8.3 °C / -14.9 F).
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
1%
8%
15%
4%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
55
56
-2%
53
4%
49
11%
56
-2%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=613)
17%
Maximum Bottom *
55
59
-7%
65
-18%
63
-15%
68
-24%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=611)
11%
Idle Upper Side *
36
33
8%
26
28%
24
33%
28
22%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=564)
14%
Idle Bottom *
36
34
6%
30
17%
25
31%
29
19%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=562)
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.246.62532.738.3312731.24032.838.35027.335.8632643.68027.352.210025.764.312523.669.416024.167.320023.669.425022.56931520.468.540019.465.35001966.863017.970.580018.572.5100018.371.3125017.769.616001768.520001765.5250017.664.1315017.363.5400017.360.5500017.458.1630017.359.2800017.358.21000017.262.91250017.155.41600017.144.1SPL29.979N1.348.1median 17.7median 65.5Delta1.74.442.241.736.134.229.632.533.333.326.430.526.131.124.937.924.240.722.34121.448.121.754.822.257.220.558.318.962.918.865.217.763.917.470.117.273.816.874.117.173.61772.1177017.267.917.265.117.262.117.261.417.255.717.25117.147.51740.329.681.81.347.5median 17.2median 62.11.99hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus GL504GSRazer Blade 15 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus GL504GS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.8 / 2.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 29 / 32 / 38 Watt
Carga midlight 100 / 217 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
31%
31%
38%
39%
18%
Idle Minimum *
29
14
52%
14
52%
7
76%
10
66%
20.1 (3.9 - 113, n=608)
31%
Idle Average *
32
17
47%
18
44%
11
66%
13
59%
25.7 (6.8 - 119, n=608)
20%
Idle Maximum *
38
21
45%
22
42%
20
47%
18
53%
30.8 (8.3 - 122, n=608)
19%
Load Average *
100
95
5%
91
9%
98
2%
95
5%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=599)
-4%
Load Maximum *
217
179
18%
173
20%
182
16%
179
18%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=598)
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
170
141
17%
142
16%
132
22%
114
33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
2h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 11min
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, 66 Wh
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 46.7 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
89%
235%
122%
89%
58%
Reader / Idle
176
382
117%
762
333%
507
188%
400
127%
331 (39 - 1174, n=595)
88%
H.264
150
324
116%
504
236%
356
137%
288
92%
244 (88 - 506, n=122)
63%
WiFi v1.3
146
322
121%
513
251%
362
148%
262
79%
250 (78 - 622, n=269)
71%
Load
71
72
1%
156
120%
81
14%
111
56%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=561)
11%

Pro

+ very responsive 144-Hz panel
+ NVMe-SSD + SSHD
+ good input devices
+ very fast WLAN
+ RGB illumination
+ powerful sound
+ powerful tools
+ thin bezels

Contra

- unfortunate positioning of the webcam
- limited CPU and GPU Turbo
- high noise level under load
- neither Optimus nor G-Sync
- weak battery life
- no Thunderbolt 3

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

ROG Strix GL504, test unit provided by Asus Germany
ROG Strix GL504, test unit provided by Asus Germany

No segmento de portáteis de jogos finos com um design de marcos finos, podemos ver o início de uma dura concorrência. Depois de que o Gigabyte Aero 15X e o Razer Blade 15 já conseguiram convencer quase completamente nos últimos meses, com o ASUS ROG Strix GL504 Cicatriz II, agora há um terceiro candidato que alcança uma avaliação geral de 87% ou 88%.

O dispositivos de15 polegadas deve sua alta porcentagem na avaliação não só à carcaça estilosa com a tela de 144-Hz, mas também a seus bons dispositivos de entrada e o som surpreendentemente alto dos alto-falantes.

Por outro lado, é questionável porque a Asus escolheu um GeForce GTX 1070 convencional, em vez da versão Max-Q. Embora o modelo padrão traga um pouco mais de potência, como resultado, as emissões, a altura da carcaça e o peso sofrem, ficando melhor com os concorrentes na maioria dos casos.

No entanto, na prática, a falta da comutação gráfica é ainda mais um problema. Sem a tecnologia Optimus, torna-se difícil considerar o GL504GS uma plataforma móvel de jogos, uma vez que os compradores estarão muito dependentes da fonte de alimentação (de acordo com a Asus, pelo menos o GL504GM com uma GTX 1060 supostamente suporta Optimus). O fabricante também poderia fazer algumas melhorias em termos de conexões. Em 2018, esperamos uma porta Thunderbolt 3 na faixa de preço acima de 1000 Euros (~$1139).

Apesar destes déficits, o dispositivo de 15 polegadas pode superar o MSI GS65 cuja carcaça mostra diversas fraquezas. E no final do dia, o Schenker XMG Neo 15 também perde contra ele.

Asus GL504GS - 08/21/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
65%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
96%
Desempenho da aplicação
99%
Temperatura
79 / 95 → 83%
Ruído
63 / 90 → 70%
Audio
86%
Médio
79%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Asus ROG Strix GL504
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-08-28 (Update: 2018-09- 8)