Breve Análise do Portátil Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Name: Asus TUF FX705GM
Brand: Asus

A good balance. Apesar de fazer vários recortes, o Asus TUF FX705 é um interessante portátil para jogos com um bom equilíbrio entre custo e desempenho. Descubra nesta análise onde o modelo de 17 polegadas brilha e quais fraquezas devem ser levadas em consideração.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/20/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF FX705GM (TUF FX705 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 398.35, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB

, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW, SSD NVMe de 256 GB + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, HDD de 1 TB, 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 400 x 279

Bateria

64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180-W, McAfee LiveSafe trial, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.753 kg, Suprimento de energia: 439 g

Preço

1499 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Asus TUF FX705GM DIN A4 ❌

Left side: DC in, RJ45-LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB type-A 2.0, 2x USB type-A 3.0, audio

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s +65%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Wireless-AC 9560	692 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Wireless-AC 9260	670 MBit/s -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	640 MBit/s -8%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	448 MBit/s -35%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	317 MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s +102%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Wireless-AC 9260	693 MBit/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	692 MBit/s +2%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Wireless-AC 9560	681 MBit/s
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 MBit/s -4%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	468 MBit/s -31%


236 cd/m²	246 cd/m²	236 cd/m²
225 cd/m²	234 cd/m²	228 cd/m²
208 cd/m²	225 cd/m²	215 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 246 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 228.1 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 205 cd/m²
Contraste: 1170:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.02
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF FX705GM AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, TN LED, 1920x1080	MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080	SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		30%	31%	-1%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	62.4	90 44%	90.8 46%	66.1 6%	67.1 8%
sRGB Coverage	88.8	100 13%	99.9 13%	84.4 -5%	86.1 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.8	84.8 33%	85.8 34%	61.7 -3%	63 -1%
Response Times		4%	17%	-281%	-253%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) -19%	7.8 ?(4.4, 3.4) -5%	39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8) -430%	36 ?(18.8, 17.2) -386%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(4.8, 5.2)	7.4 ?(5.2, 2.2) 26%	6.2 ?(4.4, 1.8) 38%	23.2 ?(10.8, 12.4) -132%	22 ?(10.4, 11.6) -120%
PWM Frequency		25510 ?(15)	25510 ?(14)	119000 ?(90)	122000 ?(95)
Screen		-33%	-15%	-61%	-68%
Brightness middle	234	297.8 27%	262 12%	362 55%	365 56%
Brightness	228	285 25%	261 14%	350 54%	341 50%
Brightness Distribution	85	84 -1%	94 11%	91 7%	89 5%
Black Level *	0.2	0.33 -65%	0.2 -0%	0.29 -45%	0.32 -60%
Contrast	1170	902 -23%	1310 12%	1248 7%	1141 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.16	3.68 -70%	3.96 -83%	6.06 -181%	6.51 -201%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.39	7.71 -127%	7.29 -115%	11.6 -242%	12.32 -263%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.02	2.71 -34%	2.18 -8%	3.13 -55%	2.9 -44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	5 -150%	3.09 -55%	7.22 -261%	7.65 -283%
Gamma	2.46 ^89%	2.06 ^107%	2.48 ^89%	2.51 ^88%	2.64 ^83%
CCT	6394 ^102%	6728 ^97%	6977 ^93%	7659 ^85%	8066 ^81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	58	84.77 46%	76 31%	55 -5%	56 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	89	99.97 12%	100 12%	84 -6%	86 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		0% / -16%	11% / -3%	-114% / -77%	-107% / -78%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.8 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.8 ms rise
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points +53%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H	173 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H	168 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points +173%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H	1137 Points
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H	1132 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	1112 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H	1027 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H	807 Points -29%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=24, last 2 years)	3.23 Points +62%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H	2 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points 0%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H	1.96 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=25, last 2 years)	34.6 Points +171%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H	12.79 Points
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.33 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	12.2 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H	11.2 Points -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H	8.79 Points -31%

Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)

MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø995 (976.78-1132)

SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (966-1112.47)

Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (926.78-1026.8)

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.79 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

175 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1137 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points +47%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5525 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5169 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB	4734 Points -8%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5371 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)	5222 Points +12%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4660 Points
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4393 Points -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND	4253 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB	4196 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)	6048 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5719 Points
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5528 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB	5389 Points -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND	5347 Points -7%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5323 Points -7%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4660 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5719 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5169 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus TUF FX705GM WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Hynix HFS128G39TND
AS SSD		8%	12%	34%	-61%
Seq Read	1571	1993 27%	1749 11%	2589 65%	513 -67%
Seq Write	1236	1031 -17%	1173 -5%	1449 17%	128.2 -90%
4K Read	38.49	35.76 -7%	42.81 11%	52.8 37%	26.5 -31%
4K Write	101.9	88.4 -13%	98.4 -3%	112.3 10%	62.7 -38%
Score Read	913	1520 66%	1456 59%	1153 26%	414 -55%
Score Write	1082	825 -24%	906 -16%	1592 47%	196 -82%
Score Total	2458	3075 25%	3083 25%	3291 34%	811 -67%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1704 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1301 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 321.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 282.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1325 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1295 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.46 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points +195%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18349 Points +34%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14528 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX705GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13722 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	9332 Points -32%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	9147 Points -33%

3DMark 11 Performance		13450 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø37.1 (34-39)

MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP: Ø50.2 (46-54)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND: Ø24.7 (23-26)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)	220 fps +232%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	91.6 fps +38%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	66.2 fps
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	58.8 fps -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H	46.7 fps -29%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	44.6 fps -33%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +221%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	49.6 fps +36%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	41 fps +12%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	36.5 fps
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H	26 fps -29%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	24.7 fps -32%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			66.2	36.5
The Crew 2 (2018)			60	60
Monster Hunter World (2018)			50.8	40.6
F1 2018 (2018)			92	58
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			53	47
FIFA 19 (2018)			205	203
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)			85	66
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)			52	37
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)			69.4	63.1

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 33 / 44 dB
HDD		33 dB
Carga		46 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		8%	6%	4%	7%	14%
off / environment *	29	28.6 1%	30 -3%	29 -0%	29 -0%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	32	29.4 8%	30 6%	31 3%	29 9%	25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	33	29.4 11%	34 -3%	32 3%	31 6%	27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	44	33.7 23%	36 18%	44 -0%	33 25%	30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years) 30%
Load Average *	46	41.2 10%	43 7%	44 4%	45 2%	43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years) 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	47.3 1%	45 6%	42 12%	45 6%
Load Maximum *	50	48.3 3%	45 10%	46 8%	51 -2%	53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


49 °C	51 °C	54 °C
41 °C	48 °C	45 °C
28 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 42 °C


53 °C	46 °C	47 °C
51 °C	40 °C	39 °C
29 °C	24 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 39.9 °C

Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


27 °C	30 °C	27 °C
27 °C	30 °C	29 °C
24 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C


28 °C	28 °C	29 °C
30 °C	30 °C	27 °C
23 °C	23 °C	24 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 26.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 25 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


45 °C	51 °C	50 °C
38 °C	46 °C	43 °C
26 °C	29 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C


49 °C	44 °C	44 °C
48 °C	39 °C	35 °C
24 °C	24 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).

	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-3%	-8%	-4%	-0%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	54	54.6 -1%	58 -7%	55 -2%	50 7%	46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years) 15%
Maximum Bottom *	53	41.2 22%	63 -19%	49 8%	52 2%	49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Upper Side *	30	35 -17%	32 -7%	32 -7%	33 -10%	31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Bottom *	30	35.2 -17%	30 -0%	34 -13%	30 -0%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF FX705GM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.8 / 2.2 Watt
Ocioso	13 / 17 / 24 Watt
Carga	106 / 179 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-18%	10%	20%	36%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	13	18.88 -45%	8 38%	11 15%	6 54%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Average *	17	24.36 -43%	14 18%	14 18%	9 47%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Maximum *	24	32.27 -34%	22 8%	20 17%	13 46%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -13%
Load Average *	106	107.74 -2%	92 13%	96 9%	95 10%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -5%
Witcher 3 ultra *	151	142 6%	154 -2%	97 36%	102 32%
Load Maximum *	179	160.28 10%	207 -16%	136 24%	134 25%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 20min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 35min

	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh	Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh	MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh	SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-21%	-24%	57%	41%	30%
Reader / Idle	380	320 -16%	346 -9%	704 85%	710 87%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 43%
H.264	260					399 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years) 53%
WiFi v1.3	272	213 -22%	200 -26%	378 39%	354 30%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) 35%
Load	95	70 -26%	60 -37%	141 48%	100 5%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) -11%

Pro

+ Iluminação RGB

+ Painel de 144-Hz

+ SSD NVMe

+ Marcos finos

Contra

- Muito barulho durante o uso em 3D

- Seleção limitada de portas

- Som impressionante

Asus TUF FX705GM, courtesy of Asus Germany

Com a série TUF, a Asus mostra que portáteis de jogos potentes não precisam ser escandalosamente caros.

Além da escassa seleção de portas (sem leitor de cartões, sem Thunderbolt 3, sem USB 3.1 Gen2) e o som medíocre, o FX705 não deixa muitas coisas a desejar. O modelo de 17 polegadas brilha com sua tela de 144 Hz com alta taxa de contraste e alta velocidade, que é impulsionado por um processador de seis núcleos e a GeForce GTX 1060 de alto desempenho.

A carcaça e a duração da bateria também não são muito ruins. A qualidade do chassi deve agradar a maioria dos compradores. Além disso, os jogadores ficarão felizes com a iluminação RGB (Cuidado: Existem duas variantes da carcaça com várias diferenças; Veja acima)

No entanto, há uma quantidade saudável de competição no setor de 17 polegadas, como o MSI GS73, o Schenker XMG A707 e o Acer Predator Helios 300. Enquanto os dois últimos desses portáteis ficaram ligeiramente para trás em termos de pontuação (82 em vez de 83%), o MSI alcançou uma avaliação geral um pouco melhor.

Asus TUF FX705GM - 2018-10-19 10/19/2018 v6^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 82%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

52 / 81 → 64%

Peso

58 / 10-66 → 86%

Bateria