Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20 Pro – Quad-Cam e muita energia

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/05/2019

Câmera quadrupla. Honor conta com quatro objetivos fotográficas na parte traseira do Honor 20 Pro, o que é uma ligeira atualização em relação à configuração do Honor 20. Leia em nosso teste, se isso e a bateria bastante robusta justificam o aumento de 100 euros (~$111) para o modelo Pro.

Honor 20 Pro (20 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 980
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.26 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 412 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 243 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 154.6 x 74
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Honor SuperCharge 22,5-Watt
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.4, laser focus, phase focus, OIS, LED flash, video @2160p/​30FPS, video @720p/​960FPS (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0MP, f/​2.4, phase focus, OIS, telephoto (camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, video @1080p/​30FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, adaptador de 3,5mm, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 21/​18 (1400Mbps/​200Mbps); SAR value: 1,06 W/kg (body); A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS; aptX HD; notification LED, fanless
peso
182 g, Suprimento de energia: 98 g
Preço
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro
Honor 20 Pro

Size Comparison

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 178 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g154.6 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 182 g155 mm 75 mm 8 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
638 (min: 561, max: 664) MBit/s ∼100% +125%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
613 (min: 284, max: 694) MBit/s ∼96% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼67% +51%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼61% +37%
Honor 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
283 (min: 248, max: 294) MBit/s ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼35% -21%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 481, max: 556) MBit/s ∼100% +105%
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 421, max: 559) MBit/s ∼99% +104%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼63% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼54% +10%
Honor 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
257 (min: 216, max: 290) MBit/s ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼40% -18%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Dirt track
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Dirt track
GPS Honor 20 Pro – Overview
GPS Honor 20 Pro – Overview
GPS Honor 20 Pro – Bridge
GPS Honor 20 Pro – Bridge
GPS Honor 20 Pro – Dirt track
GPS Honor 20 Pro – Dirt track

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Low-light picture default settings
Low-light picture default settings
Low-light picture night mode
Low-light picture night mode
Picture wide-angle lens
Picture wide-angle lens
Picture standard optics
Picture standard optics
Picture telephoto lens
Picture telephoto lens
Picture macro lens
Picture macro lens
30x hybrid zoom
30x hybrid zoom
Bokeh effect
Bokeh effect
Test chart, photographed
Test chart, photographed
Test chart, detailed view
Color Checker color chart. The bottom half of each box shows the reference color for comparison
499
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 514 cd/m² Médio: 495.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.06 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 514 cd/m²
Contraste: 1028:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
Honor 20 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Nokia 9 PureView
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 5.99
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Screen
21%
34%
5%
11%
Brightness middle
514
603
17%
648
26%
402
-22%
478
-7%
Brightness
495
605
22%
641
29%
399
-19%
486
-2%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
92
0%
92
0%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.5
Contrast
1028
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
3.5
31%
2.3
55%
4.1
20%
2.97
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.8
7.7
1%
5.2
33%
6.5
17%
10.18
-31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
2.7
53%
2.2
62%
3.7
36%
2.5
57%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.266 97%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.031 108%
CCT
8142 80%
6775 96%
6592 99%
7841 83%
6533 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 333 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 333 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 333 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9428 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5905 Points ∼44%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼56% +25%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13272 Points ∼100% +125%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7553 Points ∼57% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼59% +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5677 - 9870, n=9)
7355 Points ∼55% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼34% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9854 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8909 Points ∼78% -10%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10765 Points ∼95% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼60% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (9547 - 10024, n=9)
9838 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼40% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3315 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼100% +6%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2421 Points ∼69% -27%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3476 Points ∼99% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼69% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3207 - 3378, n=9)
3303 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼39% -59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7825 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼95% +18%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8415 Points ∼87% +8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼74% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (7567 - 9326, n=9)
8450 Points ∼87% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼52% -36%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
10278 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼100% +18%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9917 Points ∼82% -4%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11857 Points ∼98% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼71% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (9728 - 13531, n=9)
11270 Points ∼93% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼46% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2190 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2857 Points ∼86% +30%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3134 Points ∼94% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼81% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2106 - 3183, n=4)
2640 Points ∼79% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=56)
2369 Points ∼71% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2303 Points ∼39%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼100% +155%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4978 Points ∼85% +116%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5779 Points ∼99% +151%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼37% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2232 - 4688, n=4)
3459 Points ∼59% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=56)
2333 Points ∼40% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2277 Points ∼45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼100% +120%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4273 Points ∼85% +88%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4866 Points ∼97% +114%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼45% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2203 - 4242, n=4)
3222 Points ∼64% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=59)
2039 Points ∼41% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2227 Points ∼50%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼100% +98%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3456 Points ∼78% +55%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4235 Points ∼96% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼72% +42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2227 - 4439, n=9)
3299 Points ∼75% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=386)
1836 Points ∼42% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2747 Points ∼39%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼100% +158%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5828 Points ∼82% +112%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7083 Points ∼100% +158%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼34% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2747 - 4361, n=9)
3868 Points ∼55% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=386)
1605 Points ∼23% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2611 Points ∼42%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼100% +139%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5057 Points ∼81% +94%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6162 Points ∼99% +136%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼41% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2611 - 4317, n=9)
3680 Points ∼59% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=389)
1492 Points ∼24% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3288 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3368 Points ∼76% +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4120 Points ∼94% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼69% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2421 - 4493, n=9)
3422 Points ∼78% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1813 Points ∼41% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3612 Points ∼35%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8435 Points ∼82% +134%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10279 Points ∼100% +185%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼35% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2536 - 5893, n=9)
4289 Points ∼42% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=401)
2189 Points ∼21% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3535 Points ∼45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼100% +125%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6322 Points ∼80% +79%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7716 Points ∼97% +118%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼44% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2525 - 5511, n=9)
4053 Points ∼51% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=402)
1863 Points ∼23% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3380 Points ∼83%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼100% +21%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3418 Points ∼84% +1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4093 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼79% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3380 - 4216, n=9)
3820 Points ∼93% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=462)
1774 Points ∼43% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2082 Points ∼33%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼100% +204%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5123 Points ∼81% +146%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +205%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼35% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2082 - 4400, n=9)
3851 Points ∼61% +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=464)
1337 Points ∼21% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2276 Points ∼40%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼100% +148%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4612 Points ∼81% +103%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5661 Points ∼100% +149%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼42% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2276 - 4264, n=9)
3828 Points ∼68% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=472)
1275 Points ∼23% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3899 Points ∼96%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼100% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3179 Points ∼78% -18%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3919 Points ∼96% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼79% -18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3548 - 4215, n=9)
3887 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=495)
1682 Points ∼41% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3749 Points ∼37%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼100% +167%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8053 Points ∼80% +115%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9932 Points ∼99% +165%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼35% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2347 - 5431, n=9)
4073 Points ∼41% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=495)
1806 Points ∼18% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3781 Points ∼50%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼100% +100%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6007 Points ∼79% +59%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7407 Points ∼98% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼45% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2567 - 4996, n=9)
3987 Points ∼53% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=503)
1551 Points ∼21% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20828 Points ∼58%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36069 Points ∼100% +73%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
23877 Points ∼66% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼54% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (19993 - 37164, n=8)
28033 Points ∼78% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼38% -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
42308 Points ∼40%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83854 Points ∼79% +98%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106799 Points ∼100% +152%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼48% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (42128 - 67956, n=8)
54727 Points ∼51% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼19% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34420 Points ∼53%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64782 Points ∼100% +88%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60279 Points ∼93% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼58% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (34035 - 57073, n=8)
45137 Points ∼70% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼26% -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
68 fps ∼41%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +146%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
151 fps ∼90% +122%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166 fps ∼99% +144%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼50% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (68 - 138, n=9)
106 fps ∼63% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=683)
35.2 fps ∼21% -48%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼93%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +7%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +7%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (55 - 62, n=9)
58.6 fps ∼98% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=686)
27.2 fps ∼45% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
40 fps ∼40%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼100% +150%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83 fps ∼83% +108%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼42% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (40 - 91, n=9)
68 fps ∼68% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=602)
19.5 fps ∼20% -51%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37 fps ∼62%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +62%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
50 fps ∼83% +35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (37 - 60, n=9)
54.3 fps ∼91% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=607)
18 fps ∼30% -51%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
25 fps ∼36%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼96% +168%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼86% +140%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
70 fps ∼100% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (25 - 56, n=9)
44 fps ∼63% +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=463)
15.9 fps ∼23% -36%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
39 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +46%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼56% -18%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼46% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (24 - 54, n=9)
42.9 fps ∼75% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=466)
15.3 fps ∼27% -61%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
21 fps ∼81%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼100% +24%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼50% -38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼96% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼38% -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (19 - 21, n=8)
20.3 fps ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=166)
8.92 fps ∼34% -58%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼100% +21%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% 0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼40% -51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (13 - 14, n=8)
13.6 fps ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=166)
6.19 fps ∼36% -56%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100% +23%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼55% -32%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% -48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (18 - 32, n=8)
29.4 fps ∼77% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=167)
13.5 fps ∼36% -56%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼74%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +34%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼86% +16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼42% -44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (30 - 36, n=8)
32.8 fps ∼76% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=167)
14.8 fps ∼34% -54%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
25 fps ∼60%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +68%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼83% +40%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼40% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (17 - 33, n=9)
28.4 fps ∼68% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=392)
10.7 fps ∼25% -57%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
15 fps ∼41%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼100% +147%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
19 fps ∼51% +27%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼41% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (15 - 30, n=9)
23.6 fps ∼64% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=396)
9.7 fps ∼26% -35%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
289298 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼100% +28%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287123 Points ∼77% -1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
371848 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
202586 Points ∼54% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (268359 - 316199, n=9)
292583 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼35% -54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1274 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼98% +10%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1317 Points ∼92% +3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1431 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼78% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (1239 - 1430, n=9)
1329 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼52% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
6768 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7918 Points ∼84% +17%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9361 Points ∼99% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼41% -43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (4963 - 7758, n=9)
6356 Points ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼21% -71%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5405 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼90% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4072 Points ∼65% -25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6253 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼55% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5210 - 6283, n=9)
5631 Points ∼90% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼24% -73%
System (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7597 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼100% +18%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7940 Points ∼88% +5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8652 Points ∼96% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼72% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (7597 - 8604, n=9)
8112 Points ∼90% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼32% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4338 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼98% +17%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4285 Points ∼83% -1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5188 Points ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼60% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (4014 - 4746, n=9)
4419 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼28% -67%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼100% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6)
53.1 Points ∼84% +4%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
52.718 Points ∼84% +3%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)
51.24 Points ∼81%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
44.6 Points ∼71% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼63% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=93)
30.6 Points ∼49% -40%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼100% +14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
66.3 runs/min ∼98% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6)
61.7 runs/min ∼91% +4%
Honor 20 Pro (Chome 75)
59.4 runs/min ∼87%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
50.47 runs/min ∼74% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼57% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=82)
34.6 runs/min ∼51% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼100% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=9)
103 Points ∼94% +4%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)
99 Points ∼90%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
98 Points ∼89% -1%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
89 Points ∼81% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼70% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼57% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
25640 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼98% +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=9)
21662 Points ∼84% +5%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)
20618 Points ∼80%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
16484 Points ∼64% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼64% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼25% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼100% -342%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼28% -25%
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75)
2424 ms * ∼23%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2375 ms * ∼22% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=9)
2189 ms * ∼20% +10%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼18% +19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
1851.7 ms * ∼17% +24%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 20 ProOnePlus 7Nokia 9 PureViewZTE Axon 10 ProSamsung Galaxy A80Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
13%
-36%
25%
-46%
-14%
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.2
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
88.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.6
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
Random Write 4KB
160.4
28.7
-82%
20.18
-87%
189.53
18%
21.6
-87%
98.1 (22.1 - 160, n=7)
-39%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
173.6
175.3
1%
131.98
-24%
150.36
-13%
117.5
-32%
153 (127 - 174, n=7)
-12%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
247.3
392
59%
200.3
-19%
503.04
103%
190.4
-23%
245 (228 - 253, n=7)
-1%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
843.1
1463
74%
727.97
-14%
768.93
-9%
501.5
-41%
807 (687 - 873, n=7)
-4%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-69%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.9 (35-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.9 (44-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø29.6 (28-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø29.6 (28-31)
Carga Máxima
 43.5 °C40.8 °C39.9 °C 
 43.7 °C40.8 °C40 °C 
 43.1 °C40.8 °C39.5 °C 
Máximo: 43.7 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C
38.3 °C40.6 °C41.9 °C
38.2 °C41.2 °C43.2 °C
38.4 °C40.3 °C43 °C
Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.944.52538.3373131.831.64034.132.25044396331.729.4802524.510026.731.112523.933.216021.843.420020.351.125019.657.431518.860.540017.563.850020.166.963019.767.580017.368.2100017.472.7125015.473160016.476.1200016.477.2250015.573.5315015.669.2400015.768.8500016.174.763001673.8800016.571.91000016.363.91250015.962.11600015.854SPL2969.784.9N1.223.761.2median 16.5median 67.5Delta2940.242.244.145.434.135.238.141.338.939.5303425.928.825.329.123.236.120.546.220.451.92056.918.658.617.356.217.255.820.263.119.667.616.173.913.978.515.280.815.574.414.56614.266.714.169.515.969.815.368.814.96714.662.514.960.714.757.174.265.528.362.985.62818.11.115.556.2median 15.9median 63.12.46.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 20 ProOnePlus 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 20 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.4 / 2.6 Watt
Carga midlight 5 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 20 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
16%
-27%
20%
18%
-6%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.6
33%
1.65
-83%
0.76
16%
0.6
33%
0.794 (0.6 - 0.97, n=9)
12%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=751)
2%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.1
21%
2.34
-67%
1.15
18%
1.2
14%
2.04 (0.9 - 2.6, n=9)
-46%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=750)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2
23%
2.43
7%
1.18
55%
1.4
46%
2.37 (1.83 - 2.77, n=9)
9%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=751)
22%
Load Average *
5
4
20%
5.02
-0%
3.95
21%
5
-0%
4.91 (3.74 - 6.3, n=9)
2%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=745)
19%
Load Maximum *
6.9
8
-16%
6.51
6%
7.49
-9%
7.1
-3%
7.51 (6.15 - 9.85, n=9)
-9%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=745)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 47min
Honor 20 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
-32%
-7%
-13%
Reader / Idle
2030
1989
-2%
1250
-38%
1927
-5%
1796
-12%
H.264
914
933
2%
732
-20%
1068
17%
902
-1%
WiFi v1.3
796
901
13%
486
-39%
680
-15%
713
-10%
Load
287
278
-3%
202
-30%
217
-24%
200
-30%

Pro

+ Carcaça muito elegante
+ Sensor de digitais extremamente rápido
+ Carga rápida de alta velocidade
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Câmera muito flexível...
+ ... com excelentes detalhes (dependendo da cena)
+ Capacidades de localização precisas
+ Muito espaço de armazenamento

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento
- Não é um telefone mundial
- Alto falante mono
- Tela com tempos lentos de resposta
- A câmera exibe alguns problemas de nitidez

Veredicto – Único com muitos destaques

In Review: Honor 20 Pro. Test device courtesy of Honor Germany
In Review: Honor 20 Pro. Test device courtesy of Honor Germany

A Honor tomou medidas ousadas com o 20 Pro: Uma tela IPS em um smartphone de gama alta? Essa é uma escolha rara hoje em dia. A tela é de alta qualidade e exibe cores com precisão com as configurações corretas. Como os alto-falantes estéreo podem ser encontrados em muitos smartphones atuais, o alto-falante mono, muito parecido com os tempos de resposta comparativamente lentos da tela, representam um erro muito maior.

Ao mesmo tempo, no entanto, o último carro-chefe da Honor brilha com alguns destaques reais: Tanto o sensor de digitais incrivelmente rápido dentro do botão de energia quanto a nova tecnologia de carregamento rápido, que permite um carregamento muito rápido, independentemente da grande bateria do smartphone, merecem destaque. Bateria Apropos: Embora a bateria dure muito tempo, os usuários não precisam abandonar o desempenho, dispositivos com Snapdragon 855 são um pouquinho mais rápidos, no entanto.

Um monstro em termos de espaço de armazenamento e capacidade da bateria: O Honor 20 Pro oferece muito em relação ao seu preço e vem apenas com pequenas desvantagens.

Além disso, a grande configuração de armazenamento dá ao Honor 20 Pro uma vantagem em termos de preço/desempenho e torna a falta de suporte para microSD um pouco menos dolorosa. Outra fortaleza do telefone é o seu GPS muito preciso.

Embora o recurso mais anunciado, a câmera, seja muito flexível graças às suas quatro óticas diferentes, ele não consegue competir com o topo das câmeras de ponta em termos de qualidade de imagem. Isto é devido aos pequenos problemas de nitidez para as bordas, o limite de 30-FPS para vídeo 4K e o bom, mas não ótimo, efeito Bokeh. No entanto, ficamos impressionados com a grande quantidade de detalhes.

Se os inconvenientes menores não o incomodarem muito, o Honor 20 Pro é definitivamente uma boa opção.

Honor 20 Pro - 08/02/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
98%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 75%
Peso
90%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
81 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
85%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20 Pro – Quad-Cam e muita energia
Florian Schmitt, 2019-08- 5 (Update: 2019-08- 7)