Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/23/2018

Design recém desenvolvido. A Alcatel 5 deve atrair clientes como o novo carro-chefe de design da empresa chinesa TCL. Para isso, elimina os arranjos de design estabelecidos e os reordena. O resultado é um smartphone que busca outras soluções, mas é fraco nos detalhes. Em nossa análise esclarecemos o que os compradores do Alcatel 5 podem esperar.

Alcatel 5
Processador
Mediatek MT6750
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5, Card Reader: MicroSD (até 128 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor G, sensor de proximidade, E bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900), 3G UMTS (B1/2/5/8), 4G LTE Cat. 4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28A), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 152.3 x 71.1
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 30 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 470 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 450 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, headset estéreo, Office Suite, enjoy.now, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR head: 0.92 W/kg, SAR body: 0.85 W/kg, fanless
peso
144 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g
Preço
230 Euro

 

Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼100% +495%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼93% +455%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼87% +418%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s ∼64% +280%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=255)
185 MBit/s ∼60% +255%
Alcatel 5
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.1 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼100% +542%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼90% +479%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼68% +334%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 MBit/s ∼53% +239%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=255)
181 MBit/s ∼52% +237%
Alcatel 5
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s ∼16%
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5
Alcatel 5

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Alcatel 5 test chart
Alcatel 5 test chart detail
483
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 492 cd/m² Médio: 479.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 495 cd/m²
Contraste: 1686:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286
Alcatel 5
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
12%
-31%
-11%
-11%
Brightness middle
489
761
56%
417
-15%
528
8%
634
30%
Brightness
480
723
51%
421
-12%
525
9%
635
32%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
88
-7%
89
-6%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.69
-138%
0.61
-110%
0.51
-76%
0.49
-69%
Contrast
1686
1103
-35%
684
-59%
1035
-39%
1294
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.21
2.4
54%
6.1
-17%
4.7
10%
5.9
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.31
5.2
44%
11.2
-20%
8.9
4%
11.6
-25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
1.8
72%
7.1
-9%
6.4
2%
7.8
-20%
Gamma
2.286 105%
2.21 109%
2.16 111%
2.22 108%
2.16 111%
CCT
8727 74%
6312 103%
8362 78%
7987 81%
8464 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8809 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
39247 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points ∼99% +83%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points ∼100% +85%
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points ∼94% +74%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
46651 Points ∼64% +19%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=15)
41877 Points ∼58% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=347)
70029 Points ∼96% +78%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
52439 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points ∼91% +72%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points ∼91% +72%
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points ∼89% +69%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
58282 Points ∼59% +11%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)
43747 Points ∼44% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=123)
99434 Points ∼100% +90%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
676 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points ∼97% +32%
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points ∼93% +27%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=17)
457 Points ∼49% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=450)
665 Points ∼72% -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
498 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points ∼100% +206%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points ∼100% +205%
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points ∼56% +70%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
788 Points ∼52% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=17)
587 Points ∼39% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=450)
1488 Points ∼98% +199%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
779 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points ∼63% +56%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points ∼60% +49%
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points ∼100% +148%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
778 Points ∼40% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (623 - 1288, n=17)
849 Points ∼44% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=450)
1118 Points ∼58% +44%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1844 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points ∼100% +76%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points ∼100% +76%
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points ∼96% +69%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1805 Points ∼56% -2%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1259 - 2003, n=17)
1811 Points ∼56% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=450)
2237 Points ∼69% +21%
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
834 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points ∼100% +84%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points ∼98% +80%
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points ∼94% +73%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
323 Points ∼21% -61%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (298 - 965, n=17)
676 Points ∼44% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=454)
1122 Points ∼73% +35%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1714 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points ∼100% +120%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points ∼98% +115%
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points ∼83% +82%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2190 Points ∼58% +28%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=14)
1702 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=148)
3713 Points ∼99% +117%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
2531 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points ∼22% -65%
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points ∼93% +48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2601 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=16)
2504 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=195)
3896 Points ∼97% +54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
590 Points ∼14%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points ∼20% +39%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points ∼100% +614%
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points ∼22% +58%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
681 Points ∼16% +15%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=16)
616 Points ∼15% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=196)
1149 Points ∼27% +95%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1161 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points ∼100% +57%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points ∼95% +50%
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points ∼96% +51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1134 Points ∼62% -2%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (710 - 1233, n=17)
1104 Points ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1118 - 3669, n=300)
1537 Points ∼84% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
252 Points ∼24%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points ∼70% +186%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points ∼69% +181%
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points ∼20% -18%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
262 Points ∼25% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (90 - 329, n=17)
280 Points ∼27% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (322 - 5220, n=300)
1030 Points ∼100% +309%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
305 Points ∼31%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points ∼84% +173%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points ∼82% +167%
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points ∼26% -16%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
316 Points ∼32% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (113 - 393, n=17)
334 Points ∼34% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (383 - 4732, n=308)
989 Points ∼100% +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1196 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points ∼100% +51%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points ∼96% +45%
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points ∼98% +47%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1103 Points ∼61% -8%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (718 - 1219, n=17)
1080 Points ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1176 - 3642, n=331)
1445 Points ∼80% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
387 Points ∼28%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points ∼90% +225%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points ∼89% +223%
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points ∼8% -72%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
527 Points ∼38% +36%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=17)
407 Points ∼29% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (480 - 8312, n=331)
1397 Points ∼100% +261%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
455 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points ∼100% +196%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points ∼99% +193%
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points ∼10% -70%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
596 Points ∼44% +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=17)
468 Points ∼35% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (553 - 6378, n=339)
1206 Points ∼89% +165%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
9914 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points ∼96% +30%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points ∼99% +33%
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points ∼100% +35%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
8990 Points ∼67% -9%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9934 - 10553, n=17)
8835 Points ∼66% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36494, n=486)
12099 Points ∼90% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
8502 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points ∼99% +117%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points ∼100% +118%
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points ∼63% +38%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10262 Points ∼55% +21%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9476 - 10361, n=17)
8617 Points ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=486)
15444 Points ∼83% +82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
8780 Points ∼52%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points ∼99% +92%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points ∼100% +94%
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points ∼71% +37%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
9949 Points ∼58% +13%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9574 - 10269, n=17)
8677 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=487)
13374 Points ∼79% +52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
13 fps ∼43%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps ∼100% +131%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps ∼100% +131%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps ∼63% +46%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
18 fps ∼60% +38%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=14)
15.1 fps ∼50% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=512)
26.8 fps ∼89% +106%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
21 fps ∼68%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps ∼90% +33%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps ∼100% +48%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps ∼61% -10%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
14 fps ∼45% -33%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=14)
20.2 fps ∼65% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=515)
23.4 fps ∼75% +11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
5.4 fps ∼38%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps ∼99% +159%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps ∼99% +159%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps ∼61% +61%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.6 fps ∼54% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=15)
6.28 fps ∼44% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 88.2, n=435)
14.2 fps ∼100% +163%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
10 fps ∼67%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps ∼87% +30%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps ∼59% -11%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.5 fps ∼50% -25%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=15)
9.73 fps ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 115, n=437)
14.4 fps ∼96% +44%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
3.5 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps ∼80% +180%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps ∼80% +180%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps ∼42% +49%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.4 fps ∼20% -31%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=15)
4.19 fps ∼34% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 60, n=298)
12.3 fps ∼100% +251%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
7.8 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps ∼76% +21%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps ∼81% +28%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps ∼45% -28%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
4.8 fps ∼39% -38%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=15)
7.23 fps ∼58% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.6 - 110, n=300)
12.4 fps ∼100% +59%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
1.9 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps ∼68% +195%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps ∼68% +195%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps ∼38% +63%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps ∼33% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=16)
2.25 fps ∼27% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 35, n=229)
8.25 fps ∼100% +334%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 5
3.8 fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps ∼70% +39%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps ∼77% +55%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps ∼43% -13%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps ∼35% -29%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=16)
3.44 fps ∼45% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 50, n=232)
7.62 fps ∼100% +101%

Legend

 
Alcatel 5 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=370)
33.3 Points ∼100% +83%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.167 Points ∼85% +55%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.971 Points ∼84% +54%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼70% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (16.6 - 20.8, n=17)
18.8 Points ∼56% +3%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
18.208 Points ∼55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points ∼100% +54%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points ∼100% +53%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=506)
4982 Points ∼99% +53%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼84% +29%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3305 Points ∼66% +1%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
3260 Points ∼65%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2712 - 3506, n=17)
3197 Points ∼64% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
14104.1 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=17)
13987 ms * ∼99% +1%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
13541.3 ms * ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=525)
11920 ms * ∼85% +15%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼76% +24%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9922.7 ms * ∼70% +30%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9796.9 ms * ∼69% +31%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points ∼100% +50%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points ∼92% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=248)
99.5 Points ∼85% +28%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼74% +10%
Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67)
78 Points ∼67%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
78 Points ∼67% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5)
61 Points ∼52% -22%

* ... smaller is better

Alcatel 5Motorola Moto G6 PlusNokia 6 2018Huawei P20 LiteBQ Aquaris VS PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
128%
50%
139%
53%
24%
13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
20.8 (Kingston 32GB)
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
199%
61.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
195%
69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
232%
60.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
191%
46.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=99)
122%
43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=281)
111%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
36.5 (Kingston 32GB)
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
129%
83.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
129%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
129%
84.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
132%
65.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=99)
79%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=281)
71%
Random Write 4KB
13.59
62.76
362%
15.3
13%
71.07
423%
6.4
-53%
17.4 (0.75 - 74.9, n=139)
28%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=562)
0%
Random Read 4KB
56.96
58.39
3%
38.78
-32%
48.19
-15%
48.3
-15%
34.4 (3.59 - 117, n=139)
-40%
34.6 (1.59 - 173, n=562)
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
127.78
216.09
69%
118.32
-7%
198.3
55%
205.1
61%
93.2 (14.8 - 189, n=139)
-27%
72.9 (2.99 - 228, n=562)
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
271.03
286.64
6%
272.59
1%
293.94
8%
274.3
1%
226 (25.8 - 440, n=139)
-17%
212 (12.1 - 832, n=562)
-22%
Carga Máxima
 47.1 °C40.6 °C37.1 °C 
 46.6 °C40.6 °C37.3 °C 
 44.7 °C40.7 °C37.4 °C 
Máximo: 47.1 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C
35.8 °C42.2 °C48.9 °C
37.2 °C42.2 °C45.3 °C
37.4 °C42 °C44.3 °C
Máximo: 48.9 °C
Médio: 41.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  45.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202527.62527.628.43126.827.24028.130.95028.1356320.519.88017.51910015.617.312515.915.916014.41620013.719.325012.226.131511.134.640010.14450010.148.76309.354.88008.85810008.558.912508.160.116008.359.620007.76125007.862.531508.161.740007.958.55000855.863008.254.280008.352.8100008.251.3125008.249.1160008.332.3SPL54.347.363.620.770.8N8.45.413.90.324.6median 8.3Alcatel 5median 52.8Delta1.812.935.239.232.937.437.23831.739.839.639.928.335.727.32926.931.726.732.42441.620.948.920.95419.554.718.563.317.564.717.567.315.768.315.873.616.675.215.873.815.472.415.570.21671.715.8771677.516.378.316.372.816.276.216.471.116.460.528.686.31.167median 16.4Motorola Moto G6 Plusmedian 70.22.19.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alcatel 5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.4 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 4.5 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alcatel 5
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
31%
13%
11%
-1%
19%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
0.5
64%
0.67
52%
0.98
30%
0.79
44%
1.163 (0.57 - 2.3, n=17)
17%
0.871 (0.2 - 3.4, n=585)
38%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.78
6%
1.76
7%
2
-5%
2.29
-21%
2.05 (1.42 - 3.5, n=17)
-8%
1.702 (0.6 - 6.2, n=584)
10%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.81
25%
1.78
26%
2.11
12%
2.3
4%
2.46 (1.47 - 5.9, n=17)
-3%
1.964 (0.74 - 6.6, n=585)
18%
Load Average *
4.5
3.3
27%
2.82
37%
3.9
13%
3.84
15%
5.18 (3.24 - 10.8, n=17)
-15%
3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=579)
11%
Load Maximum *
6.8
5.14
24%
4.56
33%
5.62
17%
5.95
12%
6.45 (3.3 - 12.4, n=17)
5%
5.62 (1.2 - 14.2, n=579)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 47min
Alcatel 5
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
767
702
-8%
942
23%
582
-24%
644
-16%

Pro

+ Duração da bateria
+ Desempenho da câmera com baixa iluminação
+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Sistema operacional antigo
- Desempenho medíocre do sistema
In review: Alcatel 5. Provided by Alcatel Germany.
In review: Alcatel 5. Provided by Alcatel Germany.

O Alcatel 5 atrai usuários que estão procurando um design diferente e são conscientes dos preços. Por um preço a partir de 230 Euros (~$269), os compradores interessados recebem um smartphone com um sistema operacional desatualizado e que tem desempenho suficiente para dominar todas as tarefas diárias habituais. A duração da bateria também é boa e o acabamento não dá motivos para reclamar.

Embora venha com o Android 7, o Alcatel 5 não oferece um sistema operacional atual, é capaz de ganhar alguns pontos positivos com o seu design e boa duração da bateria.

No entanto, outros fabricantes podem oferecer um pouco mais pelo mesmo preço. Particularmente no desempenho do sistema, na função da câmera e em termos de atualização, alguns concorrentes fazem um trabalho melhor. Com sua baixa resolução, a tela também não está mais atualizada, oferece cores vibrantes e um bom contraste. No final, o gosto do design e a prioridade de um comprador interessado em um sistema atual decidirão se o Alcatel 5 é uma boa opção ou não.

Alcatel 5 - 07/02/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
93%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
29 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
81%
Ruído
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 64%
Camera
66%
Médio
69%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-23 (Update: 2018-07-31)