Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20: uma câmera quádrupla em um smartphone de gama média

Name: Honor 20
Brand: Honor

Câmera na tela e muito armazenamento. A Honor está reduzindo o preço dos smartphones com equipamentos de gama alta. 6 GB de RAM e 128 GB de armazenamento interno, bem como uma câmera quádrupla, soam excelente no papel e os outros recursos também são promissores. Descubra o que o telefone de US$ 500 realmente tem a oferecer em nossa análise.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/21/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 20 (20 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 980 8 x - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76/-A55

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G76 MP10

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.26 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 412 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 116 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (900/1800), 3G WCDMA (900/2100), 4G LTE (1/3/8/20/28/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.87 x 154.25 x 73.97

Bateria

3750 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Quad: 48MP (f/1.8, 28mm, 1/2", 0.8µm) + 16MP (wide angle, f/2.2, 13mm, 1/3.1") + 2MP (f/2.4, 27mm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 0.8µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2, Teclado: onscreen, Adaptador de CA USB, cabo USB Type-C, adaptador de USB Type-C para conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, LED para notificações, Magic UI 2.1.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.84 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.29 W/kg, fanless

peso

174 g, Suprimento de energia: 68 g

Preço

499 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	580 (548^min - 602^max) MBit/s ∼100% +97%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	523 (410^min - 563^max) MBit/s ∼90% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (16.9 - 1368, n=132, last 2 years)	507 MBit/s ∼87% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	389 (366^min - 444^max) MBit/s ∼67% +32%
Honor 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (235^min - 335^max) MBit/s ∼51%
Honor 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	257 (216^min - 290^max) MBit/s ∼44% -13%
Honor 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	236 MBit/s ∼41% -20%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	668 (617^min - 692^max) MBit/s ∼100% +121%
Average of class Smartphone (31.1 - 953, n=133, last 2 years)	479 MBit/s ∼72% +59%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	447 (201^min - 659^max) MBit/s ∼67% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	383 (242^min - 434^max) MBit/s ∼57% +27%
Honor 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	302 (80^min - 331^max) MBit/s ∼45%
Honor 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	283 (248^min - 294^max) MBit/s ∼42% -6%
Honor 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	210 MBit/s ∼31% -30%

Honor 20; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (80-331)

Honor 20; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (235-335)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 4

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


482 cd/m²	477 cd/m²	470 cd/m²
493 cd/m²	481 cd/m²	472 cd/m²
487 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	487 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 493 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 480.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.32 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 491 cd/m²
Contraste: 875:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12

	Honor 20 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26	Honor 20 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26	Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.40	Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6.00
Screen		-119%	-47%	-33%	-66%	-12%
Brightness middle	481	514 7%	555 15%	594 23%	569 18%	409 -15%
Brightness	481	495 3%	537 12%	607 26%	537 12%	410 -15%
Brightness Distribution	95	92 -3%	94 -1%	91 -4%	79 -17%	96 1%
Black Level *	0.55	0.5 9%	0.39 29%		0.31 44%
Contrast	875	1028 17%	1423 63%		1835 110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	5.1 -364%	2.3 -109%	1.51 -37%	3.5 -218%	1.3 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.1	7.8 -271%	6 -186%	4.27 -103%	6 -186%	2.3 -10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	5.8 -346%	3.9 -200%	2.6 -100%	5.1 -292%	1.5 -15%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.3 ^96%	2.19 ^100%	2.219 ^99%	2.36 ^93%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6442 ^101%	8142 ^80%	6212 ^105%	6390 ^102%	6827 ^95%	6621 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19480 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.8 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3297 Points ∼81%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3315 Points ∼81% +1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	1890 Points ∼46% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3429 Points ∼84% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3444 Points ∼84% +4%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1616 Points ∼39% -51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3207 - 3378, n=9)	3303 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (783 - 8169, n=72, last 2 years)	4092 Points ∼100% +24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9813 Points ∼89%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9854 Points ∼90% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	6610 Points ∼60% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10976 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10878 Points ∼99% +11%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5172 Points ∼47% -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9547 - 10024, n=9)	9838 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 21259, n=72, last 2 years)	10952 Points ∼100% +12%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5677 Points ∼66%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5905 Points ∼68% +4%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	8634 Points ∼100% +52%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7703 Points ∼89% +36%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	6479 Points ∼75% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5677 - 9870, n=9)	7355 Points ∼85% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 14621, n=58, last 2 years)	8283 Points ∼96% +46%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9825 Points ∼75%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	10278 Points ∼79% +5%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	8530 Points ∼65% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11167 Points ∼86% +14%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	13047 Points ∼100% +33%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9397 Points ∼72% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9728 - 13531, n=10)	11164 Points ∼86% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (3341 - 19297, n=38, last 2 years)	10778 Points ∼83% +10%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7945 Points ∼81%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7825 Points ∼80% -2%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	7046 Points ∼72% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9296 Points ∼95% +17%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9814 Points ∼100% +24%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7377 Points ∼75% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7567 - 9326, n=10)	8433 Points ∼86% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2612 - 15027, n=78, last 2 years)	8981 Points ∼92% +13%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	35999 Points ∼56%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	34420 Points ∼54% -4%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	29111 Points ∼46% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	63969 Points ∼100% +78%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	26999 Points ∼42% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (34035 - 57073, n=10)	43799 Points ∼68% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (7228 - 113147, n=17, last 2 years)	46705 Points ∼73% +30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	43622 Points ∼42%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	42308 Points ∼41% -3%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	32674 Points ∼31% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	103955 Points ∼100% +138%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	35596 Points ∼34% -18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (42128 - 67956, n=10)	53280 Points ∼51% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (6349 - 200519, n=17, last 2 years)	65719 Points ∼63% +51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	22337 Points ∼66%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20828 Points ∼62% -7%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	21070 Points ∼63% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	27278 Points ∼81% +22%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33697 Points ∼100% +51%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	14631 Points ∼43% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19993 - 37164, n=10)	27047 Points ∼80% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (11896 - 52859, n=17, last 2 years)	26380 Points ∼78% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3347 Points ∼43%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3781 Points ∼48% +13%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	3358 Points ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5478 Points ∼70% +64%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7820 Points ∼100% +134%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2441 Points ∼31% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2567 - 5638, n=10)	4152 Points ∼53% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9221, n=128, last 2 years)	3028 Points ∼39% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3292 Points ∼33%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3749 Points ∼38% +14%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	3573 Points ∼36% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6325 Points ∼63% +92%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9973 Points ∼100% +203%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2428 Points ∼24% -26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2347 - 6111, n=10)	4277 Points ∼43% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 13263, n=128, last 2 years)	3269 Points ∼33% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3557 Points ∼80%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3899 Points ∼88% +10%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2773 Points ∼62% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3726 Points ∼84% +5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4454 Points ∼100% +25%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2489 Points ∼56% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3548 - 4436, n=10)	3942 Points ∼89% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (677 - 4609, n=128, last 2 years)	2766 Points ∼62% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3222 Points ∼40%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3535 Points ∼43% +10%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	3409 Points ∼42% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5460 Points ∼67% +69%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8141 Points ∼100% +153%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2528 Points ∼31% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2525 - 5990, n=10)	4247 Points ∼52% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (149 - 18846, n=196, last 2 years)	5772 Points ∼71% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3459 Points ∼34%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3612 Points ∼35% +4%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	3682 Points ∼36% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6730 Points ∼65% +95%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10290 Points ∼100% +197%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2537 Points ∼25% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2536 - 6350, n=10)	4495 Points ∼44% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 36343, n=195, last 2 years)	8728 Points ∼85% +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2598 Points ∼55%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3288 Points ∼70% +27%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2706 Points ∼58% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3288 Points ∼70% +27%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4703 Points ∼100% +81%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2495 Points ∼53% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2421 - 4997, n=10)	3580 Points ∼76% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (651 - 7019, n=194, last 2 years)	3437 Points ∼73% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4062 Points ∼71%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2276 Points ∼40% -44%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2891 Points ∼51% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5475 Points ∼96% +35%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5705 Points ∼100% +40%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1631 Points ∼29% -60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2276 - 4835, n=10)	3929 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (78 - 7890, n=150, last 2 years)	2273 Points ∼40% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4184 Points ∼66%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2082 Points ∼33% -50%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2993 Points ∼47% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6325 Points ∼100% +51%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6336 Points ∼100% +51%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1487 Points ∼23% -64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2082 - 4937, n=10)	3960 Points ∼63% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 9814, n=150, last 2 years)	2254 Points ∼36% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3685 Points ∼85%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3380 Points ∼78% -8%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2582 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3724 Points ∼86% +1%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4320 Points ∼100% +17%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2466 Points ∼57% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3380 - 4509, n=10)	3889 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (688 - 4679, n=150, last 2 years)	2824 Points ∼65% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2928 Points ∼54%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2611 Points ∼48% -11%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2855 Points ∼52% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5440 Points ∼100% +86%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5311 Points ∼98% +81%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1754 Points ∼32% -40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2611 - 5102, n=10)	3823 Points ∼70% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 16067, n=227, last 2 years)	4613 Points ∼85% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3062 Points ∼43%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2747 Points ∼39% -10%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2963 Points ∼42% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6739 Points ∼95% +120%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7069 Points ∼100% +131%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1612 Points ∼23% -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2747 - 5157, n=10)	3997 Points ∼57% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (73 - 25350, n=226, last 2 years)	6139 Points ∼87% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2540 Points ∼73%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2227 Points ∼64% -12%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	2533 Points ∼73% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3280 Points ∼95% +29%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2840 Points ∼82% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2532 Points ∼73% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2227 - 4917, n=10)	3461 Points ∼100% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (635 - 7042, n=226, last 2 years)	3400 Points ∼98% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2203 Points ∼48%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2277 Points ∼50% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4548 Points ∼100% +106%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4454 Points ∼98% +102%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1550 Points ∼34% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2203 - 4434, n=5)	3464 Points ∼76% +57%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=138, last 2 years)	2211 Points ∼49% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2232 Points ∼39%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2303 Points ∼40% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5702 Points ∼99% +155%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5747 Points ∼100% +157%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1416 Points ∼25% -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2232 - 4853, n=5)	3738 Points ∼65% +67%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=138, last 2 years)	2276 Points ∼40% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2106 Points ∼75%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2190 Points ∼78% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	2657 Points ∼95% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2492 Points ∼89% +18%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2314 Points ∼83% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2106 - 3406, n=5)	2793 Points ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (1567 - 3525, n=138, last 2 years)	2561 Points ∼92% +22%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	56 fps ∼73%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps ∼73% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	59 fps ∼77% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	69 fps ∼90% +23%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼78% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	53 fps ∼69% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (55 - 62, n=10)	58.7 fps ∼76% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.5 - 165, n=194, last 2 years)	77 fps ∼100% +38%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	69 fps ∼39%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	68 fps ∼39% -1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	124 fps ∼70% +80%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps ∼95% +142%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼95% +142%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps ∼33% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (68 - 138, n=10)	109.5 fps ∼62% +59%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 462, n=194, last 2 years)	176.3 fps ∼100% +156%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	57 fps ∼89%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	37 fps ∼58% -35%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	50 fps ∼78% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps ∼92% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼93% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	28 fps ∼44% -51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (37 - 60, n=10)	54.8 fps ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 161, n=195, last 2 years)	64.3 fps ∼100% +13%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	41 fps ∼41%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	40 fps ∼40% -2%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	59 fps ∼59% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	90 fps ∼90% +120%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97 fps ∼97% +137%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps ∼29% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (40 - 91, n=10)	70 fps ∼70% +71%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 292, n=196, last 2 years)	99.7 fps ∼100% +143%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	24 fps ∼42%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	39 fps ∼68% +63%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	34 fps ∼60% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	51 fps ∼89% +113%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	57 fps ∼100% +138%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps ∼33% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (24 - 54, n=10)	43.4 fps ∼76% +81%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 136, n=196, last 2 years)	50.7 fps ∼89% +111%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	25 fps ∼36%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	25 fps ∼36% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	39 fps ∼57% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	62 fps ∼90% +148%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼100% +176%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps ∼29% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (25 - 56, n=10)	45.2 fps ∼66% +81%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 197, n=196, last 2 years)	67.7 fps ∼98% +171%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	15 fps ∼37%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	15 fps ∼37% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	20 fps ∼49% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps ∼100% +173%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps ∼88% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps ∼27% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (15 - 30, n=10)	24 fps ∼59% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 93, n=195, last 2 years)	33.3 fps ∼81% +122%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	17 fps ∼40%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	25 fps ∼60% +47%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	23 fps ∼55% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps ∼86% +112%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +147%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps ∼26% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (17 - 33, n=10)	28.8 fps ∼69% +69%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 114, n=195, last 2 years)	41 fps ∼98% +141%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps ∼86%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31 fps ∼86% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	21 fps ∼58% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps ∼100% +16%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps ∼31% -65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (18 - 33, n=9)	29.8 fps ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 113, n=260, last 2 years)	34 fps ∼94% +10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	32 fps ∼76%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps ∼76% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	22 fps ∼52% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps ∼100% +31%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +31%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps ∼29% -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (30 - 37, n=9)	33.2 fps ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.9 - 142, n=261, last 2 years)	42.1 fps ∼100% +32%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	21 fps ∼88%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	21 fps ∼88% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	14 fps ∼58% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps ∼71% -19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼100% +14%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7.2 fps ∼30% -66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19 - 21, n=9)	20.3 fps ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 86, n=261, last 2 years)	24 fps ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	14 fps ∼58%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps ∼58% 0%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	8.4 fps ∼35% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps ∼100% +71%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼67% +14%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.5 fps ∼19% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (13 - 14, n=9)	13.7 fps ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.7 - 56, n=261, last 2 years)	16.1 fps ∼67% +15%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	285950 Points ∼72%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	289298 Points ∼73% +1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	205297 Points ∼51% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	372734 Points ∼93% +30%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	398720 Points ∼100% +39%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	158868 Points ∼40% -44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10)	295586 Points ∼74% +3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4390 Points ∼81%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4338 Points ∼80% -1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	3374 Points ∼63% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4045 Points ∼75% -8%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5397 Points ∼100% +23%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2794 Points ∼52% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4014 - 4746, n=10)	4446 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 9555, n=175, last 2 years)	4783 Points ∼89% +9%
System (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7639 Points ∼84%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7597 Points ∼84% -1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	5882 Points ∼65% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7423 Points ∼82% -3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9094 Points ∼100% +19%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5507 Points ∼61% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7597 - 8604, n=10)	8146 Points ∼90% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2083 - 19657, n=175, last 2 years)	8396 Points ∼92% +10%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5683 Points ∼76%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5405 Points ∼72% -5%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	3808 Points ∼51% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3922 Points ∼52% -31%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7500 Points ∼100% +32%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3316 Points ∼44% -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5116 - 6283, n=10)	5580 Points ∼74% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 11617, n=175, last 2 years)	5357 Points ∼71% -6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6681 Points ∼71%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	6768 Points ∼72% +1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	4397 Points ∼47% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8700 Points ∼92% +30%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9416 Points ∼100% +41%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2815 Points ∼30% -58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4963 - 7758, n=10)	6484 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 27384, n=175, last 2 years)	9454 Points ∼100% +42%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1281 Points ∼90%
Honor 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1274 Points ∼89% -1%
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 4096	1316 Points ∼92% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1076 Points ∼75% -16%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1321 Points ∼93% +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1186 Points ∼83% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1239 - 1462, n=10)	1343 Points ∼94% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2392, n=175, last 2 years)	1427 Points ∼100% +11%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=172, last 2 years)	76.4 Points ∼100% +55%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	59.7 Points ∼78% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	58.7 Points ∼77% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6)	53.1 Points ∼70% +8%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)	51.2 Points ∼67% +4%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	49.16 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.08 Points ∼42% -35%
Honor 10 (Chrome 74)	29.17 Points ∼38% -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.8 - 375, n=160, last 2 years)	72.6 runs/min ∼100% +25%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	66.7 runs/min ∼92% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6)	61.7 runs/min ∼85% +6%
Honor 20 Pro (Chome 75)	59.4 runs/min ∼82% +2%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	58.3 runs/min ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	42.5 runs/min ∼59% -27%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.5 runs/min ∼45% -44%
Honor 10 (Chrome 74)	32.2 runs/min ∼44% -45%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	108 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	107 Points ∼99% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10)	105.1 Points ∼97% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=171, last 2 years)	104.1 Points ∼96% +21%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)	99 Points ∼92% +15%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	86 Points ∼80%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	69 Points ∼64% -20%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	62 Points ∼57% -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=197, last 2 years)	27455 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	24313 Points ∼89% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10)	21733 Points ∼79% +2%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	21358 Points ∼78%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)	20618 Points ∼75% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	20598 Points ∼75% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	11056 Points ∼40% -48%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	10965 Points ∼40% -49%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	3899 ms * ∼100% -26%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	3361 ms * ∼86% -8%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	3098 ms * ∼79%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)	2424 ms * ∼62% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=182, last 2 years)	2419 ms * ∼62% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	2334 ms * ∼60% +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10)	2176 ms * ∼56% +30%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	2030 ms * ∼52% +34%

* ... smaller is better

	Honor 20	Honor 20 Pro	Honor 10	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL	Google Pixel 3a XL	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		10%	-1%	-4%	0%	-39%	5%	70%
Sequential Read 256KB	829	843 2%	828 0%	809 -2%	831 0%	315.6 -62%	772 ?(427 - 1011, n=105) -7%	1040 ?(90.5 - 3557, n=256, last 2 years) 25%
Sequential Write 256KB	196.4	247.3 26%	192.1 -2%	196.9 0%	195.6 0%	179.1 -9%	293 ?(13.6 - 719, n=105) 49%	611 ?(11.9 - 2723, n=256, last 2 years) 211%
Random Read 4KB	156.7	173.6 11%	145.9 -7%	142.5 -9%	153.3 -2%	92.1 -41%	150.7 ?(92.6 - 239, n=105) -4%	190.1 ?(13.5 - 543, n=256, last 2 years) 21%
Random Write 4KB	157	160.4 2%	163 4%	148.5 -5%	160.2 2%	87 -45%	129.2 ?(18.2 - 290, n=105) -18%	194.5 ?(13 - 552, n=257, last 2 years) 24%

Arena of Valor

Honor 20; min: Ø59.9 (55-61)

Honor 20; high HD: Ø60 (59-61)

Asphalt 9: Legends

Honor 20; High Quality: Ø29.7 (28-31)

Honor 20; Standard / low: Ø29.8 (28-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


34.3 °C	33.1 °C	33.9 °C
34.9 °C	34.7 °C	34.1 °C
34.8 °C	34.2 °C	33.7 °C

Máximo: 34.9 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C


28.8 °C	31.1 °C	33.6 °C
28.9 °C	31.2 °C	34.1 °C
26.9 °C	30.9 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor 20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.22 Watt
Ocioso	0.88 / 2.27 / 2.34 Watt
Carga	4.81 / 6.63 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Honor 20 3750 mAh	Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh	Honor 10 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 980	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		3%	-10%	12%	-7%	30%	0%	11%
Idle Minimum *	0.88	0.9 -2%	1.12 -27%	0.7 20%	0.81 8%	0.7 20%	0.802 ?(0.6 - 0.97, n=10) 9%	0.888 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=187, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Average *	2.27	1.4 38%	2.26 -0%	1 56%	2.35 -4%	1.63 28%	2.07 ?(0.9 - 2.6, n=10) 9%	1.561 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=187, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	2.34	2.6 -11%	2.3 2%	1.3 44%	2.37 -1%	1.67 29%	2.38 ?(1.83 - 2.77, n=10) -2%	1.773 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=187, last 2 years) 24%
Load Average *	4.81	5 -4%	5.14 -7%	5.2 -8%	5.33 -11%	2.64 45%	4.87 ?(3.74 - 6.3, n=10) -1%	4.37 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=187, last 2 years) 9%
Load Maximum *	6.63	6.9 -4%	7.89 -19%	10 -51%	8.55 -29%	4.62 30%	7.46 ?(6.15 - 9.85, n=10) -13%	7.23 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=187, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		21h 02min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 75)		10h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 06min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 28min

	Honor 20 3750 mAh	Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh	Honor 10 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh
Battery Runtime		43%	2%	35%	110%	37%
Reader / Idle	1262	2030 61%	1162 -8%	1768 40%	2114 68%	1822 44%
H.264	606	914 51%	662 9%	987 63%	2138 253%	960 58%
WiFi v1.3	654	796 22%	663 1%	762 17%	801 22%	709 8%
Load	208	287 38%	216 4%	249 20%	409 97%	289 39%

Pro

+ Boa qualidade da câmera

+ Adaptador de USB Type-C para conector de 3,5 mm incluído

+ DRM L1

+ Bluetooth 5.0

Contra

- Desempenho médio

- O armazenamento não pode ser expandido

- Apenas algumas bandas GSM e 3G

Veredicto - Muito espaço de armazenamento e uma boa câmera

In review: Honor 20. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.com

O Honor 20 prova ser um smartphone impressionantemente completo. Está disponível por pouco menos de US$ 500 e oferece boa qualidade de câmera, muito espaço armazenamento interno e desempenho suficiente para uso diário e aplicativos mais exigentes. O desempenho do dispositivo pode ser aprimorado ativando seu modo de alto desempenho, embora isso cause impacto na duração da bateria. Isso é muito bom com quase 11 horas e pode facilmente acompanhar sua concorrência.

O Honor 20 pontua bem com a sua boa câmera e a decente duração da bateria. Os usuários terão que se virar sem um cartão microSD.

Não encontramos muito a criticar sobre o Honor 20: Seu design de furos é uma questão de gosto e alguns usuários podem não apreciar o sensor de digitais colocado ao lado. É uma pena que a Honor não tenha incluído um leitor de cartões microSD, particularmente porque o slot dualSIM poderia ter sido facilmente transformado em um slot híbrido.

Honor 20 - 2019-08-19 08/19/2019 v6^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

98%

Conectividade

45 / 60 → 75%

Peso

90%

Bateria

94%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

61 / 63 → 96%

Desempenho da aplicação

81 / 70 → 100%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

81%

Médio

80%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Linked Articles

Honor 20 (20 Serie)

Análise

•

Breve Análise do Smartphone Ho...

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 296 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20: uma câmera quádrupla em um smartphone de gama média

Mike Wobker, 2019-08-21 (Update: 2019-08-23)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20: uma câmera quádrupla em um smartphone de gama média

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Arena of Valor

Asphalt 9: Legends

Honor 20 audio analysis

Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Muito espaço de armazenamento e uma boa câmera

Linked Articles

Pricecompare