Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) Duos

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/02/2017

Nem tudo é um arco íris. O Samsung Galaxy J7 é a versão maior do Galaxy J5. Ele possui recursos similares, mas uma tela maior de 5,5 polegadas. Após o redesenho de toda a série, o J7, agora também tem uma bateria removível. Para descobrir sobre outras alterações, dê uma olhada na nossa análise. Atualização: A análise foi finalizada.

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Galaxy J Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Memória
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3, 933 MHz
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor geomagnético, scher, Hall effect sensor, proximidade e G sensor, BeiDou, Ant+, OTG, Wifi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 and 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 152.5 x 74.8
Bateria
3600 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 24 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (Sony IMX258, f/1.7, auto focus, full-HD video)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (Samsung S5K3M3, f/1.9, fixed focus, full-HD video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, fones, guia de início rápido, informações de segurança e garantia, TouchWiz 8.1, 24 Meses Garantia, Micro-USB, FM radio , head SAR: 0.567 W/kg, body SAR: 1.33 W/kg, fanless
peso
181 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g
Preço
340 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
251 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
121 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
88.8 MBit/s ∼35% -65%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
53.4 MBit/s ∼21% -79%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
32.9 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
280 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
216 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
112 MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
51.5 MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
31.2 MBit/s ∼11% -89%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
Galaxy J7 (2017)
LG G6
LG G6
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Lenovo P2
Lenovo P2
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo P2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-25%
-3%
-85%
-19%
-71%
Brightness
463
289
-38%
511
10%
633
37%
477
3%
481
4%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
93
8%
93
8%
91
6%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.66
0.5
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2
2.9
-45%
2.2
-10%
4.9
-145%
2.4
-20%
4.2
-110%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
2.1
-24%
2
-18%
5.8
-241%
2.8
-65%
4.8
-182%
Gamma
2.1 114%
2.05 117%
2.25 107%
2.26 106%
2.28 105%
2.36 102%
CCT
6394 102%
6228 104%
6768 96%
7840 83%
6702 97%
7568 86%
Contrast
997
970

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 257.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 257.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 257.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
45234 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
45613 Points ∼20% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼27% +30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼27% +32%
Lenovo P2
63522 Points ∼28% +34%
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼28% +36%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points ∼57% +4%
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼70% +29%
Huawei Nova Plus
4672 Points ∼68% +26%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3691 Points ∼44% -25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points ∼60% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼82% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼82% +38%
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼58% -2%
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼69% +16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
624 Points ∼40% +6140%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points ∼48% +7270%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼42% +6390%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% +6920%
Lenovo P2
783 Points ∼51% +7730%
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼49% +7440%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
512 Points ∼6% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼12% +90%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% +91%
Lenovo P2
1016 Points ∼12% +91%
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼12% +90%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1319 Points ∼30% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points ∼28% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼18% -37%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% -18%
Lenovo P2
1451 Points ∼33% +15%
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼35% +23%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
2127 Points ∼32% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points ∼34% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼31% -13%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% +23%
Lenovo P2
1960 Points ∼30% -17%
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼32% -10%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
973 Points ∼26% +176%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points ∼27% +190%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼27% +189%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼32% +244%
Lenovo P2
1226 Points ∼32% +247%
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼33% +258%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2332 Points ∼27% -2%
Huawei Nova Plus
3401 Points ∼40% +43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3704 Points ∼23% -2%
Huawei Nova Plus
3148 Points ∼19% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
732 Points ∼15% -1%
Huawei Nova Plus
880 Points ∼18% +20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1681 Points ∼56% +10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points ∼57% +13%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points ∼54% +7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼70% +39%
Lenovo P2
1673 Points ∼55% +10%
Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points ∼59% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
242 Points ∼4% +22%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points ∼3% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points ∼7% +92%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% +91%
Lenovo P2
380 Points ∼7% +91%
Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points ∼7% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
299 Points ∼8% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points ∼6% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points ∼12% +87%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% +88%
Lenovo P2
459 Points ∼12% +86%
Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points ∼12% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
303 Points ∼10% -80%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points ∼56% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼54% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼70% +38%
Lenovo P2
1682 Points ∼56% +10%
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼60% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1687 Points ∼22% +507%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% +161%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% +159%
Lenovo P2
726 Points ∼9% +161%
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼9% +164%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
394 Points ∼8% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼17% +143%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% +148%
Lenovo P2
831 Points ∼17% +144%
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼17% +148%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12949 Points ∼19% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points ∼18% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼23% +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼23% +23%
Lenovo P2
15462 Points ∼22% +19%
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼23% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7746 Points ∼2% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% +80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% +81%
Lenovo P2
13398 Points ∼3% +80%
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼3% +80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
8505 Points ∼4% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points ∼4% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% +68%
Lenovo P2
13808 Points ∼7% +66%
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼7% +67%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% +92%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% +92%
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼2% +92%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼2% +92%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
19 fps ∼4% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps ∼4% +67%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼5% +92%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% +75%
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼5% +92%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼5% +92%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9.4 fps ∼2% +84%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% +96%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% +94%
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼2% +96%
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼2% +94%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
4.9 fps ∼1% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps ∼3% +96%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼3% +96%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% +90%
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼3% +96%
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼3% +96%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3.2 fps ∼1% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps ∼1% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% +88%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% +88%
Lenovo P2
6.2 fps ∼1% +88%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼1% +88%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7.2 fps ∼4% +125%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps ∼4% +131%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼4% +109%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% +91%
Lenovo P2
6.7 fps ∼4% +109%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼4% +106%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1.8 fps ∼1% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.4 fps ∼1% +79%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼1% +79%
Lenovo P2
3.4 fps ∼1% +79%
Huawei Nova Plus
3.7 fps ∼1% +95%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3.6 fps ∼0% +89%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps ∼0% +95%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.7 fps ∼0% +95%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼0% +79%
Lenovo P2
3.7 fps ∼0% +95%
Huawei Nova Plus
3.4 fps ∼0% +79%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
5.3 fps ∼14%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
10438 Points ∼24%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21210 Points ∼47%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
138 Points ∼7%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo P2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points ∼100% +22%
Huawei Nova Plus
31.3 Points ∼98% +21%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼98% +20%
Lenovo P2
28.883 Points ∼91% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
26.37 Points ∼83% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
25.972 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
24.119 Points ∼76% -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
4968 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼99% +8%
Huawei Nova Plus
4730 Points ∼95% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4560 Points ∼92%
Lenovo P2
4435 Points ∼89% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3905 Points ∼78% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9670.9 ms * ∼100% -42%
Lenovo P2
8463 ms * ∼88% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8168.9 ms * ∼84% -20%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼83% -18%
Huawei Nova Plus
8027.7 ms * ∼83% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
6820.9 ms * ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
6784.4 ms * ∼70% +1%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points ∼100% +12%
Lenovo P2
84 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei Nova Plus
83 Points ∼99% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points ∼99% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
80 Points ∼95% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
75 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
66 Points ∼79% -12%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017Samsung Galaxy J7 2016Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosLenovo Moto Z PlayAsus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLLenovo P2Huawei Nova Plus
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-8%
71%
73%
75%
35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
50.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-21%
50.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-22%
59.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
33.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
74.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
4%
79.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
4%
41.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-45%
Random Write 4KB
10.54
10.11
-4%
9.9
-6%
45.58
332%
7.4
-30%
44.4
321%
30.12
186%
Random Read 4KB
25.86
22.33
-14%
24.07
-7%
38.78
50%
74
186%
38.2
48%
35.64
38%
Sequential Write 256KB
52.98
46.24
-13%
51.96
-2%
73.14
38%
188
255%
76.74
45%
82.13
55%
Sequential Read 256KB
198.47
189.35
-5%
204.45
3%
254.78
28%
282
42%
270.14
36%
241.57
22%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high18 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
 400 MSM8928, Adreno 305
18
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
 425, Adreno 308
18
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
18
ZTE Blade V8
 435, Adreno 505
19
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
 435, Adreno 505
19
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Temple Run 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 default59 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 32 °C32.2 °C31 °C 
 32.6 °C32.1 °C31.6 °C 
 31.7 °C32.5 °C31.6 °C 
Máximo: 32.6 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C
30.3 °C30.8 °C31.5 °C
30.4 °C31 °C31.2 °C
30.9 °C31.3 °C31.3 °C
Máximo: 31.5 °C
Médio: 31 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.630.82525.430.53125.331.24032.930.75033.631.76331.628.88028.422.6100272612520.836.81602240.220021.349.225020.853.731521.257.140019.462.650019.567.463017.767.880017.969.5100017.870.7125017.372.1160017.474.6200016.775.2250017.275.5315018.277.9400017.981.4500017.679630017.775.6800017.875.41000017.971.31250018.162.61600018.255.8SPL3087.1N1.370.5median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J7 2017median 69.5Delta1.310.631.64225.437.625.331.432.936.333.651.731.634.328.431.72736.920.8262229.921.341.820.853.921.259.419.463.619.567.417.766.117.970.117.869.817.373.417.474.616.776.717.277.218.278.917.979.617.67617.772.917.873.217.971.118.164.518.257.23087.41.368.4median 17.9Huawei Nova Plusmedian 69.81.310.231.640.525.432.925.334.132.932.933.635.931.633.628.430.7272620.826.82229.521.336.920.846.921.251.819.456.919.561.617.76417.969.317.869.517.372.917.471.116.770.617.268.918.273.817.97617.669.417.771.617.873.517.971.118.170.418.268.23083.71.356.5median 17.9Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLmedian 69.31.310.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.06 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.39 / 1.06 / 1.08 Watt
Carga midlight 1.82 / 3.21 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Power Consumption
-47%
-3%
-93%
-10%
-52%
Idle Minimum *
0.39
0.67
-72%
0.51
-31%
0.83
-113%
0.54
-38%
0.49
-26%
Idle Average *
1.06
1.71
-61%
0.87
18%
2.11
-99%
1.01
5%
1.63
-54%
Idle Maximum *
1.08
1.83
-69%
0.9
17%
2.12
-96%
1.03
5%
1.76
-63%
Load Average *
1.82
2.37
-30%
1.69
7%
3.41
-87%
1.78
2%
2.98
-64%
Load Maximum *
3.21
3.31
-3%
4
-25%
5.46
-70%
3.98
-24%
4.99
-55%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
32h 30min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
15h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
8h 45min
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
14%
-21%
16%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1950
2030
4%
2540
30%
1502
-23%
2841
46%
2048
5%
H.264
1096
1220
11%
1190
9%
905
-17%
1199
9%
732
-33%
WiFi v1.3
904
1025
13%
824
-9%
797
-12%
978
8%
820
-9%
Load
525
681
30%
652
24%
352
-33%
528
1%
366
-30%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
768 min ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
681 min ∼89% +2%
Huawei Mate 9
677 min ∼88% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
669 min ∼87%
Sony Xperia XZ
482 min ∼63% -28%
HTC U11
476 min ∼62% -29%

Pro

+ Ótima tela Full-HD
+ Dual SIM e microSD
+ Internet sem fio veloz
+ Ótimas durações da bateria
+ Boa geolocalização
+ Bom sensor de digitais

Contra

- PWM
- Durações de bateria mais fracas que a do predecessor
- Qualidade de chamada modesta
- Sem USB Tipo C
- GPU muito fraca
In review: Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) Duos SM-J730F
In review: Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) Duos SM-J730F

O Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) é um smartphone bem feito. No entanto, não consegue dominar seus concorrentes tanto quanto o Galaxy J5. Isso se torna muito aparente em termos de duração da bateria. No entanto, isto é reclamar em um nível muito alto, dado que ainda é muito bom. Apesar da bateria maior, infelizmente é pior do que o J7 do ano passado. A Samsung pode melhorar isso com uma atualização.

O Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) não melhorou em todos os aspectos. No entanto, é um ótimo smartphone.

O Galaxy J7 (2017) pode brilhar com a sua ótima tela Super-AMOLED, que é finalmente controlada por um sensor de luz ambiente - o que estava atrasado há muito tempo. Além disso, agora oferece resolução Full HD. Infelizmente, a Samsung não equipa o telefone com um SoC ligeiramente mais poderoso para lidar com a maior densidade de pixels. Isso é notório no desempenho fraco dos jogos, mas também pode ser um motivo para durações da bateria mais curtas. As câmeras não são modelos de referência, mas produzem bons resultados se o ambiente for suficientemente iluminado. O módulo Wi-Fi não suporta apenas todos os padrões atuais, mas também oferece boas taxas de transferência. O armazenamento interno de 16 GB também é bastante padrão. No entanto, a capacidade de armazenamento pode ser expandida com um microSD sem renunciar ao recurso dual SIM.

O que resta é um smartphone visualmente melhorado. No entanto, sua bateria agora é removível. Em troca, ele vem com um sensor de digitai e 3 GB de RAM. Para alguns, pode valer a penas adquirir o modelo do ano passado.

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 - 07/28/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Bateria
98%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
14 / 63 → 22%
Desempenho da aplicação
43 / 70 → 61%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Camera
63%
Médio
72%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) Duos
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-08- 2 (Update: 2017-08-11)