Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20 Lite

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

P20 de gama média O Huawei P20 Lite é ofuscado por seus irmãos maiores e sua concorrência também está bem posicionada nessa relação preço-desempenho. Independentemente disso, nossa análise mostra que os compradores deste smartphone de gama média recebem um bom dispositivo.

Huawei P20 Lite (P Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.84 polegadas 18.7:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB (SIM slot 2), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, HSPA, 3G WCDMA: B1/B2/B5/B8, 4G FDD: B1/B3/B7/B8/B20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 148.6 x 71.2
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 30 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 471 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 454 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Dual-camera 16 MP + 2 MP, f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, Headset, Guia de início rápido, EMUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value(head): 0,74 W/kg, SAR value(body): 1,22 W/kg, fanless
peso
145 g, Suprimento de energia: 20 g
Preço
370 EUR

 

Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s ∼74% +16%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s ∼72% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼69% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=211)
201 MBit/s ∼65% +2%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼100% +24%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s ∼95% +18%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼81%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 MBit/s ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=211)
194 MBit/s ∼67% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼58% -28%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
554
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 554 cd/m² Médio: 525.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 528 cd/m²
Contraste: 1035:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
97.8% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P10 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
8%
8%
37%
-3%
Brightness middle
528
545
3%
507
-4%
539
2%
513
-3%
Brightness
525
526
0%
509
-3%
542
3%
506
-4%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
95
7%
93
4%
93
4%
Black Level *
0.51
0.42
18%
0.36
29%
0.42
18%
Contrast
1035
1298
25%
1408
36%
1221
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
4.9
-4%
5.1
-9%
1.6
66%
5
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
8.5
4%
9
-1%
2.6
71%
11.4
-28%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
5.4
16%
6.1
5%
1.5
77%
7.8
-22%
Gamma
2.22 108%
2.31 104%
2.28 105%
2.28 105%
2.2 109%
CCT
7987 81%
7610 85%
8143 80%
6422 101%
7964 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10390 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points ∼93%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei P10 Lite
60438 Points ∼82% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼82% -11%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points ∼97% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=6)
65270 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=307)
71466 Points ∼97% +5%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points ∼77%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points ∼78% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=4)
86967 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (21088 - 266981, n=81)
114287 Points ∼100% +29%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
4793 Points ∼96%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points ∼97% +1%
Huawei P10 Lite
4464 Points ∼89% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼81% -15%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points ∼100% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4793 - 4911, n=6)
4851 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4673 - 8601, n=170)
4525 Points ∼90% -6%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
5704 Points ∼95%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points ∼97% +2%
Huawei P10 Lite
5794 Points ∼97% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼84% -12%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points ∼98% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5704 - 6252, n=6)
5983 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 10264, n=335)
4698 Points ∼79% -18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points ∼93%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points ∼93% 0%
Huawei P10 Lite
654 Points ∼71% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼72% -23%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points ∼100% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=6)
832 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=410)
673 Points ∼73% -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points ∼55%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points ∼99% +79%
Huawei P10 Lite
829 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼100% +80%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points ∼98% +77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (843 - 859, n=6)
850 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=410)
1530 Points ∼100% +80%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points ∼100%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼78% -22%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points ∼69% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=6)
1896 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=410)
1115 Points ∼58% -42%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points ∼95%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points ∼99% +3%
Huawei P10 Lite
2642 Points ∼81% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼80% -17%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points ∼100% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=6)
3039 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=410)
2214 Points ∼68% -29%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points ∼92%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points ∼88% -5%
Huawei P10 Lite
1229 Points ∼79% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼90% -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points ∼100% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=6)
1419 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=413)
1131 Points ∼72% -22%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points ∼78%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points ∼99% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3117, n=6)
3022 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=108)
3998 Points ∼100% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points ∼89%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei P10 Lite
3460 Points ∼83% -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points ∼99% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3342 - 3749, n=6)
3623 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=152)
4105 Points ∼98% +9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points ∼76%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points ∼71% -6%
Huawei P10 Lite
913 Points ∼74% -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points ∼70% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=6)
921 Points ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=153)
1231 Points ∼100% +32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points ∼99%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼89% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼96% -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points ∼92% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=6)
1679 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (585 - 3669, n=260)
1555 Points ∼87% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points ∼19%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points ∼67% +252%
Huawei P10 Lite
326 Points ∼30% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼65% +243%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points ∼65% +243%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (207 - 338, n=6)
279 Points ∼25% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=260)
1096 Points ∼100% +429%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points ∼25%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points ∼81% +226%
Huawei P10 Lite
396 Points ∼38% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼78% +218%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points ∼78% +216%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (257 - 409, n=6)
342 Points ∼33% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=268)
1042 Points ∼100% +305%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points ∼100%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei P10 Lite
1537 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1656 - 1788, n=6)
1719 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (581 - 3642, n=290)
1448 Points ∼82% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points ∼7%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points ∼86% +1053%
Huawei P10 Lite
520 Points ∼36% +377%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼72% +866%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points ∼86% +1048%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (109 - 532, n=6)
351 Points ∼24% +222%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=290)
1460 Points ∼100% +1239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points ∼10%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points ∼100% +868%
Huawei P10 Lite
610 Points ∼46% +342%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼86% +737%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points ∼100% +867%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (138 - 627, n=6)
420 Points ∼31% +204%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=298)
1247 Points ∼93% +804%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points ∼97%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points ∼94% -3%
Huawei P10 Lite
13510 Points ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼95% -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points ∼95% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=6)
13790 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=443)
12098 Points ∼88% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points ∼63%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points ∼100% +58%
Huawei P10 Lite
10603 Points ∼57% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼72% +14%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points ∼100% +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=6)
11107 Points ∼60% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=443)
15622 Points ∼84% +33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points ∼71%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points ∼99% +40%
Huawei P10 Lite
11135 Points ∼66% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼78% +10%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points ∼100% +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=6)
11604 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=444)
13452 Points ∼79% +12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps ∼56%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps ∼88% +58%
Huawei P10 Lite
17 fps ∼50% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼100% +79%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps ∼88% +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 19, n=6)
18.5 fps ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=469)
27 fps ∼79% +42%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps ∼58%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps ∼88% +53%
Huawei P10 Lite
18 fps ∼55% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps ∼94% +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=6)
18.2 fps ∼55% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=472)
23.4 fps ∼71% +23%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps ∼58%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼93% +61%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.2 fps ∼48% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼100% +72%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps ∼93% +61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.7, n=6)
8.2 fps ∼55% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=394)
14.4 fps ∼96% +66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps ∼59%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼93% +57%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.7 fps ∼51% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼100% +69%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps ∼100% +69%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=6)
8.18 fps ∼55% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=396)
14.5 fps ∼97% +63%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps ∼41%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps ∼76% +87%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.2 fps ∼33% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼71% +75%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps ∼76% +87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.3, n=6)
4.67 fps ∼36% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=259)
12.8 fps ∼100% +146%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps ∼44%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps ∼77% +75%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼38% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼70% +61%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps ∼78% +79%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=6)
5 fps ∼39% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3.3 - 110, n=261)
12.8 fps ∼100% +129%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps ∼35%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps ∼62% +77%
Huawei P10 Lite
2.8 fps ∼31% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼58% +68%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps ∼62% +77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=6)
3.03 fps ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.9 - 35, n=191)
8.91 fps ∼100% +187%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps ∼41%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps ∼68% +64%
Huawei P10 Lite
3 fps ∼38% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼65% +58%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps ∼75% +82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=6)
2.97 fps ∼37% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 50, n=194)
7.98 fps ∼100% +142%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points ∼44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659
147 Points ∼25%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=59)
587 Points ∼100%

Legend

 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=327)
34.7 Points ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼93% +38%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.047 Points ∼87% +28%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.993 Points ∼84% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=6)
27.6 Points ∼80% +18%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.368 Points ∼79% +17%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼68%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=463)
5019 Points ∼95% +20%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points ∼93% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5302, n=6)
4782 Points ∼91% +14%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points ∼91% +14%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4589 Points ∼87% +9%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼80%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=482)
11875 ms * ∼100% -10%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼91%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10235.7 ms * ∼86% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=6)
9496 ms * ∼80% +12%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * ∼80% +12%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8590.8 ms * ∼72% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼54% +40%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points ∼100% +23%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points ∼94% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 111, n=6)
99.3 Points ∼94% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=230)
97.9 Points ∼92% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼84% +3%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼81%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
62 Points ∼58% -28%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P20 LiteHTC U11 LifeHuawei P10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A5 2017Sony Xperia XA2Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
-26%
-44%
-23%
-26%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
32.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-53%
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
64.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
50.7 (19.6 - 74.7, n=43)
-27%
42.7 (8.29 - 87.1, n=240)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
53.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
68.9 (21.1 - 86.9, n=43)
-17%
61 (13.5 - 96.5, n=240)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
71.07
50.2
-29%
19.36
-73%
12.13
-83%
13.82
-81%
15.9 (3.4 - 71.1, n=51)
-78%
13.2 (0.14 - 164, n=516)
-81%
Random Read 4KB
48.19
39.3
-18%
72.47
50%
22.41
-53%
43.07
-11%
47.7 (11.4 - 149, n=51)
-1%
33.6 (1.59 - 173, n=516)
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
198.3
120
-39%
129.18
-35%
77.1
-61%
127.38
-36%
157 (40 - 216, n=51)
-21%
69 (2.99 - 216, n=516)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.94
268
-9%
264.3
-10%
182.03
-38%
271.46
-8%
267 (115 - 704, n=51)
-9%
207 (12.1 - 832, n=516)
-30%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.8 °C36.2 °C32 °C 
 36.1 °C36 °C34.6 °C 
 34.8 °C35.7 °C34.1 °C 
Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 35 °C
31.7 °C31.9 °C35.6 °C
32.1 °C32.4 °C36.8 °C
32 °C33.4 °C36.3 °C
Máximo: 36.8 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2422532.941.83137.230.44031.736.65039.641.86328.331.48027.331.510026.934.212526.731.41602429.620020.938.325020.947.631519.546.640018.55450017.562.863017.559.480015.758.9100015.863125016.666.4160015.869.3200015.471.3250015.573.431501674.8400015.875.950001676.5630016.371.2800016.371.61000016.271.31250016.467.51600016.459.6SPL28.684.1N1.153.6median 16.4Huawei P20 Litemedian 63Delta2.111.328.627.224.929.624.624.826.428.830.828.623.62020.222.219.920.717.625.119.142.319.142.917.449.716.95316.857.215.159.216.560.615.664.41567.615.568.715.373.215.775.715.575.315.575.515.47715.875.61674.415.873.516.17116.16717.357.427.985.6159.9median 16Sony Xperia XA2median 670.612.235.245.132.941.137.238.931.736.639.642.728.33427.33026.930.226.736.32441.720.946.520.950.619.551.718.557.517.556.917.556.615.760.915.870.316.675.715.878.515.479.615.581.21679.415.8781674.416.377.316.381.316.283.816.468.316.455.328.690.21.176median 16.4HTC U11 Lifemedian 68.32.113.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.98 / 2 / 2.11 Watt
Carga midlight 3.9 / 5.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
18%
34%
27%
3%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.63
36%
0.38
61%
0.64
35%
0.39
60%
0.832 (0.62 - 1.02, n=6)
15%
0.848 (0.2 - 3.4, n=543)
13%
Idle Average *
2
2.1
-5%
1.87
6%
1.36
32%
1.61
19%
1.992 (1.59 - 2.46, n=6)
-0%
1.686 (0.6 - 6.2, n=542)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.11
2.15
-2%
1.92
9%
1.4
34%
1.62
23%
2.07 (1.71 - 2.51, n=6)
2%
1.914 (0.74 - 6.6, n=543)
9%
Load Average *
3.9
3.34
14%
3.82
2%
2.53
35%
3.12
20%
4.01 (3.23 - 4.61, n=6)
-3%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=537)
-2%
Load Maximum *
5.62
4.83
14%
4.9
13%
3.63
35%
4.92
12%
5.69 (4.93 - 6.39, n=6)
-1%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=537)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 63)
9h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 07min
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
65%
36%
116%
93%
Reader / Idle
750
1820
143%
1410
88%
2418
222%
2503
234%
H.264
470
798
70%
586
25%
984
109%
766
63%
WiFi v1.3
582
725
25%
665
14%
843
45%
886
52%
Load
247
303
23%
286
16%
467
89%
298
21%

Pro

+ Câmera dupla de 16+2 MP
+ Câmera frontal de 16 MP
+ Veloz armazenamento interno
+ Design atraente
+ Tela quase sem marcos

Contra

- Duração da bateria desnecessariamente curta
- Alto-falantes balanceados
- Resultados de benchmark moderados
Review: Huawei P20 Lite. Test device provided by:
Review: Huawei P20 Lite. Test device provided by:

O Huawei P20 Lite apresenta-se como um sólido smartphone de gama média na nossa análise, mas não consegue diferenciar-se da concorrência em termos de desempenho. A câmera dupla de 16 MP tira boas fotos e o sistema como um todo funciona sem problemas, embora isso já seja algo ao qual já estamos acostumados com smartphones de outros fabricantes. O design pode ser o único fator decisivo para uma compra e, embora sua tela quase sem bordas e o entalhe não sejam exclusivos, eles não são encontrados com frequência nessa faixa de preços.

O Huawei P20 Lite é um smartphone para aqueles sem a necessidade de aplicativos 3D complexos que estão procurando um dispositivo do dia-a-dia que tenha bom desempenho e um design atraente.

Os compradores em potencial podem esperar por um smartphone com Android atualizado e desempenho fluente do sistema. O rápido armazenamento interno e o moderno SoC oferecem uma experiência fluente. O desempenho gráfico pode ser insuficiente para jogadores de smartphones ou usuários de aplicativos 3D complexos. No entanto, esta é uma fraqueza que o P20 Lite compartilha com seu predecessor. Considerando a capacidade de 3000 mAh, a duração da bateria é um pouco curta, mas ainda é suficiente para quase 10 horas de uso intensivo do dispositivo.

Huawei P20 Lite - 05/08/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 75%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
18 / 63 → 29%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 76%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
65%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20 Lite
Mike Wobker, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)