Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 9 PureView

Name: Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 9 PureView
Item: Nokia 9 PureView
Rating: 87
Author: Manuel Masiero

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/22/2019

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Connect five. A HMD Global foi além com seu novo carro-chefe Nokia 9 PureView e equipou-o com um total de cinco lentes para a câmera principal, a fim de obter uma qualidade de imagem superior. Não é apenas a câmera, o resto do dispositivo possui hardware ainda mais sofisticado. Descubra na nossa análise se o Nokia 9 PureView cumpre ou não as suas próprias expectativas.

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 9 PureView

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 630

Memória

6144 MB

, LPPDDR4X

Pantalha

5.99 polegadas 2:1, 2880 x 1440 pixel 538 PPI, capacitiva, P-OLED, QHD+, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 113 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Fingerprint Sensor, G-Sensor, E-Compass, Gyroscope, Hall Sensor, Barometer, Biometric Face Unlock, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.16 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 4x4 MIMO, WiFi Calling, head-SAR 0.88 W/kg, body-SAR 0.86 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 155 x 75

Bateria

3320 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Carregamento Qi Wireless

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 5 x 12 MP, f/1.82, 1,25 µm, 28 mm (2 x RBG, 3 x monochrome), RAW-Format, Camera2 API Full
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Flash de tela

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Um alto-falante no lado inferior, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular de 18 watts (5V / 3A, 9V / 2A, 12V / 1.5A), cabo USB (Type-C para Type-A), SIM tool, adaptador de USB-C para 3,5 mm, Fones, Guia de início rápido, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

172 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g

Preço

649 Euro

Links

Nokia página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	638 (min: 561, max: 664) MBit/s ∼94%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=381)	221 MBit/s ∼33% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s ∼90% +15%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼83% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	523 (min: 421, max: 559) MBit/s ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼72% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=381)	212 MBit/s ∼32% -59%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø638 (561-664)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø523 (421-559)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Nokia 9 PureView

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Honor View 20

click to load images

Nokia 9 PureView

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Honor View 20

click to load images

Nokia 9 PureView

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Honor View 20


619 cd/m²	625 cd/m²	671 cd/m²
635 cd/m²	648 cd/m²	675 cd/m²
629 cd/m²	629 cd/m²	638 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 675 cd/m² Médio: 641 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 648 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
92.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3

	Nokia 9 PureView P-OLED, 2880x1440, 5.99	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4	Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen		16%	8%	-6%	-74%	24%
Brightness middle	648	656 1%	597 -8%	567 -12%	543 -16%	593 -8%
Brightness	641	659 3%	608 -5%	559 -13%	542 -15%	587 -8%
Brightness Distribution	92	88 -4%	89 -3%	89 -3%	92 0%	94 2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.3	1.7 26%	2.2 4%	3.3 -43%	6.6 -187%	0.9 61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.2	2.8 46%	3.6 31%	6.1 -17%	11 -112%	2 62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.2	1.7 23%	1.6 27%	1.1 50%	4.7 -114%	1.5 32%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	1.998 ^110%	2.23 ^99%	2.46 ^89%	1.835 ^120%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6592 ^99%	6487 ^100%	6268 ^104%	6495 ^100%	6817 ^95%	6548 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

235.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9603 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13272 Points ∼98%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points ∼63% -35%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13519 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13194 Points ∼97% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼55% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)	13578 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (870 - 21070, n=266)	4615 Points ∼34% -65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8909 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points ∼88% +11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8687 Points ∼77% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7934 Points ∼71% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼98% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)	8705 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=319)	4464 Points ∼40% -50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2421 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points ∼100% +97%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points ∼69% +37%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2397 Points ∼50% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2272 Points ∼48% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼74% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)	2416 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (437 - 4824, n=320)	1316 Points ∼28% -46%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8415 Points ∼92%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points ∼100% +9%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8141 Points ∼89% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼99% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7983 - 9868, n=28)	8069 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 9868, n=328)	4831 Points ∼53% -43%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9917 Points ∼76%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points ∼100% +31%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10361 Points ∼80% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11474 Points ∼88% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼85% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)	10123 Points ∼78% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4290 - 13531, n=497)	5261 Points ∼40% -47%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2857 Points ∼87%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3183 Points ∼97% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	2857 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 15735, n=21)	2621 Points ∼80% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4978 Points ∼87%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4688 Points ∼82% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	4978 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 14536, n=21)	2572 Points ∼45% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4273 Points ∼87%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4242 Points ∼86% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	4273 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 14786, n=22)	2314 Points ∼47% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3456 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points ∼65% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points ∼100% +21%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2809 Points ∼67% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3764 Points ∼90% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼90% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2185 - 3764, n=28)	3088 Points ∼74% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=343)	1781 Points ∼43% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5828 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points ∼68% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points ∼62% -25%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4133 Points ∼58% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5810 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=28)	5439 Points ∼77% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=343)	1522 Points ∼22% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5057 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points ∼70% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points ∼73% -15%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3741 Points ∼63% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5184 Points ∼88% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=28)	4607 Points ∼78% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=346)	1419 Points ∼24% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3368 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points ∼100% +24%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points ∼69% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3672 Points ∼88% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼91% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=27)	3094 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=358)	1758 Points ∼42% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8435 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points ∼100% +23%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points ∼56% -32%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6024 Points ∼58% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8369 Points ∼81% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼99% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=27)	7671 Points ∼74% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=358)	2094 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6322 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points ∼90% +5%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points ∼71% -16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4842 Points ∼65% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6517 Points ∼87% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=27)	5761 Points ∼77% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7980, n=359)	1781 Points ∼24% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3418 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points ∼79% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points ∼100% +13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2740 Points ∼71% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3703 Points ∼96% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼98% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)	3217 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=417)	1719 Points ∼45% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5123 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points ∼59% -27%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points ∼69% -14%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4275 Points ∼67% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5092 Points ∼80% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)	4919 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=419)	1261 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4612 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points ∼64% -23%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points ∼77% -8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3802 Points ∼69% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4700 Points ∼85% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)	4388 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=427)	1207 Points ∼22% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3179 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points ∼71% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points ∼100% +20%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2731 Points ∼71% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3603 Points ∼94% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼94% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)	3115 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=450)	1624 Points ∼42% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8053 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points ∼55% -33%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6439 Points ∼65% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8014 Points ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)	7763 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 9983, n=450)	1712 Points ∼17% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6007 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points ∼73% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points ∼69% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4947 Points ∼69% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6300 Points ∼88% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)	5811 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=458)	1469 Points ∼20% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	36069 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points ∼75% -23%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points ∼86% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30418 Points ∼83% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	36794 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼69% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)	33322 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (8253 - 45072, n=613)	13377 Points ∼36% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	83854 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points ∼100% +90%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points ∼40% -24%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	79818 Points ∼50% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83927 Points ∼53% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼67% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)	80548 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3588 - 162695, n=613)	19189 Points ∼12% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64782 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points ∼67% -20%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58651 Points ∼76% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	65330 Points ∼84% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼80% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)	61139 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=614)	16078 Points ∼21% -75%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	151 fps ∼67%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps ∼61% -9%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	105 fps ∼46% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	152 fps ∼67% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼74% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)	142 fps ∼63% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=638)	33.5 fps ∼15% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼97% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps ∼97% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼97% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)	62.1 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=641)	26.2 fps ∼42% -56%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	83 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps ∼85% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼55% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83 fps ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼93% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)	73.1 fps ∼68% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 132, n=557)	18.2 fps ∼17% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	50 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps ∼98% +18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps ∼98% +18%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps ∼55% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	50 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)	54.4 fps ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=562)	17 fps ∼28% -66%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼87%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps ∼81% -7%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	41 fps ∼59% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	57 fps ∼82% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)	53.9 fps ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=419)	15.2 fps ∼22% -75%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps ∼54%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps ∼100% +84%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps ∼80% +47%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps ∼36% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	31 fps ∼53% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼98% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)	45.3 fps ∼77% +42%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=422)	14.6 fps ∼25% -54%

GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps ∼40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps ∼100% +147%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps ∼62% +54%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps ∼37% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps ∼44% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼75% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=17)	18.6 fps ∼58% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 59, n=123)	8.91 fps ∼28% -31%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼86%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps ∼86% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps ∼74% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼98% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=17)	15.6 fps ∼96% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=123)	6.15 fps ∼38% -56%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps ∼45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps ∼100% +124%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps ∼68% +52%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	16 fps ∼34% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	21 fps ∼45% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼79% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=17)	29.1 fps ∼62% +39%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=124)	13.2 fps ∼28% -37%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps ∼90% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps ∼88% -3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30 fps ∼73% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps ∼90% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=16)	35.2 fps ∼86% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=123)	14.7 fps ∼36% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps ∼95% +14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps ∼79% -6%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps ∼62% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	35 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)	33.4 fps ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=348)	10.3 fps ∼25% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	19 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps ∼82% +63%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps ∼71% +42%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps ∼34% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	19 fps ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)	27.7 fps ∼73% +46%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=352)	9.3 fps ∼24% -51%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	287123 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points ∼81% +6%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points ∼84% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	270884 Points ∼72% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	292268 Points ∼78% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)	277434 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (36768 - 374820, n=239)	125615 Points ∼34% -56%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.4 - 13595, n=22)	646 Points ∼100% +1348%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.469 Points ∼9% +36%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	44.6 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	44.6 Points ∼7% 0%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min ∼97% +30%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	50.47 runs/min ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (46.4 - 50.5, n=2)	48.4 runs/min ∼71% -4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	46.4 runs/min ∼68% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 123, n=22)	44.7 runs/min ∼66% -11%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points ∼100% +74%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points ∼79% +37%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points ∼70% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	98 Points ∼63% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	94 Points ∼61% +6%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	89 Points ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=18)	85.2 Points ∼55% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=105)	63.2 Points ∼41% -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points ∼100% +162%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points ∼57% +49%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points ∼52% +36%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	16982 Points ∼39% +3%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	16484 Points ∼38%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	15906 Points ∼37% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)	15153 Points ∼35% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=631)	5976 Points ∼14% -64%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=651)	11028 ms * ∼100% -364%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)	2905 ms * ∼26% -22%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	2375 ms * ∼22%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	2361 ms * ∼21% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	2295 ms * ∼21% +3%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009.1 ms * ∼18% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873.2 ms * ∼17% +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603.1 ms * ∼5% +75%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 9 PureView	Huawei P30 Pro	LG V40 ThinQ	Sony Xperia XZ3	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		191%	3%	1%	204%	76%	-49%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		68.19 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		64.7 (51.3 - 72.4, n=13)	47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		82.6 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		79.6 (73.2 - 85.4, n=13)	66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382)
Random Write 4KB	20.18	159.22 689%	23.36 16%	22.22 10%	165.32 719%	80.3 (18.2 - 250, n=31) 298%	18.8 (0.14 - 250, n=683) -7%
Random Read 4KB	131.98	174.36 32%	130.13 -1%	135.67 3%	149.36 13%	136 (98.9 - 158, n=31) 3%	42.9 (1.59 - 174, n=683) -67%
Sequential Write 256KB	200.3	250.82 25%	203.92 2%	196.14 -2%	388.27 94%	198 (183 - 212, n=31) -1%	88.7 (2.99 - 388, n=683) -56%
Sequential Read 256KB	727.97	849.48 17%	689.59 -5%	680.98 -6%	666.06 -9%	740 (427 - 912, n=31) 2%	250 (12.1 - 1468, n=683) -66%

Dead Trigger 2

; 1.5.5: Ø59.4 (18-60)

PUBG Mobile

; 0.11.0: Ø29.9 (23-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.2 °C	32.6 °C	32 °C
32.5 °C	32.8 °C	31.9 °C
32.1 °C	32.6 °C	31.5 °C

Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C


31 °C	32.6 °C	32.5 °C
30.3 °C	31.1 °C	33 °C
30.9 °C	32.6 °C	33.8 °C

Máximo: 33.8 °C
Médio: 32 °C

alimentação elétrica 28.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia 9 PureView audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.06 / 0.56 Watt
Ocioso	1.65 / 2.34 / 2.43 Watt
Carga	5.02 / 6.51 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		23%	11%	24%	30%	27%	10%	24%
Idle Minimum *	1.65	1 39%	0.68 59%	0.87 47%	0.8 52%	0.67 59%	0.862 (0.42 - 1.8, n=26) 48%	0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714) 46%
Idle Average *	2.34	1.4 40%	2.6 -11%	1.39 41%	1.2 49%	1.26 46%	1.728 (0.67 - 2.9, n=26) 26%	1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713) 26%
Idle Maximum *	2.43	1.7 30%	2.77 -14%	1.41 42%	1.5 38%	1.29 47%	2.07 (0.87 - 3.5, n=26) 15%	2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714) 17%
Load Average *	5.02	4.6 8%	3.74 25%	3.96 21%	4.8 4%	3.71 26%	4.87 (3.56 - 7.41, n=26) 3%	4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708) 19%
Load Maximum *	6.51	6.7 -3%	6.82 -5%	8.6 -32%	6.2 5%	9.3 -43%	9.27 (6.2 - 12.3, n=26) -42%	5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708) 10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		8h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 22min

	Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		19%	66%	11%	-14%	20%
Reader / Idle	1250	1305 4%	1966 57%	1140 -9%	1270 2%	1650 32%
H.264	732	801 9%	1193 63%	659 -10%	420 -43%	1008 38%
WiFi v1.3	486	742 53%	838 72%	510 5%	419 -14%	546 12%
Load	202	223 10%	344 70%	320 58%	202 0%	194 -4%

Pro

+ À prova de poeira e água para IP67

+ Android 9 e Android One

+ Bom GPS

+ NFC, Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat.16

+ Tela OLED muito brilhante

+ SoC veloz

Contra

- Porta USB-C lenta

- Câmera decepcionante

- Sensor de digitais com taxa de detecção moderada

- PWM flickering

- Afogamento sob uso intenso

- Alto-falante fraco

- Curta duração da bateria

In review: Nokia 9 PureView. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

O que começou como uma ideia ambiciosa acabou em decepção. A câmera quíntupla do Nokia 9 PureView certamente não é nada especial ou mesmo particularmente boa. Seu aplicativo de câmera é lento e não responde, o que piora ainda mais a impressão geral dessa câmera de smartphone.

Só podemos esperar que a HMD Global melhore ambos com uma atualização de software. É uma pena, de verdade, porque a ideia inovadora de combinar três imagens monocromáticas com duas fotos RGB tem muito potencial. As impressionantes capacidades de bokeh são a prova viva disso.

O Nokia 9 PureView não tira o máximo partido do seu inovador design de câmara quíntupla. Como resultado, definitivamente não está entre as melhores câmeras de smartphone disponíveis.

Se a qualidade da câmera é de extrema importância para você, então você terá que procurar outra coisa. O carro-chefe Mi 9 da Xiaomi vem à mente, o que, de fato, também é um pouco mais barato, para começar.

No geral, o Nokia 9 PureView ainda conseguiu deixar uma impressão decente. Sua carcaça de alumínio com certificação IP67 de alta qualidade é digna de um telefone carro-chefe e, graças ao recurso do Android One, as atualizações de segurança estão garantidas para os próximos anos. Adicionalmente, seu modem LTE Cat. 16 oferece velocidades rápidas de comunicação celular, possui um modem GPS bom e preciso, uma tela OLED muito brilhante e oferece um desempenho geral muito alto do sistema.

No entanto, a lista de desvantagens é simplesmente muito longa para um smartphone carro-chefe. Enquanto o conector para fones de 3,5 mm ausente pode ser suportado graças ao adaptador USB-C incluído, outros problemas, como o leitor de digitais com que ocasionalmente não detectou nossos dedos completamente ou a duração da bateria comparativamente curta são muito mais difíceis de engolir.

Nokia 9 PureView - 2019-04-1804/18/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

89%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

92%

Conectividade

44 / 60 → 74%

Peso

90%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

69 / 63 → 100%

Desempenho da aplicação

77 / 70 → 100%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

61 / 91 → 67%

Camera

60%

Médio

79%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 9 PureView

Size Comparison

Os Top 10

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Dead Trigger 2

PUBG Mobile

Nokia 9 PureView audio analysis

Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare