Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 5
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 1105:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Nokia 5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.20 | Lenovo K6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20 | Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | Wiko U Feel Prime IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -0% | -4% | 26% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 630 | 470 -25% | 289 -54% | 660 5% | 411 -35% |
| Brightness | 635 | 461 -27% | 291 -54% | 625 -2% | 386 -39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 96 7% | 92 2% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.38 33% | 0.29 49% | 0.36 37% | |
| Contrast | 1105 | 1237 12% | 2276 106% | 1142 3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 5.2 -4% | 4.7 6% | 4.9 2% | 4.3 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.7 | 9.5 -9% | 7.3 16% | 7.6 13% | 7.9 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 5.6 19% | 3 57% | 4.8 30% | 2.8 59% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% | 2.03 108% | 2.18 101% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 8736 74% | 7924 82% | 6291 103% | 7357 88% | 6589 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 5 | Lenovo K6 | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | Lenovo Moto G5 | Wiko U Feel Prime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | -14% | 47% | 7% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 255.6 | 262.6 3% | 147 -42% | 230.6 -10% | 270.9 6% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 74.9 | 46.66 -38% | 72 -4% | 45.6 -39% | 137.3 83% |
| Random Read 4KB | 40.54 | 32.01 -21% | 21 -48% | 37.6 -7% | 55 36% |
| Random Write 4KB | 8.39 | 10.5 25% | 11.6 38% | 37.9 352% | 9.4 12% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.9 | 78.2 -7% | 79.8 -5% | 78.5 -6% | 41.98 -50% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62 | 50.4 -19% | 46.61 -25% | 58 -6% | 35.21 -43% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 54 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo K6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.12 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.52 / 1.78 / 1.96 Watt |
| Carga |
3.23 / 4.88 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 5 3000 mAh | Lenovo K6 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | 17% | -10% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.52 | 0.65 -25% | 0.61 -17% | 0.73 -40% | 0.66 -27% |
| Idle Average * | 1.78 | 1.65 7% | 1.41 21% | 1.64 8% | 1.66 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.96 | 1.67 15% | 1.51 23% | 1.68 14% | 1.76 10% |
| Load Average * | 3.23 | 3.58 -11% | 2.56 21% | 3.46 -7% | 2.85 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.88 | 5.58 -14% | 3.1 36% | 6.13 -26% | 5.01 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 5 3000 mAh | Lenovo K6 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | -3% | -27% | -24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1772 | 1626 -8% | 1599 -10% | 1243 -30% | 1254 -29% |
| H.264 | 790 | 633 -20% | 658 -17% | 616 -22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 713 | 715 0% | 643 -10% | 561 -21% | 575 -19% |
| Load | 323 | 350 8% | 402 24% | 207 -36% |
Pro
Contra
Você não pode esperar muito de um smartphone listado por 200 Euros (~ $236), ou pode? O Nokia 5 prova exatamente o contrário, oferecendo bastante em termos de recursos e desempenho. Você recebe um veloz SoC octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, uma tela HD muito brilhante, LTE Cat.4 cobrindo uma ampla gama de bandas de frequência e uma boa câmera de 13 MP. A versão atual do Android 7.1, uma longa duração da bateria e a elegante carcaça de alumínio, incluindo um sensor de digitais, também falam pelo Nokia 5.
O rápido, bem construído e elegante Nokia 5 é um bom smartphone de gama média, que oferece muito por um preço relativamente baixo.
Em termos de armazenamento de memória, os compradores devem diminuir as suas expectativas, dado que infelizmente não são possíveis mais de 16 GB. O fabricante também não incluiu um conector USB Type-C que teria evitado inseri-lo da maneira errada. Além disso, o Nokia 5 adiciona um leve matiz azul à sua tela nítida e mostra alguns halos de luz na parte inferior e bordas em particular com o brilho máximo da tela. No entanto, no geral, a Nokia acerta em mais coisas das que erra e, portanto, merece uma recomendação.
Nokia 5
-
08/01/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero