Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot J3 Pro

Name: Cubot J3 Pro
Brand: Cubot

Torne-se Pro. O Cubot J3 Pro é outro smartphone de nível de entrada do fabricante chinês. Será que o modelo “Pro” pode ter sucesso onde seu irmão menor ficou aquém? Leia mais para descobrir o que o apelido Pro acrescenta e se o J3 Pro pode desafiar melhor seus concorrentes orçamentários do que o J3 pôde.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/11/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Cubot J3 Pro (J Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6739 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8100

Memória

1024 MB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 18:9, 960 x 480 pixel 195 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 12.5 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: COnector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB , 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 150.3 x 72

Bateria

10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix contrast AF, LED Flash. 2.0 MP depth of field secondary sensor
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Ferramenta SIM, capa de silicone, SAR values: Body – 1.582 W/kg, Head - 0.356 W/kg. LTE Cat. 6: 300 MBit/s download and 50 MBit/s upload speeds, fanless

peso

175 g, Suprimento de energia: 52 g

Preço

99 Euro

Links

Cubot página inicial
Cubot Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Cubot J3 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.3 (49^min - 59^max) MBit/s
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s -1%
Blackview A20 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s -14%
Wiko View Lite PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 MBit/s -82%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +516%
Cubot J3 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	61 (44^min - 62^max) MBit/s
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 (29^min - 54^max) MBit/s -20%
Blackview A20 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	44.4 MBit/s -27%
Wiko View Lite PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 MBit/s -90%

Cubot J3 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.9 (44-62)

Cubot J3 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.3 (49-59)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


439 cd/m²	482 cd/m²	481 cd/m²
426 cd/m²	476 cd/m²	484 cd/m²
426 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	455 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 484 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 459.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 476 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 12.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
88% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.273

	Cubot J3 Pro IPS, 960x480, 5.50	Blackview A20 IPS, 960x480, 5.50	Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	Wiko View Lite IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Screen		-11%	28%	29%
Brightness middle	476	364 -24%	338 -29%	524 10%
Brightness	459	375 -18%	327 -29%	499 9%
Brightness Distribution	88	90 2%	82 -7%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.75	0.71 5%	0.27 64%	0.6 20%
Contrast	635	513 -19%	1252 97%	873 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.14	10.12 -24%	5.36 34%	4.75 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.68	19.63 -18%	9.77 41%	8.45 49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	12.2	11.1 9%	6.2 49%	4.3 65%
Gamma	2.273 ^97%	2.722 ^81%	2.345 ^94%	2.248 ^98%
CCT	7643 ^85%	10121 ^64%	8460 ^77%	7261 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 35 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	571 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	427 Points -25%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	636 Points +11%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	653 Points +14%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	437 Points -23%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (571 - 675, n=14)	632 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +816%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1447 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	1160 Points -20%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1602 Points +11%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1846 Points +28%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	1174 Points -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1896, n=14)	1733 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +871%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	3956 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2696 Points -32%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4310 Points +9%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2695 Points -32%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11)	4323 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +281%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	2951 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3146 Points +7%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3068 Points +4%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16)	3206 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +268%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	3392 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2924 Points -14%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6133 Points +81%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4185 Points +23%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2920 Points -14%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3392 - 4339, n=17)	3912 Points +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	2880 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2470 Points -14%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5487 Points +91%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3582 Points +24%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2469 Points -14%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2878 - 4346, n=17)	3398 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	8980 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	8200 Points -9%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10427 Points +16%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10197 Points +14%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	8093 Points -10%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7103 - 10981, n=17)	9367 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	58 Points
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	151 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 211, n=17)	157.5 Points
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	46 Points
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	125 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 185, n=17)	131.6 Points
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	892 Points
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	574 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (445 - 690, n=17)	567 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	297 Points
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	195 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (159 - 225, n=16)	192.4 Points
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	250 Points
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	163 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (131 - 189, n=16)	161.4 Points
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	885 Points
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	636 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (530 - 698, n=16)	615 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	80 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	103 Points +29%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (80 - 221, n=17)	104.9 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +3344%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	65 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	83 Points +28%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (65 - 185, n=17)	85.4 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +4132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	486 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	585 Points +20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (486 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +551%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	94 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	121 Points +29%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (93 - 225, n=14)	120.2 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +7067%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	76 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	98 Points +29%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (75 - 189, n=14)	98.1 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +12693%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	573 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	642 Points +12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (573 - 677, n=14)	614 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +637%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	13 fps
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	10 fps -23%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	14 fps +8%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	9.6 fps -26%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	11 fps -15%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 15, n=17)	10.1 fps -22%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +551%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	5 fps
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	4.4 fps -12%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps +52%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	6 fps +20%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	4.4 fps -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=17)	5.64 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +4840%

GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	8.1 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6.1 fps -25%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	5.4 fps -33%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16)	5.61 fps -31%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +791%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	4.7 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3.4 fps -28%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)	3.51 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +1196%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1.3 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.6 fps +23%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)	1.494 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +7515%

GFXBench - on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1.8 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.5 fps -17%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)	1.553 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +2311%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	25012 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	24802 Points -1%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	37484 Points +50%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	34225 Points +37%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (25012 - 38060, n=13)	33655 Points +35%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	477 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	418 Points -12%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	643 Points +35%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	186 Points -61%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	384 Points -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (162 - 637, n=15)	291 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +1107%
System (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1103 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	969 Points -12%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1228 Points +11%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1342 Points +22%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	957 Points -13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1103 - 1526, n=15)	1294 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +777%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	524 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	376 Points -28%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	502 Points -4%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	494 Points -6%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	266 Points -49%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (420 - 1039, n=15)	768 Points +47%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +1096%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	150 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	145 Points -3%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	428 Points +185%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	186 Points +24%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	145 Points -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 190, n=15)	160.5 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +9380%
Web (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	597 Points
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	580 Points -3%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	649 Points +9%
Wiko View Lite Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10 Points -98%
Cubot J3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	587 Points -2%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 624, n=15)	165.4 Points -72%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +150%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)	19213 ms * -16%
Cubot J3 Pro (Chrome 73)	16599 ms *
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)	16427 ms * +1%
Wiko View Lite (Chrome 67)	15713 ms * +5%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	13821 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +90%

* ... smaller is better

	Cubot J3 Pro	Blackview A20	Nokia 2.1	Wiko View Lite	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-70%	26%	4%	-22%	1549%
Sequential Read 256KB	235.6	90.2 -62%	288.3 22%	253.2 7%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -30%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 540%
Sequential Write 256KB	47.5	8 -83%	51.2 8%	44.45 -6%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -9%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 2254%
Random Read 4KB	27.2	11.3 -58%	50.5 86%	27.35 1%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -20%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 808%
Random Write 4KB	10.1	3.4 -66%	13.45 33%	11.05 9%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -20%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 2593%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	74.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	20.6 ?(Kingston 32GB) -72%	79.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	80.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -21%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	11.2 ?(Kingston 32GB) -81%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -34%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.1 °C	31.8 °C	32.4 °C
43.1 °C	31.7 °C	34 °C
42.1 °C	31.3 °C	32.2 °C

Máximo: 43.1 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C


42.5 °C	33 °C	32 °C
43.5 °C	33 °C	32.5 °C
43.1 °C	33.1 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 43.5 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Cubot J3 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 2.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.4 / 1.8 / 2.4 Watt
Carga	5.5 / 7.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Cubot J3 Pro 2800 mAh	Blackview A20 3000 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Wiko View Lite 3000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6739	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	36%	-3%	-4%	14%
Idle Minimum *	1.4	1.1 21%	0.7 50%	1.2 14%	1.522 ?(0.87 - 2.8, n=16) -9%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 36%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.5 17%	1.2 33%	2 -11%	2.17 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=16) -21%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Maximum *	2.4	2.3 4%	1.9 21%	3.2 -33%	2.86 ?(1.68 - 6.3, n=16) -19%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 32%
Load Average *	5.5	4.8 13%	3.2 42%	5.2 5%	4.73 ?(2.8 - 7, n=16) 14%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -1%
Load Maximum *	7.2	6.5 10%	4.8 33%	6.4 11%	5.99 ?(3.5 - 11.9, n=16) 17%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		8h 52min

	Cubot J3 Pro 2800 mAh	Blackview A20 3000 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Wiko View Lite 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	532	556 5%	809 52%	638 20%

Pro

+ Duração decente da bateria, apesar da bateria pequena

+ Sensor de digitais confiável

+ Bateria substituível

+ Conectividade LTE

+ Tela relativamente brilhante

Contra

- Alto falante mono ruim

- Altas temperaturas da superfície

- Câmeras comparativamente pobres

- GPS inexato

O Cubot J3 Pro é certamente digno do cargo de €30 sobre o J3. Melhora em quase todas as áreas que seu irmão menor não o faz e também sem nenhuma falha séria. Além disso, mantém os aspectos positivos do J3 também, como a bateria substituível, juntamente com seus slots de cartão dual-SIM e microSD dedicados.

O Cubot J3 Pro é um smartphone de orçamento bem equipado, com alguns compromissos típicos de dispositivos desta faixa de preço.

Nosso modelo de teste é, portanto, um dispositivo muito mais completo e melhor concebido do que seu irmão menor, embora tenha algumas desvantagens típicas de smartphones baratos. Sua tela não é tão precisa quanto a cor e seu alto-falante mono não é nada para se escrever. Da mesma forma, ele tem temperaturas de superfície mais altas do que muitos dispositivos de gama média, e talvez o mais importante é que seu SoC e RAM de 1 GB são notoriamente pouco potentes. Nós não somos fãs de sua carcaça de plástico, nem do seu módulo GPS impreciso.

Se você pode viver com todas essas restrições, então o Cubot J3 Pro é um smartphone decente para o seu valor. Você também recebe algumas coisas boas, como um sensor de digitais e câmeras duplas traseiras, o que nem sempre acontece em smartphones econômicos.

Cubot J3 Pro - 2019-04-09 04/09/2019 v6^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

62%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

36 / 60 → 59%

Peso

90%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

79%

Desempenho do jogos

5 / 63 → 8%

Desempenho da aplicação

30 / 70 → 43%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

50 / 91 → 55%

Camera

54%

Médio

64%

74%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot J3 Pro

Florian Schmitt, 2019-04-11 (Update: 2019-04-11)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot J3 Pro

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Cubot J3 Pro audio analysis

Nokia 2.1 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare