Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG A707 (Clevo N871EK1)

Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/03/2018

Um bom comprometimento. O Schenker XMG A707 é projetado para atrair os amantes de jogos e multimídia. Para este fim, o fabricante equipou a versão mais cara do portátil com um Core i7-8750H e uma GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Será que o portátil de 17 polegadas tem alguma chance em contra dos rivais estabelecidos da Acer, MSI, e Asus?

Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 397.93, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, all slots occupied, max. 32 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, Full HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB, 256 GB 
, NVMe + Seagate BarraCuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inches
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x fone, 1x micropfone, Card Reader: 6-em-1, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 419 x 289
Bateria
62 Wh, 5300 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 332 g
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Full HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 150-watts, key ring, pano de limpeza, adesivo, DVD de recuperação, DVD de controladores, cartão de garantia, guia de início rápido, memória USB com software, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.886 kg, Suprimento de energia: 484 g
Preço
1449 EUR

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=186)
91.4 MB/s ∼100% +20%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.06 MB/s ∼88% +5%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼85% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼83% 0%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼83%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=185)
111 MB/s ∼100% +32%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.33 MB/s ∼79% +4%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼78% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼77% +2%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s ∼76%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
693 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
670 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=148)
590 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
670 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
614 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 691, n=148)
520 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
359
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 362 cd/m² Médio: 349.8 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 362 cd/m²
Contraste: 1248:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.06 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.13
ΔE Greyscale 7.22 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
84% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 1920x1080
Response Times
-45%
5%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
45 (20, 25)
-15%
36 (18.8, 17.2)
8%
11.6 (6, 5.6)
70%
Response Time Black / White *
23.2 (10.8, 12.4)
28 (7, 21)
-21%
22 (10.4, 11.6)
5%
8.8 (6, 2.8)
62%
PWM Frequency
119000 (90)
450 (90)
-100%
122000 (95)
3%
26040 (25)
-78%
Screen
12%
-3%
15%
Brightness middle
362
312
-14%
365
1%
331.1
-9%
Brightness
350
304
-13%
341
-3%
312
-11%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
89
-2%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.29
0.23
21%
0.32
-10%
0.31
-7%
Contrast
1248
1357
9%
1141
-9%
1068
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.06
4.19
31%
6.51
-7%
2.86
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.6
8.7
25%
12.32
-6%
6.35
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.13
2.9
7%
2.66
15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.22
3.72
48%
7.65
-6%
4.3
40%
Gamma
2.51 96%
2.29 105%
2.64 91%
2.268 106%
CCT
7659 85%
7104 91%
8066 81%
7034 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
59
7%
56
2%
75
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
91
8%
86
2%
100
19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-17% / -2%
1% / -1%
17% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10647 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
latencies
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
163 Points ∼94% -6%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 206, n=385)
150 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1112 Points ∼100%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
1005 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points ∼73% -27%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=386)
720 Points ∼65% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96% -4%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=387)
1.662 Points ∼84% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.2 Points ∼100%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.15 Points ∼91% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points ∼72% -28%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=488)
7.05 Points ∼58% -42%
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.2 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1112 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=89)
4912 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
4734 Points ∼96%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4532 Points ∼92% -4%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
5389 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5288 Points ∼98% -2%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=285)
4877 Points ∼90% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
4196 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=301)
4194 Points ∼98% 0%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4148 Points ∼97% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4196 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5389 pontos
Ajuda
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
AS SSD
-3%
-70%
-71%
Score Total
3291
3031
-8%
811
-75%
634
-81%
Score Write
1592
651
-59%
196
-88%
196
-88%
Score Read
1153
1619
40%
414
-64%
311
-73%
4K Write
112.28
148.48
32%
62.73
-44%
59.11
-47%
4K Read
52.84
47.68
-10%
26.5
-50%
18.93
-64%
Seq Write
1448.94
1163.97
-20%
128.2
-91%
212.79
-85%
Seq Read
2588.72
2628.16
2%
512.95
-80%
993.35
-62%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 256GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3554 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1533 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 353.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1307 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1420 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.7 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=416)
10173 Points ∼100% +32%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8027 Points ∼79% +4%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7953 Points ∼78% +3%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7695 Points ∼76%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7610 Points ∼75% -1%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=488)
11660 Points ∼100% +25%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10008 Points ∼86% +7%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9332 Points ∼80%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9147 Points ∼78% -2%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9128 Points ∼78% -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
9585 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27238 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6956 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=189)
45.1 fps ∼100% +83%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
27.6 fps ∼61% +12%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
26 fps ∼58% +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
26 fps ∼58% +5%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
24.7 fps ∼55%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 184, n=157)
75.9 fps ∼100% +70%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.4 fps ∼66% +13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
46.7 fps ∼62% +5%
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
44.6 fps ∼59%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 44.624.7fps
The Division (2016) 43.733.5fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 49.344.9fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 4741.2fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 40.127.9fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 205194fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 54.4fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 56.151.2fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 50.340.8fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 46.742.2fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 44 dB
HDD
32 dB
Carga
44 / 46 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Asus GL703GE-ES73
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
2%
6%
3%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
29
-0%
28.2
3%
29.5 (27.7 - 32, n=195)
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31
31
-0%
29
6%
28.2
9%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=616)
-2%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
31
3%
30
6%
32.9 (28 - 46.6, n=616)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
44
38
14%
33
25%
32
27%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=616)
21%
Load Average *
44
44
-0%
45
-2%
36
18%
40.3 (30.3 - 58, n=617)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42
45
-7%
48.8
-16%
Load Maximum *
46
50
-9%
51
-11%
48.8
-6%
47.6 (38.9 - 64, n=617)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

 46 °C48 °C55 °C 
 45 °C48 °C51 °C 
 38 °C39 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 44.7 °C
48 °C44 °C48 °C
49 °C45 °C40 °C
33 °C33 °C36 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Asus GL703GE-ES73
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
3%
-12%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
55
50.6
8%
50
9%
58.6
-7%
45.4 (28 - 68.8, n=581)
17%
Maximum Bottom *
49
50.8
-4%
52
-6%
59.4
-21%
48.9 (25.9 - 78, n=579)
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
32
28.7
10%
33
-3%
35
-9%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=532)
4%
Idle Bottom *
34
27.1
20%
30
12%
37
-9%
31.5 (21.1 - 50.3, n=530)
7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.544.32533.336.53129.428.84029.739.55026.229.96324.327.48026.529.810028.428.512524.823.316022.222.720022.625.625024.535.131519.844.940018.152.550017.954.163017.654.880017.559.8100018.267.1125017.867160016.969.7200017.265.5250017.363.9315017.367.8400017.168.3500017.162.9630017.358.6800017.356.41000017.251.21250017.156.1160001759.3SPL29.877.3N1.335.7median 17.5Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lakemedian 56.4Delta1.810.941.64337.239.72830.335.335.728.128.926.129.926.83525.547.422.346.822.143.922.353.322.164.119.768.71970.218.472.217.37717.878.11775.216.968.117.166.31763.71761.71755.917.257.81760.21757.417.156.917.159.116.966.816.860.229.581.91.348.5median 17.1Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6median 61.726.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11 / 14 / 20 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 136 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Asus GL703GE-ES73
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
3%
19%
-14%
-52%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
6
45%
12.8
-16%
20.6 (3.9 - 113, n=576)
-87%
Idle Average *
14
14
-0%
9
36%
18.1
-29%
26.2 (6.8 - 119, n=576)
-87%
Idle Maximum *
20
23
-15%
13
35%
24.7
-24%
31.3 (8.3 - 122, n=576)
-57%
Load Average *
96
82
15%
95
1%
98.4
-3%
105 (14.1 - 319, n=567)
-9%
Load Maximum *
136
163
-20%
134
1%
114.6
16%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=566)
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
97
102
-5%
122.5
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
0h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 21min
Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 62 Wh
Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 62 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 48 Wh
Asus GL703GE-ES73
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 64 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-15%
-11%
-47%
-44%
Reader / Idle
704
613
-13%
710
1%
347
-51%
324 (39 - 1174, n=570)
-54%
WiFi v1.3
378
288
-24%
354
-6%
286
-24%
245 (78 - 622, n=240)
-35%
Load
141
128
-9%
100
-29%
47
-67%
78.4 (18 - 202, n=536)
-44%
H.264
322
241 (88 - 504, n=117)

Pro

+ Configurações individuais
+ Emissões moderadas
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Sem bloatware
+ Bom painel IPS
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Um pouco de afogamento da GPU quando o Control Center está ativo (bug de software)
- Controle medíocre da ventoinha
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Som insatisfatório

Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake - 07/07/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 81%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
90%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
45%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG A707
Schenker XMG A707
Schenker XMG A707
Schenker XMG A707
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG A707 (Clevo N871EK1)
Florian Glaser, 2018-07- 3 (Update: 2018-07-10)