Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng (K3D42EA)
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA (Spectre 12 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core m7-6Y75 2 x 1.2 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 515, Análises do: 950 MHz
Memória
8 GB
, dual-channel
Pantalha
12.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 10 dados, native pen support, LGD04A5, IPS, WUXGA-UWVA BrightView, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, 256 GB
, M.2 SSD
peso
1.229 kg, Suprimento de energia: 328 g
Preço
1400 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LGD04A5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 347.1 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 353 cd/m²
Contraste: 802:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.24 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| HP Spectre x2 12 1920x1080 | MS Surface Pro 4 2736x1824 | Lenovo TP Helix 2 1920x1080 | Toshiba Z20t-B 1920x1080 | MS Surface Book i5 3000x2000 | Acer AS R7-371T 1920x1080 | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 31% | -15% | 30% | 29% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 52.9 | 67.5 28% | 42.63 -19% | 67 27% | 66.1 25% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 71.8 | 96.6 35% | 63.6 -11% | 95.8 33% | 96.4 34% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 52.6 | 69 31% | 44.1 -16% | 68.9 31% | 68.1 29% | ||
| Response Times | -9% | -15% | -83% | ||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 46 ? 2% | 48.4 ? -3% | 74 ? -57% | |||
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 31 ? -19% | 32.8 ? -26% | 54 ? -108% | |||
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 211 ? | |||||
| Screen | 33% | 20% | -17% | 44% | 15% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 353 | 389.2 10% | 365 3% | 342 -3% | 430.9 22% | 321 -9% | 332 -6% |
| Brightness | 347 | 392 13% | 342 -1% | 301 -13% | 410 18% | 322 -7% | 321 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 86 -5% | 76 -16% | 93 2% | 83 -9% | 86 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.27 39% | 0.329 25% | 0.393 11% | 0.254 42% | 0.32 27% | 0.19 57% |
| Contrast | 802 | 1441 80% | 1109 38% | 870 8% | 1696 111% | 1003 25% | 1747 118% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.09 | 3.61 41% | 4.37 28% | 9.69 -59% | 2.06 66% | 4.79 21% | 5.56 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.24 | 3.8 39% | 2.8 55% | 9.27 -49% | 2.22 64% | 2.67 57% | 7.01 -12% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.16 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.95 75% | 2.13 103% | 2.52 87% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7238 90% | 5969 109% | 6595 99% | 6010 108% | 6520 100% | 6835 95% | 8459 77% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 46 | 63 37% | 40.4 -12% | 64 39% | 63 37% | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 71 | 97 37% | 96 35% | 97 37% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
27% | 20% /
20% | -16% /
-16% | 20% /
33% | 15% /
15% | -10% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17988 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2675 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3362 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4078 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Spectre x2 12 Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G | MS Surface Pro 4 m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | MS Surface Pro 4 i7 Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Lenovo TP Helix 2 Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU | Toshiba Z20t-B Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | MS Surface Book i5 Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 Samsung PM851 MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 53% | 120% | 3% | 42% | 121% | 29% | |
| Seq Read | 439.1 | 845 92% | 1312 199% | 473.9 8% | 513 17% | 1223 179% | 509 16% |
| Seq Write | 216.9 | 138.1 -36% | 274.8 27% | 216.4 0% | 457.2 111% | 275.2 27% | 232.7 7% |
| 4K Read | 23.12 | 31.39 36% | 33.47 45% | 14.63 -37% | 21.4 -7% | 34.31 48% | 30.4 31% |
| 4K Write | 49.2 | 63.2 28% | 89.2 81% | 41.14 -16% | 76.8 56% | 85 73% | 77.6 58% |
| Score Total | 722 | 1759 144% | 2518 249% | 1152 60% | 954 32% | 2712 276% | 943 31% |
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | 62% | -17% | 32% | 25% | ||
| Read Seq | 410.1 | 663 62% | 834 103% | 422.7 3% | 530 29% | 526 28% | |
| Write Seq | 316 | 158.2 -50% | 304 -4% | 247.4 -22% | 473.3 50% | 242.1 -23% | |
| Read 4k | 27.4 | 30.14 10% | 40.75 49% | 19.44 -29% | 22.91 -16% | 34.32 25% | |
| Write 4k | 53.5 | 68 27% | 106.3 99% | 43.08 -19% | 88.2 65% | 90.6 69% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
35% | 91% /
94% | -7% /
-6% | 37% /
37% | 121% /
121% | 27% /
27% |
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Sequential Read:
410.1 MB/s
Sequential Write:
316 MB/s
512K Read:
260.8 MB/s
512K Write:
241.6 MB/s
4K Read:
27.4 MB/s
4K Write:
53.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
196 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
147.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6293 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1098 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 42545 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4546 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 660 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 20.2 | 12.9 | 8.3 | |
| Fifa 15 (2014) | 38.3 | 29.6 | 15.1 | |
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 25.9 | 20.5 | 8.3 |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -24% | 9% | 0% | 1% | 10% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43.5 | 43.6 -0% | 52.3 -20% | 45.4 -4% | 42.1 3% | 48.3 -11% | 44.2 -2% | 50.8 -17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 45.2 -8% | 51.4 -22% | 43.2 -3% | 42.3 -1% | 43.2 -3% | 41.2 2% | 45.1 -7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 32.4 2% | 43.2 -31% | 25.2 24% | 31.3 5% | 28.9 12% | 26 21% | 33.1 -0% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.3 | 29.6 -1% | 36 -23% | 24 18% | 31.3 -7% | 27.7 5% | 23.8 19% | 28.1 4% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 12 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | 13% | 18% | -26% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 4.4 2% | 2 56% | 2.4 47% | 3.6 20% | 3.3 27% |
| Idle Average * | 7.7 | 9 -17% | 6 22% | 4.6 40% | 8 -4% | 5.2 32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.3 | 10.7 -29% | 6.6 20% | 5.6 33% | 8.9 -7% | 6.4 23% |
| Load Average * | 19.8 | 19.6 1% | 17.6 11% | 15.6 21% | 32.7 -65% | 13.6 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 20.6 | 19.9 3% | 29.7 -44% | 30.7 -49% | 35.7 -73% | 14 32% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.5 / 1.4 Watt |
| Ocioso |  4.5 / 7.7 / 8.3 Watt |
| Carga |
19.8 / 20.6 Watt |
    
| |
| HP Spectre x2 12 42 Wh 1920x1080 | MS Surface Pro 4 m3 38 Wh 2736x1824 | MS Surface Pro 4 i5 38 Wh 2736x1824 | MS Surface Pro 4 i7 38 Wh 2736x1824 | Lenovo TP Helix 2 35 Wh 1920x1080 | Toshiba Z20t-B 72 Wh 1920x1080 | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 38 Wh 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 0% | -7% | -34% | 10% | 97% | 37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 954 | 791 -17% | 899 -6% | 654 -31% | 964 1% | 1616 69% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 361 | 488 35% | 427 18% | 293 -19% | 760 111% | 495 37% | |
| Load | 166 | 138 -17% | 111 -33% | 79 -52% | 197 19% | 348 110% | |
| H.264 | 360 | 787 | |||||
| WiFi | 396 |
Pro
+ Fonte de alimentação via USB Tipo C
+ Robusto, conveniente dock de teclado
+ Boas qualidades de digitação da teclas
+ Teclado iluminado com alto falantes
+ Tela táctil IPS brilhante
+ Câmera RealSense na traseira
+ Boa qualidade das fotos
+ Bom microfone
+ Stand ajustável
+ Bom desempenho geral
+ Silencioso
Contra
- Fraquezas menores na construção
- Desempenho baixo nos jogos
- Velocidade de computação da CPU abaixo da média
Com o seu stand muito estável e o teclado sleeve que está "conectado" ao tablet, o Spectre x2 pode ser usado como um portátil sobre a mesa até um grau muito alto. As portas USB Tipo C recarregam o aparelho, e fornecem uma conexão cabeada para periféricos Tipo A existentes, via um hub ou adaptador (incluído). A câmera principal na traseira do tablet tira fotos e vídeos muito bons. Não tínhamos visto isso há um tempo em um tablet Windows. Além disso, a câmera RealSense permite a digitalização em 3D - pelo menos no futuro. Ela pode medir a profundidade estrutural, por exemplo, de um rosto.
O Spectre x2 também tem algumas desvantagens menores, porém, toleráveis. Alguns usuários sentirão falta de um leitor de cartões para cartões SD padrão. O stand sai se sua posição de descanso quando o tablet é um pouco flexionado. As durações não são ruins, mas sete a oito em vez de seis horas de uso do Wi-Fi teriam sido desejáveis, em vista do preço e do Core M.
O poder de computação que somente atinge aquele de um Surface Pro Core M3 é decepcionante. o comprador potencial também pode optar pela versão m3-6Y30 (2x 900 MHz) que provavelmente seja ainda mais frugal durante o uso móvel. O preço é o mesmo; o processador "mais fraco" vem junto com um modem LTE. os usuários deveriam ficar com o Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i5/i7 em termos de desempenho. Eles também vêm com um SSD NVMe mais veloz.
Caso precise de mais poder em um HP, o seu irmão maior, o Spectre x360 13 com um conversível i5-6200U, atingiu 84% em nossa avaliação. O Microsoft Surface Book, Acer Aspire R7-371T-52EL, Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 12, bem como o Microsoft Surface Pro (i5/i7) estão na mesma categoria de desempenho de SoC. Embora os "power users" devam dar uma olhada nestes aparelhos, não é um critério para excluir o Spectre x2. Geralmente é possível trabalhar bem com o aparelho 2-em-1. O desempenho de aplicativos determinado é bastante competitivo, apesar do lento M7.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
-
04/18/2016 v5.1(old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Convertible - Médio equilibrado