Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 830 G5 (i7, FHD, SureView)

Benjamin Herzig (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

O maior subportátil. O mais recente EliteBook 830 G5 da HP é muito mais do que uma simples reformulação do design. Não só possui uma tela maior, mas também é um salto quântico para a linha de negócios da HP. Descubra se a HP está ou não saltando na direção certa, em nossa análise extensiva.

HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 2 de 2 slots utilizados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, IVO M133NVF3-R0, IPS LED, Brilhante: não
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), 1024 GB 
, M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe, 884 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, Intel XMM 7360 LTE-A, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.7 x 310 x 229
Bateria
49 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p IR com capa
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Bang & Olufsen stereo, Teclado: Teclado de chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, HP Jumpstart, HP Client Security, HP Power Manager, HP WorkWise, HP Support Assistant, HP Sure Run, HP Velocity, Microsoft Office Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.33 kg, Suprimento de energia: 245 g
Preço
2700 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Right: SIM slot, audio-combo jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, RJ45 Ethernet, docking port, Thunderbolt 3, power
Right: SIM slot, audio-combo jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, RJ45 Ethernet, docking port, Thunderbolt 3, power
Left: smart card reader, USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington lock
Left: smart card reader, USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
641 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
611 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (71 - 950, n=68)
534 MBit/s ∼83% -16%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
506 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
525 MBit/s ∼99% +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72 - 949, n=68)
520 MBit/s ∼98% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s ∼97%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
507 MBit/s ∼96% -1%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
474 MBit/s ∼89% -7%
334
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 355 cd/m² Médio: 326.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 315 cd/m²
Contraste: 1663:1 (Preto: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
87.3% sRGB (Argyll) 57.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.22
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
IVO M133NVF3-R0, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
B125HAN02.2, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 7390
AU Optronics AUO462D / B133HAN [DELL P/N:F7VDJ], , 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell Latitude 7280
AUO236D , , 1920x1080, 12.5
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 12.5
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX69EA
AUO482D, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
-15%
-39%
-8%
-1%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 (18.8, 17.2)
40 (22, 18)
-11%
48.8 (24.8, 24)
-36%
32.4 (12.4, 20)
10%
35 (16, 19)
3%
48.4 (22.8, 25.6)
-34%
Response Time Black / White *
24.8 (14, 10.8)
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
-19%
35.2 (21.2, 14)
-42%
31.2 (9.2, 22)
-26%
26 (7, 19)
-5%
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
-24%
PWM Frequency
1020 (99)
Screen
-11%
4%
-28%
-25%
3%
Brightness middle
316
344
9%
329
4%
310.4
-2%
326
3%
415
31%
Brightness
326
313
-4%
316
-3%
301
-8%
304
-7%
396
21%
Brightness Distribution
85
82
-4%
92
8%
88
4%
81
-5%
81
-5%
Black Level *
0.19
0.25
-32%
0.25
-32%
0.32
-68%
0.29
-53%
0.33
-74%
Contrast
1663
1376
-17%
1316
-21%
970
-42%
1124
-32%
1258
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.7
-4%
4.3
4%
5.9
-31%
6.49
-44%
3.7
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.1
19.4
-60%
7.8
36%
21
-74%
15.95
-32%
8.1
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.9
2.5
14%
2.8
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
2.2
56%
3.6
28%
5.1
-2%
6.16
-23%
3.9
22%
Gamma
2.22 108%
2.16 111%
2.43 99%
2.33 103%
2.32 103%
2.19 110%
CCT
6018 108%
6252 104%
6928 94%
6816 95%
7575 86%
6342 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.9
41.2
-29%
59.1
2%
42
-27%
42
-27%
58.7
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87.3
64.1
-27%
90.6
4%
65
-26%
65
-26%
89.8
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -12%
-18% / -3%
-18% / -24%
-13% / -21%
-13% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1020 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1020 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1020 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10415 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

432
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 432 cd/m² Médio: 395.7 cd/m² Minimum: 33.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 413 cd/m²
Contraste: 1258:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
89.8% sRGB (Argyll) 58.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590Tooltip
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø530 (526-566)
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX69EA UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø566 (561.47-589.12)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
169 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
164 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=44)
161 Points ∼95% -5%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i5-8350U
152 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼86% -14%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX69EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼85% -15%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 169, n=217)
109 Points ∼64% -36%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
684 Points ∼100% +19%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i5-8350U
625 Points ∼91% +8%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX69EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
608 Points ∼89% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
577 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=46)
575 Points ∼84% 0%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
351 Points ∼51% -39%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Core i7-7500U
329 Points ∼48% -43%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 721, n=218)
283 Points ∼41% -51%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
577 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
51.95 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
169 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5116 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
4957 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
4868 Points ∼95% -5%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4824 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
4768 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4125 - 5154, n=15)
4638 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=163)
3908 Points ∼76% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3948 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3268 - 4017, n=17)
3673 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
3667 Points ∼93% -7%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3660 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
3600 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
3574 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4182, n=187)
2963 Points ∼75% -25%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
3048 Points ∼100% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
2945 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2296 - 3062, n=12)
2712 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (729 - 3058, n=33)
2115 Points ∼69% -28%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
6529 Points ∼100% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
6393 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4962 - 6860, n=12)
6178 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1690 - 6729, n=33)
4679 Points ∼72% -27%
Essentials
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8015 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
7845 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6743 - 8660, n=12)
7670 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3092 - 8549, n=33)
6229 Points ∼78% -22%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
3860 Points ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3816 Points ∼99%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
3577 Points ∼93% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2629 - 4012, n=14)
3537 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1150 - 3860, n=36)
2869 Points ∼74% -25%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3948 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5116 pontos
Ajuda
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
Dell Latitude 7390
SK hynix SC311 M.2
Dell Latitude 7280
SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX69EA
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Average Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
32%
-52%
-51%
-7%
-39%
15%
Write 4k QD32
412.8
645.6
56%
254.5
-38%
183
-56%
491.7
19%
385.51
-7%
487 (413 - 549, n=6)
18%
Read 4k QD32
305
387.9
27%
284.4
-7%
344.4
13%
567.8
86%
241.78
-21%
553 (305 - 642, n=6)
81%
Write 4k
113.9
129.4
14%
64.67
-43%
59.51
-48%
151.6
33%
90.3
-21%
154 (114 - 182, n=6)
35%
Read 4k
49.4
59.27
20%
27.63
-44%
30.23
-39%
42.87
-13%
30.57
-38%
54 (49.4 - 58.2, n=6)
9%
Write 512
1058
1864
76%
322.6
-70%
323.2
-69%
594.4
-44%
468.86
-56%
1048 (627 - 1292, n=6)
-1%
Read 512
1219
1751
44%
354.6
-71%
370.1
-70%
660.9
-46%
662.22
-46%
960 (586 - 1301, n=6)
-21%
Write Seq
1114
1236
11%
413.4
-63%
477.4
-57%
594.2
-47%
285
-74%
1374 (932 - 1702, n=6)
23%
Read Seq
2331
2535
9%
493.4
-79%
470.8
-80%
1315
-44%
1111.8
-52%
1762 (883 - 2408, n=6)
-24%
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Sequential Read: 2331 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1114 MB/s
512K Read: 1219 MB/s
512K Write: 1058 MB/s
4K Read: 49.4 MB/s
4K Write: 113.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 305 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 412.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1821 Points ∼100% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1728 Points ∼95%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1366 - 1915, n=71)
1653 Points ∼91% -4%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1606 Points ∼88% -7%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1515 Points ∼83% -12%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1442 Points ∼79% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 4191, n=307)
1111 Points ∼61% -36%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1280 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1197 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (819 - 1336, n=64)
1061 Points ∼83% -17%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
959 Points ∼75% -25%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
886 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3389, n=194)
885 Points ∼69% -31%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
819 Points ∼64% -36%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9711 Points ∼100% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
9470 Points ∼98%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 10493, n=66)
8640 Points ∼89% -9%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8104 Points ∼83% -14%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7618 Points ∼78% -20%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
7032 Points ∼72% -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 18572, n=216)
6628 Points ∼68% -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
1954 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8022 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1162 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 72.4737.7931.8910.71fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 22.1fps
Civilization VI (2016) 37.717.2fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB
Carga
33.2 / 36.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.232.430.634.32530.530.329.130.73134.130.628.833.24032.930.42830.95028.930.227.628.46328.125.82625.58025.525.625.425.110025.425.427.127.812525.124.224.824.616024.225.223.425.620023.224.422.324.125022.622.721.524.231521.821.220.322.840020.319.519.120.150020.519.519.220.363020.217.717.720.580020.717.116.921.2100021.416.916.621.4125021.416.716.522.7160022.416.516.224.620002116.516.424.1250024.416.816.230.2315020.716.616.325.7400020.917.416.722.6500020.418.816.920.5630018.219.217.318.4800018.320.117.518.1100001819.817.617.81250018.721.617.5181600018.92217.517.6SPL33.230.429.336.1N1.81.41.22.2median 20.9HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EAmedian 19.5median 17.5median 22.6Delta1.42.72.42.23232.332.132.132.533.63029.730.233.735.633.933.533.933.432.531.434.13133.229.428.127.82930.228.725.926.626.626.224.725.125.325.426.825.923.923.924.525.924.123.122.623.82522.721.822.422.824.822.12222.321.721.320.822.221.121.121.12120.120.320.421.622.421.320.218.720.423.121.720.818.320.222.620.519.617.62124.221.720.21720.125.523.421.817.420.927.324.521.316.321.127.124.321.31621.629.526.523.41622.229.726.723.91623.129.727.223.716.422.429.32727.416.72329.928.723.91720.727.122.519.517.118.923.921.419.217.618.622.72018.317.717.920.218.518.217.817.618.717.917.717.517.639.737.234.829.233.43.12.521.21.9median 24.1Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00median 22.2median 21.3median 17.6median 21.12.51.61.51.41.2hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 35.3 °C37.8 °C37 °C 
 36.5 °C37 °C36.7 °C 
 27.5 °C26.2 °C27.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.8 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
39.2 °C41.3 °C34.6 °C
35.2 °C37.3 °C34.4 °C
29.6 °C29.8 °C29.3 °C
Máximo: 41.3 °C
Médio: 34.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.633.22529.131.63128.837.2402832.75027.630.7632628.68025.430.410027.135.412524.83416023.441.720022.353.425021.556.531520.361.140019.164.250019.26763017.769.980016.966.9100016.667.8125016.571.7160016.271200016.469.3250016.268.2315016.372.2400016.772.5500016.975.2630017.372.1800017.565.21000017.666.51250017.562.41600017.553.2SPL29.382.7N1.256median 17.5HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EAmedian 66.9Delta2.47.927.735.928.53231.136.929.132.531.627.725.82624.525.624.127.422.232.522.842.721.750.220.854.819.756.618.6581864.217.262.316.870.11871.316.263.815.958.71662.415.961.816.161.816.461.116.966.81764.417.362.117.459.417.356.717.257.329.176.81.239.4median 17.3Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00median 61.11.64.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.52 / 0.91 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.5 / 6.4 / 9.2 Watt
Carga midlight 35.7 / 65.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 7390
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell Latitude 7280
7600U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
12%
13%
27%
34%
10%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
4.5
3.11
31%
2.34
48%
4.28
5%
2.7
40%
3.76 (2 - 8.5, n=70)
16%
6.94 (1 - 36, n=541)
-54%
Idle Average *
6.4
5.01
22%
5.6
12%
5.11
20%
4.8
25%
6.97 (4.3 - 11.8, n=70)
-9%
10.1 (2.06 - 39, n=541)
-58%
Idle Maximum *
9.2
8.11
12%
6.5
29%
5.49
40%
6.6
28%
8.52 (5.2 - 13.1, n=70)
7%
12.5 (3.9 - 55, n=541)
-36%
Load Average *
35.7
44.6
-25%
43
-20%
29.83
16%
28.5
20%
36 (20 - 51.1, n=70)
-1%
33.2 (6.3 - 75, n=531)
7%
Load Maximum *
65.4
51.7
21%
67.4
-3%
30.05
54%
29
56%
42.5 (23 - 71.2, n=70)
35%
40.1 (7.6 - 111, n=534)
39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
7h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 01min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 20min
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 49 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 7390
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Dell Latitude 7280
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
22%
46%
59%
42%
-9%
Reader / Idle
766
1212
58%
1660
117%
1553
103%
1346
76%
588 (87 - 2557, n=518)
-23%
H.264
481
572
19%
749
56%
532
11%
446 (182 - 899, n=92)
-7%
WiFi v1.3
424
531
25%
682
61%
566
33%
453 (206 - 764, n=157)
7%
Load
140
119
-15%
92
-34%
159
14%
205
46%
121 (40 - 327, n=524)
-14%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta de alumínio
+ Teclado fácil de manter e substituir
+ Boa conectividade
+ Suporta até 32 GB de RAM
+ Sensação agradável ao digitar
+ Excelente touchpad
+ Paineis IPS com até apenas 400 nits
+ Baixas emissões de temperatura e ruído
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Três anos de garantia

Contra

- Comparativamente grande e pesado
- Duração da bateria abaixo da média
- Sem leitor de cartões SD
- PointStick HP pobre
- Layout incomum do teclado com teclas de função de comunicação dedicadas
In review: HP EliteBook 830 G5. Review unit courtesy of HP.
In review: HP EliteBook 830 G5. Review unit courtesy of HP.

O EliteBook 830 G5 é mais do que um simples passo evolucionário na história do subportátil EliteBook. Em vez disso, considerando as ambições comerciais do dispositivo, é uma pequena revolução porque o formato tradicional de 12,5 polegadas parece estar desaparecendo.

Primeiro, vamos dar uma olhada no que a HP fez corretamente com o novo EliteBook. A rígida e robusta carcaça de metal certamente está entre essas, e está mais fino que nunca. Ao estilo de um portátil empresarial típico, o EliteBook está maduro, com portas e, mais importante, com recursos de segurança. Um leitor de cartões inteligentes, uma câmera de infravermelho, um leitor de impressões digitais e o SureView serão difíceis de superar. Os dispositivos de entrada são de qualidade mista. O touchpad é excelente; o teclado é decente para a digitação. Todas as opções de tela possuem um painel IPS, e a opção de tela de 400 nits pode até ser um pouco adequada para o seu uso em exteriores. Além disso, o EliteBook pode suportar até 32 GB de RAM - algo que nenhum de seus concorrentes é capaz de fazer. As temperaturas e as emissões de ruído são baixas, mesmo quando realizamos nosso teste de estresse. Por último, mas não menos importante, para um portátil tão pequeno como este, o EliteBook possui alto-falantes bastante decentes e é vendido com uma garantia padrão limitada a três anos.

No entanto, também há algumas falhas. Em primeiro lugar, falta-lhe um leitor de cartões SD. O trackpoint não era tão bom quanto osdos ThinkPads da Lenovo, e a adição de teclas de comunicação dedicadas no teclado continua sendo um mistério para nós, já que a maioria dos usuários provavelmente nunca usará essas teclas e outras teclas mais importantes estão faltando. Embora esses problemas possam não afetar todos os usuários, a duração da bateria abaixo da média certamente afetará, considerando a natureza altamente portátil deste subportátil. Em poucas palavras, a pequena bateria combinada com o consumo de energia comparativamente alto acabou por ser uma mistura mortal. Por fim, o maior incômodo é o tamanho e o peso do dispositivo. Isso é irônico, considerando que essas são consequências diretas da decisão da HP de equipar o EliteBook 830 G5 com uma tela maior, em primeiro lugar. É quase tão grande quanto o Uktrabook Lenovo ThinkPad T480s de 14 polegadas, e todos seus concorrentes de 12,5 e 13,3 polegadas são bastante menores. O Dell Latitude 7390, em particular, é a prova viva de que uma tela de 13,3 polegadas não necessariamente precisa resultar em uma carcaça maior.

O EliteBook 830 G5 é grande e pesado demais, mas em geral não é muito ruim.

Em resumo, o EliteBook fica aquém de sua promessa de colocar uma tela maior em uma carcaça menor, reduzindo a largura dos marcos da tela. No entanto, merece nosso endosso total e sua pontuação total muito boa. O 830 G5 é a escolha certa se você precisa de 32 GB de RAM - nem o Lenovo ThinkPad X280, nem o Dell Latitude 7290, nem o Dell Latitude 7390 suportam tudo isso - mas isso tem um preço: Uma carcaça comparativamente grossa e volumosa.

HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA - 05/07/2018 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
92 /  98 → 93%
Teclado
86%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
65 / 80 → 82%
Peso
71 / 35-78 → 84%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
92 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
93 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
97%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Médio
79%
88%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 830 G5 (i7, FHD, SureView)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-05-31)