Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/20/2018

A good balance. Apesar de fazer vários recortes, o Asus TUF FX705 é um interessante portátil para jogos com um bom equilíbrio entre custo e desempenho. Descubra nesta análise onde o modelo de 17 polegadas brilha e quais fraquezas devem ser levadas em consideração.

bom (83%) Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) Gaming - 10/19/2018 - v6
Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Error: PNG file fileadmin/png_rating/rating_r5090_l4_TUFFX705GM.png could not be rewritten!

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Asus TUF FX705GM (TUF FX705 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 398.35, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB 
, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW, SSD NVMe de 256 GB + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, HDD de 1 TB, 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 400 x 279
Bateria
64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180-W, McAfee LiveSafe trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.753 kg, Suprimento de energia: 439 g
Preço
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
693 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=175)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
468 MBit/s ∼68% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
670 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=175)
533 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
448 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
317 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
236
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
208
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 246 cd/m² Médio: 228.1 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 205 cd/m²
Contraste: 1170:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.02
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
89% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Asus TUF FX705GM
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, TN LED, 1920x1080
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
4%
17%
-281%
-253%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
-19%
7.8 (4.4, 3.4)
-5%
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
-430%
36 (18.8, 17.2)
-386%
Response Time Black / White *
10 (4.8, 5.2)
7.4 (5.2, 2.2)
26%
6.2 (4.4, 1.8)
38%
23.2 (10.8, 12.4)
-132%
22 (10.4, 11.6)
-120%
PWM Frequency
25510 (15)
25510 (14)
119000 (90)
122000 (95)
Screen
-33%
-15%
-61%
-68%
Brightness middle
234
297.8
27%
262
12%
362
55%
365
56%
Brightness
228
285
25%
261
14%
350
54%
341
50%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
94
11%
91
7%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.2
0.33
-65%
0.2
-0%
0.29
-45%
0.32
-60%
Contrast
1170
902
-23%
1310
12%
1248
7%
1141
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.16
3.68
-70%
3.96
-83%
6.06
-181%
6.51
-201%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.39
7.71
-127%
7.29
-115%
11.6
-242%
12.32
-263%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.02
2.71
-34%
2.18
-8%
3.13
-55%
2.9
-44%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
5
-150%
3.09
-55%
7.22
-261%
7.65
-283%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.06 107%
2.48 89%
2.51 88%
2.64 83%
CCT
6394 102%
6728 97%
6977 93%
7659 85%
8066 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
84.77
46%
76
31%
55
-5%
56
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
99.97
12%
100
12%
84
-6%
86
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-15% / -27%
1% / -10%
-171% / -95%
-161% / -96%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Software
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
1137 Points ∼100%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
1132 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1112 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1015 Points ∼89% -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼65% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼84% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.79 Points ∼100%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.33 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.2 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.2 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼57% -43%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø995 (976.78-1132)
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (966-1112.47)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (926.78-1026.8)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.79 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1137 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5525 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=115)
4933 Points ∼89% -5%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
4734 Points ∼86% -8%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5528 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
5389 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5323 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼86% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5371 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points ∼87%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4393 Points ∼82% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points ∼79% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼79% -9%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
4196 Points ∼78% -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4660 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5719 pontos
Ajuda
Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND
AS SSD
8%
12%
34%
-61%
Score Total
2458
3075
25%
3083
25%
3291
34%
811
-67%
Score Write
1082
825
-24%
906
-16%
1592
47%
196
-82%
Score Read
913
1520
66%
1456
59%
1153
26%
414
-55%
4K Write
101.9
88.38
-13%
98.36
-3%
112.28
10%
62.73
-38%
4K Read
38.49
35.76
-7%
42.81
11%
52.84
37%
26.5
-31%
Seq Write
1236.46
1031.3
-17%
1172.8
-5%
1448.94
17%
128.2
-90%
Seq Read
1571.32
1993.13
27%
1749.34
11%
2588.72
65%
512.95
-67%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1704 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1301 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 321.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 282.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1325 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1295 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18349 Points ∼100% +34%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14528 Points ∼79% +6%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13722 Points ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=515)
11872 Points ∼65% -13%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9332 Points ∼51% -32%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9147 Points ∼50% -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
13450 pontos
Ajuda
0102030405060