Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 6 (2018)

Um Finn frio. A Nokia atualizou seu smartphone Nokia 6 de gama média. Enquanto o nome permanece o mesmo, idealmente, sua configuração e qualidade melhoraram. Vamos descobrir se esse é o caso em nossa análise.
Nokia 6.1 (6 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, até 256 GB (slot SIM 2), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giro, proximidade, bússola, digitais, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900, UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 LTE: 700, 800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 148.8 x 75.8
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 16 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 500 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1.0 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1.12 µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, headset, nenhum, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR-value head (EU): 0.49 W/Kg; SAR-value body (EU): 0.71 W/Kg, fanless
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 76 g
Preço
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

power supply
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
336 MBit/s -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s -16%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +30%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s +17%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s +7%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s -22%
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Color Checker
Color Checker
test chart
test chart
test chart details
test chart details
439
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 446 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 421.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: 684:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Motorola Moto X4
LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.20
Screen
21%
21%
31%
Brightness middle
417
513
23%
469
12%
545
31%
Brightness
421
506
20%
479
14%
526
25%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
86
-2%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.61
0.42
31%
0.37
39%
0.42
31%
Contrast
684
1221
79%
1268
85%
1298
90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.1
5
18%
5.5
10%
4.9
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.2
11.4
-2%
10.7
4%
8.5
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.1
7.8
-10%
6.7
6%
5.4
24%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.2 100%
2.1 105%
2.31 95%
CCT
8362 78%
7964 82%
8064 81%
7610 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2381 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise
↘ 30.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
70445 Points -3%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)
68642 Points -5%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)
89396 Points -1%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X4
5919 Points +8%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)
5632 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +175%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points +6%
Motorola Moto X4
4887 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)
4968 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +130%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X4
1536 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)
1479 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +283%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points +1%
Motorola Moto X4
3279 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)
3147 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +199%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points +14%
Motorola Moto X4
1405 Points +21%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)
1199 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +440%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
1519 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)
1494 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +836%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X4
795 Points -11%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)
859 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +67%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X4
870 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)
853 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +492%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
4115 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)
4009 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +234%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points
Motorola Moto X4
3894 Points +6%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)
3718 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +195%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
16767 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)
16750 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
18355 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)
18279 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
12870 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)
12963 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
1351 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)
1341 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
1259 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)
1258 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +235%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
1816 Points +5%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)
1746 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
835 Points +3%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)
825 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)
2738 Points +236%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
724 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)
718 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)
2733 Points +287%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X4
1811 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)
1734 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)
3156 Points +82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
31 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)
29.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +173%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
30 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)
29.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +723%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
15 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)
13.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +381%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
14 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)
13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +904%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
11 fps +10%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)
9.36 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +509%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps -1%
Motorola Moto X4
9.6 fps -2%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)
9.38 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +910%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps +2%
Motorola Moto X4
5.7 fps -3%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)
5.48 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +636%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps -2%
Motorola Moto X4
5.3 fps -5%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)
5.48 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +970%

Legend

 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +270%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
30.81 Points +9%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.99 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)
28.3 Points 0%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.17 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.37 Points -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +568%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
5050 Points +1%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)
4963 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10236 ms * -3%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9923 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)
9702 ms * +2%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * +4%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
8396 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +84%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)
105.9 Points -9%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
86 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 6 2018Sony Xperia XA2Motorola Moto X4HTC U11 LifeAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
47%
38%
1%
878%
Sequential Read 256KB
272.6
271.5
0%
281.6
3%
268
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
118.3
127.4
8%
120.5
2%
120
1%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
38.78
43.07
11%
45.4
17%
39.3
1%
Random Write 4KB
15.3
13.82
-10%
55.3
261%
50.2
228%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
60 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-14%
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high59 fps
 minimal29 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min30 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 33.3 °C33.5 °C32.9 °C 
 32.9 °C33.4 °C35.4 °C 
 31.9 °C32.9 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
31.2 °C31 °C32 °C
31.2 °C31.6 °C31.9 °C
31.4 °C31.7 °C31.9 °C
Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.245.82532.946.53137.232.24031.738.45039.639.76328.332.28027.330.910026.929.712526.732.51602433.620020.939.125020.947.331519.551.140018.559.250017.568.563017.566.780015.768.5100015.872.9125016.673.6160015.875200015.476.8250015.578.531501676.7400015.876.450001676.1630016.375.5800016.375.51000016.268.61250016.463.61600016.452.1SPL28.687.2N1.167.9median 16.4median 68.5Delta2.211.928.627.224.929.624.624.826.428.830.828.623.62020.222.219.920.717.625.119.142.319.142.917.449.716.95316.857.215.159.216.560.615.664.41567.615.568.715.373.215.775.715.575.315.575.515.47715.875.61674.415.873.516.17116.16717.357.427.985.6159.9median 16median 670.711.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 6 2018Sony Xperia XA2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt
Carga midlight 2.82 / 4.56 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
-6%
-12%
-18%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.39
42%
0.65
3%
0.63
6%
0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.61
9%
1.51
14%
2.1
-19%
1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
1.62
9%
1.57
12%
2.15
-21%
2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13)
-21%
Load Average *
2.82
3.12
-11%
3.88
-38%
3.34
-18%
3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13)
-35%
Load Maximum *
4.56
4.92
-8%
5.47
-20%
4.83
-6%
5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13)
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 02min
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
-15%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1833
2503
37%
1652
-10%
1820
-1%
H.264
675
766
13%
688
2%
798
18%
WiFi v1.3
942
886
-6%
659
-30%
725
-23%
Load
362
298
-18%
289
-20%
303
-16%

Pro

+ Android stock
+ Atualizações de segurança rápidas
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Consumo de energia médio
+ Temperaturas muito baixas
+ Certificado para aptX
+ NFC e Bluetooth 5.0
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Sem bloatware
+ Tela antirrefletiva
+ Boa qualidade de imagem da câmera
+ Carcaça estável
+ Belo design
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Os jogos são exibidos em até 60 fps
+ Tela táctil rápida

Contra

- O headset incluído poderia ter um melhor design
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul visível
- Borda traseira não utilizada na parte inferior da tela
Review: Nokia 6 (2018). Test unit provided by HMD Global DE.
Review: Nokia 6 (2018). Test unit provided by HMD Global DE.

O mais novo produto da série Nokia 6 oferece um pacote interessante, mas a forte concorrência nessa faixa de preços dificulta muito. O modelo de 5,5 polegadas com o painel 16: 9 não tem realmente um único destaque para as vendas. Pelo menos um dos dispositivos de comparação também possui um slot SIM híbrido, 3 GB de RAM e 32 GB de armazenamento. A Nokia também decidiu ir contra a tendência atual de câmeras duplas, o que poderia ser uma desvantagem para compradores para os quais as especificações técnicas são importantes, no entanto, dando uma olhada nas fotos tiradas com a câmera mostra que a qualidade da câmera é tão boa quanto como a de câmeras duplas. Os puristas podem apreciar o sistema operacional Android completamente intacto e o fato de que não há software desnecessário instalado no telefone. As atualizações de segurança são instaladas diretamente pela Google graças ao Android One e podemos esperar mais atualizações do sistema.  

Elegância, alto desempenho, sucesso completo ... em outras palavras: Um verdadeiro Nokia

O Nokia 6 oferece um excelente pacote: Ele tem um SoC rápido que pode atender todos os nossos requisitos atuais para um smartphone, um exterior de boa aparência, baixas temperaturas e uma boa configuração a um preço atraente. Não experimentamos fraquezas durante o nosso teste e definitivamente podemos recomendá-lo, considerando seu preço de $290.

Nokia 6 2018 - 05/15/2018 v6(old)
Florian Schaar

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
46 / 60 → 76%
Peso
90%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 63 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
73%
Médio
76%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 6 (2018)
Florian Schaar, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)