Breve Análise do Portátil Fujitsu LifeBook A557 (Core i5, Full-HD)

Name: Fujitsu Lifebook A557
Brand: Fujitsu

Um sólido aparelho de escritório! Com a introdução dos processadores ULV nos LifeBooks, tiveram que sofrer algumas perdas em termos de desempenho. Neste breve teste resumimos para você se as coisas estão melhorando novamente com os novos processadores Kaby Lake.

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/04/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Kaby Lake Windows Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lifebook A557 (LifeBook A Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 620, 21.20.16.4542 WHQL

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, 1/2 slots em uso, máx. 32 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N42, a-Si TFT-LCD , LCM, 262K 47% (CIE1931), 60Hz, antiglare, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000, 512 GB

, 410 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: stereo, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30.9 x 378 x 256

Bateria

49 Wh, 4200 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: Full HD com Status-LED

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Fonte de alimentação, MacAfee Life Safe (versão de teste), 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.254 kg, Suprimento de energia: 313 g

Preço

649 Euro

Links

Fujitsu página inicial
LifeBook A (Serie)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Dell Latitude 15-3570 DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington Security Slot, Ethernet (RJ-45), air vents, VGA, HDMI, 3x USB 3.0

Right: audio in/out, 1x USB 2.0, DVD Super Multi, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu Lifebook A557	121 MB/s
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA	72.7 MB/s -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000	66.3 MB/s -45%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET	36.3 MB/s -70%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX	25.5 MB/s -79%
Dell Latitude 15-3570	22.24 MB/s -82%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Fujitsu Lifebook A557	180.5 MB/s
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA	89 MB/s -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000	85.6 MB/s -53%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX	26 MB/s -86%
Dell Latitude 15-3570	24.15 MB/s -87%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	680 MBit/s +22%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	665 MBit/s +19%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Wireless-AC 7265	558 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	676 MBit/s 0%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Wireless-AC 7265	675 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	495 MBit/s -27%


264 cd/m²	257 cd/m²	262 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	266 cd/m²
237 cd/m²	263 cd/m²	239 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE NV156FHM-N42 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 259.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 1305:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.68 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.85% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Lifebook A557 BOE NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET BOE, , 1366x768, 15.60	Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Lenovo LP156WF6-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-5%	6%	-3%	-8%	-10%
Display P3 Coverage	41.85	39.89 -5%	44.49 6%	40.61 -3%	38.5 -8%	37.78 -10%
sRGB Coverage	62.9	59.5 -5%	66.9 6%	61.1 -3%	57.5 -9%	56.8 -10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	43.24	41.24 -5%	45.97 6%	41.96 -3%	39.8 -8%	39.04 -10%
Response Times		-18%	12%	14%	33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	55 ?(24, 31)	51 ?(23, 28) 7%	44 ?(21, 23) 20%	37 ?(13, 24) 33%	38.4 ?(13.2, 25.2) 30%
Response Time Black / White *	35 ?(19, 16)	30 ?(10, 20) 14%	29 ?(9, 20) 17%	37 ?(20, 17) -6%	22.4 ?(6.4, 16) 36%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)	50 ?(40) -75%	200 ?(90) 0%
Screen		-80%	-74%	-103%	-32%	-72%
Brightness middle	287	214 -25%	248 -14%	202 -30%	257 -10%	205 -29%
Brightness	260	201 -23%	230 -12%	211 -19%	234 -10%	210 -19%
Brightness Distribution	83	77 -7%	88 6%	88 6%	83 0%	71 -14%
Black Level *	0.22	0.43 -95%	0.56 -155%	0.62 -182%	0.27 -23%	0.4 -82%
Contrast	1305	498 -62%	443 -66%	326 -75%	952 -27%	513 -61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.21	10.68 -154%	8.7 -107%	12.35 -193%	7.16 -70%	9.76 -132%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.81	18.07 -105%	14.96 -70%	19.9 -126%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.68	11.32 -322%	11.48 -328%	13.46 -402%	6.28 -134%	10.47 -291%
Gamma	2.5 ^88%	2.26 ^97%	2.38 ^92%	2.44 ^90%	2.44 ^90%	2.56 ^86%
CCT	6066 ^107%	12204 ^53%	11179 ^58%	15217 ^43%	6806 ^96%	12103 ^54%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	40	38 -5%	42 5%	39 -2%	36.6 -8%	36 -10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	63	59 -6%	67 6%	61 -3%	57.3 -9%	57 -10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-34% / -55%	-19% / -43%	-31% / -67%	-2% / -18%	-41% / -57%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24 ms rise
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (benchmark)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points +13%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	124 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U	109 Points -16%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	69 Points -47%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	355 Points +7%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	332 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	319 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points -13%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U	260 Points -22%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	181 Points -45%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	1.47 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	1.45 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U	1.24 Points -16%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	0.81 Points -45%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	3.67 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	3.55 Points -3%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U	2.85 Points -22%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	2.18 Points -41%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	6395 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	6343 Points -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	14554 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	14045 Points -3%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	238.6 Points +17%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	203.9 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	189.6 Points -7%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	61.4 Points -70%

Octane V2 - Total Score
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	35703 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	29745 Points +3%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	28982 Points
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U	13295 Points -54%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	8351 Points -71%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B	3826 ms * -230%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U	2551 ms * -120%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U	1161 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U	1104 ms * +5%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	998 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8271

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11009

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5011

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

8393 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

14554 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

6395 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.67 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

30.16 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.47 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

332 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

39.02 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	3595 Points +1%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000	3556 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	3337 Points -6%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3163 Points -11%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U, 2200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD	3090 Points -13%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B, 1600 MHz, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	2634 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4725 Points 0%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000	4713 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	4650 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4477 Points -5%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U, 2200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD	3979 Points -16%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B, 1600 MHz, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	3577 Points -24%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000	4375 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	4049 Points -7%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B, 1600 MHz, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	2607 Points -40%

PCMark 7
Score
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000	5115 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	5102 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U, 2200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD	4293 Points -16%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B, 1600 MHz, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	1888 Points -63%
Productivity
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000	4359 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	4032 Points -8%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel Core i5-5200U, 2200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD	3618 Points -17%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Pro A8-8600B, 1600 MHz, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	1151 Points -74%

PCMark Vantage Result		15019 pontos
PCMark 7 Score		5115 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3556 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4375 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4713 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000	HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-91%	-57%	-53%	-20%
Read Seq	504	122.1 -76%	453.2 -10%	462 -8%	507 1%
Write Seq	503	110.7 -78%	137.7 -73%	174.5 -65%	337.5 -33%
Read 512	393.6	33.53 -91%	308.5 -22%	306.8 -22%	325 -17%
Write 512	413.6	51.3 -88%	134.1 -68%	168.6 -59%	346.8 -16%
Read 4k	36.98	0.357 -99%	19.06 -48%	16.14 -56%	29.37 -21%
Write 4k	92.1	0.641 -99%	21.31 -77%	36.24 -61%	93.9 2%
Read 4k QD32	277.6	0.778 -100%	93.5 -66%	95.7 -66%	103.8 -63%
Write 4k QD32	250.6	0.672 -100%	23.3 -91%	36.23 -86%	217.7 -13%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000

Sequential Read: 504 MB/s

Sequential Write: 503 MB/s

512K Read: 393.6 MB/s

512K Write: 413.6 MB/s

4K Read: 36.98 MB/s

4K Write: 92.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 277.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 250.6 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U	10288 Points +49%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	9122 Points +32%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6907 Points
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i5-5200U	6590 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5909 Points -14%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U	1760 Points +120%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1637 Points +104%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	801 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U	2522 Points +76%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2092 Points +46%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1433 Points
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A8-8600B	1349 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1273 Points -11%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i5-5200U	1147 Points -20%

3DMark 03 Standard		17137 pontos
3DMark 05 Standard		12775 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		7998 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		5274 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1553 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		50970 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5690 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		750 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		337 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		340 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	43.2	25.2	20.3	6.3
Battlefield 4 (2013)	33.4	26.2	17.5	6.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.8	10.1	4.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	15.4	9.5	5.8

Barulho

Ocioso		30.3 / 30.3 / 32.3 dB
HDD		31.3 dB
DVD		54.9 / dB
Carga		38.5 / 39.7 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)

	Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX	HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370	Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500
Noise		-4%	3%	4%	8%	1%
off / environment *	30.3	31.6 -4%	31.5 -4%	31 -2%
Idle Minimum *	30.3	32.6 -8%	31.6 -4%	31 -2%	29.2 4%	31.8 -5%
Idle Average *	30.3	32.6 -8%	31.6 -4%	31 -2%	29.2 4%	31.8 -5%
Idle Maximum *	32.3	33 -2%	31.6 2%	31 4%	29.2 10%	31.8 2%
Load Average *	38.5	38.9 -1%	33.5 13%	34.2 11%	33.6 13%	35 9%
Load Maximum *	39.7	38.9 2%	33.5 16%	34.3 14%	35.5 11%	37.6 5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


31.5 °C	24.3 °C	23 °C
33.3 °C	30 °C	23.3 °C
25.9 °C	29 °C	24.1 °C

Máximo: 33.3 °C
Médio: 27.2 °C


22.2 °C	22.5 °C	35.3 °C
22.7 °C	24.3 °C	30 °C
23.2 °C	22.9 °C	25.7 °C

Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 25.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).

	Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX	HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370	Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500
Heat		-19%	-17%	-21%	-13%	-8%
Maximum Upper Side *	33.3	44.3 -33%	35.8 -8%	36.1 -8%	45 -35%	34.3 -3%
Maximum Bottom *	35.3	46.3 -31%	37.6 -7%	47 -33%	39.8 -13%	42.1 -19%
Idle Upper Side *	27	27.8 -3%	33.4 -24%	31.7 -17%	26.1 3%	26.7 1%
Idle Bottom *	26	27.7 -7%	33.2 -28%	32.9 -27%	27.7 -7%	29.2 -12%

* ... smaller is better

Fujitsu Lifebook A557 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.15 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	2.9 / 6.4 / 6.9 Watt
Carga	31.8 / 29 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX	HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370	Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500
Power Consumption		-34%	-29%	-14%	-53%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	2.9	3.8 -31%	5.8 -100%	4.9 -69%	4.2 -45%	3.2 -10%
Idle Average *	6.4	6.6 -3%	7.5 -17%	7.2 -13%	7.5 -17%	5.5 14%
Idle Maximum *	6.9	11.3 -64%	8.6 -25%	7.5 -9%	8.2 -19%	6.4 7%
Load Average *	31.8	38 -19%	31 3%	25.4 20%	49.6 -56%	31.8 -0%
Load Maximum *	29	45 -55%	30.5 -5%	28 3%	65.8 -127%	33 -14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		16h 32min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.0.0)		8h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 55min

	Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh	HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 48 Wh	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, 48 Wh	Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500, 37 Wh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-58%	14%	-16%	-32%
Reader / Idle	992	746 -25%		1024 3%	884 -11%	703 -29%
H.264	456				413 -9%
WiFi v1.3	525	513 -2%	220 -58%	542 3%	342 -35%	321 -39%
Load	115	123 7%		157 37%	104 -10%	83 -28%

Com o LifeBook A557 a Fujitsu possui um sistema muito atraente para o seu pequeno pedaço de mercado. O portátil de 15,6-polegadas convence principalmente com um sólido desempenho de sistema, que sustenta a sua implantação como um sistema de escritório. Até a data o Intel Core i5-7200U se tornou um processador comum que é muito capaz de lidar com tarefas mais complexas. Com 8 GB de RAM, nosso sistema está bem equipado. Se isso não for suficiente, pode ser expandido sem dificuldades, dado que as possibilidades de manutenção são exemplares no Fujitsu LifeBook A557. O SSD de 512 GB oferece muito armazenamento e contribui com um boa parte para a fluidez do sistema.

O Fujitsu LifeBook A557 oferece um bom desempenho para orçamento moderados. Aqueles que não dão muita importância ao design estarão contentes com o Fujitsu LifeBook A557.

Não conseguimos encontrar muitas falhas no Fujitsu LifeBook A557. Visualmente, nosso sistema de teste é bastante simples, e no futuro o fabricante poderia melhorar a poluição sonora. Também teríamos desejado um teclado iluminado. Mas com um preço de 649 Euros (~$682) deveríamos esperar o incômodo compromisso. Além disso, a tela oferece somente um a cobertura de cores limitada, embora seus ângulos de visão sejam convincentes. O Fujitsu LifeBook A557 também deixou uma impressão positiva com o seu baixo consumo de energia que, ao mesmo tempo, garante uma longa duração da bateria.

Pro

+ Preço atraente

+ Design funcional

+ Alto desempenho do sistema

+ SSD com 512 GB

+ Veloz leitor de cartões SD

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ A imagem da tela é boa desde todos os ângulos

+ Baixo consumo de energia

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Fácil manutenção

+ Muito boas características térmicas

Contra

- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores

- Bleeding da tela claramente visível

- Posicionamento da conectividade não muito bem pensada

- Sem USB Tipo C

- Teclado não iluminado

- Claramente audível sob carga

- Poucos recursos de segurança

In review: Fujitsu LifeBook A557. Test model provided by Fujitsu Germany

With the LifeBook A557 Fujitsu has a very attractive system for the small pocket on the market. The 15.6-inch notebook convinces mainly with a solid system performance, which underpins its deployment as an office system. By now the Intel Core i5-7200U has become a common processor that is quite capable to take on also more complex tasks. With 8 GB of RAM, our system is well equipped. If that is not enough, it can be expanded without difficulties, since the maintenance possibilities are exemplary in the Fujitsu LifeBook A557. The 512 GB SSD offers a lot of storage and contributes a relevant share to the smooth running system.

The Fujitsu LifeBook A557 offers a decent performance for small purses. Those who do not place too much importance on the design will be happy with the Fujitsu LifeBook A557.

We cannot find much fault in the Fujitsu LifeBook A557. Visually, our test system is rather unspectacular, and in the future the manufacturer could improve on the noise pollution. We also would have wished for an optional backlit keyboard. But with a price tag of 649 Euros (~$682) we should expect the odd compromise. Furthermore, the display offers only a limited color space coverage, although its viewing angles are convincing. The Fujitsu LifeBook A557 also left a positive impression with its low power consumption that in turn assures a long battery life.

Fujitsu Lifebook A557 - 2017-03-29 03/29/2017 v6^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

84%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

51 / 80 → 63%

Peso

61 / 20-67 → 88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

55 / 68 → 80%

Desempenho da aplicação

86 / 92 → 94%

Temperatura

95%

Ruído

90%

Audio

56%

Camera

53 / 85 → 62%

Médio

74%

84%

Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Fujitsu LifeBook A557 (Core i5, Full-HD)

Sebastian Bade, 2017-04- 4 (Update: 2017-04-11)

Breve Análise do Portátil Fujitsu LifeBook A557 (Core i5, Full-HD)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Fujitsu Lifebook A557 audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare