Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5

Name: Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5
Item: Alcatel 5
Rating: 80
Author: Mike Wobker

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/23/2018

Design recém desenvolvido. A Alcatel 5 deve atrair clientes como o novo carro-chefe de design da empresa chinesa TCL. Para isso, elimina os arranjos de design estabelecidos e os reordena. O resultado é um smartphone que busca outras soluções, mas é fraco nos detalhes. Em nossa análise esclarecemos o que os compradores do Alcatel 5 podem esperar.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	310 MBit/s ∼100% +495%
Nokia 6 2018 Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	289 MBit/s ∼93% +455%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash	270 MBit/s ∼87% +418%
Huawei P20 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash	198 MBit/s ∼64% +280%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=255)	185 MBit/s ∼60% +255%
Alcatel 5 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.1 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018 Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	345 MBit/s ∼100% +542%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	311 MBit/s ∼90% +479%
Huawei P20 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash	233 MBit/s ∼68% +334%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash	182 MBit/s ∼53% +239%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=255)	181 MBit/s ∼52% +237%
Alcatel 5 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.7 MBit/s ∼16%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


483 cd/m²	488 cd/m²	471 cd/m²
492 cd/m²	489 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
476 cd/m²	474 cd/m²	475 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 492 cd/m² Médio: 479.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 495 cd/m²
Contraste: 1686:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286

	Alcatel 5 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7	Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9	Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5	Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84	BQ Aquaris VS Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen		12%	-31%	-11%	-11%
Brightness middle	489	761 56%	417 -15%	528 8%	634 30%
Brightness	480	723 51%	421 -12%	525 9%	635 32%
Brightness Distribution	95	90 -5%	88 -7%	89 -6%	96 1%
Black Level *	0.29	0.69 -138%	0.61 -110%	0.51 -76%	0.49 -69%
Contrast	1686	1103 -35%	684 -59%	1035 -39%	1294 -23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.21	2.4 54%	6.1 -17%	4.7 10%	5.9 -13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.31	5.2 44%	11.2 -20%	8.9 4%	11.6 -25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	6.5	1.8 72%	7.1 -9%	6.4 2%	7.8 -20%
Gamma	2.286 ^105%	2.21 ^109%	2.16 ^111%	2.22 ^108%	2.16 ^111%
CCT	8727 ^74%	6312 ^103%	8362 ^78%	7987 ^81%	8464 ^77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8809 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	39247 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	71635 Points ∼99% +83%
Nokia 6 2018	72580 Points ∼100% +85%
Huawei P20 Lite	68232 Points ∼94% +74%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	46651 Points ∼64% +19%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=15)	41877 Points ∼58% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=347)	70029 Points ∼96% +78%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	52439 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	90347 Points ∼91% +72%
Nokia 6 2018	90435 Points ∼91% +72%
Huawei P20 Lite	88550 Points ∼89% +69%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	58282 Points ∼59% +11%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)	43747 Points ∼44% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=123)	99434 Points ∼100% +90%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	676 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	925 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 6 2018	895 Points ∼97% +32%
Huawei P20 Lite	858 Points ∼93% +27%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	10 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=17)	457 Points ∼49% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=450)	665 Points ∼72% -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	498 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1523 Points ∼100% +206%
Nokia 6 2018	1520 Points ∼100% +205%
Huawei P20 Lite	848 Points ∼56% +70%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	788 Points ∼52% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=17)	587 Points ∼39% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=450)	1488 Points ∼98% +199%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	779 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1213 Points ∼63% +56%
Nokia 6 2018	1161 Points ∼60% +49%
Huawei P20 Lite	1930 Points ∼100% +148%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	778 Points ∼40% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (623 - 1288, n=17)	849 Points ∼44% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=450)	1118 Points ∼58% +44%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	1844 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	3249 Points ∼100% +76%
Nokia 6 2018	3237 Points ∼100% +76%
Huawei P20 Lite	3109 Points ∼96% +69%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	1805 Points ∼56% -2%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1259 - 2003, n=17)	1811 Points ∼56% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=450)	2237 Points ∼69% +21%
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	834 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1535 Points ∼100% +84%
Nokia 6 2018	1504 Points ∼98% +80%
Huawei P20 Lite	1445 Points ∼94% +73%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	323 Points ∼21% -61%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (298 - 965, n=17)	676 Points ∼44% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=454)	1122 Points ∼73% +35%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	1714 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	3763 Points ∼100% +120%
Nokia 6 2018	3690 Points ∼98% +115%
Huawei P20 Lite	3116 Points ∼83% +82%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2190 Points ∼58% +28%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=14)	1702 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=148)	3713 Points ∼99% +117%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	2531 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	4011 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 6 2018	883 Points ∼22% -65%
Huawei P20 Lite	3749 Points ∼93% +48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2601 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=16)	2504 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=195)	3896 Points ∼97% +54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	590 Points ∼14%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	822 Points ∼20% +39%
Nokia 6 2018	4210 Points ∼100% +614%
Huawei P20 Lite	935 Points ∼22% +58%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	681 Points ∼16% +15%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=16)	616 Points ∼15% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=196)	1149 Points ∼27% +95%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	1161 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1822 Points ∼100% +57%
Nokia 6 2018	1738 Points ∼95% +50%
Huawei P20 Lite	1757 Points ∼96% +51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	1134 Points ∼62% -2%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (710 - 1233, n=17)	1104 Points ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1118 - 3669, n=300)	1537 Points ∼84% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	252 Points ∼24%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	721 Points ∼70% +186%
Nokia 6 2018	707 Points ∼69% +181%
Huawei P20 Lite	207 Points ∼20% -18%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	262 Points ∼25% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (90 - 329, n=17)	280 Points ∼27% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (322 - 5220, n=300)	1030 Points ∼100% +309%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	305 Points ∼31%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	833 Points ∼84% +173%
Nokia 6 2018	814 Points ∼82% +167%
Huawei P20 Lite	257 Points ∼26% -16%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	316 Points ∼32% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (113 - 393, n=17)	334 Points ∼34% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (383 - 4732, n=308)	989 Points ∼100% +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	1196 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1802 Points ∼100% +51%
Nokia 6 2018	1733 Points ∼96% +45%
Huawei P20 Lite	1760 Points ∼98% +47%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	1103 Points ∼61% -8%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (718 - 1219, n=17)	1080 Points ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1176 - 3642, n=331)	1445 Points ∼80% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	387 Points ∼28%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1258 Points ∼90% +225%
Nokia 6 2018	1249 Points ∼89% +223%
Huawei P20 Lite	109 Points ∼8% -72%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	527 Points ∼38% +36%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=17)	407 Points ∼29% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (480 - 8312, n=331)	1397 Points ∼100% +261%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	455 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	1348 Points ∼100% +196%
Nokia 6 2018	1332 Points ∼99% +193%
Huawei P20 Lite	138 Points ∼10% -70%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	596 Points ∼44% +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=17)	468 Points ∼35% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (553 - 6378, n=339)	1206 Points ∼89% +165%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	9914 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	12845 Points ∼96% +30%
Nokia 6 2018	13196 Points ∼99% +33%
Huawei P20 Lite	13387 Points ∼100% +35%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	8990 Points ∼67% -9%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9934 - 10553, n=17)	8835 Points ∼66% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36494, n=486)	12099 Points ∼90% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	8502 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	18449 Points ∼99% +117%
Nokia 6 2018	18572 Points ∼100% +118%
Huawei P20 Lite	11713 Points ∼63% +38%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	10262 Points ∼55% +21%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9476 - 10361, n=17)	8617 Points ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=486)	15444 Points ∼83% +82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	8780 Points ∼52%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	16818 Points ∼99% +92%
Nokia 6 2018	17030 Points ∼100% +94%
Huawei P20 Lite	12048 Points ∼71% +37%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	9949 Points ∼58% +13%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9574 - 10269, n=17)	8677 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=487)	13374 Points ∼79% +52%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	13 fps ∼43%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	30 fps ∼100% +131%
Nokia 6 2018	30 fps ∼100% +131%
Huawei P20 Lite	19 fps ∼63% +46%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	18 fps ∼60% +38%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=14)	15.1 fps ∼50% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=512)	26.8 fps ∼89% +106%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	21 fps ∼68%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	28 fps ∼90% +33%
Nokia 6 2018	31 fps ∼100% +48%
Huawei P20 Lite	19 fps ∼61% -10%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	14 fps ∼45% -33%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=14)	20.2 fps ∼65% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=515)	23.4 fps ∼75% +11%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	5.4 fps ∼38%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	14 fps ∼99% +159%
Nokia 6 2018	14 fps ∼99% +159%
Huawei P20 Lite	8.7 fps ∼61% +61%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	7.6 fps ∼54% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=15)	6.28 fps ∼44% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 88.2, n=435)	14.2 fps ∼100% +163%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	10 fps ∼67%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	13 fps ∼87% +30%
Nokia 6 2018	15 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei P20 Lite	8.9 fps ∼59% -11%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	7.5 fps ∼50% -25%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=15)	9.73 fps ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 115, n=437)	14.4 fps ∼96% +44%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	3.5 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	9.8 fps ∼80% +180%
Nokia 6 2018	9.8 fps ∼80% +180%
Huawei P20 Lite	5.2 fps ∼42% +49%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2.4 fps ∼20% -31%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=15)	4.19 fps ∼34% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 60, n=298)	12.3 fps ∼100% +251%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	7.8 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	9.4 fps ∼76% +21%
Nokia 6 2018	10 fps ∼81% +28%
Huawei P20 Lite	5.6 fps ∼45% -28%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	4.8 fps ∼39% -38%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=15)	7.23 fps ∼58% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.6 - 110, n=300)	12.4 fps ∼100% +59%

GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	1.9 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	5.6 fps ∼68% +195%
Nokia 6 2018	5.6 fps ∼68% +195%
Huawei P20 Lite	3.1 fps ∼38% +63%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2.7 fps ∼33% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=16)	2.25 fps ∼27% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 35, n=229)	8.25 fps ∼100% +334%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5	3.8 fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus	5.3 fps ∼70% +39%
Nokia 6 2018	5.9 fps ∼77% +55%
Huawei P20 Lite	3.3 fps ∼43% -13%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2.7 fps ∼35% -29%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=16)	3.44 fps ∼45% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 50, n=232)	7.62 fps ∼100% +101%

Legend

Alcatel 5 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris VS Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6750

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=370)	33.3 Points ∼100% +83%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)	28.167 Points ∼85% +55%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)	27.971 Points ∼84% +54%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	23.424 Points ∼70% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (16.6 - 20.8, n=17)	18.8 Points ∼56% +3%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)	18.208 Points ∼55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)	5011 Points ∼100% +54%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)	4993 Points ∼100% +53%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=506)	4982 Points ∼99% +53%
Huawei P20 Lite	4191 Points ∼84% +29%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	3305 Points ∼66% +1%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)	3260 Points ∼65%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2712 - 3506, n=17)	3197 Points ∼64% -2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)	14104.1 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=17)	13987 ms * ∼99% +1%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)	13541.3 ms * ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=525)	11920 ms * ∼85% +15%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	10788.1 ms * ∼76% +24%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)	9922.7 ms * ∼70% +30%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)	9796.9 ms * ∼69% +31%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 6 2018	117 Points ∼100% +50%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)	108 Points ∼92% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=248)	99.5 Points ∼85% +28%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	86 Points ∼74% +10%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)	78 Points ∼67%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)	78 Points ∼67% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5)	61 Points ∼52% -22%

* ... smaller is better

	Alcatel 5	Motorola Moto G6 Plus	Nokia 6 2018	Huawei P20 Lite	BQ Aquaris VS Plus	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		128%	50%	139%	53%	24%	13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	20.8 (Kingston 32GB)	62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 199%	61.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 195%	69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 232%	60.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 191%	46.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=99) 122%	43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=281) 111%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	36.5 (Kingston 32GB)	83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 129%	83.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 129%	83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 129%	84.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 132%	65.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=99) 79%	62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=281) 71%
Random Write 4KB	13.59	62.76 362%	15.3 13%	71.07 423%	6.4 -53%	17.4 (0.75 - 74.9, n=139) 28%	13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=562) 0%
Random Read 4KB	56.96	58.39 3%	38.78 -32%	48.19 -15%	48.3 -15%	34.4 (3.59 - 117, n=139) -40%	34.6 (1.59 - 173, n=562) -39%
Sequential Write 256KB	127.78	216.09 69%	118.32 -7%	198.3 55%	205.1 61%	93.2 (14.8 - 189, n=139) -27%	72.9 (2.99 - 228, n=562) -43%
Sequential Read 256KB	271.03	286.64 6%	272.59 1%	293.94 8%	274.3 1%	226 (25.8 - 440, n=139) -17%	212 (12.1 - 832, n=562) -22%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


47.1 °C	40.6 °C	37.1 °C
46.6 °C	40.6 °C	37.3 °C
44.7 °C	40.7 °C	37.4 °C

Máximo: 47.1 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C


35.8 °C	42.2 °C	48.9 °C
37.2 °C	42.2 °C	45.3 °C
37.4 °C	42 °C	44.3 °C

Máximo: 48.9 °C
Médio: 41.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 45.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Alcatel 5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Ocioso	1.4 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga	4.5 / 6.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Alcatel 5 3000 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh	Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh	Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6750	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		29%	31%	13%	11%	-1%	19%
Idle Minimum *	1.4	0.5 64%	0.67 52%	0.98 30%	0.79 44%	1.163 (0.57 - 2.3, n=17) 17%	0.871 (0.2 - 3.4, n=585) 38%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.78 6%	1.76 7%	2 -5%	2.29 -21%	2.05 (1.42 - 3.5, n=17) -8%	1.702 (0.6 - 6.2, n=584) 10%
Idle Maximum *	2.4	1.81 25%	1.78 26%	2.11 12%	2.3 4%	2.46 (1.47 - 5.9, n=17) -3%	1.964 (0.74 - 6.6, n=585) 18%
Load Average *	4.5	3.3 27%	2.82 37%	3.9 13%	3.84 15%	5.18 (3.24 - 10.8, n=17) -15%	3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=579) 11%
Load Maximum *	6.8	5.14 24%	4.56 33%	5.62 17%	5.95 12%	6.45 (3.3 - 12.4, n=17) 5%	5.62 (1.2 - 14.2, n=579) 17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		12h 47min

	Alcatel 5 3000 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh	Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh	Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	767	702 -8%	942 23%	582 -24%	644 -16%

Pro

+ Duração da bateria

+ Desempenho da câmera com baixa iluminação

+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Sistema operacional antigo

- Desempenho medíocre do sistema

In review: Alcatel 5. Provided by Alcatel Germany.

O Alcatel 5 atrai usuários que estão procurando um design diferente e são conscientes dos preços. Por um preço a partir de 230 Euros (~$269), os compradores interessados recebem um smartphone com um sistema operacional desatualizado e que tem desempenho suficiente para dominar todas as tarefas diárias habituais. A duração da bateria também é boa e o acabamento não dá motivos para reclamar.

Embora venha com o Android 7, o Alcatel 5 não oferece um sistema operacional atual, é capaz de ganhar alguns pontos positivos com o seu design e boa duração da bateria.

No entanto, outros fabricantes podem oferecer um pouco mais pelo mesmo preço. Particularmente no desempenho do sistema, na função da câmera e em termos de atualização, alguns concorrentes fazem um trabalho melhor. Com sua baixa resolução, a tela também não está mais atualizada, oferece cores vibrantes e um bom contraste. No final, o gosto do design e a prioridade de um comprador interessado em um sistema atual decidirão se o Alcatel 5 é uma boa opção ou não.

Alcatel 5 - 2018-07-0207/02/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

82%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 86%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

37 / 60 → 62%

Peso

93%

Bateria

96%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

16 / 63 → 25%

Desempenho da aplicação

29 / 70 → 42%

Temperatura

81%

Ruído

100%

Audio

58 / 91 → 64%

Camera

66%

Médio

69%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5

Size Comparison

Os Top 10

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Alcatel 5 audio analysis

Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare