Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot J3 Pro

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/11/2019

Torne-se Pro. O Cubot J3 Pro é outro smartphone de nível de entrada do fabricante chinês. Será que o modelo “Pro” pode ter sucesso onde seu irmão menor ficou aquém? Leia mais para descobrir o que o apelido Pro acrescenta e se o J3 Pro pode desafiar melhor seus concorrentes orçamentários do que o J3 pôde.

Cubot J3 Pro
Processador
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8100
Memória
1024 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 18:9, 960 x 480 pixel 195 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: COnector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB , 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 150.3 x 72
Bateria
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix contrast AF, LED Flash. 2.0 MP depth of field secondary sensor
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Ferramenta SIM, capa de silicone, SAR values: Body – 1.582 W/kg, Head - 0.356 W/kg. LTE Cat. 6: 300 MBit/s download and 50 MBit/s upload speeds, fanless
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 52 g
Preço
99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Cubot J3 Pro
Cubot J3 Pro
Cubot J3 Pro
Cubot J3 Pro

Size Comparison

153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g150.3 mm 72 mm 8.8 mm 175 g149.4 mm 70.7 mm 8.5 mm 147 g146.7 mm 70.7 mm 9.6 mm 170 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=367)
219 MBit/s ∼100% +259%
Cubot J3 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
61 (min: 44, max: 62) MBit/s ∼28%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼22% -20%
Blackview A20
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
44.4 MBit/s ∼20% -27%
Wiko View Lite
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5.9 MBit/s ∼3% -90%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=367)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +294%
Cubot J3 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 (min: 49, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -1%
Blackview A20
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼22% -14%
Wiko View Lite
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 MBit/s ∼4% -82%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.9 (44-62)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.3 (49-59)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Cubot J3 Pro - Overview
GPS test: Cubot J3 Pro - Overview
GPS test: Cubot J3 Pro - Loop
GPS test: Cubot J3 Pro - Loop
GPS test: Cubot J3 Pro - Bridge
GPS test: Cubot J3 Pro - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
439
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 484 cd/m² Médio: 459.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 476 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.14 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 12.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
88% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.273
Cubot J3 Pro
IPS, 960x480, 5.5
Blackview A20
IPS, 960x480, 5.5
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Wiko View Lite
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Screen
-11%
28%
29%
Brightness middle
476
364
-24%
338
-29%
524
10%
Brightness
459
375
-18%
327
-29%
499
9%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
82
-7%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.75
0.71
5%
0.27
64%
0.6
20%
Contrast
635
513
-19%
1252
97%
873
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.14
10.12
-24%
5.36
34%
4.75
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
16.68
19.63
-18%
9.77
41%
8.45
49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.2
11.1
9%
6.2
49%
4.3
65%
Gamma
2.273 97%
2.722 81%
2.345 94%
2.248 98%
CCT
7643 85%
10121 64%
8460 77%
7261 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9715 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 35 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1447 Points ∼33%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1160 Points ∼26% -20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼36% +11%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1846 Points ∼42% +28%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1174 Points ∼26% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1418 - 1852, n=12)
1567 Points ∼35% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=303)
4448 Points ∼100% +207%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
571 Points ∼44%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
427 Points ∼33% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼49% +11%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
653 Points ∼50% +14%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
437 Points ∼33% -23%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (571 - 665, n=12)
571 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=304)
1309 Points ∼100% +129%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2951 Points ∼61%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼66% +7%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3068 Points ∼64% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2630 - 3320, n=13)
2485 Points ∼52% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=313)
4800 Points ∼100% +63%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
3956 Points ∼76%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2696 Points ∼52% -32%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4310 Points ∼82% +9%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2695 Points ∼52% -32%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (3956 - 4711, n=10)
3386 Points ∼65% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2695 - 13531, n=482)
5229 Points ∼100% +32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
573 Points ∼32%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
642 Points ∼36% +12%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (573 - 645, n=12)
452 Points ∼25% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4439, n=328)
1777 Points ∼100% +210%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
76 Points ∼5%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
98 Points ∼6% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (75 - 102, n=12)
64.8 Points ∼4% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=328)
1520 Points ∼100% +1900%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
94 Points ∼7%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
121 Points ∼9% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (93 - 125, n=12)
79.9 Points ∼6% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 5913, n=331)
1416 Points ∼100% +1406%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼50%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
636 Points ∼36%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (530 - 658, n=12)
552 Points ∼31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=343)
1754 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼12%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
163 Points ∼8%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (131 - 184, n=12)
141 Points ∼7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=343)
2095 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼17%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
195 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (159 - 215, n=12)
169 Points ∼9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=344)
1779 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
486 Points ∼28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
585 Points ∼34% +20%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (486 - 589, n=13)
503 Points ∼29% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4216, n=404)
1709 Points ∼100% +252%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
65 Points ∼5%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
83 Points ∼7% +28%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (65 - 92, n=13)
70.3 Points ∼6% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6355, n=406)
1249 Points ∼100% +1822%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
80 Points ∼7%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
103 Points ∼9% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (80 - 113, n=13)
86.9 Points ∼7% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5509, n=414)
1195 Points ∼100% +1394%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼55%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
574 Points ∼36%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (445 - 620, n=12)
541 Points ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=437)
1613 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼3%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
125 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (102 - 148, n=12)
122 Points ∼7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=437)
1697 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼4%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
151 Points ∼10%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (120 - 178, n=12)
147 Points ∼10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=445)
1455 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
8980 Points ∼67%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8200 Points ∼62% -9%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼78% +16%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10197 Points ∼77% +14%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8093 Points ∼61% -10%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7103 - 10197, n=12)
9194 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=597)
13317 Points ∼100% +48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2880 Points ∼15%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2470 Points ∼13% -14%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼29% +91%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3582 Points ∼19% +24%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2469 Points ∼13% -14%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2878 - 4346, n=12)
3298 Points ∼17% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=597)
19059 Points ∼100% +562%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
3392 Points ∼21%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2924 Points ∼18% -14%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼38% +81%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4185 Points ∼26% +23%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2920 Points ∼18% -14%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (3392 - 4203, n=12)
3781 Points ∼24% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=598)
15973 Points ∼100% +371%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
5 fps ∼15%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼13% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼23% +52%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6 fps ∼18% +20%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼13% -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.9 - 6.1, n=13)
5.52 fps ∼17% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.4 - 251, n=621)
33.1 fps ∼100% +562%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
13 fps ∼50%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
10 fps ∼38% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼54% +8%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9.6 fps ∼37% -26%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
11 fps ∼42% -15%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (8.2 - 13, n=13)
9.44 fps ∼36% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11 - 120, n=624)
26 fps ∼100% +100%
GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
8.1 fps ∼48%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼36% -25%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5.4 fps ∼32% -33%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.4 - 8.1, n=13)
5.3 fps ∼31% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 115, n=545)
16.9 fps ∼100% +109%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1.3 fps ∼9%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.6 fps ∼11% +23%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=13)
1.462 fps ∼10% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.3 - 88, n=402)
15.1 fps ∼100% +1062%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
4.7 fps ∼32%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3.4 fps ∼23% -28%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.6 - 4.7, n=13)
3.28 fps ∼22% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 110, n=405)
14.6 fps ∼100% +211%
GFXBench - on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1.8 fps ∼19%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.5 fps ∼16% -17%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.1 - 1.8, n=12)
1.467 fps ∼16% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 58, n=335)
9.31 fps ∼100% +417%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
25012 Points ∼31%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
24802 Points ∼31% -1%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
37484 Points ∼46% +50%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
34225 Points ∼42% +37%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (25012 - 38060, n=13)
33655 Points ∼41% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=437)
81300 Points ∼100% +225%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
597 Points ∼83%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
580 Points ∼81% -3%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼90% +9%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
587 Points ∼82% -2%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7 - 597, n=12)
153 Points ∼21% -74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=554)
720 Points ∼100% +21%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
150 Points ∼8%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼8% -3%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼23% +185%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
186 Points ∼10% +24%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼8% -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (18 - 188, n=12)
154 Points ∼8% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=554)
1840 Points ∼100% +1127%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
524 Points ∼39%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
376 Points ∼28% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼37% -4%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
494 Points ∼37% -6%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
266 Points ∼20% -49%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (420 - 1034, n=12)
721 Points ∼53% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=554)
1351 Points ∼100% +158%
System (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1103 Points ∼41%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
969 Points ∼36% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼45% +11%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1342 Points ∼50% +22%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
957 Points ∼35% -13%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1103 - 1526, n=12)
1273 Points ∼47% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=554)
2702 Points ∼100% +145%
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
477 Points ∼36%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
418 Points ∼31% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼48% +35%
Wiko View Lite
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
186 Points ∼14% -61%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
384 Points ∼29% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (162 - 637, n=12)
276 Points ∼21% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=558)
1341 Points ∼100% +181%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
19213 ms * ∼100% -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (15713 - 18154, n=13)
16796 ms * ∼87% -1%
Cubot J3 Pro (Chrome 73)
16599 ms * ∼86%
Wiko View Lite (Chrome 67)
15712.7 ms * ∼82% +5%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼72% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=633)
11115 ms * ∼58% +33%

* ... smaller is better

Cubot J3 ProBlackview A20Nokia 2.1Wiko View LiteAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-70%
26%
4%
-26%
32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11.2 (Kingston 32GB)
-81%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
37.7 (6.38 - 65.4, n=119)
-37%
47.4 (9.5 - 87.1, n=369)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
20.6 (Kingston 32GB)
-72%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
56.5 (8.1 - 87.7, n=119)
-24%
65.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=369)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
10.1
3.4
-66%
13.45
33%
11.05
9%
7.66 (0.49 - 43.2, n=234)
-24%
18.5 (0.14 - 250, n=665)
83%
Random Read 4KB
27.2
11.3
-58%
50.46
86%
27.35
1%
20.5 (2.49 - 61.7, n=234)
-25%
41.9 (1.59 - 174, n=665)
54%
Sequential Write 256KB
47.5
8
-83%
51.18
8%
44.45
-6%
41.5 (8.74 - 97.6, n=234)
-13%
87.2 (2.99 - 388, n=665)
84%
Sequential Read 256KB
235.6
90.2
-62%
288.26
22%
253.17
7%
160 (9.66 - 294, n=234)
-32%
245 (12.1 - 912, n=665)
4%
Carga Máxima
 41.1 °C31.8 °C32.4 °C 
 43.1 °C31.7 °C34 °C 
 42.1 °C31.3 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 43.1 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C
42.5 °C33 °C32 °C
43.5 °C33 °C32.5 °C
43.1 °C33.1 °C32 °C
Máximo: 43.5 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.639.4254341.73134.132.84040.534.15040.239.66333.929.38023.825.51002626.312528.326.216022.723.720018.722.525018.328.631517.538.740017.148.350017.156.763015.8628001668.6100017.573.312501576.116001671.920001665.9250015.858.7315014.659.4400014.463.8500014.466630014.564800014.564.51000014.559.81250014.760.91600014.755.6SPL61.464.527.980.7N12.318.1142median 16median 59.8Delta211.936.93936.539.637.235.237.640.431.737.123.830.324.43123.626.919.922.623.325.518.43218.238.815.843.414.651.415.556.11360.412.364.112.166.311.964.810.765.510.762.710.55710.353.510.758.810.560.910.563.410.665.810.663.610.564.210.65752.561.424.174.78.214.50.633.2median 11.9median 58.83.410.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCubot J3 ProNokia 2.1
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot J3 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 2.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.4 / 1.8 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 5.5 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cubot J3 Pro
2800 mAh
Blackview A20
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Wiko View Lite
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
13%
36%
-3%
-5%
20%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
1.1
21%
0.7
50%
1.2
14%
1.53 (0.87 - 2.8, n=15)
-9%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=700)
37%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.5
17%
1.2
33%
2
-11%
2.2 (1.64 - 3.5, n=15)
-22%
1.738 (0.6 - 6.2, n=699)
3%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
2.3
4%
1.9
21%
3.2
-33%
2.9 (1.68 - 6.3, n=15)
-21%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=700)
16%
Load Average *
5.5
4.8
13%
3.2
42%
5.2
5%
4.76 (2.8 - 7, n=15)
13%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=694)
26%
Load Maximum *
7.2
6.5
10%
4.8
33%
6.4
11%
6.06 (3.5 - 11.9, n=15)
16%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=694)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 52min
Cubot J3 Pro
2800 mAh
Blackview A20
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Wiko View Lite
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
52%
20%
Reader / Idle
WiFi v1.3
532
556
5%
809
52%
638
20%
Load

Pro

+ Duração decente da bateria, apesar da bateria pequena
+ Sensor de digitais confiável
+ Bateria substituível
+ Conectividade LTE
+ Tela relativamente brilhante

Contra

- Alto falante mono ruim
- Altas temperaturas da superfície
- Câmeras comparativamente pobres
- GPS inexato
The Cubot J3 Pro smartphone review.
The Cubot J3 Pro smartphone review.

O Cubot J3 Pro é certamente digno do cargo de €30 sobre o J3. Melhora em quase todas as áreas que seu irmão menor não o faz e também sem nenhuma falha séria. Além disso, mantém os aspectos positivos do J3 também, como a bateria substituível, juntamente com seus slots de cartão dual-SIM e microSD dedicados.

O Cubot J3 Pro é um smartphone de orçamento bem equipado, com alguns compromissos típicos de dispositivos desta faixa de preço.

Nosso modelo de teste é, portanto, um dispositivo muito mais completo e melhor concebido do que seu irmão menor, embora tenha algumas desvantagens típicas de smartphones baratos. Sua tela não é tão precisa quanto a cor e seu alto-falante mono não é nada para se escrever. Da mesma forma, ele tem temperaturas de superfície mais altas do que muitos dispositivos de gama média, e talvez o mais importante é que seu SoC e RAM de 1 GB são notoriamente pouco potentes. Nós não somos fãs de sua carcaça de plástico, nem do seu módulo GPS impreciso.

Se você pode viver com todas essas restrições, então o Cubot J3 Pro é um smartphone decente para o seu valor. Você também recebe algumas coisas boas, como um sensor de digitais e câmeras duplas traseiras, o que nem sempre acontece em smartphones econômicos.

Cubot J3 Pro - 04/09/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
62%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 59%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
5 / 63 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
54%
Médio
64%
74%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot J3 Pro
Florian Schmitt, 2019-04-11 (Update: 2019-04-11)