Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Toshiba Portégé X30 (i7-7600U, 256 GB)

Campeão em peso pluma? O Portégé X30 da Toshiba coloca um tonelada de recursos em um dos chassis mais leves atualmente disponíveis. Será que o X30 pode competir com outros pesos pesados finos e leves, ou será nocauteado?

Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) (Portege X30 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7600U 2.8 GHz , Dual-core, hyperthreaded
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel HD Graphics 620 21.20.16.4550
Memória
16384 MB 
, Single-Channel, DDR4-2400 / PC4-19200
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 166 PPI, multitouch de 10-pontos, Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, 225 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Combo microphone / headphone, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Escaner de retina infravermelho
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.9 x 315 x 226.1
Bateria
48 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2W, harman/kardon, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Toshiba eco Utility, Toshiba Password Utility, Toshiba Service Station, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.043 kg, Suprimento de energia: 353 g
Preço
2109 usd

 

Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0 Type-A, combo mic/line out
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0 Type-A, combo mic/line out
Right: microSD card, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI
Right: microSD card, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI
Front: status LEDs
Front: status LEDs
Rear: ventilation
Rear: ventilation
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
73.67 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
63.2 MB/s ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
61.2 MB/s ∼83% -3%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
91.23 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
89.6 MB/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
82.88 MB/s ∼91% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
660 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
647 MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
485 MBit/s ∼73% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
689 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼96% +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
580 MBit/s ∼84% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
495 MBit/s ∼72% +1%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
488 MBit/s ∼71%
342.6
cd/m²
334.6
cd/m²
345.1
cd/m²
320.5
cd/m²
332.6
cd/m²
316.8
cd/m²
298.1
cd/m²
312.6
cd/m²
302.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 345.1 cd/m² Médio: 322.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.02 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 332.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1188:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | - Ø
94% sRGB (Argyll) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.12
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
LEN40A9 (R140NWF5 R1), IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook 12 2017
APPA027, LED IPS, 12, 2304x1440
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-10%
-4%
-5%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.8 (18.8, 18)
41.6 (20.4, 21.2)
-13%
40.8 (22.8, 18)
-11%
40.8 (19.6, 21.2)
-11%
46 (26, 20)
-25%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
31.6 (18.8, 12.8)
-7%
28.8 (14.8, 14)
3%
29.2 (15.8, 13.4)
1%
33 (21, 12)
-11%
PWM Frequency
219.3 (99)
116000
Screen
-34%
-32%
-35%
Brightness
323
288
-11%
264
-18%
382
18%
Brightness Distribution
86
85
-1%
88
2%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.28
0.24
14%
0.24
14%
0.35
-25%
Contrast
1188
1296
9%
1132
-5%
1154
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
5.5
-112%
6.1
-135%
5.37
-107%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
6.2
-148%
3.4
-36%
6.44
-158%
Gamma
2.12 113%
2.02 119%
2.12 113%
2.52 95%
CCT
6720 97%
5950 109%
6077 107%
6738 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
55.96
-10%
38
-39%
58
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
85.77
-9%
60
-36%
89
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -29%
-18% / -26%
-5% / -5%
-27% / -32%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Core i7-7560U
153 Points ∼78% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
143 Points ∼73% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
143 Points ∼73% +13%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
140 Points ∼72% +11%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
126 Points ∼65%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
120 Points ∼62% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
369 Points ∼17% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
360 Points ∼17% +6%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
341 Points ∼16%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Core i7-7560U
336 Points ∼16% -1%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
314 Points ∼15% -8%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
265 Points ∼12% -22%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.68 Points ∼76%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
1.59 Points ∼72% -5%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.35 Points ∼61% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
4.13 Points ∼17% +8%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.82 Points ∼16%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.45 Points ∼14% -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
6130 Points ∼69%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
5613 Points ∼63% -8%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
12177 Points ∼24%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
11223 Points ∼23% -8%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
525.9 s * ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
446.9 s * ∼5% +15%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
560 Seconds * ∼2% -3%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
542 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8631
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
12177
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6130
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
31.6 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.2 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
341 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5053 Points ∼78% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4999 Points ∼77% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4978 Points ∼76% +1%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4910 Points ∼75%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
4890 Points ∼75% 0%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3946 Points ∼61% -20%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
5083 Points ∼55% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4910 Points ∼53% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4874 Points ∼52% +7%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4655 Points ∼50% +2%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4561 Points ∼49%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3904 Points ∼42% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4025 Points ∼67% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3987 Points ∼67% +13%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
3902 Points ∼65% +10%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3789 Points ∼63% +7%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3543 Points ∼59%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3078 Points ∼52% -13%
PCMark 7 Score
5667 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3543 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4561 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4910 pontos
Ajuda
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Apple SSD AP0256
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
19%
8%
-39%
-3%
Write 4k QD32
535.7
495.6
-7%
499.4
-7%
370.1
-31%
416
-22%
Read 4k QD32
625.5
601.2
-4%
580.1
-7%
521.3
-17%
497.1
-21%
Write 4k
143.6
172.2
20%
159.2
11%
12.78
-91%
140.2
-2%
Read 4k
40.9
60.97
49%
60.7
48%
9.721
-76%
57.47
41%
Write 512
762.9
1098
44%
855.8
12%
579.3
-24%
911.3
19%
Read 512
857.6
814
-5%
830.5
-3%
658.1
-23%
753
-12%
Write Seq
1213
1383
14%
1213
0%
898.5
-26%
1088
-10%
Read Seq
1270
1827
44%
1399
10%
954.8
-25%
1090
-14%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1270 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1213 MB/s
512K Read: 857.6 MB/s
512K Write: 762.9 MB/s
4K Read: 40.9 MB/s
4K Write: 143.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 535.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼11% +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1653 Points ∼10% +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1494 Points ∼9% +22%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1413 Points ∼9% +15%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1225 Points ∼8%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y32
1124 Points ∼7% -8%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1641 Points ∼3% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1578 Points ∼3% +9%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1562 Points ∼3% +8%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1446 Points ∼3%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y32
1227 Points ∼2% -15%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3% +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1093 Points ∼3% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1044 Points ∼3% +23%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
948 Points ∼2% +12%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
847 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼7% +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8971 Points ∼5% +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
8725 Points ∼5% +23%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8104 Points ∼5% +15%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
7068 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y32
6863 Points ∼4% -3%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
47546 Points ∼12% +30%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
36544 Points ∼10%
3DMark 11 Performance
1577 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
52149 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5812 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
780 pontos
Ajuda

Barulho

Ocioso
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB
Carga
33.2 / 37.9 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light    BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
Noise
-5%
-1%
-9%
-3%
off / environment *
28.4
29.3
-3%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
29.9
-5%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
29.3
-3%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
29.9
-5%
Idle Average *
28.4
29.3
-3%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
29.9
-5%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
32.2
-13%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
30.3
-7%
Load Average *
33.2
34.3
-3%
34.8
-5%
40
-20%
33.9
-2%
Load Maximum *
37.9
39.3
-4%
42
-11%
40
-6%
34.9
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 33 °C40.6 °C35.4 °C 
 27.4 °C34.2 °C32 °C 
 26.4 °C27.2 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 31.4 °C
32 °C40 °C35 °C
29.8 °C36.2 °C32 °C
27.8 °C29 °C28.8 °C
Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 32.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.2382537.234.43135.835.44035.334.75033.732.26332.533.78032.63310031.231.41253031.316028.737.320028.349.925027.458.831527.261.740026.860.550026.160.663025.458.980024.965.6100024.462.9125023.962160023.367.8200023.366.3250023.367.4315023.261.7400022.965.150002359.963002362.480002367.31000023.269.31250023.165.11600023.161SPL3677N2.640.8median 23.9Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)median 61.7Delta1.96.131.635.231.633.138.433.144.138.544.136.632.136.629.129.329.129.126.629.127.425.727.425.926.425.92726.12733.923.733.933.322.733.339.321.639.34620.84653.52053.551.319.451.35018.85050.418.350.452.617.652.65817.8586117.56163.117.563.164.817.464.867.317.867.367.717.967.767.118.167.165.118.365.16418.46463.618.463.661.718.361.758.118.358.17630.476331.433median 58HP Spectre 13-v131ngmedian 18.3median 5810.61.910.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.04 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HP Spectre 13-v131ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.6 / 7.6 / 8.2 Watt
Carga midlight 23.8 / 28 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
-24%
-20%
29%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
3.84
17%
4.8
-4%
2
57%
3.6
22%
Idle Average *
7.6
6.3
17%
6.6
13%
5.4
29%
6.4
16%
Idle Maximum *
8.2
8.6
-5%
7
15%
6.6
20%
9.2
-12%
Load Average *
23.8
41.9
-76%
39.2
-65%
22
8%
34
-43%
Load Maximum *
28
48.7
-74%
44.8
-60%
20
29%
34.4
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
14h 58min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
7h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 01min
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Battery Runtime
15%
24%
26%
-21%
Reader / Idle
898
1252
39%
1062
18%
718
-20%
WiFi v1.3
430
496
15%
487
13%
540
26%
394
-8%
Load
121
110
-9%
172
42%
77
-36%

Pro

+ Belo design
+ Materiais premium
+ Chassi rígido (exceto tela)
+ Incrivelmente fino e leve
+ Tela com cores precisas
+ Rápido leitor de digitais e íris
+ 2xThunderbolt 3
+ Funciona de forma relativamente fria

Contra

- A tela se flexiona facilmente
- Imã para as digitais
- Desempenho insuficiente da CPU
In review: Toshiba Portégé X30. Review unit courtesy of Toshiba
In review: Toshiba Portégé X30. Review unit courtesy of Toshiba

A Toshiba criou um bom contendor. O Portégé X30 é um feito impressionante de engenharia; colocar tanto em um chassi tão fino e leve merece aplausos. A inclusão de duas portas Thunderbolt 3 ajuda a mitigar um dos principais problemas do aparelhos modernos fino e leves. Mesmo neste sentido, o X30 ainda oferece portas suficientes que a maioria achará úteis. Embora ainda preferimos as opções de conectividade oferecidas pelo X1 Carbon, eles chegam com um custo de um pouco mais de peso e um formato um pouco maior. Os usuários avançados também podem preferir o teclado superior e a manutenção do X1, tornando-se uma escolha difícil entre a Toshiba e a Lenovo.

A leveza também desmente a robustez do chassi. Não há flexibilidade no teclado e no painel inferior, o que é novamente impressionante. No entanto, a tampa se flexiona se pressão é aplicada; isso pode se tornar um problema após meses ou anos de uso. Outras restrições incluem o teclado medíocre e o layout frustrante das teclas especiais, bem como o acabamento propenso às impressões digitais do corpo do dispositivo. Nossa principal preocupação reside no desempenho do processador. O Core i7-7600U parece ser muito melhor no papel do que se desempenha aqui. Isso pode ser dever ao afogamento (para manter as temperaturas controladas), a subutilização da CPU, ou a combinação de ambas. Embora não possamos determinar definitivamente a causa, é de pouca consequência à luz do desempenho geral do sistema. Sim, o X30 se desempenha um pouco mais lento em benchmarks do que seus rivais, mas em uso do mundo real, ainda é ágil e rápido.

No geral, o Toshiba Portégé X30 é um excelente portátil para os guerreiros da estrada e pessoas de negócios que viajam constantemente. O bom carregamento de I/O, a bela tela e o chassi bem feito são pontos altos neste delicioso aparelho, e as delicadezas, como o veloz scanner de íris e a garantia de 3 anos, são glacê sobre este bolo de penas.

Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) - 06/27/2017 v6
Sam Medley

Acabamento
91 / 98 → 93%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
67 / 80 → 84%
Peso
75 / 67 → 100%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 68 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
88 / 92 → 96%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
96%
Audio
70%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
79%
88%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Toshiba Portégé X30 (i7-7600U, 256 GB)
Sam Medley, 2017-07- 4 (Update: 2017-07- 8)