Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 10 Lite

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/12/2019

Two are better than one. O Honor 10 Lite é quase exatamente igual ao Huawei P Smart 2019. Quase não existem diferenças nas especificações, e até o preço é o mesmo. Esclarecemos em nossa análise se a única melhoria que os usuários do Honor 10 Lite podem realmente esperar é uma câmera selfie melhor.

Honor 10 Lite (10 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
6.21 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (até 512 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, proximidade, bússola, microUSB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900/1800), UMTS WCDMA (900/2100), LTE (1/3/7/8/20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 154.8 x 73.6
Bateria
3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Dual: 13MP (f/1.8) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/2.0, 0.9µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo MicroUSB, ferramenta SIM, capa protetora, EMUI 9, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.60 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.07 W/kg, fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g
Preço
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 162 g153.4 mm 74.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g149.5 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼100% +636%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 (min: 318, max: 347) MBit/s ∼95% +596%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 200, max: 344) MBit/s ∼94% +594%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼78% +476%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=367)
219 MBit/s ∼62% +352%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼46% +239%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 (min: 42, max: 52) MBit/s ∼14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 313, max: 342) MBit/s ∼100% +711%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼96% +675%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 121, max: 348) MBit/s ∼93% +655%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼85% +590%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼67% +447%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=367)
210 MBit/s ∼63% +408%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.3 (min: 29, max: 56) MBit/s ∼12%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø48.3 (42-52)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø41.4 (29-56)
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Honor 10 Lite - test chart
Honor 10 Lite - test chart (detail)
433
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 470 cd/m² Médio: 446.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.32 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 805:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Honor 10 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Umidigi Z2 Pro
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Nokia 5.1 Plus
IPS, 1520x720, 5.8
Screen
-18%
21%
15%
-110%
-37%
Brightness middle
467
421
-10%
570
22%
458
-2%
479
3%
513
10%
Brightness
446
389
-13%
565
27%
440
-1%
466
4%
502
13%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
93
4%
85
-4%
73
-18%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.58
0.33
43%
0.35
40%
0.27
53%
0.36
38%
Contrast
805
1276
59%
1309
63%
1774
120%
1425
77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
3.4
-127%
1.5
-0%
1.4
7%
8.2
-447%
5.2
-247%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.5
5.9
-31%
3.6
20%
3.8
16%
16.2
-260%
9.8
-118%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
3.9
-63%
1.2
50%
2.4
-0%
10.5
-338%
4.1
-71%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.47 89%
2.33 94%
CCT
6387 102%
7330 89%
6504 100%
6235 104%
9193 71%
7423 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9705 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 27.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5640 Points ∼100% +79%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼71% +28%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼56% 0%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (3157 - 4083, n=5)
3674 Points ∼65% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=251)
4624 Points ∼82% +46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5266 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5893 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼75% -16%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5407 Points ∼92% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=5)
5486 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=304)
4449 Points ∼75% -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1523 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1621 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼94% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1527 Points ∼94% 0%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=5)
1574 Points ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=305)
1309 Points ∼81% -14%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5803 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6052 Points ∼82% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼73% -7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5951 Points ∼81% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7384 Points ∼100% +27%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
7021 Points ∼95% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=5)
5184 Points ∼70% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=314)
4804 Points ∼65% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7160 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6274 Points ∼63% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼57% -21%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7078 Points ∼72% -1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9893 Points ∼100% +38%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
9065 Points ∼92% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7078 - 9017, n=5)
8144 Points ∼82% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2695 - 13531, n=483)
5234 Points ∼53% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2070 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2758 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼67% -11%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2085 Points ∼76% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2013 Points ∼73% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2377 Points ∼86% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2702, n=6)
2320 Points ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4439, n=329)
1779 Points ∼65% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
839 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1265 Points ∼83% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼41% -25%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
838 Points ∼55% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
881 Points ∼58% +5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
721 Points ∼47% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=6)
824 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=329)
1518 Points ∼100% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
967 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1438 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼51% -24%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
966 Points ∼67% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1007 Points ∼70% +4%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
853 Points ∼59% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=6)
958 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 5913, n=332)
1415 Points ∼98% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2067 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2751 Points ∼99% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼68% -9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2459 Points ∼89% +19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2388 Points ∼86% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2697, n=6)
2367 Points ∼86% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=344)
1756 Points ∼64% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1246 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2015 Points ∼96% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼46% -23%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1225 Points ∼59% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1423 Points ∼68% +14%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1159 Points ∼55% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1317, n=6)
1193 Points ∼57% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=344)
2093 Points ∼100% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1367 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2142 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼50% -22%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1379 Points ∼64% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1595 Points ∼74% +17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1309 Points ∼61% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1485, n=6)
1340 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=345)
1778 Points ∼83% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2326 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2759 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼66% -22%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2392 Points ∼87% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2512 Points ∼91% +8%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2149 Points ∼78% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=6)
2444 Points ∼89% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4216, n=405)
1711 Points ∼62% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1193 Points ∼96% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼51% -7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
703 Points ∼56% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
815 Points ∼65% +19%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
657 Points ∼53% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 812, n=6)
708 Points ∼57% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6355, n=407)
1248 Points ∼100% +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
810 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1365 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼54% -9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
834 Points ∼61% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
959 Points ∼70% +18%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
777 Points ∼57% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 960, n=6)
840 Points ∼62% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5509, n=415)
1194 Points ∼87% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2282 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2719 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼67% -20%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2381 Points ∼88% +4%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2587 Points ∼95% +13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2159 Points ∼79% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2645, n=6)
2413 Points ∼89% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=438)
1615 Points ∼59% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1137 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1929 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼44% -26%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼35% -40%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1112 Points ∼58% -2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
983 Points ∼51% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1280, n=6)
1037 Points ∼54% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=438)
1696 Points ∼88% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1280 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2062 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼47% -25%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
812 Points ∼39% -37%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1273 Points ∼62% -1%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1118 Points ∼54% -13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1445, n=6)
1182 Points ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=446)
1455 Points ∼71% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11211 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20437 Points ∼86% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼59% +24%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11212 Points ∼47% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23697 Points ∼100% +111%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
18065 Points ∼76% +61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 17598, n=6)
14274 Points ∼60% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=598)
13315 Points ∼56% +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19546 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29116 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼53% -20%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19510 Points ∼67% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20991 Points ∼72% +7%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
16820 Points ∼58% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 21538, n=6)
19336 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=598)
19049 Points ∼65% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16775 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26605 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼57% -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16754 Points ∼63% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21538 Points ∼81% +28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
17082 Points ∼64% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 20468, n=6)
17820 Points ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=599)
15969 Points ∼60% -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼100% +28%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼78% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
37 fps ∼74% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
30 fps ∼60% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (39 - 39, n=5)
39 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.4 - 251, n=622)
33.1 fps ∼66% -15%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +31%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼77% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
31 fps ∼66% -14%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
40 fps ∼85% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (36 - 36, n=5)
36 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11 - 120, n=625)
26 fps ∼55% -28%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼95% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼91% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
16 fps ∼73% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (21 - 21, n=5)
21 fps ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 132, n=541)
18 fps ∼82% -14%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼72% +11%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼62% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
29 fps ∼100% +53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (19 - 19, n=5)
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 115, n=546)
16.9 fps ∼58% -11%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼99% +7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼93% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼79% -14%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
9.6 fps ∼64% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (14 - 14, n=5)
14 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.3 - 88, n=403)
15.1 fps ∼100% +8%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼70% +8%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼65% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼55% -15%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (13 - 13, n=5)
13 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 110, n=406)
14.6 fps ∼73% +12%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5.1 fps ∼55% +28%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼44% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.1 fps ∼44% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
6.4 fps ∼69% +60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4 - 7, n=5)
4.66 fps ∼50% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.7 - 59, n=107)
9.34 fps ∼100% +134%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3.2 fps ∼50% +23%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼40% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.6 fps ∼40% 0%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2.1 fps ∼33% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.1, n=5)
2.7 fps ∼42% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 31, n=107)
6.44 fps ∼100% +148%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.1 fps ∼59% +27%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼47% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.6 fps ∼48% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
8.6 fps ∼63% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.4, n=5)
5.8 fps ∼42% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.5 - 59, n=108)
13.7 fps ∼100% +114%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.5 fps ∼56% +21%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼46% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.2 fps ∼47% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
6.2 fps ∼41% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=5)
6.14 fps ∼40% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.75 - 63, n=107)
15.2 fps ∼100% +117%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.6 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼87% +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼75% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.1 fps ∼69% -7%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
5.8 fps ∼56% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.6 - 7.7, n=5)
7.62 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.6 - 54, n=332)
10.3 fps ∼100% +36%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.4 fps ∼90% +24%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼73% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.7 fps ∼72% -1%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
7.4 fps ∼80% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 6.8, n=5)
6.7 fps ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 58, n=336)
9.3 fps ∼100% +37%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11.7 fps ∼38%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
7.98 fps ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (10.3 - 10.3, n=2)
10.3 fps ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.98 - 651, n=46)
30.6 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.78 fps ∼28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.26 - 9.43, n=2)
8.35 fps ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.1 - 606, n=42)
28 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.99 fps ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.38 - 8, n=2)
7.69 fps ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.4 - 739, n=41)
34.2 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
129928 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
143551 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼86% -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
130070 Points ∼91% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
137018 Points ∼95% +5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
119367 Points ∼83% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (129928 - 140188, n=5)
135847 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=226)
124968 Points ∼87% -4%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
118773 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points ∼74%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
104012 Points ∼88%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
110668 Points ∼93%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
91667 Points ∼77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (104012 - 112870, n=4)
110206 Points ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=437)
81300 Points ∼68%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1119 Score ∼57%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1029 Score ∼52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (961 - 1033, n=2)
997 Score ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1029 - 5025, n=46)
1962 Score ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1004 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1086 Points ∼94% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼94% +9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
982 Points ∼85% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1161 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1083 Points ∼93% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=5)
1123 Points ∼97% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=555)
720 Points ∼62% -28%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1470 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2293 Points ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼59% -8%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1469 Points ∼64% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1532 Points ∼67% +4%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1262 Points ∼55% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1470, n=5)
1461 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=555)
1840 Points ∼80% +25%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2969 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2269 Points ∼65% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼70% -18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2972 Points ∼85% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2721 Points ∼78% -8%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2150 Points ∼62% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2969 - 4360, n=5)
3488 Points ∼100% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=555)
1351 Points ∼39% -54%
System (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5026 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5237 Points ∼98% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼84% -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5074 Points ∼95% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3987 Points ∼75% -21%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
3817 Points ∼71% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5026 - 5568, n=5)
5351 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=555)
2705 Points ∼51% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2167 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼86% -7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2159 Points ∼93% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2096 Points ∼90% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1830 Points ∼78% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2159 - 2445, n=5)
2320 Points ∼99% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=559)
1342 Points ∼58% -38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
413 Points ∼56%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
322 Points ∼43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (431 - 431, n=2)
431 Points ∼58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36.3 - 2754, n=85)
744 Points ∼100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼94% +1%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
49.221 Points ∼93%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 50.2, n=5)
48.7 Points ∼92% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼91% -3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
45.789 Points ∼87% -7%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
41.675 Points ∼79% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 273, n=470)
37.8 Points ∼71% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼94% +3%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
9423 Points ∼91%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 9708, n=5)
9314 Points ∼90% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼88% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
8744 Points ∼84% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
8626 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4865 - 43280, n=615)
5910 Points ∼57% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=634)
11105 ms * ∼100% -170%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4611.2 ms * ∼42% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
4309 ms * ∼39% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4310, n=5)
4176 ms * ∼38% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼37% -0%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
4119.7 ms * ∼37%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼36% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼35% +6%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=91)
64.2 Points ∼93% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼90% 0%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼90%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=5)
61.4 Points ∼89% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼83% -8%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
54 Points ∼78% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
49 Points ∼71% -21%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
178 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
169 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼94% -6%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
167 Points ∼94% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (147 - 178, n=5)
163 Points ∼92% -8%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71)
139 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 362, n=312)
117 Points ∼66% -34%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 10 LiteXiaomi Mi 8 LiteSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Huawei P Smart 2019Umidigi Z2 ProNokia 5.1 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-6%
2%
2%
-8%
-14%
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
58.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
59.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
55.7 (58.4 - 74.7, n=92)
-17%
47.4 (9.5 - 87.1, n=369)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
76.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
76.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
73.9 (81.2 - 87.2, n=92)
-2%
65.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=369)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
66.06
18.75
-72%
15.45
-77%
70.7
7%
20.34
-69%
25.65
-61%
23.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=101)
-65%
18.5 (0.14 - 250, n=666)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
45.15
81.25
80%
83.98
86%
45.66
1%
86.22
91%
77.72
72%
53 (11.4 - 149, n=101)
17%
42 (1.59 - 174, n=666)
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.55
172.43
-10%
104.87
-45%
191.4
0%
188.12
-1%
88.92
-53%
172 (40 - 246, n=101)
-10%
87.4 (2.99 - 388, n=666)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.55
282.62
-2%
295.76
2%
288.27
0%
292.94
2%
301.56
5%
272 (115 - 704, n=101)
-6%
245 (12.1 - 912, n=666)
-15%

Arena of Valor

010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø31.2 (29-32)
; high HD: Ø30.7 (27-32)

Asphalt 9: Legends

010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.8 (28-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (29-31)
Carga Máxima
 33.4 °C33.4 °C32.7 °C 
 32.6 °C30.5 °C31.9 °C 
 30.4 °C30.1 °C30.5 °C 
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 31.7 °C
29 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
28.5 °C28.9 °C33.4 °C
28.3 °C29.8 °C32.1 °C
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 30.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2019.932.32520.227.13121.424.24022.922.65026.930.16318.2238022.826.310019.122.712515.825.416016.538.920014.239.625013.344.631515.347.340014.654.850014.757.963014.562.380013.766.2100014.469.1125013.968.7160013.968.4200013.870.6250013.870.3315014.276.1400014.380.9500014.677.5630014.669800014.363.6100001561.9125001552.91600014.742.2SPL26.385.6N0.855.1median 14.5median 62.3Delta0.711.132.830.524.328.818.625.824.325.833.830.221.231.624.829.318.523.916.423.617.138.117.940.716.845.814.947.915.155.714.257.913.963.514.867.514.27014.770.114.468.814.3701473.313.876.914.882.714.478.81571.214.766.114.860.914.853.914.746.526.7870.859.4median 14.8median 63.50.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 10 LiteHuawei P Smart 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.04 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 2.19 / 2.2 Watt
Carga midlight 4.64 / 7.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
17%
4%
14%
30%
-1%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.56
44%
0.71
29%
0.84
16%
0.71
29%
0.56
44%
1.014 (0.84 - 1.3, n=5)
-1%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=700)
12%
Idle Average *
2.19
1.99
9%
1.36
38%
2.21
-1%
2.01
8%
1.72
21%
2.28 (2.19 - 2.5, n=5)
-4%
1.738 (0.6 - 6.2, n=699)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.05
7%
1.47
33%
2.23
-1%
2.03
8%
1.76
20%
2.52 (2.2 - 3.6, n=5)
-15%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=700)
8%
Load Average *
4.64
4.62
-0%
5.13
-11%
4.2
9%
3.61
22%
3.11
33%
4.45 (4.06 - 5, n=5)
4%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=694)
12%
Load Maximum *
7.7
8.94
-16%
7.89
-2%
7.86
-2%
7.34
5%
5.2
32%
7 (6.13 - 7.86, n=5)
9%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=694)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 71)
8h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 58min
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
35%
6%
29%
33%
Reader / Idle
1533
1678
9%
1467
-4%
1293
-16%
1269
-17%
1953
27%
H.264
502
662
32%
836
67%
464
-8%
WiFi v1.3
484
547
13%
605
25%
506
5%
669
38%
779
61%
Load
178
150
-16%
273
53%
257
44%
294
65%
198
11%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Versão Android Pie atual
+ Marcos finos

Contra

- Sem conexão USB Type-C
- WLAN lento
- O desempenho é limitado sob uso intenso
- Duração da bateria medíocre
- Poucas bandas suportadas para GSM e UMTS
Testing the Honor 10 Lite. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Honor 10 Lite. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Em nosso teste, o Honor 10 Lite apresenta-se como um smartphone de gama média de bom desempenho com uma boa câmera selfie. O desempenho do sistema é mais do que suficiente para a maioria das aplicações diárias e oferece reservas suficientes para os jogos atuais. O armazenamento corresponde ao equipamento usual nessa faixa de preço, e o restante dos recursos do smartphone Honor também é competitivo. No entanto, os compradores interessados também devem estar cientes da cobertura de bandas de baixa frequência para GSM e UMTS.

Por cerca de 250 Euros (~$283), o Honor 10 Lite oferece uma boa câmera selfie e um sólido desempenho do sistema na gama média. No entanto, o WLAN lento é desnecessário.

Os compradores interessados talvez possam perguntar sobre as diferenças com o Huawei P Smart (2019). Ele oferece equipamentos de hardware quase idênticos e possui WLAN mais rápida, que também é o maior compromisso entre os dois smartphones. Para os usuários que uma boa câmera frontal é mais importante, devem escolher o Honor 10 Lite, e os usuários que preferirem uma conexão WLAN rápida ficarão mais felizes com o Huawei P Smart (2019). Aqueles que não conseguem decidir podem gostar mais de um dos dispositivos concorrentes.

Honor 10 Lite - 02/08/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
91%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
48 / 63 → 76%
Desempenho da aplicação
57 / 70 → 82%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
63%
Médio
75%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 10 Lite
Mike Wobker, 2019-02-12 (Update: 2019-02-12)