Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 7A

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/24/2018

Extremamente acessível. Com o 7A, a Honor promete um smartphone acessível com uma grande área de tela. Além disso, o smartphone oferece algumas funções específicas, como dual SIM com um leitor de cartões microSD separado e um modo surround. Você pode descobrir em nosso teste, se estes são apenas gimmicks ou se o Honor 7A é realmente convincente.

Honor 7A (7 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (3/7/20/28/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 152.4 x 73
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, Honor, HiCare, game suite, 24 Meses Garantia, FM radio, SAR value: 0.26 W/​kg (head), 0.88 W/​kg (body), LTE Cat 4 (50 Mbit/s upload, 150 Mbit/s download), fanless
peso
150 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
139 Euro

 

Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼100% +320%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s ∼49% +105%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼29% +24%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼27% +12%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼22% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼100% +296%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s ∼48% +90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼30% +19%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼28% +12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼25% 0%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼25%
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – overview
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – overview
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – forest
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – forest
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – bridge
Honor 7A GPS – overview
Honor 7A GPS – overview
Honor 7A GPS – forest
Honor 7A GPS – forest
Honor 7A GPS – bridge
Honor 7A GPS – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
408
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 417 cd/m² Médio: 394.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: 2317:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.46 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
89.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.423
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Screen
-17%
-2%
-9%
-19%
Brightness middle
417
483
16%
594
42%
425
2%
479
15%
Brightness
395
460
16%
570
44%
425
8%
478
21%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
86
-2%
93
6%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.18
0.4
-122%
0.22
-22%
0.37
-106%
0.58
-222%
Contrast
2317
1208
-48%
2700
17%
1149
-50%
826
-64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.46
5.8
10%
6.63
-3%
4.7
27%
4.5
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.72
12.6
-18%
13.99
-31%
8.3
23%
7.5
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5
14%
9.2
-59%
4.6
21%
4.1
29%
Gamma
2.423 99%
2.6 92%
2.24 107%
2.17 111%
2.03 118%
CCT
7839 83%
7709 84%
8663 75%
7445 87%
7139 91%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected ≤ 25 % brightness setting

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8882 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
46126 Points ∼65%
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼55% -15%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼51% -22%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼43% -34%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼53% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=14)
45068 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼100% +54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
59990 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼46% -22%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼45% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59990, n=7)
56097 Points ∼55% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (25692 - 290397, n=114)
102559 Points ∼100% +71%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
3892 Points ∼88%
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼82% -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼71% -19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼62% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼73% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3508 - 3892, n=12)
3702 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2399 - 8601, n=202)
4443 Points ∼100% +14%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
5109 Points ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼93% -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=14)
4629 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=366)
4673 Points ∼91% -9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 7A
705 Points ∼95%
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼83% -13%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼83% -12%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10 - 866, n=14)
461 Points ∼62% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=442)
670 Points ∼90% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
739 Points ∼49%
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼29% -40%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼12% -75%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼14% -72%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼26% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (715 - 788, n=14)
740 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=442)
1502 Points ∼100% +103%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1209 Points ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼88% -12%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼66% -34%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼49% -51%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (530 - 1209, n=14)
771 Points ∼64% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=442)
1123 Points ∼93% -7%
System (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1962 Points ∼88%
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼47% -47%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼59% -33%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼48% -45%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼60% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1281 - 2154, n=14)
1714 Points ∼76% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=442)
2241 Points ∼100% +14%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1055 Points ∼93%
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼66% -30%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼18% -80%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼47% -49%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼66% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (263 - 1055, n=14)
701 Points ∼62% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=445)
1132 Points ∼100% +7%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2127 Points ∼56%
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼37% -33%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼38% -32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -55%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼33% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1731 - 2224, n=9)
2029 Points ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=139)
3810 Points ∼100% +79%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2820 Points ∼71%
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼49% -31%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼47% -34%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼39% -45%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼47% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2270 - 2889, n=12)
2593 Points ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=186)
3955 Points ∼100% +40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
675 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼59% +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼57% -1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼47% -18%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼58% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (619 - 681, n=12)
656 Points ∼56% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=187)
1171 Points ∼100% +73%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1232 Points ∼80%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
531 Points ∼34% -57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points ∼51% -36%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼63% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1034 - 1360, n=14)
1199 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 3669, n=291)
1548 Points ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
254 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
88 Points ∼8% -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points ∼8% -69%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼14% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (240 - 271, n=14)
251 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5220, n=291)
1052 Points ∼100% +314%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 7A
308 Points ∼31%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
108 Points ∼11% -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points ∼10% -68%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼18% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (290 - 330, n=14)
304 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4732, n=299)
1008 Points ∼100% +227%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1259 Points ∼87%
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼62% -28%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼37% -57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼52% -40%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼65% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1002 - 1339, n=14)
1201 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=322)
1452 Points ∼100% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
535 Points ∼38%
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼4% -90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼10% -74%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼9% -75%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼17% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (483 - 535, n=14)
509 Points ∼36% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 8312, n=322)
1421 Points ∼100% +166%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
613 Points ∼50%
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼6% -89%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼14% -73%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼13% -73%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼23% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (554 - 613, n=14)
584 Points ∼48% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 6378, n=330)
1223 Points ∼100% +100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9249 Points ∼76%
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼85% +12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼69% -9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼69% -9%
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼89% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (8973 - 10364, n=13)
9188 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 36494, n=477)
12140 Points ∼100% +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9684 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼35% -44%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20% -67%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20% -67%
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼39% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9602 - 10271, n=13)
9751 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=477)
15561 Points ∼100% +61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9584 Points ∼71%
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼45% -37%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27% -61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27% -61%
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼50% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9457 - 9977, n=14)
9611 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=478)
13454 Points ∼100% +40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
16 fps ∼59%
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼29% -52%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼22% -62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼22% -62%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼41% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (16 - 18, n=14)
16.4 fps ∼61% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=503)
26.9 fps ∼100% +68%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
27 fps ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼52% -48%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼36% -64%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (14 - 27, n=14)
20.4 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=506)
23.5 fps ∼87% -13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 7A
7.1 fps ∼50%
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼20% -61%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼19% -62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼15% -69%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼29% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (7.1 - 7.7, n=14)
7.19 fps ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=426)
14.3 fps ∼100% +101%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 7A
14 fps ∼97%
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼41% -58%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼37% -61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼33% -66%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼61% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.6 - 15, n=14)
10.7 fps ∼74% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=428)
14.5 fps ∼100% +4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
4.6 fps ∼37%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.6 fps ∼13% -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼11% -70%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼21% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=14)
4.26 fps ∼34% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 60, n=289)
12.5 fps ∼100% +172%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
10 fps ∼79%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3.3 fps ∼26% -67%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼27% -66%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼50% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=14)
7.49 fps ∼59% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 110, n=291)
12.6 fps ∼100% +26%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2.6 fps ∼31%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
0.9 fps ∼11% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.5 - 2.7, n=14)
2.55 fps ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 35, n=220)
8.47 fps ∼100% +226%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
5.4 fps ∼69%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.4 fps ∼18% -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=14)
4.01 fps ∼51% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 50, n=223)
7.79 fps ∼100% +44%

Legend

 
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11 - 224, n=361)
33.6 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=13)
19.3 Points ∼57% +5%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼55% +1%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
18.394 Points ∼55%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼53% -3%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.372 Points ∼52% -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼43% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=497)
5005 Points ∼100% +48%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼68%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼64% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=14)
3176 Points ∼63% -6%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points ∼54% -21%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼52% -24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼45% -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -18%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼93% -10%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼90% -7%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼85%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12506.5 ms * ∼72% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=14)
12448 ms * ∼72% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=516)
11897 ms * ∼68% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 7A Huawei Y6 2018Umidigi A1 ProLenovo Moto E4 PlusSony Xperia L1Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-11%
8%
-49%
-39%
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
46.6
-29%
26.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-60%
36.9 (6.38 - 65.4, n=103)
-44%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
66.3
-22%
37.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
55.3 (10.8 - 87.7, n=103)
-35%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
9.4
9
-4%
10.2
9%
29.4
213%
5.9
-37%
7.24 (0.49 - 37.9, n=218)
-23%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=550)
44%
Random Read 4KB
39.2
38.8
-1%
29.6
-24%
19.15
-51%
13.6
-65%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=218)
-50%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=550)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
72.5
65.6
-10%
44.4
-39%
42
-42%
40.2
-45%
41 (8.74 - 97.6, n=218)
-43%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=550)
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
254.8
254.3
0%
269.2
6%
194.4
-24%
181.9
-29%
156 (9.66 - 294, n=218)
-39%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=550)
-17%
Carga Máxima
 41.9 °C38.3 °C37.8 °C 
 41 °C38.1 °C39 °C 
 39.3 °C37.5 °C37.1 °C 
Máximo: 41.9 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
35.6 °C38.3 °C42.3 °C
35.5 °C38.3 °C41.2 °C
35.6 °C37.8 °C39.1 °C
Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.646.32538.438.73134.231.34037.326.5503031.86326.6288023.222.410021.221.11252121.616016.326.420016.636.725015.841.231513.546.340012.251.65001252.663011.75580010.558.710009.661.612509.563.61600965.320008.567.425008.569.231508.371.340008.269.350008.167.663008.165.180008.162.3100008.264.4125008.353.3160008.235.2SPL65.451.721.959.978.6N19.17.10.31239median 9.5Honor 7A median 58.7Delta2.812.134.336.235.645.231.341.937.232.83835.62825.726.525.724.624.122.523.62131.520.243.819.648.318.352.417.157.216.75916.260.916.262.515.467.115.269.515.272.21573.11574.115.375.515.374.415.273.815.27215.372.315.471.315.258.815.241.627.884.2155.7median 15.4Huawei Y6 2018median 62.51.813.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.05 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.6 / 2.9 Watt
Carga midlight 3.7 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-29%
20%
-8%
7%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.8
-38%
1.7
-31%
0.89
32%
0.89
32%
0.824 (0.52 - 1.4, n=14)
37%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
33%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.3
-44%
2.5
-56%
1.87
-17%
2.05
-28%
1.964 (1.4 - 4.17, n=14)
-23%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
3.2
-10%
3.2
-10%
1.98
32%
2.18
25%
2.14 (1.52 - 4.2, n=14)
26%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
33%
Load Average *
3.7
4.7
-27%
5.2
-41%
3.04
18%
6.02
-63%
3.92 (2.85 - 7.5, n=14)
-6%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
-7%
Load Maximum *
6.4
6
6%
6.8
-6%
4.01
37%
6.94
-8%
6.37 (4.88 - 13.7, n=14)
-0%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 57min
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-2%
20%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1329
1398
WiFi v1.3
657
608
-7%
643
-2%
788
20%
567
-14%
Load
279
223
H.264
702
656

Pro

+ Desempenho potente
+ Preço acessível
+ GPS preciso
+ Tela de alto contraste
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- WLAN lento
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
- Tela bastante escura
- Carcaça de plástico nada atraente
Testing the Honor 7A. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Honor 7A. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O Honor 7A não se destaca com suas características particulares (alguém realmente tem 7 amigos que possuem um Honor 7A e se encontram com eles para criar um sistema de som de smartphones?), mas sim com seus pequenos marcos da tela, o alto desempenho, a boa duração da bateria e o GPS preciso. A câmera também tira fotos aceitáveis, mesmo se estiverem bastante escuras. Assim, o Honor 7A pontua mais nas virtudes essenciais que satisfazem na vida cotidiana, do que em características que são boas para o marketing, mas raramente usadas.

O fato do Honor 7A ser bastante acessível faz com que o bom desempenho em muitas áreas seja muito mais notável. É claro que também há pontos fracos, como a tela não sendo particularmente brilhante, uma tonalidade azul perceptível de fábrica, e a carcaça de plástico que está bem, mas definitivamente não ganhará prêmio algum. Mas esses são pequenos detalhes em comparação com o bom desempenho nas disciplinas básicas.

O Honor 7A é capaz de convencer em muitas áreas: Ele oferece muito desempenho e boa duração de bateria por um preço acessível, entre outras coisas.

No geral, o Honor 7A é um smartphone acessível com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.

Honor 7A - 07/09/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
69%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 61%
Peso
92%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
20 / 63 → 31%
Desempenho da aplicação
44 / 70 → 63%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Camera
64%
Médio
71%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 7A
Florian Wimmer, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-08- 1)