Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG X power2

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/15/2017

Bateria grande sem nada por trás? O LG X power2 promete uma longa duração da bateria com sua bateria de alta capacidade. Mas, além da duração da bateria, existem muitos outros aspectos que fazem um bom smartphone. Em nosso teste, descobriremos se o aparelho de gama média da LG consegue convencer aqui.

LG X power2 (X Series Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6750
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.15 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, DLNA, Miracast, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 154.7 x 78.1
Bateria
17.1 Wh, 4500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2,2, 1/3" sensor, 1.12 µm pixel size, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador rápido, cabo USB, fones, LG SmartWorld, LG Backup, QuickMemo+, 24 Meses Garantia, Banda larga (download/upload): 300Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR value: 0,519 W/kg (head), 1,360 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
164 g, Suprimento de energia: 73 g
Preço
299 Euro

 

LG X power2
LG X power2
LG X power2
LG X power2
LG X power2
LG X power2

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼100% +449%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼48% +165%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼40% +121%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88.8 MBit/s ∼35% +94%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼19% +3%
LG X power2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.7 MBit/s ∼18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +447%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 MBit/s ∼77% +322%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼40% +119%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash
104 MBit/s ∼37% +103%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼19% +4%
LG X power2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼18%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPS LG X power2 - overview
GPS LG X power2 - overview
GPS LG X power2 - crossroads
GPS LG X power2 - crossroads
GPS LG X power2 - bridge
GPS LG X power2 - bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
232
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 245 cd/m² Médio: 237.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.92 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 237 cd/m²
Contraste: 1823:1 (Preto: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.07
LG X power2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Lenovo P2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-11%
53%
-18%
56%
61%
Brightness
237
352
49%
477
101%
369
56%
463
95%
511
116%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
91
-1%
92
0%
86
-7%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.13
0.2
-54%
0.26
-100%
Contrast
1823
1905
4%
1462
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.5
7.3
-33%
2.4
56%
6.6
-20%
2
64%
2.2
60%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
7.4
-21%
2.8
54%
7.4
-21%
1.7
72%
2
67%
Gamma
2.07 116%
2.26 106%
2.28 105%
2.29 105%
2.1 114%
2.25 107%
CCT
7943 82%
8417 77%
6702 97%
8665 75%
6394 102%
6768 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG X power2
38547 Points ∼17%
LG X Power K220
30432 Points ∼13% -21%
Lenovo P2
63522 Points ∼28% +65%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
24799 Points ∼11% -36%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21% +23%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼27% +59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG X power2
3191 Points ∼47%
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼70% +51%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼55% +17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG X power2
4157 Points ∼50%
LG X Power K220
3759 Points ∼45% -10%
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼58% +16%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2383 Points ∼29% -43%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼59% +18%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼82% +63%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG X power2
601 Points ∼39%
LG X Power K220
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Lenovo P2
783 Points ∼51% +30%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
573 Points ∼37% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼42% +8%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG X power2
489 Points ∼6%
LG X Power K220
290 Points ∼3% -41%
Lenovo P2
1016 Points ∼12% +108%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
346 Points ∼4% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼12% +107%
Memory (sort by value)
LG X power2
693 Points ∼16%
LG X Power K220
521 Points ∼12% -25%
Lenovo P2
1451 Points ∼33% +109%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
421 Points ∼10% -39%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼29% +83%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼18% +15%
System (sort by value)
LG X power2
1758 Points ∼27%
LG X Power K220
1092 Points ∼17% -38%
Lenovo P2
1960 Points ∼30% +11%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
858 Points ∼13% -51%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼36% +35%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼31% +18%
Overall (sort by value)
LG X power2
773 Points ∼20%
LG X Power K220
200 Points ∼5% -74%
Lenovo P2
1226 Points ∼32% +59%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
517 Points ∼14% -33%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼9% -54%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼27% +32%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG X power2
1448 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼28% +64%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG X power2
2297 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼20% +64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG X power2
593 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼15% +24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG X power2
1074 Points ∼35%
LG X Power K220
854 Points ∼28% -20%
Lenovo P2
1673 Points ∼55% +56%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼50% +42%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points ∼54% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG X power2
254 Points ∼5%
LG X Power K220
102 Points ∼2% -60%
Lenovo P2
380 Points ∼7% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points ∼7% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG X power2
306 Points ∼8%
LG X Power K220
127 Points ∼3% -58%
Lenovo P2
459 Points ∼12% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼6% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points ∼12% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG X power2
1053 Points ∼35%
LG X Power K220
860 Points ∼29% -18%
Lenovo P2
1682 Points ∼56% +60%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
813 Points ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼51% +46%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼54% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG X power2
379 Points ∼5%
LG X Power K220
165 Points ∼2% -56%
Lenovo P2
726 Points ∼9% +92%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
46 Points ∼1% -88%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼4% -27%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG X power2
442 Points ∼9%
LG X Power K220
201 Points ∼4% -55%
Lenovo P2
831 Points ∼17% +88%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
58 Points ∼1% -87%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼7% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼17% +87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG X power2
8213 Points ∼11%
LG X Power K220
10103 Points ∼14% +23%
Lenovo P2
15462 Points ∼21% +88%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼18% +58%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼22% +94%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG X power2
8140 Points ∼2%
LG X Power K220
4330 Points ∼1% -47%
Lenovo P2
13398 Points ∼3% +65%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% +65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG X power2
8156 Points ∼4%
LG X Power K220
4960 Points ∼3% -39%
Lenovo P2
13808 Points ∼7% +69%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4675 Points ∼2% -43%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7% +71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG X power2
13 fps ∼1%
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps ∼1% -35%
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼2% +77%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
5.7 fps ∼0% -56%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼1% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% +77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG X power2
22 fps ∼5%
LG X Power K220
15 fps ∼3% -32%
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼5% +5%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
10 fps ∼2% -55%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼3% -45%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼5% +5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG X power2
5.3 fps ∼1%
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps ∼1% -42%
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼2% +89%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2 fps ∼0% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% +89%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG X power2
11 fps ∼3%
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps ∼2% -40%
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼3% -9%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4.2 fps ∼1% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -54%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼3% -9%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG X power2
3.5 fps ∼1%
LG X Power K220
2 fps ∼0% -43%
Lenovo P2
6.2 fps ∼1% +77%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼1% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% +77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG X power2
8.6 fps ∼5%
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps ∼2% -52%
Lenovo P2
6.7 fps ∼4% -22%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼2% -63%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼4% -22%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG X power2
1.9 fps ∼1%
Lenovo P2
3.4 fps ∼1% +79%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.4 fps ∼1% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG X power2
4.3 fps ∼0%
Lenovo P2
3.7 fps ∼0% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -56%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.7 fps ∼0% -14%

Legend

 
LG X power2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo P2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points ∼100% +90%
Lenovo P2
28.883 Points ∼91% +73%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
25.972 Points ∼82% +55%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
18.22 Points ∼57% +9%
LG X Power K220
18.133 Points ∼57% +8%
LG X power2
16.743 Points ∼53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points ∼100% +84%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4560 Points ∼92% +68%
Lenovo P2
4435 Points ∼89% +64%
LG X power2
2712 Points ∼54%
LG X Power K220
2657 Points ∼53% -2%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2141 Points ∼43% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG X power2
13762.8 ms * ∼100%
LG X Power K220
13196 ms * ∼96% +4%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
12145 ms * ∼88% +12%
Lenovo P2
8463 ms * ∼61% +39%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8168.9 ms * ∼59% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
6820.9 ms * ∼50% +50%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Lenovo P2
84 Points ∼100% +53%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points ∼99% +51%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
75 Points ∼89% +36%
LG X power2
55 Points ∼65%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
51 Points ∼61% -7%

* ... smaller is better

LG X power2LG X Power K220Lenovo P2HTC Desire 10 LifestyleSamsung Galaxy J7 2017Lenovo Moto Z Play
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
78%
-24%
3%
74%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.09
18.17
-69%
59.41
2%
29.2
-50%
63.86
10%
50.57
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.59
32.08
-58%
79.25
3%
47.7
-38%
76.12
-1%
74.58
-3%
Random Write 4KB
10.7
7.32
-32%
44.4
315%
7.94
-26%
10.54
-1%
45.58
326%
Random Read 4KB
25.3
18.78
-26%
38.2
51%
17.03
-33%
25.86
2%
38.78
53%
Sequential Write 256KB
41.7
43.74
5%
76.74
84%
60.62
45%
52.98
27%
73.14
75%
Sequential Read 256KB
243.8
196.81
-19%
270.14
11%
149.4
-39%
198.47
-19%
254.78
5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high28 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high47 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.4 °C33.7 °C35.7 °C 
 35.2 °C36.6 °C36 °C 
 35.7 °C37.4 °C36 °C 
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C
34.4 °C34.4 °C34.3 °C
34.7 °C34.7 °C34.4 °C
33.6 °C40.6 °C40.1 °C
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 35.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.52525.4333125.333.44032.932.25033.634.36331.631.18028.426.21002728.512520.829.41602229.420021.33025020.831.531521.231.740019.437.650019.544.963017.754.980017.964.2100017.873125017.377.9160017.477.1200016.778.1250017.276.5315018.273.9400017.977.3500017.676.6630017.779.9800017.884.41000017.980.91250018.172.21600018.262.3SPL3089.4N1.372.3median 17.9LG X power2median 72.2Delta1.317.931.630.825.430.525.331.232.930.733.631.731.628.828.422.6272620.836.82240.221.349.220.853.721.257.119.462.619.567.417.767.817.969.517.870.717.372.117.474.616.775.217.275.518.277.917.981.417.67917.775.617.875.417.971.318.162.618.255.83087.11.370.5median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J7 2017median 69.51.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG X power2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 42.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.42 / 1.47 Watt
Carga midlight 5.89 / 7.85 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG X power2
4500 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
38%
44%
43%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.64
-2%
0.54
14%
0.39
38%
0.51
19%
Idle Average *
1.42
1.3
8%
1.01
29%
1.06
25%
0.87
39%
Idle Maximum *
1.47
1.34
9%
1.03
30%
1.08
27%
0.9
39%
Load Average *
5.89
4.18
29%
1.78
70%
1.82
69%
1.69
71%
Load Maximum *
7.85
4.87
38%
3.98
49%
3.21
59%
4
49%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
45h 20min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
16h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 24min
LG X power2
4500 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
10%
-44%
-3%
11%
Reader / Idle
2720
2841
4%
1485
-45%
1950
-28%
2540
-7%
H.264
1226
1199
-2%
622
-49%
1096
-11%
1190
-3%
WiFi v1.3
982
987
1%
978
0%
574
-42%
904
-8%
824
-16%
Load
384
365
-5%
528
38%
234
-39%
525
37%
652
70%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e bem construída
+ NFC, USB-OTG, App2SD
+ Módulo GPS muito preciso
+ Fácil operação
+ Baixo valor de preto da tela
+ Acesso rápido ao cartão microSD
+ Dificilmente esquenta
+ Alto-falante aceitável
+ Ótima duração da bateria

Contra

- Má razão preço-desempenho
- Alto consumo de energia
- Tela escura
- A câmera frequentemente tira fotos embaçadas
- Correções de segurança antigas no momento do teste
- Acesso lento ao armazenamento interno
In the test: LG X power2. Test unit provided by LG Germany.
In the test: LG X power2. Test unit provided by LG Germany.

Um smartphone com X – desta vez não funcionou. O LG X power2 não é um aparelho ruim; é só que existem muitos dispositivos de preço semelhante que são melhores. Fazer o X power2 100 Euros (~$118) mais caro que o LG X Power não é facilmente justificável, em nossa opinião. Há um pouco mais de desempenho, a tela é um pouco maior e a capacidade da bateria é um pouco maior. Caso contrário, as medições do poder LG X2 são ainda piores em algumas áreas do antecessor, por exemplo, no consumo de energia ou no brilho da tela.

Também existem alguns pontos positivos no LG X power2: nós gostamos da carcaça e é bastante robusta, o desempenho é bastante bom para a faixa de preços, o alto-falante é bastante forte e não distorce, e o aparelho permanece frio e não se afoga sob carga. Claro que a duração da bateria também é considerável, mas outros dispositivos nesta faixa de preços, como o Samsung Galaxy J7 ou o Lenovo P2 também contam com isso. Além disso, com um cargo adicional de 100 Euros (~ $118), o smartphone da segunda geração da LG chegou a uma classe de competição completamente nova sem ser ajustado em conformidade: A tela possui uma resolução menor do que muitos dispositivos concorrentes, a câmera tira fotos piores e o armazenamento fornecido está na parte inferior da competição. Estamos agradavelmente surpreendidos pelo fato de que o módulo GPS funcione com bastante precisão. No entanto, as taxas de transferência WLAN  são baixas, e suporta menos bandas LTE que os dispositivos concorrentes.

O LG X power2 é simplesmente muito caro para os recursos oferecidos: uma tela de baixa resolução, câmera fraca e apenas valores de desempenho medíocres. A concorrência parece bastante imponente. A longa duração da bateria é um bom ponto de venda, mas neste ponto, outros dispositivos desta faixa de preço também têm isso.

Qualquer pessoa que simplesmente procura um smartphone com uma longa vida útil da bateria e que esteja disposta a gastar dinheiro recebe um smartphone bem equipado com o LG X power2. No entanto, concorrentes como o Lenovo P2 ou o Samsung Galaxy J7 oferecem muito mais pelo seu dinheiro. Uma dica: neste ponto o predecessor LG X Power custa apenas cerca de 150 Euros (~$177) na Internet e oferece uma duração de bateria similar.

LG X power2 - 08/01/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
78%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 61%
Peso
91%
Bateria
100%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
36 / 70 → 51%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
61%
Médio
69%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG X power2
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-15 (Update: 2017-08-25)