Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3a XL
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 409 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 22% | -102% | -158% | -170% | |
| Brightness middle | 409 | 593 45% | 567 39% | 446 9% | 572 40% |
| Brightness | 410 | 587 43% | 547 33% | 451 10% | 580 41% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 94 -2% | 92 -4% | 93 -3% | 96 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.4 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.9 31% | 4.39 -238% | 6.58 -406% | 4.5 -246% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 2 13% | 7.28 -217% | 11.94 -419% | 12.2 -430% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.5 -0% | 4.9 -227% | 3.6 -140% | 7.9 -427% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.248 98% | 2.199 100% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6621 98% | 6548 99% | 7642 85% | 7116 91% | 8726 74% |
| Contrast | 930 | 1430 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242.7 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2) | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29.6 - 33.7, n=3) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (53 - 66, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Google Pixel 3a XL | Xiaomi Mi 9 | Nokia 8.1 | Motorola Moto Z3 Play | Sony Xperia 10 Plus | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 95% | -29% | -12% | -23% | -29% | 319% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 315.6 | 666 111% | 279.3 -12% | 271.7 -14% | 280.3 -11% | 273 ? -13% | 1502 ? 376% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 179.1 | 388.3 117% | 203.8 14% | 182.5 2% | 205.2 15% | 176.8 ? -1% | 1111 ? 520% |
| Random Read 4KB | 92.1 | 149.4 62% | 69.9 -24% | 60.6 -34% | 77.7 -16% | 59.1 ? -36% | 247 ? 168% |
| Random Write 4KB | 87 | 165.3 90% | 7.3 -92% | 84.1 -3% | 16.77 -81% | 31.7 ? -64% | 271 ? 211% |
PUBG Compare
Arena of Valor
Shadow Fight 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.27 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.7 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt |
| Carga |
2.64 / 4.62 Watt |
    
| |
| Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh | Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -10% | -44% | -28% | -58% | -41% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.67 4% | 0.8 -14% | 1.3 -86% | 0.68 3% | 1.18 ? -69% | 0.897 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 1.63 | 1.26 23% | 1.5 8% | 2 -23% | 2.12 -30% | 2.89 ? -77% | 1.452 ? 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.67 | 1.29 23% | 1.8 -8% | 2.7 -62% | 2.17 -30% | 2.94 ? -76% | 1.629 ? 2% |
| Load Average * | 2.64 | 3.71 -41% | 3.2 -21% | 3.7 -40% | 3.82 -45% | 3.82 ? -45% | 5.55 ? -110% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.62 | 9.3 -101% | 5.4 -17% | 5.1 -10% | 6.44 -39% | 5.65 ? -22% | 8.31 ? -80% |
* ... smaller is better
| Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh | Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | -8% | -28% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1822 | 1650 -9% | 1682 -8% | 1245 -32% | 1400 -23% |
| H.264 | 960 | 1008 5% | 857 -11% | 648 -32% | 701 -27% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 709 | 546 -23% | 738 4% | 595 -16% | 635 -10% |
| Load | 289 | 194 -33% | 246 -15% | 199 -31% | 154 -47% |
Pro
Contra
O Pixel 3a XL mostra que a Google não esqueceu como produzir um excelente smartphone de gama média. A aparência do 3a XL não é de forma alguma inferior à de seus irmãos mais caros, enquanto seu hardware inferior ainda oferece bom desempenho e pode facilmente lidar com aplicativos exigentes. Embora tenhamos visto a ascensão de câmeras triplas e quádruplas traseiras em smartphones de gama média, a Google consegue envergonhar seus rivais com seu único sensor de 12,2 MP.
O Google Pixel 3a XL é um novo concorrente de gama média que se destaca em muitas áreas. Existem algumas deficiências menores, mas elas não impedem que o dispositivo tenha uma boa relação custo-benefício.
Infelizmente, o 3a XL também herda algumas das críticas que tivemos de outros smartphones Pixel. A falta de funcionalidade dual-SIM adequada é um descuido, assim como a insistência da Google em não incluir um leitor de cartões microSD. Os marcos grossos da tela e o design da carcaça de plástico também dividirão as opiniões, embora tenham suas vantagens. Ou seja, sem entalhe. A decisão de usar um SoC Snapdragon 670 em comparação com algo mais poderoso também atraiu críticas em outras análises. No entanto, o Snapdragon 670 não apresenta nenhuma limitação prática e rodará quase qualquer aplicativo ou jogo que você possa lançar nele.
No geral, o Pixel 3a XL é um smartphone excepcional de gama média que possui uma melhor câmera e duração de bateria do que seus concorrentes. O dispositivo também é bem projetado e a maioria de seus pontos fracos são uma questão de gosto.
Google Pixel 3a XL
-
08/31/2022 v7
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
