Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 2.1

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/06/2018

Budget 2.1. O Nokia 2.1 é o sucessor do Nokia 2 e consegue ser mais barato e mais poderoso que seu antecessor. A quantidade de memória RAM e armazenamento flash ainda é escassa, mas o dispositivo roda o Android One Oreo Edition, o que significa que ele permanece atualizado com as últimas correções de segurança. Descubra em nosso teste para quem o Nokia 2.1 é adequado e o que os compradores podem esperar do dispositivo.

Nokia 2.1 (2 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memória
1024 MB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 6 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de Proximidader, micro USB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz. 3G/HSPA: B1, B5, B8. LTE: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.7 x 153.6 x 77.6
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-A para micro USB, fones, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Head - 0.793 W/kg, Body - 1.427 W/kg, fanless
peso
174 g, Suprimento de energia: 58 g
Preço
100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nokia 2.1
Nokia 2.1
Nokia 2.1
Nokia 2.1
Nokia 2.1

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=324)
215 MBit/s ∼100% +341%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 MBit/s ∼46% +101%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼26% +14%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼21% -8%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12.5 MBit/s ∼6% -74%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=324)
209 MBit/s ∼100% +297%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 MBit/s ∼48% +89%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 MBit/s ∼26% +3%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% -11%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14.6 MBit/s ∼7% -72%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø48.2 (29-54)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.7 (27-58)
GPS test: Nokia 2.1 - Overview
GPS test: Nokia 2.1 - Overview
GPS test: Nokia 2.1 - bridge
GPS test: Nokia 2.1 - bridge
GPS test: Nokia 2.1 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Nokia 2.1 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Cycling through a grove

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
341
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 350 cd/m² Médio: 326.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 338 cd/m²
Contraste: 1252:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.36 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.345
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Gigaset GS100
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Nokia 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Wiko Jerry 3
IPS, 960x480, 5.45
Screen
-17%
-7%
18%
-28%
Brightness middle
338
442
31%
527
56%
417
23%
370
9%
Brightness
327
446
36%
503
54%
395
21%
367
12%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
91
11%
88
7%
90
10%
Black Level *
0.27
0.35
-30%
0.68
-152%
0.18
33%
0.4
-48%
Contrast
1252
1263
1%
775
-38%
2317
85%
925
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.36
8.03
-50%
5.3
1%
6.46
-21%
8.58
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.77
15.81
-62%
9.2
6%
10.72
-10%
16.5
-69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
10.4
-68%
5.8
6%
5.8
6%
9.3
-50%
Gamma
2.345 94%
2.02 109%
2.12 104%
2.423 91%
2.083 106%
CCT
8460 77%
10070 65%
7894 82%
7839 83%
9315 70%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9173 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
1405 Points ∼31%
Honor 7A
2127 Points ∼47% +51%
Wiko Jerry 3
875 Points ∼19% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=12)
1340 Points ∼30% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 21070, n=216)
4499 Points ∼100% +220%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
1602 Points ∼37%
Gigaset GS100
1418 Points ∼33% -11%
Nokia 2
1118 Points ∼26% -30%
Honor 7A
2820 Points ∼65% +76%
Wiko Jerry 3
1136 Points ∼26% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=14)
1766 Points ∼41% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1652 - 11598, n=267)
4318 Points ∼100% +170%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
636 Points ∼50%
Gigaset GS100
579 Points ∼46% -9%
Nokia 2
423 Points ∼33% -33%
Honor 7A
675 Points ∼53% +6%
Wiko Jerry 3
431 Points ∼34% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=14)
656 Points ∼52% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (590 - 4824, n=268)
1268 Points ∼100% +99%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
3146 Points ∼68%
Gigaset GS100
2630 Points ∼57% -16%
Nokia 2
2304 Points ∼50% -27%
Honor 7A
3892 Points ∼84% +24%
Wiko Jerry 3
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3629, n=14)
3279 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2828 - 9868, n=276)
4635 Points ∼100% +47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
885 Points ∼52%
Gigaset GS100
611 Points ∼36% -31%
Honor 7A
1285 Points ∼75% +45%
Wiko Jerry 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (375 - 911, n=13)
831 Points ∼49% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=312)
1710 Points ∼100% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
250 Points ∼12%
Gigaset GS100
131 Points ∼6% -48%
Honor 7A
530 Points ∼26% +112%
Wiko Jerry 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (118 - 250, n=13)
238 Points ∼12% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=312)
2048 Points ∼100% +719%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
297 Points ∼17%
Gigaset GS100
159 Points ∼9% -46%
Honor 7A
610 Points ∼35% +105%
Wiko Jerry 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (145 - 298, n=13)
282 Points ∼16% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=313)
1727 Points ∼100% +481%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
892 Points ∼57%
Gigaset GS100
532 Points ∼34% -40%
Nokia 2
539 Points ∼34% -40%
Honor 7A
1259 Points ∼80% +41%
Wiko Jerry 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 907, n=14)
864 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=404)
1567 Points ∼100% +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
46 Points ∼3%
Gigaset GS100
104 Points ∼6% +126%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼7% +161%
Honor 7A
535 Points ∼33% +1063%
Wiko Jerry 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 55, n=14)
47.2 Points ∼3% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=404)
1632 Points ∼100% +3448%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
58 Points ∼4%
Gigaset GS100
127 Points ∼9% +119%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼9% +107%
Honor 7A
613 Points ∼44% +957%
Wiko Jerry 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 70, n=14)
59.7 Points ∼4% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=412)
1395 Points ∼100% +2305%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
10427 Points ∼80%
Gigaset GS100
9159 Points ∼70% -12%
Nokia 2
7150 Points ∼55% -31%
Honor 7A
9249 Points ∼71% -11%
Wiko Jerry 3
8065 Points ∼62% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 10714, n=14)
9677 Points ∼74% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=560)
13023 Points ∼100% +25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
5487 Points ∼30%
Gigaset GS100
2878 Points ∼16% -48%
Nokia 2
4150 Points ∼23% -24%
Honor 7A
9684 Points ∼53% +76%
Wiko Jerry 3
2465 Points ∼14% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5547, n=14)
5258 Points ∼29% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=560)
18171 Points ∼100% +231%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
6133 Points ∼40%
Gigaset GS100
3395 Points ∼22% -45%
Nokia 2
4577 Points ∼30% -25%
Honor 7A
9584 Points ∼63% +56%
Wiko Jerry 3
2915 Points ∼19% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6186, n=14)
5809 Points ∼38% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=561)
15311 Points ∼100% +150%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
7.6 fps ∼24%
Gigaset GS100
5 fps ∼16% -34%
Nokia 2
5.4 fps ∼17% -29%
Honor 7A
16 fps ∼50% +111%
Wiko Jerry 3
4.4 fps ∼14% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=14)
7.36 fps ∼23% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=585)
31.8 fps ∼100% +318%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
14 fps ∼52%
Gigaset GS100
8.2 fps ∼30% -41%
Nokia 2
9.6 fps ∼36% -31%
Honor 7A
27 fps ∼100% +93%
Wiko Jerry 3
12 fps ∼44% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 14, n=14)
13 fps ∼48% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=588)
25.3 fps ∼94% +81%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
2.7 fps ∼16%
Nokia 2
1.6 fps ∼9% -41%
Honor 7A
7.1 fps ∼42% +163%
Wiko Jerry 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 2.8, n=14)
2.68 fps ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=507)
17.1 fps ∼100% +533%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
6.1 fps ∼37%
Gigaset GS100
4.4 fps ∼27% -28%
Nokia 2
4.4 fps ∼27% -28%
Honor 7A
14 fps ∼86% +130%
Wiko Jerry 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 6.4, n=14)
5.64 fps ∼35% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=510)
16.3 fps ∼100% +167%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
37484 Points ∼48%
Gigaset GS100
30702 Points ∼40% -18%
Nokia 2
24924 Points ∼32% -34%
Honor 7A
46126 Points ∼60% +23%
Wiko Jerry 3
23916 Points ∼31% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (30924 - 39106, n=14)
36785 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=406)
77517 Points ∼100% +107%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
649 Points ∼92%
Gigaset GS100
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Nokia 2
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 7A
705 Points ∼100% +9%
Wiko Jerry 3
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10 - 802, n=14)
641 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=519)
702 Points ∼100% +8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
428 Points ∼24%
Gigaset GS100
149 Points ∼9% -65%
Nokia 2
251 Points ∼14% -41%
Honor 7A
739 Points ∼42% +73%
Wiko Jerry 3
145 Points ∼8% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (428 - 447, n=14)
438 Points ∼25% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=519)
1752 Points ∼100% +309%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
502 Points ∼39%
Gigaset GS100
431 Points ∼34% -14%
Nokia 2
233 Points ∼18% -54%
Honor 7A
1209 Points ∼95% +141%
Wiko Jerry 3
373 Points ∼29% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (367 - 1372, n=14)
717 Points ∼56% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=519)
1278 Points ∼100% +155%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
1228 Points ∼48%
Gigaset GS100
1115 Points ∼43% -9%
Nokia 2
901 Points ∼35% -27%
Honor 7A
1962 Points ∼76% +60%
Wiko Jerry 3
963 Points ∼37% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=14)
1283 Points ∼50% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=519)
2571 Points ∼100% +109%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1
643 Points ∼50%
Gigaset GS100
162 Points ∼13% -75%
Nokia 2
149 Points ∼12% -77%
Honor 7A
1055 Points ∼83% +64%
Wiko Jerry 3
150 Points ∼12% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (219 - 891, n=14)
667 Points ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=523)
1276 Points ∼100% +98%

Legend

 
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=443)
37 Points ∼100% +133%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
18.394 Points ∼50% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.9 - 18.7, n=13)
17.7 Points ∼48% +12%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
15.853 Points ∼43%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
13.378 Points ∼36% -16%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
11.607 Points ∼31% -27%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
10.829 Points ∼29% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=579)
5666 Points ∼100% +126%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼60% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2503 - 3289, n=14)
2999 Points ∼53% +20%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼44%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
2093 Points ∼37% -16%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
1948 Points ∼34% -22%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
1645 Points ∼29% -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
19458 ms * ∼100% -41%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
19274.5 ms * ∼99% -39%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
15962 ms * ∼82% -15%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼76% -6%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=14)
13014 ms * ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=599)
11352 ms * ∼58% +18%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 2.1Gigaset GS100Nokia 2Honor 7A Wiko Jerry 3Average 8 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-40%
-27%
-2%
-50%
-57%
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
61.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
7.4 (Kingston 32GB)
-88%
27.4 (11.2 - 61.9, n=20)
-56%
46.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=334)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
16 (Kingston 32GB)
-80%
41.1 (16.3 - 81.9, n=20)
-48%
64.4 (8.2 - 96.5, n=334)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
13.45
6.2
-54%
8.1
-40%
9.4
-30%
11.23
-17%
5.22 (1.08 - 14, n=50)
-61%
17 (0.14 - 250, n=627)
26%
Random Read 4KB
50.46
17.6
-65%
17.44
-65%
39.2
-22%
24.18
-52%
17.5 (8 - 50.5, n=50)
-65%
39.6 (1.59 - 173, n=627)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
51.18
24
-53%
50.77
-1%
72.5
42%
50.81
-1%
21.4 (6.22 - 51.8, n=50)
-58%
82.6 (2.99 - 253, n=627)
61%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.26
97.2
-66%
131.15
-55%
254.8
-12%
117.14
-59%
126 (38.1 - 288, n=50)
-56%
235 (12.1 - 912, n=627)
-18%
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C29.4 °C30.4 °C 
 32.3 °C29.8 °C30.8 °C 
 33.5 °C29.8 °C29.8 °C 
Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C
28.2 °C28.3 °C29.4 °C
27.8 °C28 °C31.2 °C
28.8 °C28.7 °C31.5 °C
Máximo: 31.5 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.9392536.539.63137.235.24037.640.45031.737.16323.830.38024.43110023.626.912519.922.616023.325.520018.43225018.238.831515.843.440014.651.450015.556.16301360.480012.364.1100012.166.3125011.964.8160010.765.5200010.762.7250010.557315010.353.5400010.758.8500010.560.9630010.563.4800010.665.81000010.663.61250010.564.21600010.657SPL52.561.424.174.7N8.214.50.633.2median 11.9median 58.8Delta3.410.642.646.338.438.734.231.337.326.53031.826.62823.222.421.221.12121.616.326.416.636.715.841.213.546.312.251.61252.611.75510.558.79.661.69.563.6965.38.567.48.569.28.371.38.269.38.167.68.165.18.162.38.264.48.353.38.235.265.451.721.959.978.619.17.10.31239median 9.5median 58.72.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 2.1Honor 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 2.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.2 / 1.9 Watt
Carga midlight 3.2 / 4.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Wiko Jerry 3
2500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-52%
6%
-44%
-35%
-48%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.3
-86%
0.55
21%
1.3
-86%
1
-43%
1.134 (0.54 - 4.02, n=14)
-62%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=656)
-25%
Idle Average *
1.2
2.1
-75%
1.02
15%
1.6
-33%
1.5
-25%
2.28 (1.2 - 6, n=14)
-90%
1.725 (0.6 - 6.2, n=655)
-44%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2.9
-53%
1.09
43%
2.9
-53%
2.3
-21%
2.64 (1.62 - 6.64, n=14)
-39%
2 (0.74 - 6.6, n=656)
-5%
Load Average *
3.2
4.4
-38%
4.48
-40%
3.7
-16%
5
-56%
4.31 (2.9 - 9.6, n=14)
-35%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=650)
-26%
Load Maximum *
4.8
5.3
-10%
5.32
-11%
6.4
-33%
6.3
-31%
5.51 (4.3 - 7.34, n=14)
-15%
5.78 (1.2 - 14.2, n=650)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 29min
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Wiko Jerry 3
2500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
809
532
-34%
840
4%
657
-19%
394
-51%

Pro

+ Funcionalidade simultânea dual-SIM e microSD
+ Bem construído
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- RAM e memória flash pequenas
- O sistema é irregular após uma reinicialização
The Nokia 2.1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of:
The Nokia 2.1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of:
notebooksbilliger.de

O Nokia 2.1 é um smartphone econômico com uma ótima duração de bateria e um sistema operacional enxuto. O dispositivo é poderoso o suficiente para a maioria das aplicações diárias, como WhatsApp e até mesmo alguns jogos leves. No entanto, os compradores devem estar cientes de que há apenas 8 GB de armazenamento interno e os aplicativos não podem ser armazenados em um cartão microSD. Isso significa que as pessoas só poderão instalar poucos aplicativos antes que o Nokia 2.1 fique sem espaço.

O Nokia 2.1 é bom valor pelo dinheiro e é um dispositivo potente pelo dinheiro. Em suma, é um smartphone ideal para iniciantes. 

O dispositivo tem funcionalidade dual SIM e possui um slot para cartão microSD dedicado e possui câmeras surpreendentemente boas. Infelizmente, a tela é decepcionante. No geral, a funcionalidade dual SIM abre a possibilidade de adicionar o SIM do seu dispositivo principal para situações em que você preferiria usar um smartphone secundário mais barato.

Nokia 2.1 - 11/29/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
72%
Teclado
62 / 75 → 82%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
35 / 60 → 59%
Peso
90%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
23 / 70 → 33%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
44%
Médio
65%
75%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 2.1
Mike Wobker, 2018-12- 6 (Update: 2018-12-11)