Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 3X

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/23/2018

A enésima tentativa. O Alcatel 3X supostamente é mais um passo para reviver o nome da marca anteriormente muito popular. Os pontos fortes do smartphone de gama média mais recente da TCL são o Face Key, câmera grande angular e App-Launch via o sensor de digitais. Leia nossa análise para saber o que pode esperar dispositivo chinês.

Alcatel 3X (3 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8100
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 16GB ou 32GB, 21 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, Card Reader: MicroSD (up to 128GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de movimento, sensor de proximidade, E-Compass
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM Quadband (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (B1/2/5/8), 4G LTE Cat. 4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 153.5 x 71.6
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 6 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 480 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP+5 MP (16 MP+8 MP de SW), AF+ wide FF, 5P+5P lenses, pixel size 1.12 μm+1.12 μm, sensor size 1/3.06" + 1/5" aperture f/2.0+f/2.2, wide-angle from 78.4°+ 120°, dual-tone flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5 MP (8 MP from SW), FF, pixel size 1,12 µm, sensor size 1/5", aperture f/2.4, flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, USB charger, Micro-USB cable, stereo headset, OfficeSuite, enjoy.now, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR-value (head): 0,64 W/kg, SAR-value (body): 1,09 W/kg, fanless
peso
144 g, Suprimento de energia: 66 g
Preço
190 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
268 MBit/s ∼100% +390%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=297)
205 MBit/s ∼76% +275%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼21% +2%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55 MBit/s ∼21% +1%
Alcatel 3X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s ∼20%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44.7 MBit/s ∼17% -18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
273 MBit/s ∼100% +395%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=297)
200 MBit/s ∼73% +263%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.9 MBit/s ∼21% +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼20% +1%
Alcatel 3X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.1 MBit/s ∼20%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼17% -15%
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Alcatel 3X
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Alcatel 3X test chart
Alcatel 3X test chart (detail)
454
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 454 cd/m² Médio: 420.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.76 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 325 cd/m²
Contraste: 3300:1 (Preto: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
Alcatel 3X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Motorola Moto G6 Play
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Huawei Y7 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
-20%
-11%
-23%
-12%
Brightness middle
429
594
38%
614
43%
393
-8%
518
21%
Brightness
421
570
35%
593
41%
365
-13%
532
26%
Brightness Distribution
84
86
2%
90
7%
85
1%
94
12%
Black Level *
0.13
0.22
-69%
0.29
-123%
0.29
-123%
0.23
-77%
Contrast
3300
2700
-18%
2117
-36%
1355
-59%
2252
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.86
6.63
-36%
5.9
-21%
5.28
-9%
5.66
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.83
13.99
-58%
9.6
-9%
9
-2%
10.32
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6
9.2
-53%
5.5
8%
4.2
30%
6.8
-13%
Gamma
2.231 99%
2.24 98%
2.32 95%
2.6 85%
2.269 97%
CCT
8103 80%
8663 75%
7822 83%
7086 92%
8564 76%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
31718 Points ∼34%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼39% +14%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
46267 Points ∼50% +46%
Huawei Y7 2018
45687 Points ∼49% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
92672 Points ∼100% +192%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (30702 - 38060, n=10)
34317 Points ∼37% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=382)
74754 Points ∼81% +136%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
42032 Points ∼36%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼40% +9%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
58511 Points ∼50% +39%
Huawei Y7 2018
59421 Points ∼51% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
115654 Points ∼100% +175%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (26874 - 46930, n=10)
42294 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=160)
115872 Points ∼100% +176%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
3210 Points ∼57%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼56% -2%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
3624 Points ∼64% +13%
Huawei Y7 2018
3874 Points ∼69% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
5642 Points ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2630 - 3320, n=11)
2412 Points ∼43% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=243)
4492 Points ∼80% +40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
4711 Points ∼96%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼88% -8%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
4590 Points ∼93% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
4918 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4147 - 4711, n=8)
3241 Points ∼66% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=410)
4890 Points ∼99% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
9 Points ∼1%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
866 Points ∼100% +9522%
Huawei Y7 2018
673 Points ∼78% +7378%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 591, n=10)
67.7 Points ∼8% +652%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=485)
689 Points ∼80% +7556%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
150 Points ∼9%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼11% +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
737 Points ∼44% +391%
Huawei Y7 2018
739 Points ∼44% +393%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 188, n=10)
155 Points ∼9% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=485)
1675 Points ∼100% +1017%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
982 Points ∼81%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼67% -18%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
741 Points ∼61% -25%
Huawei Y7 2018
1144 Points ∼95% +16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (431 - 1034, n=10)
770 Points ∼64% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=485)
1205 Points ∼100% +23%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
1302 Points ∼53%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼54% +1%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
1531 Points ∼63% +18%
Huawei Y7 2018
1906 Points ∼78% +46%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1113 - 1526, n=10)
1303 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=485)
2435 Points ∼100% +87%
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
206 Points ∼17%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼17% +1%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
923 Points ∼76% +348%
Huawei Y7 2018
1020 Points ∼84% +395%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (162 - 637, n=10)
239 Points ∼20% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=489)
1217 Points ∼100% +491%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
Points ∼0%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
2224 Points ∼49%
Huawei Y7 2018
2133 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
4578 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1451, n=9)
1166 Points ∼25%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=184)
4424 Points ∼97%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
Points ∼0%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
2322 Points ∼47%
Huawei Y7 2018
2889 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
4943 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1852, n=10)
1571 Points ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=233)
4232 Points ∼86%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
Points ∼0%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
643 Points ∼48%
Huawei Y7 2018
676 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
1339 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (579 - 665, n=10)
569 Points ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=234)
1250 Points ∼93%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
546 Points ∼23%
Umidigi A1 Pro
531 Points ∼23% -3%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
1259 Points ∼54% +131%
Huawei Y7 2018
1258 Points ∼54% +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
2346 Points ∼100% +330%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (549 - 589, n=11)
504 Points ∼21% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=340)
1630 Points ∼69% +199%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
76 Points ∼6%
Umidigi A1 Pro
88 Points ∼7% +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
254 Points ∼22% +234%
Huawei Y7 2018
255 Points ∼22% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
797 Points ∼68% +949%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (69 - 92, n=11)
71.3 Points ∼6% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=340)
1175 Points ∼100% +1446%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
94 Points ∼8%
Umidigi A1 Pro
108 Points ∼10% +15%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
309 Points ∼28% +229%
Huawei Y7 2018
310 Points ∼28% +230%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
934 Points ∼83% +894%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (86 - 113, n=11)
88.1 Points ∼8% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=348)
1121 Points ∼100% +1093%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
538 Points ∼23%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼23% 0%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
1254 Points ∼53% +133%
Huawei Y7 2018
1280 Points ∼54% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
2379 Points ∼100% +342%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (445 - 620, n=11)
544 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=371)
1517 Points ∼64% +182%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
125 Points ∼8%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼9% +12%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
522 Points ∼33% +318%
Huawei Y7 2018
524 Points ∼33% +319%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
1313 Points ∼82% +950%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 148, n=11)
124 Points ∼8% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=371)
1592 Points ∼100% +1174%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
151 Points ∼10%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼12% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
600 Points ∼41% +297%
Huawei Y7 2018
603 Points ∼41% +299%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
1458 Points ∼100% +866%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 178, n=11)
148 Points ∼10% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6378, n=379)
1354 Points ∼93% +797%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
9188 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
9162 Points ∼52% 0%
Huawei Y7 2018
9153 Points ∼52% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
17471 Points ∼100% +90%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7103 - 10197, n=10)
9217 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=525)
12683 Points ∼73% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
2898 Points ∼14%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
9713 Points ∼46% +235%
Huawei Y7 2018
9713 Points ∼46% +235%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
20909 Points ∼100% +621%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2878 - 4346, n=10)
3381 Points ∼16% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=525)
17522 Points ∼84% +505%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
3418 Points ∼17%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
9585 Points ∼48% +180%
Huawei Y7 2018
9583 Points ∼48% +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
20033 Points ∼100% +486%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3395 - 4203, n=10)
3857 Points ∼19% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=526)
14738 Points ∼74% +331%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
4.9 fps ∼14%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼17% +22%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
16 fps ∼46% +227%
Huawei Y7 2018
16 fps ∼46% +227%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
35 fps ∼100% +614%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=11)
5.61 fps ∼16% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=550)
30.2 fps ∼86% +516%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
9 fps ∼26%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼28% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
26 fps ∼74% +189%
Huawei Y7 2018
27 fps ∼77% +200%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
35 fps ∼100% +289%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 10, n=11)
9.23 fps ∼26% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=553)
24.4 fps ∼70% +171%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
2.2 fps ∼14%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼17% +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
7.1 fps ∼44% +223%
Huawei Y7 2018
7.1 fps ∼44% +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
16 fps ∼99% +627%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=10)
2.56 fps ∼16% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=472)
16.2 fps ∼100% +636%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
5 fps ∼32%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼35% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
14 fps ∼90% +180%
Huawei Y7 2018
14 fps ∼90% +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
15 fps ∼97% +200%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 5.7, n=11)
5.13 fps ∼33% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=475)
15.5 fps ∼100% +210%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
1.3 fps ∼9%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.6 fps ∼12% +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
4.6 fps ∼33% +254%
Huawei Y7 2018
4.6 fps ∼33% +254%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
9.8 fps ∼71% +654%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.6, n=11)
1.491 fps ∼11% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=335)
13.8 fps ∼100% +962%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
3.1 fps ∼23%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3.3 fps ∼24% +6%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
10 fps ∼74% +223%
Huawei Y7 2018
10 fps ∼74% +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
10 fps ∼74% +223%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 3.6, n=11)
3.2 fps ∼24% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=338)
13.5 fps ∼100% +335%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
0.77 fps ∼8%
Umidigi A1 Pro
0.9 fps ∼9% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
2.6 fps ∼27% +238%
Huawei Y7 2018
2.6 fps ∼27% +238%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
6.3 fps ∼65% +718%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.72 - 0.91, n=10)
0.849 fps ∼9% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=267)
9.62 fps ∼100% +1149%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X
1.6 fps ∼18%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.4 fps ∼16% -12%
Motorola Moto G6 Play
5.3 fps ∼61% +231%
Huawei Y7 2018
5.4 fps ∼62% +238%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
6 fps ∼69% +275%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 1.7, n=10)
1.46 fps ∼17% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=270)
8.68 fps ∼100% +443%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
255 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=75)
701 Points ∼100%

Legend

 
Alcatel 3X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 88869, n=408)
254 Points ∼100% +1549%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)
44.322 Points ∼17% +188%
Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66)
18.142 Points ∼7% +18%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points ∼7% +16%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼7% +16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.1, n=11)
16.5 Points ∼6% +7%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
15.406 Points ∼6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)
8422 Points ∼100% +197%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=545)
5462 Points ∼65% +92%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
3363 Points ∼40% +18%
Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66)
3296 Points ∼39% +16%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼38% +12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3202, n=11)
2884 Points ∼34% +2%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
2838 Points ∼34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
17274.5 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (15713 - 18154, n=11)
16782 ms * ∼97% +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼91% +9%
Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66)
13730 ms * ∼79% +21%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
13541 ms * ∼78% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=565)
11590 ms * ∼67% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)
4740 ms * ∼27% +73%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)
158 Points ∼100% +151%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=275)
108 Points ∼68% +71%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
82 Points ∼52% +30%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
63 Points ∼40%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (52 - 63, n=2)
57.5 Points ∼36% -9%

* ... smaller is better

Alcatel 3XUmidigi A1 ProMotorola Moto G6 PlayHuawei Y7 2018Xiaomi Redmi Note 5Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
119%
5%
31%
11%
3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
60.73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
61.5
19%
62.4
21%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-9%
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
85
7%
83.4
5%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-17%
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
9.62
10.2
6%
61.68
541%
9.5
-1%
16.3
69%
18.6 (0.75 - 77.3, n=148)
93%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=594)
60%
Random Read 4KB
26.05
29.6
14%
65.95
153%
38.8
49%
48.9
88%
36.2 (3.59 - 117, n=148)
39%
37.4 (1.59 - 173, n=594)
44%
Sequential Write 256KB
127.7
44.4
-65%
135.82
6%
71.5
-44%
121.6
-5%
94.4 (14.8 - 189, n=148)
-26%
78.2 (2.99 - 246, n=594)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB
260.55
269.2
3%
243.67
-6%
256
-2%
287.6
10%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=148)
-12%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=594)
-13%
Carga Máxima
 40.8 °C36.3 °C35.1 °C 
 39.6 °C36.5 °C35.9 °C 
 38.3 °C36.1 °C35.5 °C 
Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
33.8 °C36.5 °C40.2 °C
34.2 °C36.6 °C39.4 °C
34.8 °C36.6 °C37.4 °C
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 326 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202529.62527.629.43126.8284028.132.25028.132.26320.520.58017.521.610015.617.512515.915.616014.416.320013.714.825012.21931511.128.540010.138.850010.144.96309.3538008.859.110008.560.212508.160.716008.359.520007.760.225007.861.331508.162.740007.964.8500086563008.261.980008.355.8100008.255.8125008.256.3160008.340.4SPL63.254.347.363.620.773.2N15.28.45.413.90.328.3median 8.3median 55.8Delta1.813.735.237.732.937.637.238.131.733.339.633.728.333.227.330.926.929.926.729.1243120.937.720.946.219.548.718.556.317.559.817.564.315.766.215.87416.67515.87515.47315.572.61675.815.876.51674.116.372.516.372.116.266.716.461.916.452.728.685.41.160.3median 16.4median 66.22.113hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAlcatel 3XMotorola Moto G6 Play
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alcatel 3X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G6 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.08 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt
Carga midlight 5.2 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alcatel 3X
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Play
4000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
4000 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
36%
25%
6%
8%
31%
Idle Minimum *
2
1.8
10%
0.68
66%
0.9
55%
1
50%
1.593 (0.87 - 2.8, n=11)
20%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=630)
56%
Idle Average *
2.5
2.3
8%
1.8
28%
1.9
24%
2.6
-4%
2.23 (1.64 - 3.5, n=11)
11%
1.723 (0.6 - 6.2, n=629)
31%
Idle Maximum *
3.2
3.2
-0%
1.83
43%
2.3
28%
2.9
9%
3 (1.68 - 6.3, n=11)
6%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=630)
38%
Load Average *
5.2
4.7
10%
3.38
35%
4.7
10%
5
4%
4.96 (2.8 - 7, n=11)
5%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=624)
22%
Load Maximum *
6.3
6
5%
5.67
10%
5.7
10%
8.2
-30%
6.29 (3.5 - 11.9, n=11)
-0%
5.73 (1.2 - 14.2, n=624)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 15min
Alcatel 3X
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Play
4000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
675
608
-10%
887
31%
624
-8%
872
29%

Pro

+ Tela com uma ótima relação de contraste
+ Desempenho da câmera com baixa iluminação

Contra

- Desempenho do sistema
- Porta micro USB
In review: Alcatel 3X. Provided courtesy of: Alcatel Germany.
In review: Alcatel 3X. Provided courtesy of: Alcatel Germany.

Em nossa análise, o Alcatel 3X revela-se como um smartphone de gama média sólido, que realmente não oferece desempenho suficiente para justificar seu preço de 190 euros ($222). Com o Alcatel 3X, os compradores recebem um smartphone Android que pode realizar todas as tarefas diárias. Ele também fornece uma experiência de usuário decente. A câmera é adequada para fotos instantâneas ocasionais e oferece imagens aceitáveis sob boas condições de iluminação.

O Alcatel 3X brilha com sua tela rica em contraste, mas não tem mais nada a oferecer.

O Alcatel 3X não traz nada de especial para a mesa quando comparado com os dispositivos concorrentes. A maior atração é a alta relação de contraste de sua tela. No entanto, outros fabricantes oferecem smartphones com preço e desempenho similares. Em última análise, cada usuário terá que decidir por si mesmo se deve ou não comprar o Alcatel 3X com base em suas preferências pessoais. Em qualquer caso, o smartphone é adequado para aplicativos simples, como WhatsApp ou tirar fotos ocasionais.

Alcatel 3X - 07/04/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
93%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 9%
Desempenho da aplicação
36 / 70 → 52%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
66%
Médio
69%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 3X
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-23 (Update: 2018-07-31)