Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20 Lite
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 528 cd/m²
Contraste: 1035:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Sony Xperia XA2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 8% | 37% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 528 | 545 3% | 507 -4% | 539 2% | 513 -3% |
| Brightness | 525 | 526 0% | 509 -3% | 542 3% | 506 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 95 7% | 93 4% | 93 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.42 18% | 0.36 29% | 0.42 18% | |
| Contrast | 1035 | 1298 25% | 1408 36% | 1221 18% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.9 -4% | 5.1 -9% | 1.6 66% | 5 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.9 | 8.5 4% | 9 -1% | 2.6 71% | 11.4 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 5.4 16% | 6.1 5% | 1.5 77% | 7.8 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7987 81% | 7610 85% | 8143 80% | 6422 101% | 7964 82% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Lite | HTC U11 Life | Huawei P10 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Sony Xperia XA2 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | -26% | -44% | -23% | -12% | 393% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 293.9 | 268 -9% | 264.3 -10% | 182 -38% | 271.5 -8% | 273 ? -7% | 1508 ? 413% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 198.3 | 120 -39% | 129.2 -35% | 77.1 -61% | 127.4 -36% | 176.8 ? -11% | 1118 ? 464% |
| Random Read 4KB | 48.19 | 39.3 -18% | 72.5 50% | 22.41 -53% | 43.07 -11% | 59.1 ? 23% | 247 ? 413% |
| Random Write 4KB | 71.1 | 50.2 -29% | 19.36 -73% | 12.13 -83% | 13.82 -81% | 31.7 ? -55% | 272 ? 283% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.5 ? | 82.8 ? -1% | 53.4 ? -36% | 73.7 ? -12% | 86 ? 3% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 69 ? | 59.8 ? -13% | 32.7 ? -53% | 56 ? -19% | 64.8 ? -6% | 58.3 ? -16% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U11 Life audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.98 / 2 / 2.11 Watt |
| Carga |
3.9 / 5.62 Watt |
    
| |
| Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 18% | 34% | 27% | -34% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.98 | 0.63 36% | 0.38 61% | 0.64 35% | 0.39 60% | 1.265 ? -29% | 0.897 ? 8% |
| Idle Average * | 2 | 2.1 -5% | 1.87 6% | 1.36 32% | 1.61 19% | 2.96 ? -48% | 1.452 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.11 | 2.15 -2% | 1.92 9% | 1.4 34% | 1.62 23% | 3.1 ? -47% | 1.629 ? 23% |
| Load Average * | 3.9 | 3.34 14% | 3.82 2% | 2.53 35% | 3.12 20% | 5.05 ? -29% | 5.55 ? -42% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.62 | 4.83 14% | 4.9 13% | 3.63 35% | 4.92 12% | 6.7 ? -19% | 8.31 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 65% | 36% | 116% | 93% | |
| Reader / Idle | 750 | 1820 143% | 1410 88% | 2418 222% | 2503 234% |
| H.264 | 470 | 798 70% | 586 25% | 984 109% | 766 63% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 582 | 725 25% | 665 14% | 843 45% | 886 52% |
| Load | 247 | 303 23% | 286 16% | 467 89% | 298 21% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei P20 Lite apresenta-se como um sólido smartphone de gama média na nossa análise, mas não consegue diferenciar-se da concorrência em termos de desempenho. A câmera dupla de 16 MP tira boas fotos e o sistema como um todo funciona sem problemas, embora isso já seja algo ao qual já estamos acostumados com smartphones de outros fabricantes. O design pode ser o único fator decisivo para uma compra e, embora sua tela quase sem bordas e o entalhe não sejam exclusivos, eles não são encontrados com frequência nessa faixa de preços.
O Huawei P20 Lite é um smartphone para aqueles sem a necessidade de aplicativos 3D complexos que estão procurando um dispositivo do dia-a-dia que tenha bom desempenho e um design atraente.
Os compradores em potencial podem esperar por um smartphone com Android atualizado e desempenho fluente do sistema. O rápido armazenamento interno e o moderno SoC oferecem uma experiência fluente. O desempenho gráfico pode ser insuficiente para jogadores de smartphones ou usuários de aplicativos 3D complexos. No entanto, esta é uma fraqueza que o P20 Lite compartilha com seu predecessor. Considerando a capacidade de 3000 mAh, a duração da bateria é um pouco curta, mas ainda é suficiente para quase 10 horas de uso intensivo do dispositivo.
Huawei P20 Lite
-
05/08/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker