Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/27/2019

Simply good. O smartphone da Xiaomi com a ROM global finalmente chegou ao mercado europeu. O Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite é um smartphone bom e de alta qualidade que não faz um buraco no seu bolso. Leia nossa análise para descobrir o que pode esperar deste dispositivo de 270-Euro (~$307).

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Mi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
6.26 polegadas 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 112 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de movimento, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 156.4 x 75.8
Bateria
3350 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12MP/f1.9/1.4µm + 5MP/f2.0/1.12µm (SAMSUNG S5K5E8)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f2.0/1.8µm (Sony IMX 576)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, adaptador USB-C para f=conector de fones de 3,5mm, capa protetora, ferramenta SIMl, MIUI Global 10.0, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR-value (head): 0,749 W/kg, SAR-value (body): 1,585 W/kg, fanless
peso
169 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 75.4 mm 8.3 mm 175 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g153.4 mm 74.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g149.5 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 (min: 318, max: 347) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 200, max: 344) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
330 (min: 63, max: 342) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 313, max: 342) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼96% +12%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 121, max: 348) MBit/s ∼93% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼85%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (min: 252, max: 263) MBit/s ∼77% -9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼67% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼63% -26%
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite - Test chart
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite - Test chart (Detail)
386
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 421 cd/m² Médio: 388.9 cd/m² Minimum: 0.91 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1276:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Umidigi Z2 Pro
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
HTC U12 Life
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Nokia 5.1 Plus
IPS, 1520x720, 5.8
Screen
19%
-51%
42%
-40%
-8%
Brightness middle
421
458
9%
479
14%
570
35%
468
11%
513
22%
Brightness
389
440
13%
466
20%
565
45%
452
16%
502
29%
Brightness Distribution
85
85
0%
73
-14%
93
9%
90
6%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.33
0.35
-6%
0.27
18%
0.62
-88%
0.36
-9%
Contrast
1276
1309
3%
1774
39%
755
-41%
1425
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
1.4
59%
8.2
-141%
1.5
56%
6.09
-79%
5.2
-53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.9
3.8
36%
16.2
-175%
3.6
39%
10.23
-73%
9.8
-66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2.4
38%
10.5
-169%
1.2
69%
6.8
-74%
4.1
-5%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.47 89%
2.07 106%
2.708 81%
2.33 94%
CCT
7330 89%
6235 104%
9193 71%
6504 100%
6972 93%
7423 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 18 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9447 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28.8 ms rise
↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5640 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
3157 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4026 Points ∼71% -29%
HTC U12 Life
4465 Points ∼79% -21%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9)
5524 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=309)
4566 Points ∼81% -19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5893 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
5407 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4429 Points ∼75% -25%
HTC U12 Life
4914 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=364)
4554 Points ∼77% -23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1621 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1527 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1525 Points ∼94% -6%
HTC U12 Life
1338 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (691 - 4824, n=366)
1356 Points ∼84% -16%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
6052 Points ∼82%
Huawei P Smart 2019
5951 Points ∼81% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7384 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5387 Points ∼73% -11%
HTC U12 Life
5730 Points ∼78% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7021 Points ∼95% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6187, n=10)
6022 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 11440, n=359)
5004 Points ∼68% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
6274 Points ∼63%
Huawei P Smart 2019
7078 Points ∼72% +13%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
9893 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5625 Points ∼57% -10%
HTC U12 Life
6412 Points ∼65% +2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9065 Points ∼92% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=10)
6654 Points ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4096 - 14439, n=527)
5476 Points ∼55% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2758 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2085 Points ∼76% -24%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2013 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1845 Points ∼67% -33%
HTC U12 Life
2386 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2377 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2121 - 2797, n=10)
2654 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=374)
1832 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1265 Points ∼79%
Huawei P Smart 2019
838 Points ∼52% -34%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
881 Points ∼55% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
629 Points ∼39% -50%
HTC U12 Life
869 Points ∼54% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
721 Points ∼45% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1134 - 1268, n=10)
1235 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=374)
1597 Points ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1438 Points ∼97%
Huawei P Smart 2019
966 Points ∼65% -33%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1007 Points ∼68% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
737 Points ∼50% -49%
HTC U12 Life
1012 Points ∼68% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
853 Points ∼57% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1270 - 1442, n=10)
1403 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=377)
1484 Points ∼100% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2751 Points ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2459 Points ∼89% -11%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2765 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1871 Points ∼68% -32%
HTC U12 Life
2343 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2388 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2238 - 2815, n=10)
2700 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4703, n=388)
1807 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2015 Points ∼92%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1225 Points ∼56% -39%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1423 Points ∼65% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
954 Points ∼43% -53%
HTC U12 Life
1403 Points ∼64% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1159 Points ∼53% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1734 - 2033, n=10)
1934 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=388)
2194 Points ∼100% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2142 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1379 Points ∼64% -36%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1595 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1071 Points ∼50% -50%
HTC U12 Life
1540 Points ∼72% -28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1309 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1887 - 2151, n=10)
2055 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 8141, n=389)
1861 Points ∼87% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2759 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2392 Points ∼87% -13%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2512 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1821 Points ∼66% -34%
HTC U12 Life
2281 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2149 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=10)
2573 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4320, n=450)
1762 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1193 Points ∼90%
Huawei P Smart 2019
703 Points ∼53% -41%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
815 Points ∼62% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
634 Points ∼48% -47%
HTC U12 Life
815 Points ∼62% -32%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
657 Points ∼50% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1201, n=10)
1173 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=452)
1324 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1365 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
834 Points ∼61% -39%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
959 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
741 Points ∼54% -46%
HTC U12 Life
951 Points ∼70% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
777 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1175 - 1372, n=11)
1339 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=460)
1262 Points ∼92% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2719 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2381 Points ∼88% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2587 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1829 Points ∼67% -33%
HTC U12 Life
2364 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2159 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=10)
2700 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4454, n=482)
1669 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1929 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
683 Points ∼35% -65%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1112 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
845 Points ∼44% -56%
HTC U12 Life
1336 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
983 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1938, n=10)
1891 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=482)
1802 Points ∼93% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2062 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
812 Points ∼39% -61%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1273 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
960 Points ∼47% -53%
HTC U12 Life
1479 Points ∼72% -28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1118 Points ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2073, n=10)
2025 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7820, n=490)
1543 Points ∼75% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
20437 Points ∼86%
Huawei P Smart 2019
11212 Points ∼47% -45%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
23697 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
13914 Points ∼59% -32%
HTC U12 Life
16924 Points ∼71% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
18065 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=10)
19357 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4811 - 45072, n=642)
13649 Points ∼58% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
29116 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
19510 Points ∼67% -33%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
20991 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15567 Points ∼53% -47%
HTC U12 Life
20778 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16820 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=10)
28566 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (11358 - 162695, n=642)
20023 Points ∼69% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
26605 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
16754 Points ∼63% -37%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
21538 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15167 Points ∼57% -43%
HTC U12 Life
19777 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
17082 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=10)
25808 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (11565 - 83518, n=643)
16599 Points ∼62% -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
50 fps ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
39 fps ∼78% -22%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
37 fps ∼74% -26%
HTC U12 Life
36 fps ∼72% -28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
30 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=10)
48.2 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=670)
35 fps ∼70% -30%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
47 fps ∼98%
Huawei P Smart 2019
36 fps ∼75% -23%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
31 fps ∼65% -34%
HTC U12 Life
35 fps ∼73% -26%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
40 fps ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 52, n=10)
47.8 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=673)
26.9 fps ∼56% -43%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
22 fps ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
21 fps ∼94% -5%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
20 fps ∼90% -9%
HTC U12 Life
16 fps ∼72% -27%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16 fps ∼72% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=10)
22.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=589)
19.3 fps ∼87% -12%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
21 fps ∼72%
Huawei P Smart 2019
19 fps ∼66% -10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
18 fps ∼62% -14%
HTC U12 Life
15 fps ∼52% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
29 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 23, n=10)
21.3 fps ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=594)
17.8 fps ∼61% -15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
15 fps ∼94%
Huawei P Smart 2019
14 fps ∼88% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
12 fps ∼75% -20%
HTC U12 Life
10 fps ∼63% -33%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9.6 fps ∼60% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=10)
14.5 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=450)
15.9 fps ∼100% +6%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
14 fps ∼70%
Huawei P Smart 2019
13 fps ∼65% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
11 fps ∼55% -21%
HTC U12 Life
9.8 fps ∼49% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
20 fps ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=11)
13.7 fps ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=453)
15.1 fps ∼76% +8%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5.1 fps ∼57%
Huawei P Smart 2019
4.1 fps ∼46% -20%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
4.1 fps ∼46% -20%
HTC U12 Life
3.6 fps ∼40% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.4 fps ∼72% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3 - 6.3, n=5)
4.88 fps ∼55% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=153)
8.93 fps ∼100% +75%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3.2 fps ∼52%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2.6 fps ∼42% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2.6 fps ∼42% -19%
HTC U12 Life
2.2 fps ∼36% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2.1 fps ∼34% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3.2 - 4.8, n=5)
3.52 fps ∼57% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=153)
6.17 fps ∼100% +93%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
8.1 fps ∼60%
Huawei P Smart 2019
6.4 fps ∼48% -21%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
6.6 fps ∼49% -19%
HTC U12 Life
5.7 fps ∼43% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
8.6 fps ∼64% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 9.7, n=5)
8.22 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=155)
13.4 fps ∼100% +65%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
8.5 fps ∼57%
Huawei P Smart 2019
7 fps ∼47% -18%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.2 fps ∼49% -15%
HTC U12 Life
6 fps ∼41% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.2 fps ∼42% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.5 - 8.7, n=5)
8.6 fps ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=154)
14.8 fps ∼100% +74%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
9 fps ∼84%
Huawei P Smart 2019
7.7 fps ∼72% -14%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.1 fps ∼66% -21%
HTC U12 Life
6.3 fps ∼59% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
5.8 fps ∼54% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.1 - 9.1, n=10)
8.88 fps ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=379)
10.7 fps ∼100% +19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
8.4 fps ∼87%
Huawei P Smart 2019
6.8 fps ∼71% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
6.7 fps ∼70% -20%
HTC U12 Life
6 fps ∼62% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7.4 fps ∼77% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 9.8, n=11)
8.58 fps ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=383)
9.64 fps ∼100% +15%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
143551 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
130070 Points ∼91% -9%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
137018 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
122826 Points ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Life
116595 Points ∼81% -19%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
119367 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (52607 - 398720, n=272)
130479 Points ∼91% -9%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
118773 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
104012 Points ∼88% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
110668 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
87728 Points ∼74% -26%
HTC U12 Life
95287 Points ∼80% -20%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
91667 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11)
116194 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 283270, n=476)
85674 Points ∼72% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1086 Points ∼94%
Huawei P Smart 2019
982 Points ∼85% -10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1161 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1090 Points ∼94% 0%
HTC U12 Life
1061 Points ∼91% -2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1083 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1146, n=10)
1092 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=602)
742 Points ∼64% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2293 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1469 Points ∼64% -36%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1532 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1356 Points ∼59% -41%
HTC U12 Life
1597 Points ∼70% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1262 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=10)
2257 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=602)
1943 Points ∼85% -15%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2269 Points ∼76%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2972 Points ∼100% +31%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2721 Points ∼92% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2445 Points ∼82% +8%
HTC U12 Life
1979 Points ∼67% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2150 Points ∼72% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=10)
2360 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=602)
1449 Points ∼49% -36%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5237 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
5074 Points ∼97% -3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3987 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4506 Points ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Life
4563 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3817 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=10)
4957 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=602)
2857 Points ∼55% -45%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2332 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2159 Points ∼93% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2096 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2009 Points ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Life
1978 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1830 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=11)
2314 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=606)
1420 Points ∼61% -39%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 5.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=10)
52.4 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼91% -9%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
45.789 Points ∼87% -13%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
44.314 Points ∼84% -16%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
41.675 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=505)
38.8 Points ∼73% -27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=11)
10080 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼88% -12%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
9121 Points ∼88% -12%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
8744 Points ∼84% -16%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
8626 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=663)
6281 Points ∼61% -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=683)
10792 ms * ∼100% -178%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
4757.5 ms * ∼44% -23%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4611.2 ms * ∼43% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
4309 ms * ∼40% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼38% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=10)
4057 ms * ∼38% -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼37% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=134)
63.4 Points ∼92% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=6)
60.7 Points ∼88% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼83% -8%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
54 Points ∼78% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
49 Points ∼71% -21%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
171 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
169 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼98% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
167 Points ∼98% -2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71)
139 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=329)
119 Points ∼70% -30%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteHuawei P Smart 2019Umidigi Z2 ProSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 HTC U12 LifeNokia 5.1 PlusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
1%
-10%
-6%
-4%
11%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
58.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
60.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
59.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
65.9 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
3%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
76.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
82.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
76.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
-10%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
18.75
70.7
277%
20.34
8%
15.45
-18%
16.2
-14%
25.65
37%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
89%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=712)
7%
Random Read 4KB
81.25
45.66
-44%
86.22
6%
83.98
3%
56.71
-30%
77.72
-4%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
-16%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=712)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
172.43
191.4
11%
188.12
9%
104.87
-39%
209.45
21%
88.92
-48%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
0%
92.2 (2.99 - 503, n=712)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
282.62
288.27
2%
292.94
4%
295.76
5%
272.79
-3%
301.56
7%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
1%
259 (12.1 - 1468, n=712)
-8%

Arena of Valor

0102030405060Tooltip
; min: Ø59.9 (55-60)
; high HD: Ø59.5 (49-60)

Asphalt 9: Legends

010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø28.2 (25-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.3 (24-30)
Carga Máxima
 31.6 °C31 °C33.2 °C 
 31.3 °C29.3 °C33 °C 
 30.8 °C28.5 °C32.7 °C 
Máximo: 33.2 °C
Médio: 31.3 °C
27.2 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
28 °C29.5 °C32.7 °C
27.5 °C29.9 °C31.8 °C
Máximo: 32.7 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  26 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204035.82528.127.63124.622.94023.425.55035.739.96326.125.48025.9331002534.312521.127.21601742.420016.147.725013.556.731516.259.940014.962.750014.763.963014.262.580014.360.6100013.365.8125014.171.1160013.973.7200013.676.3250014.477.5315014.275.6400014.775500014.172.6630014.370.4800014.570.21000014.873.81250015.369.21600015.451.4SPL26.485.3N0.859.9median 14.5median 65.8Delta0.89.632.830.524.328.818.625.824.325.833.830.221.231.624.829.318.523.916.423.617.138.117.940.716.845.814.947.915.155.714.257.913.963.514.867.514.27014.770.114.468.814.3701473.313.876.914.882.714.478.81571.214.766.114.860.914.853.914.746.526.7870.859.4median 14.8median 63.50.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 8 LiteHuawei P Smart 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.56 / 1.99 / 2.05 Watt
Carga midlight 4.62 / 8.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
3%
7%
-1%
21%
-6%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.56
0.84
-50%
0.71
-27%
0.71
-27%
0.7
-25%
0.56
-0%
0.738 (0.56 - 1.2, n=10)
-32%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-57%
Idle Average *
1.99
2.21
-11%
2.01
-1%
1.36
32%
1.5
25%
1.72
14%
1.903 (1.4 - 2.2, n=10)
4%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.05
2.23
-9%
2.03
1%
1.47
28%
2.5
-22%
1.76
14%
2.21 (1.54 - 4.1, n=10)
-8%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
1%
Load Average *
4.62
4.2
9%
3.61
22%
5.13
-11%
4.7
-2%
3.11
33%
4.61 (3.47 - 8.2, n=10)
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
12%
Load Maximum *
8.94
7.86
12%
7.34
18%
7.89
12%
7.4
17%
5.2
42%
8.22 (5.93 - 12.2, n=10)
8%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 30min
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
31%
27%
10%
30%
Reader / Idle
1678
1293
-23%
1269
-24%
1467
-13%
1953
16%
H.264
662
464
-30%
836
26%
WiFi v1.3
547
506
-7%
669
22%
605
11%
603
10%
779
42%
Load
150
257
71%
294
96%
273
82%
198
32%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Câmeras muito boas
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ Muito espaço de armazenamento

Contra

- Duração da bateria média
- Sem conector para fones de 3,5 mm
- As configurações são parcialmente restritas por meio de requisitos “sempre on-line” e pela conta Mi
- Sem NFC
- Suporta apenas DRM L3
In review: Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite. Test device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite. Test device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

A Xiaomi revelou o Mi 8 Lite com a ambição de se estabelecer como um dos principais protagonistas do mercado europeu e se distinguir dos smartphones importados da China. A versão global do MIUI 10.0 proprietário da Xiaomi não se presta a críticas, exceto pelo fato de que você precisa criar uma conta Mi. Além disso, os pop-ups ocasionais que nos pedem para avaliar aplicativos não são algo que nos entusiasma.

O desempenho do sistema do Mi 8 Lite é excelente e está no mesmo nível que o resto da concorrência. Além disso, o fabricante chinês eleva o nível do que se espera de um smartphone de gama média equipando o Mi 8 Lite com 6 GB de RAM e 128 GB de armazenamento interno. As câmeras também oferecem uma qualidade de imagem muito boa. Infelizmente, não há chip NFC, e é por isso que o smartphone não pode usar serviços como o Google Pay. Aqueles que não precisam de um fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm e estão satisfeitos com a velocidade do USB 2.0 não conseguirão um smartphone melhor por 270 euros (~$307). 

O Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite coloca a concorrência sob pressão no mercado europeu e oferece uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite - 01/26/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 63 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
60 / 70 → 86%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
67%
Médio
76%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Mike Wobker, 2019-01-27 (Update: 2019-01-30)