Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5

Design recém desenvolvido. A Alcatel 5 deve atrair clientes como o novo carro-chefe de design da empresa chinesa TCL. Para isso, elimina os arranjos de design estabelecidos e os reordena. O resultado é um smartphone que busca outras soluções, mas é fraco nos detalhes. Em nossa análise esclarecemos o que os compradores do Alcatel 5 podem esperar.
Alcatel 5 (5 Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6750 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.70 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5, Card Reader: MicroSD (até 128 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor G, sensor de proximidade, E bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900), 3G UMTS (B1/2/5/8), 4G LTE Cat. 4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28A), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 152.3 x 71.1
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 30 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 470 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 450 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, headset estéreo, Office Suite, enjoy.now, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR head: 0.92 W/kg, SAR body: 0.85 W/kg, fanless
peso
144 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g
Preço
230 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5

Size Comparison

160 mm 75.5 mm 8 mm 167 g152.3 mm 71.1 mm 8.4 mm 144 g152.3 mm 76.7 mm 8.4 mm 183 g148.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.2 mm 175 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s +542%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s +479%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s +334%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 MBit/s +239%
Alcatel 5
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +622%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s +495%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s +455%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s +418%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s +280%
Alcatel 5
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.1 MBit/s
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Alcatel 5 test chart
Alcatel 5 test chart detail
483
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 479.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 495 cd/m²
Contraste: 1686:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286
Alcatel 5
IPS, 1440x720, 5.70
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.90
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
12%
-31%
-11%
-11%
Brightness middle
489
761
56%
417
-15%
528
8%
634
30%
Brightness
480
723
51%
421
-12%
525
9%
635
32%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
88
-7%
89
-6%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.69
-138%
0.61
-110%
0.51
-76%
0.49
-69%
Contrast
1686
1103
-35%
684
-59%
1035
-39%
1294
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.21
2.4
54%
6.1
-17%
4.7
10%
5.9
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.31
5.2
44%
11.2
-20%
8.9
4%
11.6
-25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
1.8
72%
7.1
-9%
6.4
2%
7.8
-20%
Gamma
2.286 96%
2.21 100%
2.16 102%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
CCT
8727 74%
6312 103%
8362 78%
7987 81%
8464 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
39247 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points +83%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points +85%
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points +74%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
46651 Points +19%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17)
41781 Points +6%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
52439 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points +72%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points +72%
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points +69%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
58282 Points +11%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)
54391 Points +4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
834 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points +84%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points +80%
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points +73%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
323 Points -61%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (253 - 965, n=19)
663 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points +582%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1844 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points +76%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points +76%
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points +69%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1805 Points -2%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1077 - 2003, n=19)
1776 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points +420%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
779 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points +56%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points +49%
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points +148%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
778 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (609 - 1288, n=19)
833 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points +697%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
498 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points +206%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points +205%
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points +70%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
788 Points +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=19)
585 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +2682%
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
676 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points +37%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points +32%
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points +27%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10 Points -99%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=19)
446 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points +120%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
590 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points +39%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points +50%
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points +58%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
681 Points +15%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=18)
618 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (800 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5109 Points +766%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
2531 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points +58%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points +66%
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points +48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2601 Points +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=18)
2520 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
13696 Points +441%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1714 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points +120%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points +115%
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points +82%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2190 Points +28%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=16)
1705 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=71, last 2 years)
10674 Points +523%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
8780 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points +92%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points +94%
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points +37%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
9949 Points +13%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5606 - 10269, n=18)
9018 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
8502 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points +117%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points +118%
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points +38%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10262 Points +21%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5884 - 10361, n=18)
9007 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
9914 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points +30%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points +33%
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points +35%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
8990 Points -9%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (4811 - 10553, n=18)
9040 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
455 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points +196%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points +193%
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points -70%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
596 Points +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=18)
471 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points +680%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
387 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points +225%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points +223%
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points -72%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
527 Points +36%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=18)
411 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points +909%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1196 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points +51%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points +45%
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points +47%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1103 Points -8%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (694 - 1219, n=18)
1059 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
305 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points +173%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points +167%
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points -16%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
316 Points +4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (105 - 393, n=19)
324 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points +779%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
252 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points +186%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points +181%
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points -18%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
262 Points +4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (83 - 329, n=19)
272 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points +958%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1161 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points +57%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points +50%
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points +51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1134 Points -2%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (702 - 1233, n=19)
1086 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points +169%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
21 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps +33%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps +48%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps -10%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
14 fps -33%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=16)
20.6 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps +296%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
13 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps +131%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps +131%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps +46%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
18 fps +38%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=16)
15.1 fps +16%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps +1769%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
10 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps +30%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps +50%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps -11%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.5 fps -25%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17)
10 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +608%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
5.4 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps +159%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps +159%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps +61%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.6 fps +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17)
6.26 fps +16%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps +2452%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
7.8 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps +21%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps +28%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps -28%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
4.8 fps -38%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17)
7.46 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps +665%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
3.5 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps +180%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps +180%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps +49%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.4 fps -31%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17)
4.18 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps +2674%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
3.8 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps +39%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps +55%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps -13%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps -29%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=18)
3.57 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps +1024%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1.9 fps
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps +195%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps +195%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps +63%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps +42%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=18)
2.24 fps +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +2984%

Legend

 
Alcatel 5 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points +368%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.17 Points +55%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.97 Points +54%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.42 Points +29%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
18.21 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19)
18.2 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +922%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points +54%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points +53%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points +29%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3305 Points +1%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
3260 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19)
3095 Points -5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19)
14563 ms * -3%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
14104 ms *
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
13541 ms * +4%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788 ms * +24%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9923 ms * +30%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9797 ms * +31%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +88%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points +38%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points +10%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
78 Points
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
78 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5)
61 Points -22%

* ... smaller is better

Alcatel 5Motorola Moto G6 PlusNokia 6 2018Huawei P20 LiteBQ Aquaris VS PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
128%
50%
139%
53%
43%
846%
Sequential Read 256KB
271
286.6
6%
272.6
1%
293.9
8%
274.3
1%
242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247)
-11%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
443%
Sequential Write 256KB
127.8
216.1
69%
118.3
-7%
198.3
55%
205.1
60%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-21%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
748%
Random Read 4KB
57
58.4
2%
38.78
-32%
48.19
-15%
48.3
-15%
43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247)
-24%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
326%
Random Write 4KB
13.59
62.8
362%
15.3
13%
71.1
423%
6.4
-53%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
65%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
1865%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
36.5 ?(Kingston 32GB)
83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
129%
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
128%
83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
129%
84.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
132%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
97%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
20.8 ?(Kingston 32GB)
62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
199%
61.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
195%
69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
232%
60.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
191%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
154%
Carga Máxima
 47.1 °C40.6 °C37.1 °C 
 46.6 °C40.6 °C37.3 °C 
 44.7 °C40.7 °C37.4 °C 
Máximo: 47.1 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C
35.8 °C42.2 °C48.9 °C
37.2 °C42.2 °C45.3 °C
37.4 °C42 °C44.3 °C
Máximo: 48.9 °C
Médio: 41.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  45.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202527.62527.628.43126.827.24028.130.95028.1356320.519.88017.51910015.617.312515.915.916014.41620013.719.325012.226.131511.134.640010.14450010.148.76309.354.88008.85810008.558.912508.160.116008.359.620007.76125007.862.531508.161.740007.958.55000855.863008.254.280008.352.8100008.251.3125008.249.1160008.332.3SPL54.347.363.620.770.8N8.45.413.90.324.6median 8.4median 51.3median 38.7median 10.5median 47.7Delta3.714.524.910.223.135.239.232.937.437.23831.739.839.639.928.335.727.32926.931.726.732.42441.620.948.920.95419.554.718.563.317.564.717.567.315.768.315.873.616.675.215.873.815.472.415.570.21671.715.8771677.516.378.316.372.816.276.216.471.116.460.528.686.31.167median 16.4median 70.22.28.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAlcatel 5Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alcatel 5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.4 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 4.5 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Alcatel 5
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
31%
13%
11%
0%
10%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
0.5
64%
0.67
52%
0.98
30%
0.79
44%
1.13 ?(0.57 - 2.3, n=19)
19%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
36%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.78
6%
1.76
7%
2
-5%
2.29
-21%
2.02 ?(1.42 - 3.5, n=19)
-6%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.81
25%
1.78
26%
2.11
12%
2.3
4%
2.42 ?(1.47 - 5.9, n=19)
-1%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
32%
Load Average *
4.5
3.3
27%
2.82
37%
3.9
13%
3.84
15%
5.21 ?(3.24 - 10.8, n=19)
-16%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-22%
Load Maximum *
6.8
5.14
24%
4.56
33%
5.62
17%
5.95
12%
6.56 ?(3.3 - 12.4, n=19)
4%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
12h 47min
Alcatel 5
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
767
702
-8%
942
23%
582
-24%
644
-16%

Pro

+ Duração da bateria
+ Desempenho da câmera com baixa iluminação
+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Sistema operacional antigo
- Desempenho medíocre do sistema
In review: Alcatel 5. Provided by Alcatel Germany.
In review: Alcatel 5. Provided by Alcatel Germany.

O Alcatel 5 atrai usuários que estão procurando um design diferente e são conscientes dos preços. Por um preço a partir de 230 Euros (~$269), os compradores interessados recebem um smartphone com um sistema operacional desatualizado e que tem desempenho suficiente para dominar todas as tarefas diárias habituais. A duração da bateria também é boa e o acabamento não dá motivos para reclamar.

Embora venha com o Android 7, o Alcatel 5 não oferece um sistema operacional atual, é capaz de ganhar alguns pontos positivos com o seu design e boa duração da bateria.

No entanto, outros fabricantes podem oferecer um pouco mais pelo mesmo preço. Particularmente no desempenho do sistema, na função da câmera e em termos de atualização, alguns concorrentes fazem um trabalho melhor. Com sua baixa resolução, a tela também não está mais atualizada, oferece cores vibrantes e um bom contraste. No final, o gosto do design e a prioridade de um comprador interessado em um sistema atual decidirão se o Alcatel 5 é uma boa opção ou não.

Alcatel 5 - 07/02/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
93%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
29 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
81%
Ruído
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 64%
Camera
66%
Médio
69%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-23 (Update: 2018-07-31)