Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto G4 Play

Round 4. O Moto G4 Play pode ser o aparelho mais barato da linha Moto G, mas a Lenovo não recortou todas as pontas. Em nossos testes, o smartphone Android de 5-polegadas nos impressionou com a sua boa relação preço-desempenho, bom hardware e longas durações da bateria.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Moto G Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Capacitiva, Multi-touch, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões MicroSD de até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz ambiente, Chromecast, USB-OTG, App2SD
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1 LE, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Bandwidth 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.9 x 144.4 x 72
Bateria
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0 shutter, flash LED, Auto-HDR, vídeos em 1080p até 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2 shutter
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes frontais, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, manual breve, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
137 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156 mm 77.5 mm 10.55 mm 202 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g146 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 143 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.5 MBit/s +103%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.6 MBit/s +79%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s
Moto G4 Play: path
Moto G4 Play: path
Moto G4 Play: bridge
Moto G4 Play: bridge
Moto G4 Play: forest
Moto G4 Play: forest
Garmin Edge 500: path
Garmin Edge 500: path
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: forest
Garmin Edge 500: forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
404
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 430 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 414.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 412 cd/m²
Contraste: 981:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.4
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
HTC One A9
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
11%
22%
7%
-9%
6%
Brightness middle
412
586
42%
346
-16%
289
-30%
518
26%
418
1%
Brightness
414
566
37%
349
-16%
291
-30%
475
15%
407
-2%
Brightness Distribution
94
84
-11%
93
-1%
96
2%
81
-14%
95
1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.57
-36%
0.61
-45%
0.49
-17%
Contrast
981
1028
5%
849
-13%
853
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.6
4.2
25%
1.55
72%
4.7
16%
6.8
-21%
3.92
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.7
8.4
13%
7.3
25%
11.4
-18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.9
6.3
9%
2.05
70%
3
57%
7
-1%
3.81
45%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.39 92%
2.15 102%
2.03 108%
2.35 94%
2.27 97%
CCT
8422 77%
6614 98%
6267 104%
6291 103%
8151 80%
7361 88%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18080 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
26169 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points +70%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
4328 Points -2%
HTC One A9
9163 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points +152%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4402 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3767 Points -2%
HTC One A9
9015 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points +183%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3789 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9043 Points -2%
HTC One A9
9423 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
10148 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
53 Points 0%
HTC One A9
680 Points +1183%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points +1038%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
49 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
42 Points 0%
HTC One A9
618 Points +1371%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points +1150%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
39 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
719 Points 0%
HTC One A9
1051 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points +76%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
758 Points +6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps
HTC One A9
16 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps +1%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps +192%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5.2 fps 0%
HTC One A9
16 fps +208%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps +246%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps +2%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1.8 fps -56%
HTC One A9
6.7 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -7%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps +266%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps -10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.8 fps +111%
HTC One A9
6.4 fps +256%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps +300%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9
4 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9
3.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3691 Points -14%
HTC One A9
4293 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
622 Points +3%
HTC One A9
981 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points +73%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points -15%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1088 Points +5%
HTC One A9
1595 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points +121%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1166 Points +13%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
797 Points +8%
HTC One A9
1018 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points +45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
317 Points +1%
HTC One A9
726 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
315 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
544 Points -1%
HTC One A9
786 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
484 Points -12%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
2685 Points -3%
HTC One A9
3911 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points +46%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points +19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12953 ms *
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
13525 ms * -4%
HTC One A9
11054 ms * +15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * -1%
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * +26%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * +9%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
48 Points
HTC One A9
69 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points +8%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.09 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
17.53 Points +3%
HTC One A9
24.79 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points +61%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
20.83 Points +22%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.1 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
130.6 MB/s -9%
HTC One A9
187.6 MB/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s +2%
Sony Xperia XA
240.4 MB/s +67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
131.4 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
31.1 MB/s -29%
HTC One A9
39.61 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s +64%
Sony Xperia XA
68.6 MB/s +56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.33 MB/s -49%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9.1 MB/s -49%
HTC One A9
10 MB/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s +17%
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s +23%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.79 MB/s +27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.6 MB/s -87%
HTC One A9
3.61 MB/s -87%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s -59%
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s -63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.11 MB/s -82%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
38.43 MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.8 MB/s +22%
Sony Xperia XA
72.9 MB/s +11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
18.93 MB/s -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s -9%
Sony Xperia XA
50.7 MB/s -1%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.8 °C34 °C31.9 °C 
 38.8 °C33.5 °C31.4 °C 
 37.8 °C34 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 34.5 °C
32.6 °C34 °C35.4 °C
31.4 °C33.4 °C34.8 °C
31.9 °C33.3 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 35.6 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2017.919.719.617.92519.618.619.519.63117.617.521.317.6402019.223.2205017.715.620.717.76315.516.621.915.58017.218.214.417.210018.120.315.918.112528.930.425.328.91601424.611.81420014.929.511.914.925016.432.413.516.431518.934.214.718.940022.238.813.422.250025.843.914.425.86303046.910.63080036.853.1836.810004056.98.940125039.856.39.839.816003956.1839200036.952.68.136.9250036.553.66.536.5315035.453.86.435.4400037.756.46.237.750004058.15.740630044595.744800043.658.65.743.61000038.6545.838.6125003246.15.832160002437.25.624SPL51.167.620.851.1N7.121.20.37.1median 35.4median 52.6median 8.1median 35.4Delta8.810.43.88.835.342.132.435.331.13031.331.134.630.731.734.633.733.62633.737.436.639.437.434.526.836.234.527.626.728.627.626.124.325.426.124.626.121.324.624.222.723.324.221.620.922.521.626.921.722.426.937.730.521.337.747.441.418.447.459.652.917.559.668.96217.568.975.869.817.275.875.369.816.875.370.165.117.370.166.761.317.466.766.460.216.666.467.66117.367.666.961.317.666.967.862.117.667.869.963.917.769.974.96917.474.980.57517.780.581.676.717.981.671.866.918.171.855.65018.155.685.680.129.885.659.2421.359.2median 66.9median 61.3median 17.7median 66.912.813.91.712.837.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2median 42.6median 17.7median 65.212.912.11.712.92832.42833.331.333.332.531.732.534.92634.947.639.447.633.736.233.730.728.630.727.925.427.930.421.330.433.223.333.235.122.535.141.822.441.845.421.345.45018.45055.817.555.860.517.560.56717.26767.416.867.468.117.368.164.817.464.858.716.658.76417.36471.517.671.57417.67474.517.774.573.917.473.97117.77169.417.969.458.318.158.348.918.148.98229.88248.51.348.5median 60.5median 17.7median 60.511.41.711.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto G4 PlayAsus ZenFone Max ZC550KLSamsung Galaxy J5 2016Sony Xperia XA
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.08 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.68 / 1.58 / 1.61 Watt
Carga midlight 3.36 / 3.91 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 mAh
Power Consumption
-50%
-12%
14%
-11%
18%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
1.15
-69%
0.9
-32%
0.61
10%
0.72
-6%
0.4
41%
Idle Average *
1.58
2.09
-32%
1.2
24%
1.41
11%
1.5
5%
1
37%
Idle Maximum *
1.61
2.17
-35%
1.4
13%
1.51
6%
1.57
2%
1.2
25%
Load Average *
3.36
5.38
-60%
3.8
-13%
2.56
24%
3.48
-4%
2.9
14%
Load Maximum *
3.91
6.08
-55%
5.9
-51%
3.1
21%
6.04
-54%
5
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 18min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 23min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 06min
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 mAh
Battery Runtime
52%
-40%
2%
-46%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1998
1154
-42%
1599
-20%
775
-61%
1364
-32%
H.264
683
465
-32%
658
-4%
460
-33%
677
-1%
WiFi v1.3
630
959
52%
368
-42%
643
2%
353
-44%
526
-17%
Load
306
176
-42%
402
31%
170
-44%
264
-14%

Pro

+ Boa tela HD
+ Android 6.0 Marshmallow
+ LTE
+ Permanece frio
+ Sem afogamento sob uso intenso
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Alto falantes fracos
- Câmeras médias
- Sem NFC
- Poucos acessórios
In review: Lenovo Moto G4 Play. Test model provided by Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Moto G4 Play. Test model provided by Lenovo Germany.

 

"Motorola entrega um smartphone de gama média com o Moto G, com recursos especiais e impressionantes." Esta frase foi o veredicto do Moto G de 3ra geração. Nós podemos aplicá-la diretamente para o Moto G4. O modelo de teste combina bom hardware e um desempenho sólido, sem grandes falhas. Em comparação com o predecessor, o Moto G4 tem um SoC mais veloz, mais espeço de armazenamento, uma tela similar, mas com preço mais baixo. Se você deseja um smartphone barato, porém, bom, recomendamos pagar 159 Euros (~$174) pelo Moto G4 Play.

O Lenovo Moto G4 Play é um aparelho bastante completo de gama média com fortalezas específicas por um preço relativamente baixo.

O telefone tem algumas falhas: o alto falante é relativamente silencioso e as câmeras não impressionarão o usuário. Não suporta NFC e o conteúdo da tela somente pode ser transmitido para uma TV utilizando o Chromecast. Nós também sentimos falta do cabo Micro-USB separado.

Lenovo Moto G4 Play - 11/01/2016 v5.1(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
93%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
5 / 63 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
36 / 70 → 51%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
60%
Médio
70%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Manuel Masiero, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-27)