Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1276:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26 | Huawei P Smart 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.20 | Umidigi Z2 Pro IPS, 2246x1080, 6.20 | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00 | HTC U12 Life IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Nokia 5.1 Plus IPS, 1520x720, 5.80 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | -51% | 42% | -40% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 421 | 458 9% | 479 14% | 570 35% | 468 11% | 513 22% |
| Brightness | 389 | 440 13% | 466 20% | 565 45% | 452 16% | 502 29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 73 -14% | 93 9% | 90 6% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.35 -6% | 0.27 18% | 0.62 -88% | 0.36 -9% | |
| Contrast | 1276 | 1309 3% | 1774 39% | 755 -41% | 1425 12% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 1.4 59% | 8.2 -141% | 1.5 56% | 6.09 -79% | 5.2 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.9 | 3.8 36% | 16.2 -175% | 3.6 39% | 10.23 -73% | 9.8 -66% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 2.4 38% | 10.5 -169% | 1.2 69% | 6.8 -74% | 4.1 -5% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.47 89% | 2.07 106% | 2.708 81% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7330 89% | 6235 104% | 9193 71% | 6504 100% | 6972 93% | 7423 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 18 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
| HTC U12 Life | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 30, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
| HTC U12 Life | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.2 - 15, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
| HTC U12 Life | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
| HTC U12 Life | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | Huawei P Smart 2019 | Umidigi Z2 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | HTC U12 Life | Nokia 5.1 Plus | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 40% | 1% | -10% | -6% | -4% | 32% | 632% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 282.6 | 288.3 2% | 292.9 4% | 295.8 5% | 272.8 -3% | 301.6 7% | 283 ? 0% | 1505 ? 433% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 172.4 | 191.4 11% | 188.1 9% | 104.9 -39% | 209.4 21% | 88.9 -48% | 193 ? 12% | 1112 ? 545% |
| Random Read 4KB | 81.3 | 45.66 -44% | 86.2 6% | 84 3% | 56.7 -30% | 77.7 -4% | 82.4 ? 1% | 247 ? 204% |
| Random Write 4KB | 18.75 | 70.7 277% | 20.34 8% | 15.45 -18% | 16.2 -14% | 25.65 37% | 54 ? 188% | 271 ? 1345% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.9 ? | 76.2 ? -11% | 76.1 ? -11% | 78.2 ? -9% | 82.3 ? -4% | 76.6 ? -11% | 78.1 ? -9% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64 ? | 66.9 ? 5% | 58.9 ? -8% | 64.4 ? 1% | 60.9 ? -5% | 59.6 ? -7% | 61.8 ? -3% |
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.56 / 1.99 / 2.05 Watt |
| Carga |
4.62 / 8.94 Watt |
    
| |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh | Umidigi Z2 Pro 3550 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Life 3600 mAh | Nokia 5.1 Plus 3060 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | 3% | 7% | -1% | 21% | -34% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.56 | 0.84 -50% | 0.71 -27% | 0.71 -27% | 0.7 -25% | 0.56 -0% | 1.052 ? -88% | 0.897 ? -60% |
| Idle Average * | 1.99 | 2.21 -11% | 2.01 -1% | 1.36 32% | 1.5 25% | 1.72 14% | 2.62 ? -32% | 1.452 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.05 | 2.23 -9% | 2.03 1% | 1.47 28% | 2.5 -22% | 1.76 14% | 2.88 ? -40% | 1.629 ? 21% |
| Load Average * | 4.62 | 4.2 9% | 3.61 22% | 5.13 -11% | 4.7 -2% | 3.11 33% | 5.1 ? -10% | 5.55 ? -20% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.94 | 7.86 12% | 7.34 18% | 7.89 12% | 7.4 17% | 5.2 42% | 9.08 ? -2% | 8.31 ? 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh | Umidigi Z2 Pro 3550 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Life 3600 mAh | Nokia 5.1 Plus 3060 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | 31% | 27% | 10% | 30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1678 | 1293 -23% | 1269 -24% | 1467 -13% | 1953 16% | |
| H.264 | 662 | 464 -30% | 836 26% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 547 | 506 -7% | 669 22% | 605 11% | 603 10% | 779 42% |
| Load | 150 | 257 71% | 294 96% | 273 82% | 198 32% |
Pro
Contra
A Xiaomi revelou o Mi 8 Lite com a ambição de se estabelecer como um dos principais protagonistas do mercado europeu e se distinguir dos smartphones importados da China. A versão global do MIUI 10.0 proprietário da Xiaomi não se presta a críticas, exceto pelo fato de que você precisa criar uma conta Mi. Além disso, os pop-ups ocasionais que nos pedem para avaliar aplicativos não são algo que nos entusiasma.
O desempenho do sistema do Mi 8 Lite é excelente e está no mesmo nível que o resto da concorrência. Além disso, o fabricante chinês eleva o nível do que se espera de um smartphone de gama média equipando o Mi 8 Lite com 6 GB de RAM e 128 GB de armazenamento interno. As câmeras também oferecem uma qualidade de imagem muito boa. Infelizmente, não há chip NFC, e é por isso que o smartphone não pode usar serviços como o Google Pay. Aqueles que não precisam de um fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm e estão satisfeitos com a velocidade do USB 2.0 não conseguirão um smartphone melhor por 270 euros (~$307).
O Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite coloca a concorrência sob pressão no mercado europeu e oferece uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
-
01/26/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker