Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA

Andreas Kilian, Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/31/2016

Épocas douradas? Com o seu Xperia XA, a Sony lança uma nova obra de designer no ringe dos smartphones de gama média. Estetas, em particular, devem notar a moldura lateral fina da tela, e a construção simples, de imediato. Mas será que os valores interiores são suficientes para manter os rivais à distância?

Sony Xperia XA (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, giroscópio, bússola, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, DLNA, nano-SIM, USB-OTG, rádio FM
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (bandas 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20) Cat 4 (max. 50 Mbit/s upload, 150 Mbit/s download), SAR body: 0.473 W/kg, SAR head: 0.471 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 143.6 x 66.8
Bateria
8.7 Wh, 2300 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (autofoco f/2.0, 1080p video @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (autofoco f/2.0, 1080p video @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, fones, Playstation, FM radio, Movie Creator, TrackID, Sketch, SwiftKey, AR Effect, Spotify, Facebook, Amazon Shopping, Xperia Lounge, Kobo eBooks, Sky Go, AVG Protection, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
137 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g
Preço
300 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA rear
Sony Xperia XA side
Sony Xperia XA camera
Sony Xperia XA card slots

Size Comparison

146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g146 mm 72.5 mm 7.95 mm 136 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g142 mm 70.9 mm 6.9 mm 122 g134.5 mm 65.2 mm 7.4 mm 131 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +228%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼82% +169%
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
244 MBit/s ∼81% +164%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.5 MBit/s ∼31%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼16% -46%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s ∼15% -52%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100% +247%
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
219 MBit/s ∼76% +162%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼71% +145%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.6 MBit/s ∼29%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼20% -30%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼17% -41%
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Sony Xperia XA - route
Sony Xperia XA - route
Sony Xperia XA - underpass
Sony Xperia XA - underpass
Sony Xperia XA - turning point
Sony Xperia XA - turning point
Camera app: Clever automatic
Camera app: Clever automatic
Camera app: Additional modes
Camera app: Additional modes

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
421
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 518 cd/m² Médio: 475 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 518 cd/m²
Contraste: 849:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.35
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5
Screen
10%
34%
10%
-14%
20%
Brightness middle
518
289
-44%
386
-25%
505
-3%
409
-21%
349
-33%
Brightness
475
291
-39%
394
-17%
468
-1%
411
-13%
353
-26%
Brightness Distribution
81
96
19%
88
9%
88
9%
96
19%
92
14%
Black Level *
0.61
0.74
-21%
0.38
38%
Contrast
849
682
-20%
1076
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.8
4.7
31%
1.11
84%
4.1
40%
9.4
-38%
2.6
62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.4
7.3
36%
3.35
71%
5.8
49%
17.6
-54%
8.2
28%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
3
57%
1.34
81%
4.9
30%
11.6
-66%
1.8
74%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.03 108%
2.12 104%
2.5 88%
2.25 98%
2.06 107%
CCT
8151 80%
6291 103%
6441 101%
7116 91%
9597 68%
6542 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17093 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼9% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
35964 Points ∼12% -26%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼17% +4%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼13% -23%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points ∼11% -34%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼21% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4051 Points ∼21% -14%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼27% +14%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼20% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
756 Points ∼37% +5%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼38% +7%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points ∼27% -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼1% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
415 Points ∼1% -38%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼3% +22%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼1% -36%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points ∼1% -69%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼6% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1380 Points ∼8% -40%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼15% +7%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼7% -48%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points ∼3% -76%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼7% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
662 Points ∼8% -37%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼14% +15%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼3% -76%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points ∼5% -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -71%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps ∼0% -33%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼0% +6%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼0% -33%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps ∼0% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼0% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps ∼1% -29%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% -32%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼0% -57%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps ∼0% -80%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps ∼1% -43%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% +8%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼0% -6%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼0% -40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼0% -74%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
2.5 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
2.8 fps ∼1% +12%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
5.4 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼1% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼14% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
916 Points ∼18% -27%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼27% +9%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼19% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼0% -92%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
235 Points ∼2% -55%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼4% -10%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼2% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -91%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
281 Points ∼3% -53%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼6% -8%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼3% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼10% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points ∼13% -4%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼16% +13%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼12% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points ∼1% -40%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% +4%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points ∼3% -35%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼5% +5%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% -39%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
9609.8 ms * ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * ∼22% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11796.2 ms * ∼20% -23%
Huawei P9 Lite
9396.5 ms * ∼16% +2%
ZTE Blade V7
13761.1 ms * ∼23% -43%
Microsoft Lumia 650
18237.4 ms * ∼31% -90%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points ∼5% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points ∼7% -12%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points ∼9% +18%
ZTE Blade V7
2689 Points ∼5% -34%
Microsoft Lumia 650
2574 Points ∼5% -36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼6% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
64 Points ∼8% -11%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points ∼8% -7%
Microsoft Lumia 650
52 Points ∼6% -28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points ∼5% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
22.1 Points ∼6% -20%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points ∼8% +6%
ZTE Blade V7
18.19 Points ∼5% -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
50.68 MB/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s ∼53% -8%
Huawei P9 Lite
25.1 MB/s ∼29% -50%
ZTE Blade V7
20.89 MB/s ∼24% -59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
72.87 MB/s ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.83 MB/s ∼83% +10%
Huawei P9 Lite
60.81 MB/s ∼63% -17%
ZTE Blade V7
43.67 MB/s ∼45% -40%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s ∼4% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
10.27 MB/s ∼4% -3%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s ∼6% +45%
ZTE Blade V7
7.58 MB/s ∼3% -28%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s ∼9% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
21.92 MB/s ∼10% -1%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s ∼17% +73%
ZTE Blade V7
28.07 MB/s ∼12% +27%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
68.64 MB/s ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s ∼10% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
27.27 MB/s ∼4% -60%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s ∼6% -33%
ZTE Blade V7
39.45 MB/s ∼5% -43%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
240.43 MB/s ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s ∼8% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
168.79 MB/s ∼9% -30%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.55 MB/s ∼16% +18%
ZTE Blade V7
196.76 MB/s ∼11% -18%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼9% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points ∼6% -59%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼18% +25%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼11% -27%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points ∼8% -47%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high27 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high59 fps
Carga Máxima
 41.7 °C41.6 °C37.1 °C 
 42 °C41.6 °C36.6 °C 
 40.4 °C40.2 °C36.3 °C 
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
33.9 °C38.2 °C41.4 °C
35.4 °C37.4 °C41.7 °C
32.3 °C38.4 °C41.5 °C
Máximo: 41.7 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202832.4282533.331.333.33132.531.732.54034.92634.95047.639.447.66333.736.233.78030.728.630.710027.925.427.912530.421.330.416033.223.333.220035.122.535.125041.822.441.831545.421.345.44005018.45050055.817.555.863060.517.560.58006717.267100067.416.867.4125068.117.368.1160064.817.464.8200058.716.658.725006417.364315071.517.671.540007417.674500074.517.774.5630073.917.473.980007117.7711000069.417.969.41250058.318.158.31600048.918.148.9SPL8229.882N48.51.348.5median 60.5median 17.7median 60.5Delta11.61.611.640.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72median 53.9median 17.7median 7211.19.91.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia XAHuawei P9 Lite
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.72 / 1.5 / 1.57 Watt
Carga midlight 3.48 / 6.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Power Consumption
20%
10%
-15%
10%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
0.61
15%
0.96
-33%
0.73
-1%
0.73
-1%
0.7
3%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.41
6%
1.39
7%
2.09
-39%
0.92
39%
1.1
27%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.51
4%
1.45
8%
2.11
-34%
0.93
41%
1.18
25%
Load Average *
3.48
2.56
26%
2.65
24%
4.15
-19%
4.47
-28%
4.04
-16%
Load Maximum *
6.04
3.1
49%
3.51
42%
5.05
16%
5.96
1%
4.07
33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 50min
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Battery Runtime
92%
111%
59%
47%
13%
Reader / Idle
775
1599
106%
1978
155%
1404
81%
910
17%
H.264
460
658
43%
863
88%
568
23%
510
11%
WiFi v1.3
353
643
82%
628
78%
604
71%
519
47%
345
-2%
Load
170
402
136%
376
121%
272
60%
213
25%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina
+ Botão dedicado da câmera
+ Slot micro-SD com App2SD
+ Micacast , USB OTG e suporte para DLNA
+ WiFi de 5 GHz
+ Boa câmera frontal com autofoco
+ Tela brilhante
+ Bom desempenho total
+ Android 6.0 Marshmallow
+ Boa qualidade das chamadas mediante o fone
+ Suporte para carga rápida

Contra

- Curta duração da bateria
- Sem leitor de digitais
- Problemas com a tela táctil no modelo de teste
- Desempenho pobre da viva voz
- Problemas com o foco da câmera principal em vídeos
- Bateria não removível
- Sem carregador Pump Express+ 2.0 incluído
In review: Sony Xperia XA (F3111). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Sony Xperia XA (F3111). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

O novo smartphone de gama média Sony Xperia XA colhe alguns pontos adicionais com sua boa configuração: O armazenamento interno de 16 GB é facilmente expansível com um cartão micro-SD, a porta micro-USB é compatível com OTG, e NFC também está abordo. No entanto, um leitor de digitais para desbloquear o smartphone de forma confortável está ausente. Os entusiastas das fotos provavelmente ficarão satisfeitos com o botão de liberação dedicado, e a resolução relativamente alta da câmera principal e autofoco. Como é comum nesta categoria, compromissos terão que ser feitos em termos de qualidade de imagem. Também gostamos do bom desempenho do SoC MediaTek e tela brilhante. Os recorrentes problemas da tela táctil, no entanto, foram perturbantes durante o teste. Algo totalmente inaceitável para muitos compradores potenciais provavelmente será a duração da bateria abaixo da média.

O Xperia XA chamara a atenção principalmente com sua linha fina, mas os valores interiores na forma de um veloz SoC, tela brilhante, e armazenamento expansível também são muito convincentes. Finalmente é a curta duração da bateria que estraga o modelo de teste, que de outra maneira teria um bom resultado.

Com um preço de aproximadamente 270 Euros (~$302), o Xperia XA se situa entre a escala de preços superior para smartphones de gama média. O Huawei P9 Lite em particular, demonstrou ser um oponente digno em muitos aspectos no teste. Ele oferece algumas vantagens com uma tela maior, duração mais longa da bateria e leitor de digitais integrado, e também está disponível a partir de aproximadamente 270 Euros (~$302).

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês.

Sony Xperia XA - 08/10/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
77%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 74%
Peso
93%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
25 / 63 → 40%
Desempenho da aplicação
44 / 70 → 63%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
70%
Médio
71%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA
Andreas Kilian, 2016-08-31 (Update: 2016-09- 9)