Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G5s

Evolução da câmera. A edição especial do Moto G5 destina-se a adicionar à seleção da Motorola de smartphones de gama média, e houve uma série de mudanças para que isso aconteça. Mais notavelmente, a câmera foi significativamente aprimorada. Em nossa análise, verificaremos se isso irá revelar uma melhoria acentuada no uso diário.
Motorola Moto G5s (Moto G5s Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21.7 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5mm-Headsetport, Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); Max. bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 150 x 73.5
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, QuickCharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, phase-detection-af, LED-flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.0, flash LED
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, ferramenta de cartão SIM, Moto, 24 Meses Garantia, Head-SAR: 0.472W/​kg, Body-SAR: 1.050W/​kg, fanless
peso
157 g, Suprimento de energia: 81 g
Preço
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s
Motorola Moto G5s

Size comparison

150 mm 73.5 mm 9.5 mm 157 g149.7 mm 72.5 mm 8.05 mm 148 g146.5 mm 72.7 mm 7.9 mm 153 g146.2 mm 71.3 mm 8 mm 158 g144.3 mm 73 mm 9.5 mm 144.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s +153%
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s +143%
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s +1%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s +175%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
278 MBit/s +130%
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s 0%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Motorola Moto G5s – overview
GPS Motorola Moto G5s – overview
GPS Motorola Moto G5s – crossing
GPS Motorola Moto G5s – crossing
GPS Motorola Moto G5s – bridge
GPS Motorola Moto G5s – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Lens and camera testing chart
Lens and camera testing chart
Lens and camera testing chart detail
Lens and camera testing chart detail
ColorChecker: target colour is displayed in the lower half of each colour square
ColorChecker: target colour is displayed in the lower half of each colour square
501
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 524 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 502.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.63 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 490 cd/m²
Contraste: 1140:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.4
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
BQ Aquaris X
LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.20
Nokia 5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.20
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
1%
-4%
12%
26%
11%
Brightness middle
490
675
38%
630
29%
448
-9%
660
35%
512
4%
Brightness
502
702
40%
635
26%
451
-10%
625
25%
500
0%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
90
-2%
91
-1%
92
0%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.43
0.59
-37%
0.57
-33%
0.29
33%
0.35
19%
Contrast
1140
1144
0%
1105
-3%
2276
100%
1463
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.7
4.5
21%
5
12%
2.7
53%
4.9
14%
4.6
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.8
9.1
-17%
8.7
-12%
9.8
-26%
7.6
3%
7.6
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.7
6.4
-36%
6.9
-47%
1.6
66%
4.8
-2%
3.8
19%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
2.37 93%
2.06 107%
2.18 101%
2.11 104%
CCT
7526 86%
7478 87%
8736 74%
6557 99%
7357 88%
6952 93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 6 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 6 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points
BQ Aquaris X
63428 Points +37%
Nokia 5
45274 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
45613 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G5
44653 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
63746 Points +37%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points
BQ Aquaris X
5792 Points +24%
Nokia 5
5060 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto G5
4730 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5656 Points +21%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points
BQ Aquaris X
4891 Points +36%
Nokia 5
3807 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto G5
3583 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5035 Points +40%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points
BQ Aquaris X
1333 Points +57%
Nokia 5
958 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points +21%
Lenovo Moto G5
815 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1033 Points +22%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points
BQ Aquaris X
3551 Points +129%
Nokia 5
2154 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points +43%
Lenovo Moto G5
1656 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2914 Points +88%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points
BQ Aquaris X
1039 Points +58%
Nokia 5
788 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points +90%
Lenovo Moto G5
538 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
584 Points -11%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points
BQ Aquaris X
1014 Points +40%
Nokia 5
740 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto G5
722 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
986 Points +36%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points
BQ Aquaris X
843 Points +20%
Nokia 5
671 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto G5
686 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
679 Points -3%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points
BQ Aquaris X
929 Points +47%
Nokia 5
671 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
732 Points +16%
Lenovo Moto G5
619 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
841 Points +33%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points
BQ Aquaris X
4522 Points +99%
Nokia 5
2849 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3704 Points +63%
Lenovo Moto G5
2563 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
4308 Points +90%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2332 Points +25%
Lenovo Moto G5
1731 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2628 Points +40%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points
BQ Aquaris X
14034 Points +48%
Nokia 5
9529 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto G5
9494 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13732 Points +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points
BQ Aquaris X
13330 Points +38%
Nokia 5
9684 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto G5
9617 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13225 Points +37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points
BQ Aquaris X
17124 Points +89%
Nokia 5
9023 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points +39%
Lenovo Moto G5
9089 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
15860 Points +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points
BQ Aquaris X
849 Points +53%
Nokia 5
581 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points -39%
Lenovo Moto G5
572 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
843 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points
BQ Aquaris X
724 Points +50%
Nokia 5
503 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points -43%
Lenovo Moto G5
496 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
723 Points +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points
BQ Aquaris X
2139 Points +85%
Nokia 5
1268 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points +46%
Lenovo Moto G5
1243 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2016 Points +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points
BQ Aquaris X
465 Points +58%
Nokia 5
298 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto G5
296 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
463 Points +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points
BQ Aquaris X
380 Points +56%
Nokia 5
245 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points -24%
Lenovo Moto G5
243 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
379 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points
BQ Aquaris X
2179 Points +82%
Nokia 5
1227 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points +44%
Lenovo Moto G5
1245 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2021 Points +69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps
BQ Aquaris X
22 fps +38%
Nokia 5
27 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps +25%
Lenovo Moto G5
14 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
19 fps +19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps
BQ Aquaris X
23 fps +44%
Nokia 5
17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps -25%
Lenovo Moto G5
16 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
23 fps +44%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps
BQ Aquaris X
9.7 fps +31%
Nokia 5
14 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps +35%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.4 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
10 fps +35%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps
BQ Aquaris X
9.8 fps +38%
Nokia 5
7.2 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps -28%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
9.8 fps +38%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps
BQ Aquaris X
6.3 fps +26%
Nokia 5
10 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps +48%
Lenovo Moto G5
5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.9 fps +38%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps
BQ Aquaris X
6.4 fps +39%
Nokia 5
4.6 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps -30%
Lenovo Moto G5
4.6 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.4 fps +39%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps +30%
Nokia 5
5.2 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps +37%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.7 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.8 fps +41%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps +40%
Nokia 5
2.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps -24%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.5 fps +40%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
27.1 Points +45%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
26.41 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
26.37 Points +41%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
21.48 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
20.36 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.66 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4968 Points +64%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
4786 Points +58%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
4456 Points +47%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3138 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
2604 Points -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms *
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
11358 ms * +13%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
10396 ms * +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
9361 ms * +28%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
8825 ms * +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6784 ms * +48%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
80 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
57 Points -7%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
57 Points -7%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G5sBQ Aquaris XNokia 5Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosLenovo Moto G5Motorola Moto G5s Plus
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-14%
-36%
-15%
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB
259
266.4
3%
255.6
-1%
204.4
-21%
230.6
-11%
237.4
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
77.5
75.3
-3%
74.9
-3%
52
-33%
45.6
-41%
75.7
-2%
Random Read 4KB
40.6
37.47
-8%
40.54
0%
24.07
-41%
37.6
-7%
37.94
-7%
Random Write 4KB
46.2
11.85
-74%
8.39
-82%
9.9
-79%
37.9
-18%
44.89
-3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
83.9
0%
72.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
78.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
79.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
62
0%
44.21 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-29%
58 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
Carga Máxima
 36 °C33.4 °C32.6 °C 
 34.3 °C33.7 °C31.6 °C 
 34.9 °C32.5 °C31.4 °C 
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
32.4 °C33 °C33.1 °C
32.1 °C32.3 °C31.9 °C
30.1 °C32.1 °C32.2 °C
Máximo: 33.1 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  22.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.243.32532.946.63137.236.84031.735.55039.642.16328.3388027.336.810026.934.212526.737.91602441.820020.94625020.951.131519.556.340018.559.850017.564.263017.56980015.774.2100015.875.8125016.673.6160015.869200015.471.4250015.57131501677.6400015.879.750001679.9630016.376.2800016.374.41000016.282.41250016.480.81600016.462.2SPL28.688.4N1.173.5median 16.4median 71.4Delta2.29.231.636.625.436.225.335.832.927.833.627.631.630.328.430.32727.820.832.9223221.339.620.845.521.252.819.457.319.564.917.769.417.969.817.873.217.372.117.470.216.770.717.272.518.271.817.969.817.669.617.765.717.86417.964.318.157.518.251.33082.11.351.5median 17.9median 64.91.49.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G5sLenovo Moto G5
Motorola Moto G5s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.4 / 1.52 Watt
Carga midlight 4.56 / 7.05 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-20%
5%
36%
0%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
1.12
-67%
0.52
22%
0.52
22%
0.73
-9%
0.83
-24%
Idle Average *
1.4
2.16
-54%
1.78
-27%
1.17
16%
1.64
-17%
1.67
-19%
Idle Maximum *
1.52
2.18
-43%
1.96
-29%
1.24
18%
1.68
-11%
1.85
-22%
Load Average *
4.56
2.94
36%
3.23
29%
1.66
64%
3.46
24%
3.47
24%
Load Maximum *
7.05
5.1
28%
4.88
31%
2.94
58%
6.13
13%
5.41
23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 45min
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
37%
53%
-1%
65%
Reader / Idle
1233
1772
44%
1564
27%
1243
1%
1496
21%
H.264
645
790
22%
917
42%
616
-4%
WiFi v1.3
518
592
14%
713
38%
738
42%
561
8%
974
88%
Load
225
323
44%
449
100%
207
-8%
419
86%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e atraente
+ Quase nada de bloatware
+ GPS preciso
+ Características de som forte e decente do alto-falante
+ Boa câmera
+ Manuseio preciso
+ O desempenho lida bem com as tarefas diárias
+ Não esquenta muito

Contra

- A bateria poderia durar mais tempo
- A tela tem baixos níveis de contraste em comparação
- Alto consumo de energia sob uso intenso
- Microfone não excepcional
Review: Motorola Moto G5s. Test unit supplied by Motorola Germany.
Review: Motorola Moto G5s. Test unit supplied by Motorola Germany.

O Moto G5s é uma evolução bem sucedida do seu antecessor e mudou menos do que parece à primeira vista: mais memória, câmera melhorada, tela maior e um novo alto-falante. Além disso, os novos sensores da câmera funcionam de forma muito decente: as fotos tiradas com a câmera principal estão no lado frio, mas o sensor corrige bem as condições de iluminação adversas. A câmera frontal confirma essas descobertas.

O smartphone não apresenta falhas graves: a tela é mais escura do que a do antecessor e seu consumo de energia é um pouco alto demais. Além disso, o alto-falante respeitável deve ser ajustado com um equalizador para corrigir os altos enfatizados demais. O microfone também é bastante medíocre. Em troca, o software funciona sem problemas e vem sem bloatware. O dispositivo também permanece frio.

Mesmo com a bateria maior, a duração da bateria não melhorou e, considerando tudo, uma atualização desde o Moto G5 não vale a pena. Se você estiver, no entanto, decidindo entre optar pelo G5 e o G5s, depende da importância da bateria removível do G5 para você. Caso contrário, optar pelo G5 é certamente uma boa, pois vem com mais memória e uma câmera melhorada. O G5s Plus vem com uma câmera dupla que não constitui uma vantagem drástica, embora a CPU e GPU notavelmente mais rápidas possam justificar a diferença no preço.

O Motorola Moto G5s é um produto intermediário de sucesso que não oferece inovação revolucionária. Em vez disso, ele vem com melhorias de alguns detalhes, mas uma ou outra mudança para pior também: sua tela, por exemplo, é mais escura do que a do antecessor. Tudo considerado, o Moto G5s parece ser um negócio bem equilibrado que encontra seu lugar no gama média baixa.

No geral, o Moto G5s ganhou o seu lugar na família da série Moto G e pode manter o nível contra smartphones com preços similares de outros fabricantes.

Motorola Moto G5s - 12/07/2017 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 71%
Peso
92%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
19 / 63 → 30%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
72%
Médio
72%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G5s
Florian Wimmer, 2017-12-23 (Update: 2018-01- 5)